ICH Quality Systems Why
ICH Quality Systems Why
(AKA Q10)
Gerry Migliaccio
Pfizer Inc
FDA PhRMA
Ms. Diana Amador Dr. Barbara Allen
Mr. Joe Famulare Mr. Gerry Migliaccio
Dr. Chris Joneckis
MHLW JPMA
Dr. Yukio Hiyama Dr. Takemine Kanai
Dr. Yoshihiro Matsuda Mr. Makoto Shigemitsu
Mr. Takashi Nagashima Mr. Tetsu Yamada
Mr. Yoshihiko Yanagihara
Observers and Interested Parties
Observers
Mr. Sultan Ghani – Health Canada
Dr. Sabine Kopp – WHO
Dr. Markus-Peter Müller – Swissmedic
Interested Parties
Dr. Petar Vojvodic – Boots Healthcare Int.
Dr. Joannes Moors – Pharmachemie BV
Q10 Proposal
Q10 will not be a global GMP guideline!
Q10 will:
Define the modern quality systems needed to assure
quality over the lifecycle of the product.
Serve as a bridge between different regional
regulations leading to a harmonized position on quality
systems.
Use existing Quality Systems Documents such as ISO
and the draft FDA guidance.
Facilitate realization of full benefits of ICH Q8
(Pharmaceutical Development) and Q9 (Quality Risk
Management).
Q10 Proposal
Terminology
Quality Management System
Product Realization
Measurement, Analysis and Improvement
Q10 Potential Benefits
Harmonize the concept of quality systems for
pharmaceutical industry between the three regions.
Enable the potential benefits from ICH Q8, ICH Q6A
and ICH Q9 to be fully realized.
Encourage industry to improve manufacturing
processes thus reducing undesired variability and
leading to a more consistent product quality,
improved process robustness and more efficient
processes.
Demonstrate industry and regulatory commitment
to robust quality systems and technical innovation
and enhance assurance of consistent availability of
medicines around the world.
Q10 Potential Benefits
Facilitate innovation and continual improvement as
defined in this guideline throughout the whole
product life cycle.
Provide the link between development and
manufacturing to ensure systems are in place to
ensure and to give confidence that the correct
decisions are made by industry to manage changes,
both within and outside the design space.
Facilitate management commitment to quality.
Encourage a science and risk based approach to
quality decisions.
Q10 Potential Benefits
Cost Savings
Improved process performance
Reduce cost of internal failures
Reduce cost of delayed implementation of improvements
Reduce cost of preparing and reviewing post-approval
submissions
Potential Savings
Global data is difficult to obtain
IBM Business Study (May 2005) estimates potential 3%
COGS savings related to internal failures
Cost to Implement
Dependent on current state of quality system in firm along
with size and complexity
“Q10” Timeline