Fundamentals of Laws
Fundamentals of Laws
Fundamentals of Laws
mostly work in the business world, and they are therefore required to perform their duties within the laws of the nation. Engineering is a profession that is critical to the advancement of society.
Law
It is a formalized code of conduct describing what society feels is the proper way to behave. It is derived from agreed-upon tradition and custom and were given the authority of law by decision in the courts.
It is created by a federal or state legislative body.
Common law
Statutory law
Case law
Ethics
It is the study of human conduct that lays out the moral ground rules based on societys value It is the behavior that is desired by society and is separate from the minimum standards of the law.
Ethical conduct
Contract
Breach of contract
It occurs when one party fails to perform its part on the contract.
Liability
It means being bound or obligated to pay damages or restitution. Two common ways of incurring liability are breaching a contract or committing a tort.
Tort
It is a civil wrong committed against a person, or the business, property, or reputation that causes damage. Common examples of torts are fraud, misrepresentation, negligence, and product liability.
Product Liability
It is the legal action by which an injured party seeks to recover damages for personal injury or property loss from the producer or seller of a product. Under the theory of law, the plaintiff must prove that: (1) the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous, (2) the defect existed at the time the product left the defendants control, (3) the defect caused the harm, and (4) the harm is appropriately assignable to the identified defect.
Product liability law evolved to serve four basic societal goals: loss spreading Punishment Deterrence symbolic affirmation of social values
1.
2.
3.
It is the failure to do something that a reasonable person, guided by the considerations that ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do. Negligence in design is usually based on one of three factors: That the manufacturers design has created a concealed danger. That the manufacturer has failed to provide needed safety devices as part of the design of the product. That the design called for materials of inadequate strength or failed to comply with accepted standards.
Another common area of negligence is failure to warn the user of the product concerning possible dangers involved in the product use. This should take the form of warning labels firmly affixed to the product and more detailed warnings of restrictions of use and maintenance procedures in the brochure that comes with the product.
While the boundary between legal and illegal acts is generally well defined by the law, the distinction between what is ethical and what is unethical is much less well defined. Professional engineering societies provide guidance by means of codes of ethics.
Honesty and truth Honor showing respect, integrity, and reputation for achievement Knowledge gained through education and experience Efficiency producing effectively with minimum of unnecessary effort Diligence persistent effort Loyalty allegiance to employers goals Confidentiality dependable in safeguarding information Protecting public safety and health
Engineering is a profession, and as such, you are bound by the ethical standards of the profession. It does not matter whether you have individually made that agreement. The profession expects you to behave in a certain ethical way. The existence of a code of ethics is important to you because it gives you an authoritative standard to fall back on if you are engaged in a serious ethical conflict in the workplace.
Gary Smith is a district salesman for Zip-R Engineering Corp., manufacturers of automation equipment. He has submitted a proposal to ABC Mfg. Co. for 20 specialized robots, in response to their request for bids. The next day, Gary was talking with Joe Clark, purchasing agent for ABC. In the course of the phone conversation Joe told Gary, Congratulations, you are a lucky guy. Gary took this as a signal that he had won the contract, and that a written agreement would be entered into later. Because it was close to the end of the quarter, and he needed this job to make his sales quota, Gary booked the job. Because Zip-Rs backlog was low, they started work on the order immediately. One week later, ABCs VP of Manufacturing decided to buy the robots from another company because of their reputation for requiring low maintenance. Can Zip-R recover damages for breach of contract?
Bill Garrison was hired by ABC Mfg. Co. as a consultant in plastic processing, with a chemical engineering degree and 10 years of experience. He was asked to recommend the equipment needed to convert a certain product line from metal to plastic parts. In particular, it was required that the production rate be at least equal to that at which the line made metal parts. When over $10M of new equipment was installed, it was found that because of longer cycle time due to curing the plastic, the plastic line produced only 70 percent of the number of parts as made by the metal line in a given time. Can ABC hold Garrison personally responsible for this development?
A small child threw an aerosol can into a blazing i replace. The can exploded, injuring the child, and the childs father sued the manufacturer of the cleaner in the spray can. The manufacturer defended itself by stating that the can contained a label warning the user not to incinerate. The childs father argued that the manufacturer should have anticipated that some cans would accidentally be incinerated and that some sort of fail-safe design should have been provided to prevent explosion.
A consulting engineer is hired by the county to investigate a bridge collapse. In the course of his investigation he examines a bridge of similar design and finds that it is only marginally safe. He contacts the county engineer to tell him about this discovery. The county official tells him that they know about this condition and that they hope to repair it in the next budget year. However, they must keep the second bridge open because to close it would increase the response time of emergency vehicles by about 30 minutes. What should the consulting engineer do?