Value Engineering: Continuous Improvement
Value Engineering: Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement
May 03
During the World War II, when many critical components were difficult to procure, VA / VE emerged in the industrial community. The problem forced the use of substitute material and design in many manufacturing concerns.
The Value Engineering concept was developed and implemented at General Electric Co, U.S by Mr. Lawrence D.Miles during the second world war. These proven concepts in GE were accepted and being practiced in the world industries since then.
Value Engineering is a organised way of thinking through a functional approach which involves an objective appraisal of functions performed by parts, components, products, equipments, procedures, services, etc. in short , anything that costs money, or can be measured by other means. The VE approach is aimed at providing the necessary function for the lowest cost. It is designed to check the upward spiral of costs, while assuring product reliability, performance, maintainability and quality. Value Engineering is seen as systematic and creative approach for increasing the return on investment on components, systems, facilities, procedures and material acquired and operated.
VE is a fundamental approach which challenges everything and takes nothing for granted, including the necessity, for the existence of the product.
systems
equipment facilities procedures
methods
software and supplies.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Construction Design or equipment modification Equipment or logistic support Equipment maintenance Installation Operation Maintenance Repair & replacement Facilities, master plans & concepts Manufacturing process
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
Material handling and transportation Packing and preservation Procedures and reports Procurement and re-procurement Quality assurance and reliability Salvage rejected and excess material Specifications and drawings Technical and logistic data Testing, test equipments & procedure Tooling
The questioning of Users specifications are to be examined, questioned, specifications determined to be inappropriate, out-of-date or over specified. Additional effort design Application of additional skills, ideas and information available but not utilised during previous design effort.
5
6
Changes in users Users modification or redefinition of mission, function or need application of item
Feed back from test / use Design modification based on user tests or field experience suggesting that specified parameters governing previous design were unrealistic or exaggerated
Design deficiencies
Prior design proved inadequate in use (eg was characterised by inadequate performance, excessive failure rates or technical deficiency.
Costs are frequently on the hands of design engineers, production workers.Further complications may arise in achieving the highest value at the lowest cost as the product may be conceived by one group, designed by another, refined by a third and implemented by a fourth. Every phase in the development of a product involves new people, some of whom may not care about costs or have no direct responsibility for them.
Basic questioning in VA / VE
Expenditures to increase the functional capability of an item beyond that which is needed also are of little value to the user. Thus anything less than the necessary functional capability is unacceptable; anything more is unnecessary and wasteful. To achieve optimum value, functions must be carefully defined so that their associated costs may be determined and properly assigned. The VE approach requires the development of valid and complete answers for the following six questions:
What is the item? What MUST it do (its function)? What does it cost? What is it worth (the least possible cost to perform the function)? What else would work? What does that cost?
Maintain Operate:
Is it accessible? Are service calls excessive? Would you like to own and pay for its maintenance? Is labour inordinate to cost of materials? How often is it actually used? Does it cause problems? Have users established procedures to get around it?
Standardise Simplify:
Could standard part be used? Would modified standard part work? Does the standard contribute to cost? Does anything prevent it from being standardised? Is it too complex? Can connections be simplified?
Requirements Cost:
Are any requirements excessive? Can less expensive materials be used? Is it proprietary? Are factors of safety too high? Are calculation always rounded off on the higher side? Would lighter gauge materials work? Could a different finish be used?
Challenge Identify:
Does it do more than is required? Dose it cost more than it is worth? Is someone else buying it at lower cost? What is special about it? Is it justified? Can tolerances be relaxed? Have drawings & specifications been coordinated?
Dept / Process
Materials
VE Scope / Activities
1 Alternate sourcing 2 Reducing multi point procurement 3 indigeniousation 4 Salvage, rejected and excess material 5 Timely supply of materials for production 6 Logistics 7 Communication cost / traveling cost 8 Packing and forwarding 9 Standardising economic order batch quantity 10 Alternate Materials 11 Standardisation of costing systems for purchasing / job ordering (eg spares, m/c components, plastic, pressed components) 12 Standardising the tolerance limits 13 Improving yield for raw materials 14 Negotiation
Measure
Dept / Process
PDE
VE Scope / Activities
1 Standardisation of components 2 Standardising the tolerance limits 3 Reducing ECNs 4 Testing, test equipments & procedure 5 indigeniousation 6 Alternate Materials / sourcing 7 Standardisation of costing systems for purchasing / job ordering (eg spares, m/c components, plastic, pressed components) 8 Design for yield 9 Material cost reduction 10 Reduction of new products lead time to gain advance sales turnover
Measure
Dept / Process
P&S
VE Scope / Activities
1 Reducing in process inventory 2 Manufacturing process improvements like reducing cycle time, elimination / combination of process 3 Rework & rejection elimination in process, customer line rejections / warranty claims 4 Improving productivity standards 5 Improving OEE 1 Reducing inventory (consumption on the basis of NM / SM) 2 Maintaining stock accuracy 3 Reducing packing & storing cost 4 Implementing FIFO system 5 Creating norms for standardising the safe stock levels to be maintained for components / spares / RM
Measure
Stores
Dept / Process
PMD
VE Scope / Activities
1 Decreasing MTTR 2 Increasing MTBF 3 Reducing spares cost 4 Reducing spares inventory 5 Equipment maintenance 6 Installation 7 Operation 8 Maintenance 9 Repair & replacement 10 Reducing consumables intake like lubricants, oils, electricity and water.
Measure
Dept / Process
Tool Room
VE Scope / Activities
1 Standardisation of tool elements 2 Standardising the tolerance limits 3 Alternate sourcing for vendor tools 7 Standardisation of costing systems for purchase ordering (eg spares, components of plastic, pressed tool elements) 8 Design for yield 9 Incorporation of SMED techniques 10 Reduction of new tools manufacturing lead time to gain advance sales turnover 11 Decreasing MTTR for production tools 12 Increasing MTBF
Measure
Dept / Process
Mfg Engg
VE Scope / Activities
1 Optimum design of machine / assy line for productivity, maintenance etc. 2 Ensuring quick changeover through jigs & fixtures. 3 In-house manufacturing of SPMs & assy lines 4 Enhancement of flexibility & life cycle by less investments. 5 Increase in the process quality to reduce rework, inspection by improving the process capability 6 Reduction of new assy lines / machines manufacturing lead time to gain advance sales turnover 1 Study & improve imbalance in assy line 2 Continuously reducing the time standards of critical process 3 Implement time, motion & method studies to improve productivity levels (SCARE) 4 Line efficiency improvements
Measure
TIE
Dept / Process
Quality
VE Scope / Activities
1 Establishing quality standards at vendor end for reducing rework / rejections. 2 Identifying improvements pertaining to design, process during audits 3 Introduction of qualifying gauges where ever possible to reduce the inspection cost
Measure