How To Write Good Research Articles: Prof. Xiaohua Jia
How To Write Good Research Articles: Prof. Xiaohua Jia
Publication Requirement
MPhil Degree PhD Degree
Conference Publications Focus on a piece of work with limited discussion Journal Publications
Conferences
Ranking of conferences Review process of conferences N.B. a good journal / conference tends to have rigorous review process and long review time
4
Software Engineering
IEEE Trans on Software Engineering ACM Trans on Software Eng. and Methodology IEEEIntlConfonSoftwareEngineering
Distributed Systems
IEEE Trans on Parallel and Distributed Systems ACM Trans on Computer Systems IEEEIntlConfonDistributedComputingSystems
Computer Networks
IEEE/ACM Trans on Networking IEEE INFOCOM ACM Mobicom, etc.
.
6
significance of your work. Organize your thinking and decide the structure (outlines) of your paper. Stick on your central points throughout the whole paper and remove all unnecessary discussions.
7
Reader-oriented Writing
Section I. Overview A. Reader Interest 1. Which category describes this manuscript? ___Practice/Application/Case Study/Experience Report _X_Research/Technology ___Survey/Tutorial/How-To 2. How relevant is this manuscript to the readers of this periodical? Please explain your rating. ___Very Relevant _X_Relevant ___Interesting - but not very relevant ___Irrelevant B. Content 1. Please explain how this manuscript advances this field of research and/or contributes something new to the literature. . 2. Is the manuscript technically sound? Please explain your answer. ___Yes ___Appears to be - but didn't check completely _X_Partially ___No 9
ATypicalReviewFormofaJournal(contd)
C. Presentation 1. Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? Please comment. _X_Yes ___No 2. Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate references? Please comment. ___References are sufficient and appropriate _X_Important references are missing; more references are needed ___Number of references are excessive .. 3. Does the introduction state the objectives of the manuscript in terms that encourage the reader to read on? Please explain your answer. _X_Yes ___Could be improved ___No 4. How would you rate the organization of the manuscript? Is it focused? Is the length appropriate for the topic? Please comment. _X_Satisfactory ___Could be improved ___Poor .. 5. Please rate and comment on the readability of this manuscript. ___Easy to read _X_Readable - but requires some effort to understand ___Difficult to read and understand ___Unreadable
10
ATypicalReviewFormofaJournal(contd)
Section II. Summary and Recommendation
A. Evaluation Please rate the manuscript. Explain your choice. ___Award Quality ___Excellent ___Good _X_Fair ___Poor B. Recommendation Please make your recommendation and explain your decision. ___Accept with no changes as a short paper ___Accept with no changes as a regular paper ___Accept if certain minor revisions are made _X_Author should prepare a major revision for a second review ___Revise as a short paper _X_Revise as a regular paper ___Reject Section III. Detailed Comments
A. A.
Public Comments (these will be made available to authors) Comments to editors (these will not be available to authors)
11
Structure of a Paper
Title Abstract Key words Introduction Related Work System Model & Problem Statement Methods / Solutions Simulations / Experiments Conclusion Acknowledgement References
Average number of pages of a journal paper Average number of pages of a conference paper
12
13
represent the main topic of the paper. Avoid using the words that are not the main topic, suchascalculus,simulations,etc.
15
16
(paragraphs) in each subsections Writing details: expend a sentence in the sketch into a paragraph Adjustment: break / merge paragraphs, add / merge sections
N.B. keep a logical flow from section to section, paragraph to paragraph, and sentence to sentence.
17
Brief background of the topic-area Existing work, which would lead to the importance / originality of your work Description of your problem Achievement / significance / brief-methodology of work
18
Show your knowledge in the related area, Give credit to other researchers (reviewers are usually chosen from the references), Cite good quality work (particularly when citing your own work) and up to date work. Be organized to serve your topic, Emphasize on the significance / originality of your work (Introducing your work out). Consistent with the format, ordering, etc. Standard format of books / journal papers / conference papers, e.g,
X. Jia, X.D. Hu and D.Z. Du, Multiwavelength Optical Networks, Kluwer Academic, 2002. J. Li, Yi Pan, and X. Jia, Analysis of Dynamic Location Management for PCS Networks, IEEE Trans on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 51, No. 5, Sep 2002, pp.1109-1119. X. Jia, D. Li, X.Hu and D. Du, "Placement of Read-Write Web Proxies in the Internet", Proc of IEEE Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, Phoenix, USA, Apr 2001, pp.687-690.
Format of references:
19
20
Reader-oriented writing (good organization, logical flow, etc). Standard and consistent formatting (professional and neat looking). Learningfromotherpeopleswriting.
21