This document provides an overview of the development of American colleges between 1776 and 1861. It discusses three models of college development during this period: the Old-Time College, the Antebellum College, and the Multipurpose College. It also outlines three schools of historical interpretation - the Traditional View, the Revisionist View, and the Innovationist View. Finally, it discusses key developments in college governance, curriculum, and expansion during this time period, including the Dartmouth College decision of 1819 and the Yale Report of 1828.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides an overview of the development of American colleges between 1776 and 1861. It discusses three models of college development during this period: the Old-Time College, the Antebellum College, and the Multipurpose College. It also outlines three schools of historical interpretation - the Traditional View, the Revisionist View, and the Innovationist View. Finally, it discusses key developments in college governance, curriculum, and expansion during this time period, including the Dartmouth College decision of 1819 and the Yale Report of 1828.
This document provides an overview of the development of American colleges between 1776 and 1861. It discusses three models of college development during this period: the Old-Time College, the Antebellum College, and the Multipurpose College. It also outlines three schools of historical interpretation - the Traditional View, the Revisionist View, and the Innovationist View. Finally, it discusses key developments in college governance, curriculum, and expansion during this time period, including the Dartmouth College decision of 1819 and the Yale Report of 1828.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides an overview of the development of American colleges between 1776 and 1861. It discusses three models of college development during this period: the Old-Time College, the Antebellum College, and the Multipurpose College. It also outlines three schools of historical interpretation - the Traditional View, the Revisionist View, and the Innovationist View. Finally, it discusses key developments in college governance, curriculum, and expansion during this time period, including the Dartmouth College decision of 1819 and the Yale Report of 1828.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25
The Pioneering Colleges: The New American College,
Governance, Curriculum, and Faculty, 1790-1869
Les Goodchild, Santa Clara University The Pioneering Colleges—Class 3
Overview of Today’s Class
How do we understand the development of American colleges from 1776-1861? Old-Time College Antebellum College Multipurpose College Three Schools of Historical Interpretation Traditional View Revisionist View Innovationist View Pioneering Colleges—Boosterism by churches and states The Pioneering Colleges—Class 3
Governance structure of the colleges
Public Private Theory of lay governance Churches The Dartmouth College Decision of 1819 The Yale Report of 1828 The New Colleges of the West—Women, Blacks, Catholics Small Group Discussions Going to Mills College for Class 5 What accounts for the American college development in this era? Frederick Rudolph’s (1962) Designation of the “Collegiate Way” for the new American colleges of the Republic Old-Time College Antebellum College Multipurpose College Pioneering Colleges How historians wrote
The Old-Time College—college historians in the
1930s and 1940s described the 19th century in terms of what last century was like—focused on college foundings The Antebellum College—by the 1950s and 1960s college historians used the Civil War as a demarker, following mainline American historians—focused on democratic curriculum The Multipurpose College—the colleges offered many studies based on the local needs of the community—focused on the mission of the colleges Three schools of interpretation for these colleges The Traditional View—the Old-Time College Frederick Rudolph’s The American College and University (1962) followed the idea of Tewksbruy (1932) that 700 colleges had been founded after the Revolution and before the Civil War. Most fail—only 250 survive, an 81% failure rate.
These colleges were founded as
local agents of the religious denominations to bring religion to the community. Richard Hofstadter (1955) called this the “Great Retrogression” where schools of the enlightenment became “bastions of educational, political, and ideological conservatism” Three schools of interpretation for these colleges The Revisionist View—the Antebellum College Colin Burke’s The American Collegiate Populations: A Test of the Traditional View (1982) revised the number of college foundings—claiming that many were not colleges at all. He claims not that many founded—and of those 249 survive—only a 17% failure rate Natalie Naylor’s “The Antebellum College Movement” (1973) notes that these colleges contributed to the democratization of higher education by expanding postsecondary opportunities to local areas, thereby improving the quality of education there. Earle Ross’s (1942) Democracy’s Colleges offered sciences and engineering studies that broadened the utility of these schools. Three schools of interpretation for these colleges The Multipurpose College—Innovationist View Roger Geiger’s The American College in the Nineteenth Century (1995/2000) points to the variety of college offerings at the schools in the west from 1850 to 1890: from brick laying (trades)—leading to the “people’s college” and land-grant colleges, such as Iowa State College (1862) for classical studies for women—leading to Troy Female Seminary (1822) from classical studies for the professions of divinity, medicine, and law Yet another view is possible A fourth school of interpretation
The Pioneering Colleges of 19th Century
Goodchild’s “Western College Expansion, 1818-1945: Churches and Evangelization, States and Boosterism” offers a new geographical interpretation combining other aspects of the previous three interpretative schools. D. W. Meinig’s The Shaping of America (1986/1993/1998) points to the geographical aspects of development that rise of towns across the Appalachians and wagon trails west created the demand for higher education Stanford’s William Cowley in 1950s called this era one of renaissance because of the use of various types of curricula Douglas Sloan’s The Scottish Enlightenment and the American College Ideal (1971) noted that as early as 1760 brought science into the American college curriculum Governance in the New Republic: States and Colleges College Governance Shifts Yale from 1792 to mid-1800s 7 alumni replaced representatives from the General Assembly College of Philadelphia becomes the University of Pennsylvania in 1789, only governor left on board King’s College to Columbia College in 1783 legislators off the board Massachusetts legislature reorganized Harvard’s governance structure in 1810 and 1812. With the loss of state funding in 1823, college becomes independent William and Mary College becomes a state university through efforts of Jefferson in 1779 Governance Changes
Increase in lay governance
New lay members of community Trustees are elected or appointed Terms created for being on governing boards Rise of denominational colleges—private charters Public colleges—new state universities in New York, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Virginia, and Vermont Yale College—Board of Trustees has no faculty on it and growing polarization of faculty from president and trustees occurring—leading to growing denominational orientation The Dartmouth College Case of 1819 College Governance Shift from Public to Private Dartmouth College case of 1819 offers a new governance model for colleges Dartmouth College chartered by the Crown on December 13, 1769 and founded by Eleazar Wheelock Wheelock dies and wills that his son John Wheelock become the president, but then he dismissed by trustees after 10 years due to power struggle over who would appoint faculty Trustees appoint Francis Brown president The Dartmouth College Case of 1819 John Wheelock goes to New Hampshire Legislature (Democrats) and asks for them to create Dartmouth University (John keeps College records and seal) University trustees take over buildings Now the old College trustees (all Federalists) sue in state court to gain records, seal, and buildings College trustees lose in state Supreme Court (controlled by Federalists) College trustees move to appeal decision to the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall (most Federalist court) Daniel Webster, an alum, defends the College trustees— his famous defense at the end of the trail Marshall sides with the College trustees and his decision creates the law on corporations and private corporations, justices vote 5 to 1 in favor The Dartmouth College Case of 1819 Marshall sides with College trustees and Webster Marshall contends that Dartmouth was not a civil or public institution nor was its property public. Rather he claimed it was a private eleemosynary (i.e., supported by charity) institution. Its object was to benefit the public— not a public institution under public control. State cannot change the charter of an institution without the consent of its trustees Marshall defines nature of a corporation in the United States in this case The Dartmouth College Case of 1819: Interpretations Two Schools of Legal Interpretation John Whitehead (1986) claims the Dartmouth Decision had little effect; recognition of private versus public higher education did not come until after the Civil War States paid little attention to the law States still fund “private colleges,” including Harvard Seen as a fight over the religious orientation of the president Jurgen Herbst (1976/1982) claims Dartmouth Decision was the outcome of a long stream of such decisions. It is the magna carta of private higher education. Marshall wished to protect colleges from legislative interference Creates a private institution without direct denominational control—and spawns private colleges across the country Creates a decision for rights of private corporations doing business under the Constitution The Yale Report of 1828: Faculty and Curriculum
http://www.yale.edu/about/video.html What should be taught in the college curriculum?
After the Revolution,
the colleges and the professors began changing their curricula •Yale—Ezra Stiles teaches the sciences •William and Mary— Jefferson drops divinity and Hebrew William and Mary Jefferson establishes an American curricula Center for new learning—dropping religion from the curriculum—to a secular orientation Professorships in public administration, modern languages, medical sciences, natural history, moral philosophy, natural law, international law, and the fine arts Modern languages center on studies in French because of France’s help in the Revolution in 1779 University of Virginia Jefferson creates an American state university with the founding of the University of Virginia in 1825 8 different schools formed—ancient languages, modern languages, mathematics, natural philosophy, natural history, anatomy and medicine, moral philosophy, and law Earned degrees with written and oral examinations Curricula influences other southern colleges and state universities over the next 50 years Reactions to Curricular Developments In 1828, President Jeremiah Day and Professor James Kingsley publish the Yale Report in opposition to these “new modelled” forms: “What is the appropriate object of a college? . . .its object is to LAY THE FOUNDATION OF A SUPERIOR EDUCATION: and this is done at the a period of life when a substitute must be provided for parental superintendence. . . . The two great points to be gained in intellectual culture, are discipline and the furniture of the mind expanding its powers, and storing in with knowledge. . . . A commanding object, therefore, in a collegiate course, should be, to call into daily and vigorous exercise the faculties of the student.” Importance of the Yale Report
The Yale Report influenced colleges and
universities for more than a century The Yale Report upheld the liberal arts tradition of instruction in Greek and Latin as a way to form educated citizens and prepare them for professional education (in divinity, medicine, and law) Review of the 1824 Yale curriculum Yale had the largest enrollment of all the colleges Great geographical distribution of students Greatest number of alumni of any college Of the 75 colleges by 1840, 36 had presidents who graduated from Yale The last college to require Latin of all undergraduates finally dropped it in 1972 Three Schools of Interpretation
The Conservative Interpretation—the Report is
a reaction to curricular developments and is an attempt to bolster an ancient language based liberal arts curriculum (Rudy, 1960; Schmidt, 1957) The Liberal Interpretation--the Report is an open-minded and liberal defense of the classical languages (Hall, 1982; Pak, 2008; Solan, 1971) The Utilitarian Interpretation—the Report supports liberal education as a preparation for the professions Pioneering Colleges of the West
Moving beyond the former colonies, new states to the
west and south encouraged the founding of colleges on the frontier beginning the Americanization process: Catholic colleges with Georgetown in 1789, St. Louis University in 1818, the University of Notre Dame in 1842, and Santa Clara University in 1851 Women’s colleges with Troy Female Seminary in 1822, Georgia Female College in 1836, and Mount Holyoke College in 1837 African Americans with Avery College in 1849, Lincoln University in 1854, and Wilberforce University in 1856 Oberlin College allowed coeducation and African American students to enroll in 1834 , thus becoming the quintessential American college Oberlin’s American Mandate
In their 1839 statement, Oberlin College faculty
set the standard for American higher education. Their proclamation called for: “. . .the hearty recognition of equal human rights s belonging to all whom God has made in his won image; a deep sympathy with the oppressed of every color, in every clime; and a consecration of life to the well-being of suffering humanity—& finally this paramount principle, that the cultivation of moral feelings is the first object in education, Gospel love to God & man, the first of all acquisitions and more precious than all other disciplines.” The American college of this era created missions fully integrating both religious and educational aims. References
Geiger, R. (2000) The American college in the nineteenth century.
Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. Kelly, B. M. (1974). Yale: A history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Pak, M. S. (2008). The Yale Report of 1828: A new reading and new implications. History of Education Quarterly 48(1), 30-58. Rudolf, F. (1962). The American college and university: A history. New York: Vintage Books. Stites, F. N. (1972). Private interest and public gain: The Dartmouth College case, 1819. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. Whitehead, J. S. (1973). The separation of college and state: Columbia, Dartmouth, Harvard, and Yale, 1776-1876. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
The History of University Education in Maryland
The Johns Hopkins University (1876-1891). With supplementary notes on university extension and the university of the future
The History of University Education in Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University (1876-1891). With supplementary notes on university extension and the university of the future
Ryerson Memorial Volume: Prepared on the occasion of the unveiling of the Ryerson statute in the grounds of the Education department on the Queen's birthday, 1889