Leadership and
Influence Process
Chapter 17
Leadership
Leadership can be defined both as process and
property.
Process definition: leadership is the use of noncoercive
influence to shape the group’s or organization’s goals,
motivate behavior toward the achievement of those
goals, and help define group or organization culture.
Property definition: leadership is the set of
characteristics attributed to individuals who are
perceived to be leaders.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 2
Power and Leadership
Power is the ability to affect the behavior of
others.
Kinds of power:
Legitimate power
Reward power
Coercive power
Reference power
Expert power
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 3
Continued…
Using power:
Legitimate request
Instrumental compliance
Coercion
Rational persuasion
Personal identification
Inspirational appeal
Information distortion
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 4
Approaches to Studying
leadership
Leadership traits approach
Leadership behavior approach
Situational approach
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 5
Leadership Traits
Assumption was that leaders possess certain
psychological, personal and physical traits which
distinguish them from non-leaders.
This approach focused on identifying leadership traits
that will help to predict future leaders.
Various studies found different leadership traits as
intelligence, assertiveness, above-average height, good
vocabulary, attractiveness, self confidence, and similar
attributes.
Other studies also found many exceptions. So this
approach of analysis proved not to be very successful in
leadership analysis
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 6
Leadership Behaviors
Assumption is effective leaders behave
differently from less effective leaders.
Three major study in this field are
Michigan studies
Ohio State studies
Leadership grid
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 7
Michigan Studies
Study approach: interview of both leaders (mangers)
and follower (subordinates).
Major findings:
Two basic forms of leader behavior
Job centered
Employee centered
The two styles are presumed to be at the end of a single
continuum. i.e. leaders may be extreme job centered,
employee centered or some what between these two.
Employee centered leader behavior tended to be more
effective
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 8
Ohio State Studies
Study approach: extensive questionnaire survey.
Major findings:
two basic forms of leader behavior/style
Initiating structure behavior
Consideration behavior
The two styles are independent of each other i.e. a leader
can show varying level of both style at the same time.
Initial thought was that leaders having high degree of both
style tended to be effective
Further research complicated the findings as
Workers of high initiating structure leaders are high performer
but less satisfied with the job and tend more to be absent
Workers of high consideration leaders are low performer but
highly satisfied and tend less to be absent.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 9
Leadership Grid
This is an extension to the earlier two approaches
It provides a means for evaluating leadership styles and
then training managers to move toward an ideal style of
behavior.
It is also based two types of leadership behavior –
concern for production and concern for people
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 10
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 11
Continued…
Five extremes of
managerial behaviors
are shown on the grid.
9,9 is the ideal
behavior.
Mangers are trained to
achieve this style of
behavior.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 12
Situational Approaches to
leadership
Assumption is that appropriate leader behavior varies
from one situation to another.
The goal of this approach to identify the situational
factors and to specify how they interact to determine
appropriate leader behavior.
Models to be reviewed:
Tannenbaum and schmidt continunm
LPC Theory
Path – Goal Theory
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 13
An early model of situational leadership
(Tannenbaum – Schmidt continuum)
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 14
Continued..
The model has similarity with Michigan approach i.e. considers a
continuum with two ends boss centered (job centered) and
subordinate centered (employee centered) but considers some
intermediate manager behavior.
Each point on the continuum is influence by characteristics of the
manager, subordinate and the situation.
Mangers’ characteristics: value system; confidence on sub,
feelings of security etc
Subordinates’ characteristics: need for independence, readiness
for responsibility, knowledge, experience etc.
Situational characteristics: type of org., group effectiveness, the
problem itself, time pressure etc.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 15
Least Preferred Coworker
(LPC) Theory
Proponent: Fred Fiedler
Assumption: It argues that the style of behavior is a reflection of
the leader’s personality, and that most personalities fall into one
of this two categories by nature.
Task-oriented
Relationship oriented
Approach:
questionnaire survey of managers about least preferred worker
that measures mangers personality through sixteen statements
with by polar adjectives (positive and negative at two end)
It used 8 point scale with 8 indicating positive and 1 indicating
negative adjective
Leader’s LPC score was calculated by adding up the scale value
and high scores reflect relationship orientation whereas low
scores reflect task orientation.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 16
Continued…
Other elements of the theory:
Favorableness of the situation
Favorableness and leader style
Flexibility of leader style
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 17
Path-Goal Theory
It is an extension of expectancy theory of motivation.
It suggests that the primary functions of a leader are to
make valued or desired rewards available in the
workplace and to clarify for the subordinate the kinds of
behavior that will lead to goal achievement and valued
rewards.
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 18
Continued…
The Path-Goal Framework:
Subordinates’ Leader behavior Environmental
personal characteristics
•Directive
characteristics
•Supportive •Task structure
•Perceived
ability •Participative •Authority
system
•Locus of •Achievement
control oriented •Work group.
Subordinates’ motivation to perform
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 19
Personal reading
Related perspective on leadership
Substitutes for leadership
Charismatic leadership
Transformational leadership
Political behavior in organization
Common political behavior
Managing political behavior
04/15/09 S. M. Towhidur Rahman 20