Have You Ever : Shot A Rifle? Played Darts? Played Basketball?
Have You Ever : Shot A Rifle? Played Darts? Played Basketball?
Emmet
Jake
Discussion
What do you measure in your process? Why do those measures matter? Are those measures consistently the same? Why not?
Variability
8 7 10 8 9
Emmett
Jake
0.0
Variability
Emmett
7
7 7
7 6.6 = 0.4
7 6.6 = 0.4
7 6 7 7 6
Jake
0.0
Variability
8 7 10 8 9
Emmett
0.36
0.16 0.16 1.96
Jake
0.0
1.0
Variance
Variability
Emmett
7
7 7 6 6 averages
7 6 7 7 6
Jake
Variability
Emmett
7
7 7
7 - 6.6 = 0.4
7 - 6.6 = 0.4
0.16
0.16 0.36 0.36
7 6 7 7 6
Jake
0.0
0.24
Variance
Variability
Emmett
Emmett Jake
1.0 0.24
Jake
Variability
The world tends to be bell-shaped
Variability
Here is why:
Even outcomes that are equally likely (like dice), when you add them up, become bell shaped
Add up the dots on the dice
0.2
Probability
Usual or unusual?
1. One observation falls outside 3 standard deviations? 2. One observation falls in zone A? 3. 2 out of 3 observations fall in one zone A? 4. 2 out of 3 observations fall in one zone B or beyond? 5. 4 out of 5 observations fall in one zone B or beyond? 6. 8 consecutive points above the mean, rising, or falling?
XX X 34 56 X1 X XX 2 X
78
Causes of Variability
Common Causes:
Random variation (usual) No pattern Inherent in process
adjusting
Special Causes
Non-random variation May exhibit a pattern
Causes
Should show a random pattern. Not fixed pattern. For if 18 of the last 20 points plotted above the center line but below the upper control limit and only two of these points plotted below the center line but above the lower control limit, we would be very suspicious that something was wrong.
Limits
limits are used for individual items Control limits are used with averages Limits = 3 Define usual (common causes) & unusual (special causes)
Specification limits:
Engineered
In manufacturing automobile engine piston rings, the inside diameter of the rings is a critical quality characteristic. The process mean inside ring diameter is 74 millimeters, and it is known that the standard deviation of ring diameter is 0.01 millimeters. Every hour a random sample of five rings is taken, the average ring diameter of the sample (say ) is computed, and is plotted on the chart.
Consider how the control limits were determined. The process average is 74 millimeters, and the process standard deviation is 0.01 millimeters. Now if samples of size n 5 are taken, the standard deviation of the sample average is
C Target
target
target
Process capability
Good quality: defects are rare (Cpk>1) Poor quality: defects are common (Cpk<1)
= USL x = 24 20 = .667 3 3(2) = x - LSL = 20 15 = .833 3 3(2)
Cpk = min
14
15
20
24
26
= = 3 = (UPL x, or x LPL)
X 1 2
1 2
6.
7. 8.
Sample n items (often 4 or 5) Find the mean of the sample x (x-bar) Find the range of the sample R Plot x on the x chart Plot the R on an R chart Repeat steps 1-5 thirty times Average the xs to create x (x-bar-bar) Average the Rs to create R (R-bar)
Find A2 on table (A2 times R estimates 3) Use formula to find limits for x-bar chart:
X A2 R
11.
UCL D4 R
observation 3
x-bar R
10
12
R chart
observation 3
X-bar R 7.3333 1
8
3
10
9.6667 6
12
9.3333 7.3333 1
7
7 5
6
7.6667 5
8
8.0556 3.5
Centerline
LCL
X-bar chart
14.0000 12.0000 10.0000 8.0000 6.0000 4.0000 2.0000 0.0000 1 2 3 4 5 6
R chart
10
9.0125
8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 3.5
Interpreting charts
Observations outside control limits indicate the process is probably out-of-control Significant patterns in the observations indicate the process is probably out-ofcontrol Random causes will on rare occasions indicate the process is probably out-ofcontrol when it actually is not
Interpreting charts
p (1 p ) p3 n
c 3 c
u u 3 n
Chosen so that variation within the sample is considered to be from common causes Special causes should only occur between samples Special causes to avoid in sampling
passage workers shifts
of time
machines Locations
Chart advice
Larger samples are more accurate Sample costs money, but so does being out-of-control Dont convert measurement data to yes/no binomial data (Xs to Ps) Not all out-of control points are bad Dont combine data (or mix product) Have out-of-control procedures (what do I do now?) Actual production volume matters (Average Run Length)