Unit-Ii Sample and Sampling Design
Unit-Ii Sample and Sampling Design
Unit-Ii Sample and Sampling Design
SAMPLING
A part of population is known as sample. The method consisting of the selecting for study, a portion of the Universe with a view to draw conclusions about the Universe and/or Population is known as sampling. Sampling helps in time and cost saving. It also helps in checking their accuracy.
Amount of funds budgeted for the study. Facilities.-The extent of facilities available- staff,
Sampling is opted when the amount of money budgeted is smaller than the anticipated cost of census survey.
to be studied is quite large, sampling is warranted. However, the size is a relative matter. Whether a population is large or small depends upon the nature of the study, the purpose for which it is undertaken, and the time and other resources available for it.
access to computer facility and accessibility to population elements. When the availability of these facilities is limited, sampling is preferable. Time.- The time limit within the study should be completed in another important factor to be considered in deciding the question of sample survey.
Disadvantages of sampling
Sample selected, always is not a true representative of
the entire population. Bias is inherent feature of non- probability sampling method. Often all the characteristics of the entire population to be studied are not included in the sample. Chances of occurrence of sampling error can not be completely removed, however it can be minimized. In order to achieve near to actual results, researchers often choose large sample size, without considering the cost/budget and at times its vice-versa.
PROCESS OF SAMPLING
The decision process of sampling is complicated one. The various criteria governing the choice of the sampling technique. Purpose of the Survey: What does the researcher aim at? If he
intends to generalize the finding based on the sample survey to the population, then an appropriate probability sampling method must be selected. Measurability: The application of statistical inference theory requires computation of the sampling error from the sample itself. Degree of Precision (clarity): Should the results of the survey be very precise or even rough results could serve the purpose? The desired level of precision as one of the criteria of sampling method selected.
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
wherein each sampling unit in the population has a known chance of being selected for answering a survey. It is of two types , unbiased and easy to employ. A draw of lots is a typical example. For example if a marketer wants to reward his loyal customers , he puts all their purchase order in a bag and extract one order out of it. Systematic random sampling if an interviewer wants to take a sample of ten students from a class of 60 , he can get a list of all students and then he select every 6th student out of this.
a)
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
HYPOTHESIS
A Hypothesis is an assumption made by researcher that is tested to find its logical or empirical consequence. It is statement of relationship between two or more variables. The need for hypothesis is as follows: Hypothesis indicates the point of the investigation and gives direction on the study. A Hypothesis specifies the source of data, that shall be studied and in what context they shall be studied. It determines data needs. It suggests the type of research that is likely to be most appropriate. A Hypothesis contributes to the development of theory.
HYPOTHESIS
For example : 1.Students who receive counseling will
TYPES OF HYPOTHESIS
We generally consider two types of Hypothesis.
1 Null Hypothesis (Ho ) While comparing two different methods in terms of their superiority, wherein the assumption is that both the methods are equally good is called null hypothesis. 2 Alternative Hypothesis (Ha ) - While comparing two different methods in terms of their superiority, wherein, stating a particular method to be good or bad as compared to the another one is called alternate hypothesis.
COMPARISION
Null Hypothesis is always specific, while
alternate hypothesis gives an approximate value. The rejection of null hypothesis involves great risk, which is not in case of alternate hypothesis. Null hypothesis is more frequently used in statistics then alternate hypothesis because it is specific and it is not based on probabilities.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
(FLOW DIAGRAM)
within which the parameters of the populations are expected to lie, with the degree of confidence. TWO TAILED TEST- A two tailed test rejects the null hypothesis if, the sample mean is significantly higher or lower than the hypothesized value of the mean of the population.
DECIDE THE CORRECT SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION SELECTING A RANDOM SAMPLE AND WORKOUT AN APPROPRIATE VALUE (on basis of empirical data collected) CALCULATE THE PROBABILITY THAT SAMPLE RESULT WOULD DIVERGE AS WIDELY AS IT HAS FROM EXPECTATIONS,IF Ho WERE TRUE IS THIS PROBABILITY EQUAL TO OR SMALLER THAN alpha VALUE IN CASE OF ONE-TAILED TEST AND alpha/2 IN CASE OF TWO-TAILED TEST YES NO Reject Ho Accept Ho
Following points should be kept in mind while determining the sample size
Nature of population Number of classes proposed Nature of study- general/technical Type of sampling Standard of accuracy and acceptable confidence level Availability of finance Other considerations
distribution should ideally be equal to population mean. sample mean to be above or below the population mean (even if the population is not normal), hence the mean of sampling distribution is an unbiased estimate of population mean, it will be correct on average in many samples.
the sampling distribution of mean would also be normal. The standard deviation (sigma) is calculated. And z-test is used to calculate the degree of reliability. than we assume that the sample mean should be as near as possible to the population mean, thereby assuming it to be near normal however we have to take a sample size more than 30.(hence normal variate z is calculated) but if we are using sample size less than 30, t-test is used.
CONCEPT OF ATTITUDES
An attitude is a predisposition to respond
in a positive or negative way to someone or something in ones environment. It is an evaluative statement either favorable or unfavorable concerning the objects, people or events. They represent our feelings, thoughts and behavioral tendencies.
Characteristics of attitudes
An attitude has to be favorable or unfavorable. Attitudes are firmly embedded in a complex
psychological structure of beliefs. They are different from Values. Attitude is a predisposition to respond to a certain set of facts. Attitudes are always in form of evaluative statements.
Functions of attitude
Utilitarian function Value-expressive function Ego-defensive function Knowledge function
Components of attitude
Cognitive component (knowledge, beliefs)
Affective component (emotions, feelings) Conative component (behavioral aspect)
Measurement of attitudes
Attitudes are very difficult to measure
because of the nature of attitudes. since they deal with the concept of feelings and beliefs therefore they cannot be quantified as the other physical aspects such as height, weight etc. Therefore we use scales to measure different types of consumer attitudes.
Scaling refers to the process of measuring of attitudes. Choice of scale depends upon the type of attitude being measured. NON COMPARITIVE SCALES 1. NOMINAL SCALE- These scales are comprised of numbers that are used to categorize objects or events. A nominally scaled number serves only as a label for a class or category. It is the procedure of assigning facts/choice to various alternative categories which as usually exhaustive as well as mutually exclusive. EXAMPLE: How do you keep the books at present in the library? ( ) Subject wise ( ) Department wise ( ) Alphabetically ( ) Author wise
letters or other symbols used to rank items. It can be classified not only on the basis of whether they share some characteristic with another item but also whether they have more or less of this characteristic than some other object. The ranking of certain attributes/benefits as deemed important by the respondent is obtained through this scale. EXAMPLE Rank the following attributes on a scale of 1-5 according to their importance to a washing machine. a) Company image b) Functions c) Price d) Comfort e) Design
A. B. C.
numbers used to rank items such that numerically equal distances on the scale represent equal distances in the property being measured. It involves qualities description of number of respects of a product or traits of a person. EXAMPLE: Product design Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Good Brand name Lesser known 1 2 3 4 5 Well known Price Low 1 2 3 4 5 High
numbers that rank items such that numerically equal distances on the scale represent equal distances in the property being measured and have a meaningful zero. All descriptive measures and inferential techniques are applicable to ratio scaled data. EXAMPLE: Same as previous but the scale used -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
COMPARITIVE SCALES
more objects and may choose among them. ~ PAIRED COMPARISION SCALE- In this scale
respondents are asked to choose from among the alternatives. Attributes to be tested as well as every possible pair combination are listed out in the questionnaire and from each pair of alternatives the respondent makes his choice. For e.g.- comparing 5 brands of coffee with respect to flavors. The respondent is required to indicate his preference in pairs.
method of equally appearing intervals. The researcher first assembles a large number of statements, say 150 to 200 statements, about the attitude under study. Several judges are then asked to classify these statements independently into 5 piles, ranging from extremely negative to extremely positive. The sixth pile is to represent the neutral point. A final selection of 20-25 items is made based on those statements. These statements are finally presented to respondents who are asked to check those statements they agree with.
Following may be few statements I like the layout of book The book does not contain any examples The book is confusing . The language of book is simple.
called the method of summated ratings is a 5-point scale ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement. In this method, a judging group is not involved. The respondent is given a statement about a topic and he records the degree of his agreement or disagreement with the statement.
associates probes into the intensity and content of a respondents attitude towards, say, 4 companies operating in a particular sector on parameters such as: -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2+3 Brand name not known _ _ _ _ _ _ _ well known Not reliable _ _ _ _ _ _ _ reliable The evaluation is made using a scale of adjectives which are polar opposites, ranging from one extreme position to the opposite extreme, separated by seven equal intervals.
complicated scale but can be used to scale objects, individuals with minimum information. It is characterized by a set of procedures for portraying perceptual or effective dimensions of substantive interest. It is used when all the variables in a study are to be analyzed simultaneously and all such variables happen to be independent.
To determine the perception of a consumer for 5 insurance companies to be evaluated on 2 attributes viz. convenient locality and courteous personal service
Inconvenient
B A
courteous
C E D
Not courteous
convenient
Reliability
measurement process is free from errors. It deals with accuracy and consistency. The scale is said to be reliable, if it yields the same results when repeated measurements are made under constant conditions. Criteria used: Test- retest- respondents are administered scales at 2 different times under nearly equivalent conditions
Reliability (contd.)
Alternative form reliability- 2 equivalent
forms of a scale are constructed, then tested with the same respondents at 2 different times. Internal- consistency reliability- split half reliability.
we intend to measure. Validity tries to measure the same and therefore has more importance than reliability. Criteria used: Construct validity Content validity Predictive validity Criterion validity Convergent validity- positive correlation with other measures of same construct Discriminant validity- opposite to above