Int'l Exchange Bank Vs CIR

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE G.R. No.

171266, April 4, 2007 Facts On January 12, 2000, the International Exchange Bank received a Formal Assessment Notice (FAN) for deficiency DST on its Government Securities PurchasedReverse Repurchase Agreement (RRPA) and Fixed-Savings Deposit (FSD), including surcharges, in the amounts of P25,180,492.15 for 1996 and P75,383,751.55 for 1997, and an accompanying demand letter requesting payment thereof within 30 days. Acting on the FAN, petitioner filed on February 11, 2000 a protest letter alleging that the assessments should be reconsidered based on grounds mainly predicated on an alleged absence of a law imposing DST on RRPA and FSD. Issues: (1) What is a Certificate of Deposit? (2) Is a Fixed-Savings Deposit considered a Certificate of Deposit subject to DST? Held: (1) A certificate of deposit is defined as a written acknowledgment by a bank or banker of the receipt of a sum of money on deposit which the bank or banker promises to pay to the depositor, to the order of the depositor, or to some other person or his order, whereby the relation of debtor and creditor between the bank and the depositor is created. As correctly found by the CTA En Banc, a passbook representing an interest earning deposit account issued by a bank qualifies as a certificate of deposit drawing interest. A document to be deemed a certificate of deposit requires no specific form as long as there is some written memorandum that the bank accepted a deposit of a sum of money from a depositor. What is important and controlling is the nature or meaning conveyed by the passbook and not the particular label or nomenclature attached to it,

inasmuch as substance, not form, is paramount. The negotiable character of any and all documents under Section 180 is immaterial for purposes of imposing DST. Orders for the payment of sum of money payable at sight or on demand are of course explicitly exempted from the payment of DST. Thus, a regular savings account with a passbook which is withdrawable at any time is not subject to DST, unlike a time deposit which is payable on a fixed maturity date. The FSD, like a time deposit, provides for a higher interest rate when the deposit is not withdrawn within the required fixed period; otherwise, it earns interest pertaining to a regular savings deposit. Having a fixed term and the reduction of interest rates in case of pre-termination are essential features of a time deposit.

(2) Yes, a Fixed Savings Deposit is within


the meaning and contemplation of law of a certificate of deposit and therefore subject to DST. The applicable provision is Section 180 of the Tax Code (amended and renumbered as Sec. 179 of the NIRC by R.A. 9243) : Sec. 180. Stamp tax on xxx certificates of deposits drawing interest, or orders for the payment of any sum of money otherwise than at sight or on demand, or on all promissory notes, whether negotiable or non-negotiable, except bank notes issued for circulation, and on each renewal of any such note, there shall be collected a documentary stamp tax of Thirty centavos (P0.30) on each two hundred pesos, or fractional part thereof, of the face value of any such agreement, bill of exchange, draft, certificate of deposit, or note: Provided, That only one documentary stamp tax shall be imposed on either loan agreement, or promissory notes issued to secure such loan, whichever will yield a higher tax: Provided, however, That loan agreements or

promissory notes the aggregate of which does not exceed Two hundred fifty thousand pesos (P250,000) executed by an individual for his purchase on installment for his personal use or that of his family and not for business, resale, barter or hire of a house, lot, motor vehicle, appliance or furniture shall be exempt from the payment of the documentary stamp tax provided under this section. It bears emphasis that DST is levied on the exercise by persons of certain privileges conferred by law for the creation, revision, or termination of specific legal relationships through the execution of specific instruments. It is an excise upon the privilege, opportunity or facility offered at exchanges for the transaction of the business. While tax avoidance schemes and arrangements are not prohibited, tax laws cannot be circumvented in order to evade payment of just taxes. To claim that time deposits evidenced by passbooks should not be subject to DST is a clear evasion of the rule on equality and uniformity in taxation that requires the imposition of DST on documents evidencing transactions of the same kind, in this particular case, on all certificates of deposits drawing interest.

You might also like