Flow Measurement: 6 November 2012 PMI Revision 00 1
Flow Measurement: 6 November 2012 PMI Revision 00 1
Flow Measurement: 6 November 2012 PMI Revision 00 1
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
CONTENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Orifice Flow meter Vortex flow meter Ultrasonics flow meter Coriolis Mass Flowmeters
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
Orifice Flow-meters
Several sensors rely on the pressure drop or head occurring as a fluid flows by a resistance. The relationship between flow rate and pressure difference is determined by the Bernoulli equation.
6 November 2012 3
Orifice Flow-meters
An orifice plate is a restriction with an opening smaller than the pipe diameter which is inserted in the pipe; the typical orifice plate has a concentric, sharp edged opening. Because of the smaller area the fluid velocity increases, causing a corresponding decrease in pressure.
6 November 2012
Orifice Flow-meters
The flow rate can be calculated from the measured pressure drop across the orifice plate, P1-P3. The orifice plate is the most commonly used flow sensor, but it creates a rather large nonrecoverable pressure due to the turbulence around the plate, leading to high energy consumption.
6 November 2012
Orifice Flow-meters
Bernoulli's equation
where f represents the total friction loss that is usually assumed negligible.
6 November 2012
Orifice Flow-meters
General head meter equation
The meter coefficient, Cmeter, is for all non-idealities, including friction losses, and depends on the type of meter, the ratio of cross sectional areas and the Reynolds number. The compressibility factor, Y, accounts for the expansion of compressible gases; it is 1.0 for incompressible fluids. These two factors can be estimated through calibration.
6 November 2012 7
Orifice Flow-meters
Relationship for installed head meter
When the process is operating, the meter parameters are fixed, and the pressure difference is measured. Then, the flow can be calculated from the meter equation, using the appropriate values for Cmeter and Y. All constants are combined, leading to the above relationship.
6 November 2012 8
Venturi Tube
The change in cross-sectional area in the venturi tube causes a pressure change between the convergent section and the throat, and the flow rate can be determined from this pressure drop. Although more expensive that an orifice plate; the venturi tube introduces substantially lower non-recoverable pressure drops
6 November 2012 9
Pitot Tubes
Pitot tubes were invented by Henri Pitot in 1732 to measure the flowing velocity of fluids. Basically a differential pressure (d/p) flowmeter, a pitot tube measures two pressures: the static and the total impact pressure.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
10
Pitot Tubes
Pitot tubes are used to measure air flow in pipes, ducts, and stacks, and liquid flow in pipes, weirs, and open channels. While accuracy and rangeability are relatively low, pitot tubes are simple, reliable, inexpensive, and suited for a variety of environmental conditions, including extremely high temperatures and a wide range of pressures.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
11
Pitot Tubes
The point velocity of approach (VP) can be calculated by taking the square root of the difference between the total pressure (PT) and the static pressure (P) and multiplying that by the C/D ratio, where C is a dimensional constant and D is density:
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
12
Pitot Tubes
A single-port pitot tube can measure the flow velocity at only a single point in the cross-section of a flowing stream. The probe must be inserted to a point in the flowing stream where the flow velocity is the average of the velocities across the cross-section, and its impact port must face directly into the fluid flow.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
13
Pitot Tubes
(Figure 2-9).
6 November 2012 PMI Revision 00 14
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
15
Elbow meters
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
16
Elbow meters
1. A differential pressure exists when a flowing fluid changes direction due to a pipe turn or elbow. 2. The pressure difference results from the centrifugal force. 3. Since pipe elbows exist in plants, the cost for these meters is very low. 4. The accuracy is very poor; there are only applied when reproducibility is sufficient and other flow measurements would be very costly.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
17
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
19
Rangeab ility1
Dynamics
Accuracy2
(s)
Advantages
Disadvantages
orifice
3.5:1
venturi
3.5:1
1% of full span
flow nozzle
3.5:1
2% full span
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
20
Flow-meters
turbin e 20:1 0.25% of measurement -wide rangeability -good accuracy
10:1
1% of measurement
-expensive
10:1 or greater
0.5% of measurement
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
21
Vortex Flow-meters
This measuring principle is based on the fact that vortices are formed downstream of an obstacle in a fluid flow, e.g. behind a bridge pillar. This phenomenon is commonly known as the Krmn vortex street.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
22
Vortex Flow-meters
1. When the fluid flows past a bluff body in the measuring tube, vortices are alternately formed on each side of this body. 2. The frequency of vortex shedding down each side of the bluff body is directly proportional to mean flow velocity and to volume flow. 3. As they shed in the downstream flow, each of the alternating vortices creates a local low pressure area in the measuring tube.
6 November 2012 PMI Revision 00 23
Vortex Flow-meters
1.
2.
This is detected by a sensor, such as capacitive sensor and fed to the electronic processor as a primary, digitized, linear signal. Capacitive sensors with integrated temperature measurement can directly register the mass flow of saturated steam as well, for example.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
24
6 November 2012
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
26
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
27
Ultrasonic flow-meters
Swimming against the flow requires more power and more time than swimming with the flow. Ultrasonic flow measurement is based on this elementary transit time difference effect.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
28
Ultrasonic flow-meters
Two sensors mounted on the pipe simultaneously send and receive ultrasonic pulses. At zero flow, both sensors receive the transmitted ultrasonic wave at the same time, i.e. without transit time delay. When the fluid is in motion, the waves of ultrasonic sound do not reach the two sensors at the same time.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
29
Ultrasonic flow-meters
This measured "transit time difference" is directly proportional to the flow velocity and therefore to flow volume. By using the absolute transit times both the averaged fluid velocity and the speed of sound can be calculated.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
30
Ultrasonic flow-meters
Ultrasonic flow meters measure the difference of the propagation time (transit time) of ultrasonic pulses propagating in (normally an inclination angle around 30 to 45 is used) flow direction and against the flow direction. This time difference is a measure for the averaged velocity of the fluid along the path of the ultrasonic beam.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
31
Ultrasonic flow-meters
Using the two transit times tup and tdown and the distance between receiving and transmitting transducers L and the inclination angle , one can write the equations
where v is the average velocity of the fluid along the sound path and c is the speed of sound.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
32
Ultrasonic flow-meters
Measurement of the doppler shift resulting in reflecting an ultrasonic beam off the flowing fluid is another recent, accurate innovation made possible by electronics. Non-contact measurement from outside. Ideal for measuring highly aggressive liquids or fluids under high pressure
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
33
Ultrasonic flow-meters
advantage With homogeneous fluids, the principle is independent of pressure, temperature, conductivity and viscosity Usable for a wide range of nominal diameters Direct meter installation on existing pipes. Non-invasive measurement No pipe constrictions, no pressure losses No moving parts. Minimum outlay for maintenance and upkeep
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
34
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
35
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
36
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
37
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
38
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
39
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
40
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
41
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
42
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
43
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
44
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
45
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
46
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
47
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
48
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
49
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
50
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
51
Rangeability is the ratio of full span to smallest flow that can be measured with sufficient accuracy. If a chemical reactor typically operates at 300 C, the engineer might select a range of 250-350 C. Since the reactor will be started up from ambient temperature occasionally, an additional sensor should be provided with a range of -50 to 400 C.
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
52
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
53
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
54
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
55
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
56
THANK YOU
6 November 2012
PMI Revision 00
57