Resource Based View
Resource Based View
Resource Based View
Learning Objectives: The RBV has become the dominant theory in strategic management. Our main interests are in understanding (1) the theoretical bases of the RBV, and (2) how managers might apply this framework in their pursuit of competitive advantage.
General managers their decisions have great impact Pros high appeal and validity Cons positive traits are ambiguous Institutional leadership - creates vision, organization and structure Pros intuition, strong appeal Cons sr. managers not only source of advantages
Little role for management Original, indestructible gifts of nature (land) Inelastic supply function High quality factors of production quantitative, testable theory numerous resources are inelastic natural shift in demand curve other contributing factors
Pros: Cons:
Other theories of the firm Population Ecology Transaction cost Agency theory
Resource-based model
Environmental models
Resource heterogeneity Resource immobility Firms are bundles of productive resources Financial capital Physical capital Human capital Organizational capital
RBV Model:
Value
Heterogeneity Immobility Rare Imitability Substitutable VRIS or VRIO ?
competing firms
Imitability the degree that the resource can be duplicated
or substituted unique history causal ambiguity (numerous small decision) social complexity Organization how the firm is structured, organized and managed to exploit valuable, rare and costly to imitate resources.
Valuable No
Rare --
Yes
Yes Yes
No
Yes Yes
-No Yes
Parity
Temporary Advantage Sustained Advantage
Normal
Above Normal Above Normal
Some Examples
Telephone systems ? Formal strategic planning systems ? Information processing systems ? Firm reputation ? Firm culture ?
imitate resources, rather than mimic other successful firms Relative cost of difficult to implement strategy should be compared to its value Socially complex resources can be source of competitive advantage Firms structure, control systems and compensation policies should change if they conflict with firm resources or capabilities