Chamba

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 192
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses a preliminary feasibility report for the proposed 126 MW Chamba Hydroelectric Project (HEP) in Himachal Pradesh, India. It provides details about the scope, hydrology, costs, tariffs, schedule and merits of the project.

The project aims to utilize silt-free water from the tailrace of the existing 300 MW Chamera HEP Stage-II through a head of 130 m to generate 126 MW of power. The scope includes an intake, headrace tunnel, surge shaft, penstocks and a surface powerhouse with 3 x 42 MW turbine-generator units.

The catchment area at the project site is 2830 sqkm, with about 30% under permanent snow cover. Hydrological data is available from stations in the area. The design discharge considered is 127 cumecs based on water releases from the Chamera HEP tailrace.

50 000 MW HYDROELECTRIC INITIATIVE

Government of India Ministry of Power Central Electricity Authority 126 MW CHAMBA HYDRO-ELECTRIC PROJECT HIMACHAL PRADESH

Preliminary Feasibility Report


(DRAFT COPY) JUNE, 2004
Consultant:

fgekpy izns'k jkT; fctyh cksMZ


( H.P.Government Undertaking

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION As a part of an exercise to assess the balance hydro potential of the country, Central Electricity Authority (CEA )identified more than 399 Hydro-electric Projects with probable installed capacity of 1,50,000 MW. After carrying out ranking studies, 162 projects have been identified for preparation of Preliminary Feasibility Reports. Chamba HEP in Ravi basin has been identified as one of these projects for preparation of PFR by HPSEB so that it could be taken up for further development during the 10th & 11th Plans. Chamba HEP is located in river Ravi basin between the longitude 765 - 7609 and latitude 3231 to 3237 in the Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh. Consequently site visits were made to the area by Engineers of HPSEB and Geologists of GSI for identification/selection of suitable site. The intake site of the project is located on Chamba-Bharmour road and the power house site is located on Chamba-Tissa road and all sites of the project will be well connected with roads. 2. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The project has been contemplated as down stream development of Chamera HEP stage-II (300 MW). It envisages utilization of silt free water from TRT of Chamera HEP stage-II through a maximum gross head of 130 m for generation of 126 MW power. This project comprises a intake shaft near village Karian, HRT 6.50 m dia, 10320m in length opening in to 20.5 m dia surge shaft, a 5.30m dia penstock trifurcating to 3.05 m dia each & a surface power house to accommodate three vertical axis francis turbine generating units each of 42 MW installed capacity. The annual power generation from the

2 project in 90% dependable year and 50% mean year will be 646.82 Gwh and 811.20 Gwh, respectively. 3. HYDROLOGY River Ravi originates from Bara Banghal in Kangra district as a joint stream formed by the glacier fed Bhadal & Tantgari at an elevation of 4229 m above mean sea level. High peaks of the catchment remain covered with snow for about 9 months in a year. The catchment area at Chamba intake site measures 2830 Sq.Km. The entire catchment comprises of mountainous terrain with steep hill slopes. Out of total catchment area of 2830 Sq.km., about 30% area is under permanent cover of snow. The principal tributaries of the Ravi upto Chamba intake site are Kalihan nallah, Budhil nallah, Tundah nallah, Holi nallah and Balij nallah. The project area receives precipitation due to the South-West Monsoon as well as the Western disturbances that pass over the NorthWest part of the country during winter. There are thirteen non recording type rain gauge stations in the catchment area of the river Ravi. The normal annual rainfall and annual rainfall has been recorded in millimeters at all these stations for the period 1960 to 2000 by the office of Director Land Records, Revenue Department (HP). The river run off has been derived from melting of the snow/ice/glacier bound area of the catchment and the other which is directly derived from rainfall. Discharge data is available for hydrological studies at Rakh w.e.f. 1972 to 1980, at Janghi w.e.f 1980 to 1985 and at Bagga w.e.f. 1985 to 1997. For water availability at the Chamba intake site, this scheme has been proposed to utilize the water releases from tailrace of Chamera Stage-II which is under operation with NHPC. The design discharge of 127 cumecs has been proposed for carrying out the hydrological and power potential studies of this scheme after maintaining the ecology of river Ravi in down stream of Chamba diversion works by releasing of 15 cumecs from tail water of Chamera Stage-II. Design flood at intake site has been computed based on

3 Flood Estimation Report for Western Himalayan Zone-7. Design flood of 12100 cumecs has been worked out. 4. POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES Chamba Hydro-electric Project has been contemplated to operate in tandem with Chamera Stage-II (300MW) (an upstream scheme) as a peaking station to operate in Western part of North Regional Grid. Installed capacity of the project has been presently kept as 126 MW comprising 3 units of 42 MW each. The project will generate 646.82 GWH in 90% dependable year. 5. POWER EVACUATION ASPECTS The Chamba HEP is being developed between Chamera HEP Stage-I (540MW) and Chamera HEP Stage-II(300MW). The power from Chamba HEP(126MW) has to be evacuated through LILO of 400 KV Chamera HEP Stage-I (540MW) and Chamera HEP Stage-II(300MW) transmission line. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Environmental Management Plan (EMP) aims at the preservation of ecological system by considering certain mitigating measures at the proposed site. The EMP is required to ensure sustainable development in the study area of 10 km. radius of the proposed Chamba HEP site. Government regulating agencies like H.P. Pollution Control Board working in the region and more importantly the people living in the area need to extend their co-operation and contribution in this direction. It has been evaluated that the study area shall not be affected adversely with the proposed activity, but is likely to get new economical fillip

4 due to hydel power generation, not only for the study area but also for the region as whole. 7. ESTIMATES OF COST The estimates of cost has been prepared on the basis of CEA Guidelines for Rates and Cost of Civil and Electrical works for Preliminary Feasibility Reports of Hydro-electric Projects received during Oct. 2003. Accordingly cost of project works out to be Rs. 22481.73 lac for civil works, Rs. 14131.38 lac for electrical works and Rs. 1178.47 lac for transmission works based on June, 2004 price level. 8. FINANCIAL ASPECTS The financial & economic evaluation has been carried out as per CEA guide lines considering Interest During Construction (IDC) @10% and interest on working capital @ 9.75%. The life of hydro-electric project has been considered as 35 years. The 630.00 GWH energy units are available at power house bus bars in 90% dependable year and cost per unit at power house bus bars works out to Rs. 1.48 per Kwh in first year. The levelised tariff rate of energy works out to be Rs. 1.17 per Kwh at power house bus bars. 9. CONCLUSION The economy of the Himachal Pradesh is predominantly dependent on agricultural and allied sectors. The electric power being a vital and essential infrastructure, has a significant role to play in economic upliftment of the state. The construction of project will provide employment to the local people. The project will be completed within four and half years period. Being an attractive project, it deserves to be taken up for execution on priority.

INDEX
SR.NO. CHAPTER-I CHAPTER-II CHAPTER-III CHAPTER-IV CHAPTER-V CHAPTER-VI CHAPTER-VII CHAPTER-VIII CHAPTER-IX CHAPTER-X CHAPTER-XI CHAPTER-XII CHAPTER-XIII DESCRIPTION SUMMARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROJECT AREA GEO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS HYDROLOGY CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT & PLANNING POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES POWER EVACUATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE COST ESTIMATE ECONOMIC EVALUATION PAGE I-1 TO I-5 II-1 TO II-3 III-1 TO III-2 IV-1 TO IV-9 V-1 TO V-23 VI-1 TO VI-5 VII-1 TO VII-45 VIII-1 TO VIII-10 IX-1 TO IX-25 X-1 TO X-6 XI-1 TO XI-6 XII-1 TO XII-36 XIII-1 TO XIII-14

CHAMBA HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3X42 =126 MW)


HIMACHAL PRADESH 1. INTRODUCTION The Chamba Hydroelectric Project located in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh envisages utilization of the waters of the river Ravi for power generation as a run of river type development, harnessing a head of about 130m. The project with a proposed installation of 126 MW (3x42 MW) would afford an net annual energy generation of 646.82 GWh, in a 90 % dependable year. The tariff at present day cost would be Rs 1.17/unit (levellised) at power house bus bars and Rs.1.37/unit (levellised) at purchase center. The project is located between Latitude 32o31' North and 32o37' North, Longitude 76o5' East and 76o9' East. The 1ntake site is approachable from Pathankot by road being at a distance of 120 kms approx. The nearest rail head is located at Pathankot and the nearest airport is located at Jammu. 2. SCOPE OF WORKS The Chamba HE project envisages construction of : An intake shaft 15.5 m dia, 100 m high connecting with TRT of Chamera-II just before its outlet. a 10.32 km long and 6.50m dia. circular head race terminating in a surge shaft; a 92.5m high ,20.5 m dia surge shaft; 400m long, 5.3m dia pressure shaft; a surface power house having an installation of 3 Francis driven generating units of 42 MW each operating under a net head of 110 m; and 230m long tail race channel to carry the power house releases back to the river Ravi; The power generated from the project would be evacuated through. LILO of existing 400 Kv transmission line between Chamera Stage-I (540MW) & Chamera Stage-II (300 MW). tunnel

The Salient features of the project are given at Annex-I and a layout map at Plate-I 3. HYDROLOGY This project has been conceived as run of the river development to harness the gross head of 130 m available between Max. Water Level of Chamera Stage-I El. 765.00 m and normal tail water level of Chamera Stage-II El. 895.00 m. The flow series w.e.f 1972 to 1984 at Rakh stands approved by CWC in respect of Chamera Stage-II and same has been used in carrying out hydrological studies in respect of Chamba HEP. The observed data w.e.f. 1985 to 1997 at Bagga dam site (Chamera-II) has also been used for the extension of this series. 4. POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES The inflow series for 24 years viz 1972-1984 and 1985-1997 has been considered in the assessment of a power benefits from the project. As per GOI notification for tariff, the year1983-84 corresponds to 90% dependable year. An installation of 126 MW comprising 3 generating units of 42 MW each has been proposed. The energy availability from the project in a dependable and an average year has been summarized below: Particulars Annual Energy Generation Gross annual Energy Generation (GWh) Annual Load Factor (%) 646.82 59 811.20 73 90%Yr Avr. Yr.

Generation during Lean Flow Season (Dec.-Feb.) Energy Output (GWH) Load Factor (%) 59.98 22

The design energy at 95 % machine availability in a 90% dependable year has been worked out at 630.00 GWh. Since this scheme is to run in tandem with Chamera-II (300 MW), as such, net pondage of 162.23 Ham available between MDDL and FRL of Chamera-II (after deducting 15.00 cumecs as release at TRT outlet for maintaining ecological balance of Ravi) will be sufficient to have peaking of 4.40 Hrs. The pondage is equivalent to 447.50 MWH.

5.

POWER EVACUATION ASPECTS The power from the project will be evacuated through LILO of 400 Kv Chamera Stage-I and Chamera Stage-II D/C transmission line.

6.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS The project is located near Chamba town. The total land requirement for the construction of various components is 64.00 ha.,out of which private land is 20 ha. Based on assessment of environmental impacts, management plans have to be formulated for Catchment Area Treatment , compensatory afforestation and other environmental issues. These issues would be addressed during investigations for preparation of DPR.

7.

ESTIMATES OF THE COST The project is estimated to cost Rs. 408.10 crores at power house bus bars and Rs 420.90 crores at purchase center including IDC at June, 2004 price level. The preliminary cost estimate of the project has been prepared as per guidelines of CEA / CWC. The break down of the cost estimates is given below: Civil works Electro Mechanical works Sub total (Generation) Transmission works Total Cost On Generation works Interest During Construction Total : : : : : : : Rs. 224.82 Crores Rs. 141.31 Crores Rs. 366.13 Crores Rs. 11.79 Crores Rs. 377.92 Crores Rs. 40.97 Crores Rs. 408.10 Crores Rs. 42.98 Crores Rs. 420.90 Crores

At purchase center Interest During Construction : Total : 8. FINANCIAL ASPECTS

As indicated above, the Chamba HE project with an estimated cost of Rs. 408.10 Crores (including IDC of Rs.40.97crores) at power house bus bars and cost of Rs. 420.90 crores (including IDC of Rs.42.98 crores ) at purchase center with net energy of 646.82 GWH in a 90% dependable year. The project is proposed to be completed in a period of 4 years. The tariff has been worked out considering a debt-equity ratio of 70:30, 16% return on equity, annual interest rate on loan at 10% .The tariff for

first year and levellised tariff have been worked out Rs. 1.48 /kWh & Rs. 1.17/kWh respectively, at power house bus bars and Rs. 1.78 /kWh & Rs. 1.37/kWh respectively, at purchase center. 9. CONCLUSIONS Chamba HE project involves simple civil works and could be completed in 4 years. The project would afford a design energy of 646.82 GWh in a 90% dependable year. The cost per MW installed capacity works out Rs. 2.90 crores. The Preliminary Feasibility Report indicates that the scheme merits consideration for taking up for Survey & Investigation and preparation of DPR.

Annexure-I

GENERAL PROJECT FEATURES


LOCATION State District River Intake site Power house site HYDROLOGY Catchment Area at intake site Snow catchment Mean annual rainfall Design flood INTAKE/DIVERSION STRUCTURE (Model Study Required) Type Size Orifice Bottom level Top level HEAD RACE TUNNEL No. Size & Shape One 6.50m diameter, circular, Intake shaft, restricted orifice 15.5 m dia, 100m high 3.3m dia 880.00 m 980.00 m 2830 Sq. km. 890 Sq. km. above El. 4000m 1088 mm 12100cumecs Himachal Pradesh Chamba Ravi Karian Rajpura

concrete lined Length Design discharge Slope Velocity SURGE SHAFT Type Size Orifice Maximum upsurge level Minimum down surge level Bottom level Top level PRESSURE SHAFT/PENSTOCK Type Size: Main Branches Velocity in main POWER HOUSE Type Installed capacity No. and capacity of unit Size of machine hall Surface 126 MW 3 Nos. 42 MW 57 m x 17 m x 19 m 1 No., 5.30m dia, 400m long 3 Nos., 3.05m dia, 15m long each 5.75 m/sec. Underground/ Surface Underground orifice type 20.50m dia, Circular 3.20m dia El.914.70m El.862.50m El.857.50m El.950.00m 10320 m 127 cumecs 1 in 318 m 3.83m/sec

Type of turbine Speed of turbine Gross Head Normal tail water level Net operating head for design discharge Peaking duration TAIL RACE CHANNEL Shape Length SWITCH YARD Type Size POWER GENERATION Installed capacity Annual energy generation 90% dep. Year 50% mean year

Francis turbine 222.52 RPM 130 m 765 m 110 m 4.4 hrs in tandem with Chamera Stage-II

Rectangular 230 m

Surface 220 m x 180 m

3x42 MW

646.824 GWH 811.20 GWH

COST ESTIMATE & FINANCIAL ASPECTS COST ESTIMATE Capital cost of the project (At Price level June. 2004): Civil works Electrical works Rs.22481.73 Lac

(P-Production) T-Transmission Total Capital cost of Generation (Including IDC Rs. 4097Lac) Loan 70% Equity 30% Generation & Transmission Capital cost of Generation & Transmission i/c IDC Rs.4298 lac Loan 70% Equity 30% FINANCIAL ASPECTS Cost of generation per MW of Installed capacity Levelized tariff at PH Bus bars in 90% dep. Year Levelized tariff at purchase center in 90% dep. Year Energy available for sale in 90% dep. Year (Auxiliary consumption @ 0 .7% & Transformation losses @ 0.5%). at power house bus bars

Rs.14131.38 lac Rs. 1178.47 lac Rs 37791.58 lac Rs.40810.00 lac Rs.28567.00 lac Rs.12243.00 lac Rs.42090.00 lac Rs.29463.00 lac Rs.12627.00 lac

Rs.290.00 lac Rs.1.17 /Kwh Rs. 1.37 /Kwh 630.00 Gwh

CHAPTERI
SUMMARY
1.0 SUMMARY The Chamba Hydro-electric Project has been contemplated as a power generation development on river Ravi in Chamba District of H.P. It is a downstream development of Chamera Hydro-electric Project Stage-II (300 MW) presently under operation with NHPC. The project envisages utilization of silt free water from TRT of Chamera HEP Stage-II (300 MW) through a gross head of 130.00 m for generation of 126 MW of power in a power station near village Rajpura. 1.1 GENERAL PROJECT FEATURES LOCATION State District River Intake site Power house site HYDROLOGY Catchment Area at intake site Snow catchment Mean annual rainfall Design flood 2830 Sq. km. 890 Sq. km. above El. 4000m 1088 mm 12100cumecs Himachal Pradesh Chamba Ravi Karian Rajpura

II INTAKE/DIVERSION STRUCTURE (Model Study Required) Type Size Orifice Bottom level Top level HEAD RACE TUNNEL No. Size & Shape Length Design discharge Slope Velocity SURGE SHAFT Type Size Orifice Maximum upsurge level Minimum down surge level Bottom level Top level PRESSURE SHAFT/PENSTOCK Type Underground/ Surface Underground orifice type 20.50m dia, Circular 3.20m dia El.914.70m El.862.50m El.857.50m El.950.00m One 6.50m diameter, circular, concrete lined 10320 m 127 cumecs 1 in 318 m 3.83m/sec Intake shaft, restricted orifice 15.5 m dia, 100m high 3.3m dia 880.00 m 980.00 m

II Size: Main Branches Velocity in main POWER HOUSE Type Installed capacity No. and capacity of unit Size of machine hall Type of turbine Speed of turbine Gross Head Normal tail water level Net operating head for design discharge Peaking duration TAIL RACE CHANNEL Shape Length SWITCH YARD Type Size POWER GENERATION Installed capacity 3x42 MW Surface 220 m x 180 m Rectangular 230 m Surface 126 MW 3 Nos. 42 MW 57 m x 17 m x 19 m Francis turbine 222.52 RPM 130 m 765 m 110 m

1 No., 5.30m dia, 400m long 3 Nos., 3.05m dia, 15m long each 5.75 m/sec.

4.4 hrs in tandem with Chamera Stage-II

II Annual energy generation 90% dep. Year 50% mean year 1.2 STUDIES UNDERTAKEN The Layout of the Chamba HEP has been finalized keeping economical and viable scheme on Ravi river. Proposal-I in 646.824 GWH 811.20 GWH

view

various studies undertaken by HPSEB from time to time to conceive a most

This proposal envisages diversion of TRT water providing balancing reservoir with two minute storage capacity 15000 cum on the right bank of river Ravi and having 10850 m length of tunnel, but as per geological report received from Sr. Geologist GSI, no rock is available on the river bed. Hence this proposal was dropped. Proposal-II Present proposal of Chamba HEP (126 MW) is based on taking water from TRT by providing intake shaft having two gates (opening) one for HRT of Chamba HEP and another for TRT outlet of Chamera-II which will be decided later on after carrying out model studies. Length of HRT is 10320 m with one aqueduct on Sal Nallah. The alternative proposals are shown in Plate 1.1.

II 1.3 COST ESTIMATE & FINANCIAL ASPECTS COST ESTIMATE Capital cost of the project (At Price level June. 2004): Civil works Electrical works (P-Production) T-Transmission Total Capital cost of Generation (Including IDC Rs. 4097Lac) Loan 70% Equity 30% Generation & Transmission Capital cost of Generation & Transmission i/c IDC Rs.42.98 lac Loan 70% Equity 30% FINANCIAL ASPECTS Cost of generation per MW of Installed capacity Levelized tariff at PH Bus bars in 90% dep. Year Levelized tariff at purchase center in 90% dep. Year Energy available for sale in 90% dep. Year (Auxiliary consumption @ 0 .7% & Transformation losses @ 0.5%). at power house bus bars 630.00 Gwh Rs. 1.37 Kwh Rs.290.00 lac Rs.1.17 Kwh

Rs.22481.73 Lac Rs.14131.38 lac Rs. 1178.47 lac Rs 37791.58 lac Rs.40810.00 lac Rs.28567.00 lac Rs.12243.00 lac Rs.42090.00 lac Rs.29463.00 lac Rs.12627.00 lac

II -

II -

PARA 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 PLATE 1.1

DESCRIPTION SUMMARY GENERAL PROJECT FEATURES STUDIES UNDERTAKEN COST ESTIMATE & FINANCIAL ASPECTS ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL

PAGE I-1 I-1 TO I-4 I-4 I-5

II -

SALIENT FEATURES
LOCATION State District River Intake site Power house site HYDROLOGY Catchment Area at intake site Snow catchment Mean annual rainfall Design flood INTAKE/DIVERSION STRUCTURE (Model Study Required) Type Size Orifice Bottom level Top level HEAD RACE TUNNEL No. Size & Shape Length Design discharge Slope Velocity SURGE SHAFT Type Size Orifice Maximum upsurge level Minimum down surge level Bottom level Top level PRESSURE SHAFT/PENSTOCK Type Size: Main Branches Velocity POWER HOUSE Type Installed capacity No. and capacity of unit Size of machine hall Surface 126 MW 3 Nos. 42 MW 57 m x 17 m x 29 m 1 No., 5.30m dia, 400m long 3 Nos., 3.05m dia, 15m long each 5.75 m/sec. Underground/ Surface Underground orifice type 20.50m dia, Circular 3.20m dia El.914.70m El.862.55m El.857.55m El.950.00m One 6.50m diameter, circular, concrete lined 10320 m 127 cumecs 1 in 275 m 3.83m/sec Intake shaft, restricted orifice 15.5 m dia, 100m high 3.3m dia 895.00 m 980.00 m 2830 Sq. km. 890 Sq. km. above El. 4000m 1088 mm 12100cumecs Himachal Pradesh Chamba Ravi Karian Rajpura

II Type of turbine Speed of turbine Gross Head Normal tail water level Net operating head for design discharge Peaking duration TAIL RACE CHANNEL Shape Length SWITCH YARD Type Size Surface 220m x 180 m Rectangular 230 m Francis turbine 222.52 RPM 130 m 765 m 110 m 4 hrs in tandem with Chamera Stage-II

CHAPTER II
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.0 2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMTION GENERAL INFORMATION Hydel potential of Ravi basin in H.P. has been identified as 2323.95 MW as indicated in Plate-2.1 for this basin. Bhuri Singh (450 Kw), Baira Suil HEP (198 MW), Chamera Stage-I (540 MW) & Sal Stage-II ( 2 MW) and Chamera Stage-II (300 MW) are under operation at present. The construction works on Hibra (231 MW) renamed as Chamera Stage-III have also been taken up by Govt. of India through NHPC. Construction work of Holi HEP (3 MW) has been got completed by the HPSEB on turn key basis & commissioning of the project is expected shortly. MOUs have been signed with IPP/Central Agency for the projects like SaiKothi, Harsar, Kugti, Bharmour, Budhil, Sal Stage-I, Suil and Kutehr. Presently, two projects namely Chamba HEP 126 MW and Bajoli Holi HEP (180 MW) are under investigation in Ravi basin. The projects like, Bara Bhangahal (170 MW), Chanju Stage-I (25 MW), Chanju Stage-II (17 MW) & Baira Bihali (15 MW) are yet to be taken up for investigation. Chamba HEP (126 MW) is a down stream development of Chamera-II (300 MW). 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 POWER SCENARIOS & EXISTING INSTALLATIONS POWER ABSORPTION IN NORTHERN REGION POWER LOAD DEVELOPMENT The Northern Region comprises the states of Himachal, Haryana, Punjab, Rajashtan, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttranchal and Union territories of Delhi and Chandigarh. The Northern Regional Power Grid

II -

comprises the power system controlled by the Electricity Boards of above states/Union territories and Bhakhra Beas Management Board. The Power system in this region is now operating in an inter-connected and co-ordinated manner. Even in co-ordinated operation of existing hydro, nuclear and thermal power stations, including benefits from the ongoing projects and as well from the new schemes cleared by CEA, the Northern region is expected to face severe power deficits in the 10th Five Year Plan. The CEA schemes for preparation of PFR under 50,000 MW Hydroelectric Initiative schemes launched by the Honble Prime Minister of India are as under:Sr.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2.3 Name of scheme Gharopa (114 MW) Gondhala (144 MW) Bardang (114 MW) Chhatru (108 MW) Khoksar (90 MW) Chamba (126 MW) Jangi-Thopan (480 MW) Luhri (465 MW) Tidong-I (90 MW) Tidong-II (90 MW) Yangthang Khab (261 MW) Thopan Powari (402 MW) Bajoli-Holi (180 MW) River/Basin Beas Chenab -do-do-doRavi Satluj -do-do-do-do-doRavi

NECESSITY OF THE PROJECT AND RELATED ASPECTS From the growth of peak demand and anticipated installed generation capacity on the basis of schemes proposed for benefits under construction/consideration during 10th and early 11th Five Year Plan period, it is observed that power supply position in the Northern region would

II -

become all the more acute from the start of 10th Five Year Plan and power region shortages would have to be faced unless additional schemes are taken up immediately and implemented to derive timely benefits. The most important source of power development in the Northern region is its abundant hydro resources located in Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttranchal and Jammu & Kashmir. Priority would have to be given to the development of these untapped resources because of the following distinguishing features of the hydro stations. i) ii) iii) iv) They are the most economic source of power development. They provide the cheapest source of peaking capacity. They enable improvement in the utilization of thermal/nuclear power stations in the region. They provide much needed operational & flexibility to the system.

Thus, there is an urgent need of rapid hydro potential exploitation for providing additional generation capacity in the Northern region. Among the various sites, available for hydro development, Chamba Hydro-electric Project is considered very attractive from point of view of deriving benefits during 11th Five Year Plan. The intake site of the project is located on Chamba-Bharmour road and the power house site is located on ChambaTissa road and all the sites will be well connected with roads. The existing communication facilities will be of considerable utility in cutting down the pre-construction time and costs.

II -

II -

PARA 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3 PLATE - 1

DESCRIPTION BACK GROUND INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION POWER SCENARIOS & EXISTING INSTALLATIONS POWER ABSORPTION IN NORTH REGION POWER LOAD DEVELOPMENT NECESSITY OF THE PROJECTS AND RELATED ASPECTS MASTER PLAN OF RAVI BASIN

PAGE II-1 II-1 II-1 II-1 II-1 TO II-2 II-2 TO II-3

CHAPTER - III
PROJECT AREA
3.0 3.1 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INCLUDING RIVER SYSTEM

Himachal Pradesh has the unique distinction of providing water both to the Indus and Ganges basins. The major river systems of the region are Chandra- Bhaga or Chenab, the Ravi, the Beas, the Satluj and the Yamuna. These perennial rivers are both snowfed and rain fed and are protected by fairly extensive cover of natural vegetation. Chamba hydroelectric project is located in Distt. Chamba of Himachal Pradesh and the project involves the construction of intake shaft at latitude 3231' & longitude 769' and power house at latitude 3237' & longitude 765'. This project has been contemplated as down stream development of Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW). It envisages utilization of silt free water from TRT of Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW) through a max. gross head of 130 m for generation of 126 MW power in a surface power house near village Rajpura. This project comprises a intake shaft near village Karian, HRT 6.50m dia, 10320 m long, open in to 20.5 m dia surge shaft, a 5.30 m dia penstock trifurcating near surface power house with dia 3.05 m, each and a surface power house to accommodate three vertical axis francis turbine generating units each of 42 MW installed capacity. The annual power generation from the project in 90% dependable year and 50% mean year will be 646.82 Gwh and 811.20 Gwh respectively.

III 3.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND OTHER ASPECTS

The economy of the Himachal Pradesh is predominantly dependent on agricultural and allied sectors. As per Economic Survey-2002 of Himachal Pradesh published by Deptt. of Economics & Statistics, estimated per capita income of Himachal Pradesh in 2000-01 was Rs. 10,942.00 as compared to Rs. 16487.00 at the national level. The electric power being a vital and essential infrastructure has a significant role to play in economic upliftment of the state. The construction of project will provide employment to the local people. When completed, it will be another step towards realization of the dreams of the state and exploiting its power potential for heralding an era of progress and prosperity for not only of Himachal Pradesh but for the entire northern region.

III -

III -

PARA 3.0 3.1 3.2

DESCRIPTION PROJECT AREA SYSTEM SOCIO-ECONOMIC & OTHER ASPECTS

PAGE III-1

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INCLUDING RIVER III-1 III-2

CHAPTER-IV
GEO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS
GEOLOGY OF AREA AROUND PROPOSED CHAMBA HEP, DISTRICT CHAMBA, HIMACHAL PRADESH 4.1 INTRODUCTION The Central Electricity Authority (CEA), with a view to fill the gap between supply and demand in the field of power have embarked on an exercise to assess the balance hydroelectric potential in the country and rank the schemes thus identified in various parts of the country in different river basins. As a part of this exercise, 162 schemes with probable installed capacity of 50,600 MW and located in various river basins spread over 16 states have to be taken up for preparation of Pre Feasibility Reports (PFRs) in the first phase. The schemes found feasible are proposed to be taken up for further development in X and XI Five Year Plans. The proposed Chamba Hydroelectric Project is one such scheme identified in Ravi Basin in Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh State. Chamba Hydroelectric Project is a run of the river scheme that envisages diversion of tail waters of Chamera Stage _ II HEP . The diversion structure is proposed to be constructed near TRT outlet of Chamera StageII (300MW) (32o3100N:76o0900E; 52 D/2). The silt free inflow will be further carried to surge tank through 10.32 km long head race tunnel. From surge tank the inflow will be carried to powerhouse located on the right bank of Ravi River near village Rajpura (32o3700N:76o0600E; 52 D/2). The proposed powerhouse would have installed capacity of 126 MW.

4.2

REGIONAL GEOLOGY The area around the proposed project is located in Lesser Himalaya in Ravi Basin and is characterised by sharp crested ridges and deeply dissected valleys. The main drainage in the area is provided by the river Ravi which originates in Bara Bhangal area. The river initial reaches up to Khada Mukh between Tipri Chamba and Raj Nagar Khas flows along the regional strike of rocks and cuts across the strike between Khada Mukh and Tipri. The influence of lithology and structure is clearly evident from drainage by its semidenritic and rectangular pattern Geologically the region exposes rocks ranging in age from early Proterozoic to Mesozoic. The rocks of the area are extensively covered by slope debris, fluvial terraces and fan the deposits of Quaternary recent origin. The statigraphic succession in the area is given by the officers of GSI and Malviya et al (1991) is given below: Age Triassic Upper Permian Lower Permian Late Proterozoic Manjir Chamba Vaikrita -Panjal Traps Katari gali Group --Formation Khalel Salooni Lithology Limestone with calcareous shale and ferruginous clay Calcareous arenaceous slate. Green massive amygdaloidal basic lava flows Dark grey slate micaceous sandstone, quartzite, calcareous siltstone lime Dimictite shale slate sandstone, limestone Slate, phyllite, carbonaceous shaly sandstone limestone,

slate subordinate quartzite In the area around the proposed projects, the rocks belonging to Vaikrita Group are exposed in the valley of Ravi river. The rock belonging to Chamba Formation of Vaikrita Group include an assemblage of slates phyllite, carbonaceous slate and subordinate quartzites. slate/dimictite, The rocks of Chamba Formation are succeeded by an assemblage comprising pebbly phyllite, shale, sandstone and limestone belonging to Manjir Formation. The rocks of Manjir Formation are in turn succeeded by the rocks belonging to Kataria Formation which include an interbedded sequence of the slate, quartzite with limestone and magnesite. The bands of limestone, calcareous shale and ferruginous chart belonging to Khalel Formation of Triassic age have been reported to be occuring in east and north of the arc of proposed projects. 4.3 STRUCTURE AND TECTONICS Tectonically, the Chamba area is located in Main Himalayan Tectonic Belt bounded by Indus Suture Zone(ISZ) in north and MBF-I in south (Kumareta 1989). This belt exposes the lithostratigraphic units ranging in age from Proterozoic to Quaternary. The most important tectonic plane in this belt is Main Centre Thrust. However, its position between the rivers Beas and Chenab is not well defined. The other important tectonic feature in this belt is Vaikrita Thrust(VT). In addition to these tectonic planes following the Himalays trend, a number of transverse fault dissect the rocks in the area, the prominent ones being Sundernary Fault, Kishtwar Fault, Ravi Tear and a few other transverse lineaments which have been picked up with the help of satellite imageries. The tectonic zone south of Main Himalayan Belt is the Frontal Fold Belt demarcated by HFB-I in the north and Foot Hill Thrust in south. The structure elements recorded in the area are both primary and secondary. The primary structures include bedding and current bedding. The secondary structures include cleavage

and foliation, joints, folds, faults and lineation developed during metamorphic and tectonic phases. The bedding is marked by colour bands and contacts between arenaceous and argillaceous beds. The strike of bedding of the rock formations generally various from N20W-S20E to N80 W S80 E with moderate to low dips towards NE or SW. There are two sets of cleavages recorded in the rocks i.e. slaty cleavage and fracture cleavage. The trend of these varies between NNE-SSW and WNW ESE. The slaty cleavage showing NW-SW Himalayan trend in the metasedimentary rocks of the area represents axial plane cleavage of folds F1 (Datta & Singh, 1973). In general it is parallel to the bedding of the formations. The pebbles of Manjir Formation are deformed and their shape indicates these have been flattened on cleavage plane. The fracture cleavage is parallel F2 folds that have folded bedding and slaty cleavage. The rocks of the area are jointed and many of the joint sets are common to all the rocks formations. Prominent joint sets trend NW-SE, NE-SW and E-W and have moderate to steep dips in general 4.4 SEISMOTECTONICS AND SEISMICITY From seismotectonic point of view, the area under reference is located on the western fringe of Kangra Seismic Block (Narula,1991) which is bound by Ravi Tear in west and Sundernagar fault in east. The litho tectonic packets of the Himalayan Orogenic Belt are poorly metamorphosed lithol-units of the Tethyan sequence , high and low grade assemblages of the Central crystalline and other crystallines and Lesser Himalayan belt respectively along with granitoids and basic volcanics (Narula et al., 2000). The southern fringe of the Himalayan belt is occupied by cover rocks of the Frontal Belt. Further south, the Quaternary cover is represented by alluvial fill along the foredeep and peri-cratonic fills on attenuated continental crust on northern and southern sides, respectively of Delhi-Sargoda Ridge.

Within the Himalayan belt, the northernmost conspicuous structural element is the Main Central Thrust (MCT). From Manali towards east throughout the entire Himalaya almost upto the eastern syntaxis this is considered as one of the most important tectonic surfaces. However, NW of Manali, it is not clearly discernible. Further south, within the lesser Himalayan package, the other important tectonic surface is Vaikrita Thrust (VT). This Lesser Himalayan Belt is separated from the Frontal belt by the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). The southern limit of the Frontal Belt is marked by the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT). Within MBT and MFT, the belt is traversed by several subsidiary thrusts viz Jwalamukhi Thrust and Drang Thrust. Evidences of neotectonic activity have been documented at several places along MBT and in western parts of Jawalamukhi Thrust. The Frontal Belt package is affected by several regional scale folds, of which Mastgarh and Paror anticlines are prominent. In addition to the structural discontinuities sub parallel to Himalayan trend, there are a number of faults lineaments transverse to this fold-thrust belt. The Sundarnagar Fault (also known as Manali Fault) is a dextral transverse structures which extends from Higher Himalayas to Frontal Belt. The Ropar Tear is considered to be continuation of the Sunder Nagar fault. A total of 99 seismic events of magnitude > 4.0 have been recorded in the area. Out of these 20 events have magnitude >5.0 and are mostly confined to depths less than 40Km. Event having magnitude between 4.0 and 5.0 are prevalent in the area. Seismic activity in mainly concentrated along the Himalayan Belt particularly around Chamba. This sector with maximum clustering of seismic events represent part of Kangra Seismic Zone that continues towards N. Out of 20 events of magnitude >5 about 18 events define this zone. In this part of the Himalaya, 4 events having magnitude

> 6 have been recorded. Out of these, 3 events lie on MBT, which include the famous Kangra Earthquake of 1905. Six earthquakes in this area have caused considerable damage. The earliest is the Kangra Earthquake of 4th April, 1905 having Ms = 8.0, Chamba Earthquake of 22nd June 1945 also caused considerable damage to the property. Dharamshala Earthquake of 14th June, 1978, Dharamshala Earthquake of 26th April, 1986 and Keeping in view the Chamba Earthquake of 24th March 1995 are other major earthquakes that caused considerable damage in the area. seismotectonic set up and seismic status of the area, it has been kept in Zone-V as per. Map of India showing Seismic zones (IS: 1893 (Part-I)2002). Therefore, it is recommended that suitable seismic coefficient be determined for site and incorporated in the design of appurtenant structure of the projects. 4.5 GEOTECHNICAL APPRAISAL The geological map of the area indicates that the proposed Chamba Hydroelectric project is located in the area exposing the rocks belonging to Chamba Formation. The scheme has been proposed to harness the unutilized head between Chamera stage-I and Chamera stage-II Projects. The project envisages to utilize the silt-free tail race discharge of Chamera stage to produce 126 MW of power. The tailrace discharge of Chamera stage II is proposed to be conducted to powerhouse through balancing reservoir and 10.32 km long HRT. The site of intake structure and HRT are expected to encounter a sequence of slate, phyllite, carbonaceous slate and quartzite belonging to Chamba Formation. The rocks are folded and local faults have been observed. In case of balancing reservoir, it is suggested that structure be designed after assessing the nature of material available in the foundation. Stability

of hill slopes may also be kept in view while deciding the location of structure. The 10.32 km long HRT is likely to encounter slates, phyllite and carbonaceous slates and quartzite belonging to Chamba Fortmation. The rocks in general are expected to be fair to good tunneling media except in the reaches where these are charged with water. Difficult conditions are also expected in the reaches where saturated carbonaceous phyllite are encountered. The proposed HRT shall be crossing Sal River. Adequate cover over the structure be ensured at the crossing. The preliminary layout of the scheme indicates that no intermediate adit has been proposed along this 10.32 km long HRT. This would make working conditions really difficult. Efforts could be made to provide at least one intermediate adit. The powerhouse with 126 MW installed capacity is proposed on the right bank of Ravi near tail of reservoir of Chamera stage - I. It is suggested that availability of bed rock in the foundation and adequacy of space for locating powerhouse and its appurtenants without disturbing hill slopes be ensured. This project site is located in zone V as per Map Showing Seismic Zone of India [IS: 1893 (part-1) : 2002]. the project site. The geotechnical appraisal is based on the regional geological set up without field visit to

REFERENCES 1. Datta, R.K. and Singh, Surinder (1975). Report on geological mapping in parts of Chamba, District Himachal Pradesh, unpubl, GSI Report, FS 1971-72. 2. Kumar, G., Sinha, Roy, S. and Ray, K.K. (1989). Structure and Tectonics in Himalayan, GSI, spl Publ. 26 pp 85-118 3. Malviya, A.K. Jamwal, J.S. Kachker, A.K. and Pande A.C. (1991) Report on lithostratigraphy, standardisation and regional correlation of the rocks of Tethyan Realm of NW Himalaya, Unpublished GSI compilation for F.S. 1982-83 to 1988-89 4. Narula, P.L. (1991). Seismotectonic Evaluation of NW

Himalayan, Unpublished GSI Report 5. Narula, Ind. P.L., Acharayya, S.K. and Banerjee, J. (2000)

Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs. Pub. Geol. Surv.

PARA 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 PLATE - 4.1

DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION REGIONAL GEOLOGY STRUCTURE & TECTONICS SEISMO TECTONICS AND SEISMICITY GEO-TECHNICAL APPPRAISAL REFERENCES GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE PROPOSED CHAMBA HEP , RAVI BASIN, DISTRICT CHAMBA, HIMACHAL PRADESH

PAGE IV-1 IV-2 TO IV-3 IV-3 TO IV-4 IV-4 TO IV-6 IV-6 TO IV-7 IV-8 IV-9

PARA 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 TABLE-5.1

DESCRIPTION LOCATION TOPOGRAPHY AND CATCHMENT METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES WATER AVAILABILITY DESIGN FLOOD SEDIMENTATION ASPECTS 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR OF RIVER RAVI AT CHAMERA-II DAM SITE

PAGE V-1 V-1 TO V- 4 V-4 V-5 V-5 V-6 TO V-7 V-7 V-7 V-7

TEN DAILY AVERAGE DISCHARGE DATA V-8 TO V-11

TABLE-5.2 TABLE-5.3 PLATE-5.1 PLATE-5.2

RUN-OFF IN M-CUM OF CHAMERA-II DAM SITE FOR CHAMBA HEP COMPUTATIONS FOR DEPENDABLE ON THE BASIS OF RUN-OFF FLOW DURATION CURVE (OVERALL) FLOW DURATION CURVE (LEAN PERIOD) COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM HYDROLOGY DIRECTORATE, CWC ON DRAFT PFR AND REPLIES THEREOF

V-12 TO V-15 V-16 V-17 V-18 V-18 TO V-23

CHAPTER V
HYDROLOGY
5.1 LOCATION The Ravi is a major river of the Indus Basin originating in the Himalayas from the Bara Bangahal branch of the Dhaula-Dhar range. Bara-Bangahal branch comprises of snow covered peaks at heights ranging from 3050 m to 5800 m, above mean sea level. Chamba Hydro-electric Project is located on the river Ravi, between the longitudes 76-5 to 76-9 and latitudes 32-31 to 32-37 in the Chamba Distt. of Himachal Pradesh. 5.2 5.2.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND CATCHMENT TOPOGRAPHY Lying mostly astride the main Himalayas and touching the Shiwaliks on the southern fringe, the Ravi catchment area is rugged and covered with the spurs of the high ranges. The Dhauladhar range separating the basin of the Beas from that of the Ravi, the Pangi or Pir Panjal range dividing the water shed between the river Ravi and river Chenab and Zaskar range bifurcating the basins of the Chenab and the Indus, are the three well defined snowy ranges, constituting the main topographical features of the area. The Dhauladhar range running in North-West direction, forms the boundary between Mandi and Kullu Districts, at the point where it gives off Bara Bangahal branch to join the mid Himalayas. It makes a sudden bend west-ward and for the first time touches Chamba District, on the

southern border. From this point, it continues for about 50 Kms. forming the boundary between Kangra and the Chamba Districts. The Zaskar range is the direct continuation of the main Himalayan axis. It runs in north west direction, divding Ladakh from Lahaul- Spiti and then touches Chamba District, for a short distance along its northern border, separating Chamba and Lahaul-Spiti from Zaskar. The Pir Panjal range known as the Pangi range within the Chamba District after separating Kullu from Lahaul-Spiti, enters Chamba district on the western border of the Bara Bangahal and traverses the district from SouthEast to North-West for more than 100 kms. On the North-Western border, where the Pangi range leaves the territory, it gives off a branch to the South-West called the Daganidhar which forms the boundary between Chamba and Bhadrawah of Jammu and Kashmir. At its western extremity, this branch is connected by a short ridge, in which the Padri and the Chatardhar passes. Topographically, the Dagnidhar and the Chatardhar are different sections of one continuous offshoot, forming with the Pangi Range, the water shed between the (Chenab). Ravi and the Chander-Bhaga

5.2.2

RIVER RAVI AND ITS TRIBUTARIES It originates from Bara-Bangahal at an elevation of 4229 m above mean sea level, approximately 150 Kms North-East of historical Chamba town. The Ravi flows in steep gradient with series of loops & bends. In between, main tributaries like Kalihan, Budhil, Tundah, Suil & Sewa contribute lot of run-off to the Ravi. Bara-Bangahal comprises of snow covered peaks at heights ranging from 3050 mtrs to 5800 mtrs above mean sea level.

The basin represents some remarkable physical features. The river flows in a North-West direction for most of its course, rises in Baira-Balsio and continues through Traila and Chanota to Ulans, where it is joined by two of its major tributaries in the head reaches Viz. Budhil and Tundah. Beyond this, upto Chhatrari, river flows through a narrow gorge where after it opens out. After passing through Churi, Bagga, Mehla, Chamba and Udaipur, the river approaches Rajnagar, then flows in narrow gorge to Sherpur. The Suil river, the largest tributary, joins the Ravi upstream of Chamera Stage-I Dam. The Sewa river flowing from the north joins the Ravi near Khairi. It then bends to the South-West and striking the terminal spurs of the Dhauladhar range, separates Chamba from Jammu and Kashmir and finally leaves the territory of Himachal Pradesh up stream of Ranjit Sagar Dam (Punjab). Budhil nallah has its origin on the slopes of the mid Himalays near Kugti pass. At Harsar, it receives on its left bank the small stream from sacred lake of Mani-Mahesh, situated beneath the peak called the Mani-Mahesh, Kailash at an elevation of 3952 m. It passes Village Bharmour at 15 Kms downstream and soon afterwards meets the Ravi near Village Kharamukh. Tundah nallah rises at Kalichtop pass, flows through Tundah valley and joins the Ravi near Kharamukh. The right bank tributaries are bigger and have more discharge as campared to the left bank tributaries except Kalihan, which originates in Dhauladhar range on the left bank and contributes a good discharge. Both Budhil & Tundah are about 54 Kms long each . 5.2.3 CATCHMENT The catchment area of Chamba diversion site measures 2830 Sq.Km. The entire catchment comprises of mountaineous terrain with steep hill slopes

and is very thinly populated. The Ravi river after its origin from BaraBangahal branch of Dhaula Dhar range, is mainly formed by the combined waters of the three tributaries namely; Kalihan, Budhil & Tundah in the head reaches. The Catchment areas of these three are: 1. 2. 3. Kalihan Nallah Budhil Nallah Tundah Nallah 158.75 Sq.Km 555 Sq.Km 305 Sq. Km.

The river bed slope is comparatively steeper in its upper reaches. 5.3 5.3.1 METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS RAINFALL There are, in all, thirteen non recording type rain gauge stations in the catchment area of the river Ravi. The normal annual rainfall & annual rainfall has been recorded in millimeters at all these stations for the period 1960-2000 by the office of Director, Land Records, Revenue Department (HP). 5.3.2 TEMPERATURE There is no temperature record available at the proposed diversion site while some record is available at Chamba town, which is 10 Kms downstream of the proposed diversion site. The relative humidity is generally high in the monsoon season, being over 80%. In the post monsoon and winter seasons, the humidity is less. The summer is generally the driest part of the year.

5.4

HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS The Catchment area of the Ravi, above the proposed diversion site is 2830 Sq. Kms, and is elongated leaf shaped as shown in drawing No. Chamba-PR-2. In this reach, a good part of the catchment i.e. about 890 Sq.Km lies above the snow line i.e. 4000 m above M.S.L., which receives moderate to heavy snowfall during winter. The discharge of the Ravi and its major snowfed tributaries dwindles down to lowest during winter months, from December to February and starts increasing from February end due to the melting of snow. The bulk contribution is from rainfall in the monsoon months. A few discharge measuring stations namely; Bagga, Durgathi, Banthu, Tiyari, Bajoli and Kutehr were set-up by HPSEB and a good data bank is available for these sites.

5.5

HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES Daily discharge data is available for the following sites which has been made use of to carry out the hydrological studies of the project. S.No. Site Distance from 1 2 3 Rakh Janghi Bagga 2 Kms d/s 8 Kms d/s Chamera-II Catchment area 2500 2700 in 1972-1980 1980-1985 1985-1997 Data available

diversion site Sq.Km.

At dam site 2590

5.6

WATER AVAILABILITY Based on available/data of river Ravi at Chamera-II dam site from 19721997 as given in Table 5.1, a flow duration curve has been drawn using Weibulls distribution method. The flow duration curve for (Overall Period) has been shown in Plate 5.1. The curve reveals that 32.51 cumecs of discharge is available for 90% of the period, 79.71 cumecs for 50% of the overall period and design discharge of 127.00 cumecs is available for 39.34% of the total duration of 24 years. A flow duration curve for the lean period flows (Dec. to Feb.) has also

been drawn, and shown in Plate 5.2. It reveals that a discharge of 26.13 cumecs is available for 90% of the total duration during the lean periods and 35.83 cumecs is available for 50% periods. This scheme has been proposed to utilise the water releases from tail race of Chamera Stage-II (300 MW) which is under operation with NHPC. Flow series of 1972 to 1984 in respect of Chamera Stage-II, stands approved by CWC/CEA while according TEC to that scheme way back in Feb., 1985. Presently this flow series has been extended further up to 1997 by using the discharges observed at Bagga (Chamera Stage-II dam site). 4 hours peaking has been proposed in Chamera Stage-II reservoir, which shall be used in Chamba HEP as well. Both the power houses of ChameraII and that of Chamba HEP, will be operated in tandem. In Chamera-II HEP, design discharge of 142.00 cumecs has been8 proposed to be utilised for power generation. To maintain the ecology of river Ravi downstream of Chamba diversion works, a release of 15.00 cumecs from tail water of Chamera-II, has been proposed. Thus, the design discharge of (142.00-15.00) = 127.00 cumecs. has been proposed for carrying out the hydrological and power potential studies in respect of

Chamba HEP. This design discharge of 127.00 cumecs is available in 10 no. ten-daily blocks in 90% dependable year. Availability of design discharge fixed as 127.00 cumecs is about 39.34% in 90% dependable year as shown in Plate-5.1. 5.7 DESIGN FLOOD As approved by CWC/CEA, design flood of 8500 cumecs has been used for carrying out the designs of project components in respect of Chamera Stage-II. Since, for Chamba HEP, diversion has been proposed directly from the TRT of Chamera-II HEP, as such, no diversion structure on the river Ravi has been proposed and flood computations have been avoided. However, by Unit Hydrograph Method based on Flood Estimation Report for Western Himalyas-Zone-7, design flood of 12100 cumecs has been computed. Moreover, power house of this scheme has been proposed at El. 765.00 m keeping in view the down stream storage scheme Chamera Stage-I having MWL of 765.00 m and FRL 760.00m. 5.8 SEDIMENTATION ASPECTS Detailed studies shall be carried out at the DPR stage.

5.9

90% DEPENDABLE YEAR As per the latest guidelines of CEA, the year wise unrestricted energy generation has been computed for the period June-1972 to May,1997. The energy so generated has been arranged in descending order. According to Weibulls relationship p=i/(n+1) where p= percentage exceeding of occurrence, i=event number in descending order and n is the total number of events, 90% dependable year and 50% mean year, have been computed. The computations of power and energy generation have been shown in the Table 7.1.

CHAPTER VI
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT AND PLANNING
6.0 6.1 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF PROJECT COMPONENTS FINALIZATION OF CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT The proposed civil engineering structures have been planned and designed to divert and conduct 127 cumecs of water, from TRT of Chamera-II for generating 126 MW of power in a power house by utilizing a gross head of 130m. The main works of the project comprise a intake shaft, 10320m long head race tunnel, a restricted orifice type surge shaft and a power house to accommodate three vertical axis, Francis turbines driven generating units each of 42 MW. A brief geological site specific feasibility note titled Geotechnical appraisal founded on preliminary site inspection about each component is appended as Para 4.5 in chapter-IV titled Geo-Technical Aspects. 6.2 6.2.1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN FEATURES INTAKE SHAFT Silt free water from tail race tunnel of Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW)has been proposed to be used by constructing an intake shaft , 15.50m dia. about 100m deep, open to sky, nearly 200m before TRT outlet of Chamera Stage - II. A spill tunnel 6.50m dia., circular, 200m long has also been proposed to lead the spill water upto the Ravi river from the intake shaft. HRT will start at El 883.50m and provision of gates will be made at the intake portals of HRT and spill tunnel.

VI 6.2.2 6.2.2.1 HEAD RACE TUNNEL GENERAL

The head race tunnel 6.50m dia, 10320m long, circular type has been proposed to carry a design discharge of 127 cumecs from the intake shaft The tunnel is located along right bank of river Ravi. Layout of the tunnel has been fixed keeping in view the topography of the area and location of construction adits for completing the tunnel excavation work on schedule. Adequate rock cover has been ensured in entire reach of the tunnel. The invert level of tunnel at RD-0 is at El. 883.50m and at outlet end is El.851.00m resulting in a slope of 1 in 318. Four adits each 6.5m D-shaped at inlet, outlet and at intermediate locations have been provided to facilitate construction of HRT from six faces. The inlet and outlet adits are so provided that they shall separate the construction activity of the head race tunnel from that of intake shaft and surge shaft respectively. Two faces will also be available at the aqueduct near the Sal nallah crossing to facilitate the HRT construction. A pipe aqueduct 70 m long, 6.5 m dia has been proposed to provide crossing of water conductor system across Sal nallah. The layout of the tunnel and other details are indicated in Drawing. No.Chamba-PR-5 6.2.2.2 CROSS SECTION Based on geological, hydraulic, structural and functional considerations, circular cross section, 6.5m dia has been adopted. The tunnel is proposed to be lined with concrete M:20. 6.2.3 6.2.3.1 SURGE SHAFT GENERAL The underground restricted orifice type surge shaft of 20.5m dia and .

100.0m height has been proposed at the outlet end of head race tunnel at

VI - 3 RD 10320m. Top level of surge shaft is proposed at El. 950.00m. The outlet adit of HRT will be utilized to facilitate excavation of surge shaft and horizontal portions of penstock. After execution of the project this adit will be plugged near junction and rest of it will be used as a drainage gallery. General layout and details of surge shaft are shown in drawing No.Chamba-PR-6 &7. 6.2.3.2 HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS Surge shaft area has been worked out by using Thomass criteria for incipient stability with factor of safety as 1.6m conforming to IS:7396 (Part-I) 1979. Maximum upsurge and minimum down surge levels have been computed by computer analysis as per above mentioned IS code. Maximum upsurge level works out to be El. 914.70 m and minimum down surge level asEl. 862.50m. 0.012 and 0.016 respectively. 6.2.3.3 CONCRETE LINING It is proposed to provide reinforced concrete lining for surge shaft. Lateral cover around surge shaft at full height has been kept more than three times the excavated diameter of the surge shaft. It is assumed that upsurge being of very short duration will not cause any saturation in the surrounding rock mass. 6.2.4 6.2.4.1 PRESSURE SHAFT / PENSTOCK GENERAL A 5.30m dia penstock with centre line at El.854.25 m will take off from surge shaft for leading the water in to turbines. In the initial 180m horizontal reach, a valve gallery has been proposed to accommodate butterfly valve. The inclined length of main penstock is 220m. Three nos. For calculating maximum upsurge and minimum down surge levels the friction co-efficient have been taken as

VI - 4 branch pressure shaft of 3.05m dia totalling 45m in length , takes off from the main penstock to feed three units in the power house. The entire length of the penstock will be steel lined. Anchor blocks of suitable design shall be provided at selected locations to provide adequate support to the penstock besides the saddle supports at regular interval are shown in Drawing No. Chamba-PR-7. 6.2.4.2 ECONOMIC DIAMETER Economical dia of the penstock has been worked out by cost optimization studies for various diameters. Accordingly, a diameter of 5.3m has been adopted to carry the design discharge of 127 cumecs with velocity of flow as 5.75m/sec. The diameters of branches has been kept as 3.05m. 6.2.5 6.2.5.1 POWER HOUSE GENERAL The proposed power house is located about 2km. d/s of Rajpura village on right bank of river Ravi. This site has been considered suitable for surface power house as per geo-technical appraisal note received from GSI (Ref. Chapter-IV). The tail race channel from power house will discharge the flows back in to river Ravi. The approach to power house has been proposed through approach road 0.50 km long from the existing PWD road. The surface power house will have 3 generating units of 42 MW each alongwith all the auxiliary facilities such as cooling water/potable water system, fire protection system, compressed air supply, oil system, ventilation and air conditioning system etc. The control room, LT room, Battery room, air conditioning plant, offices, cable separating area will be accommodated in different floors and the upstream side of the machine hall. Service bay shall be located on one end of the machine 400 Kv switchyard will be conventional surface switchyard towards the right side of the power house. Main dimensions of the power house upto crane hook will be 57m x 17m x 29m. Electrical control system, panels and offices

VI - 5 shall be located on the upstream side of the power house building. It will be a double storied building of 35m x 7m dimensions. The safety of power house complex from flooding, from tail water end during construction stage will be adequately ensured. 6.2.5.2 TYPE Reconnaissance surveys for location of surface power house were undertaken during the site visits of project area by HPSEB Engineers and GSI authority during 2003-2004 .

Keeping in view the above fact, a surface power house with surface transformer hall has been proposed on right bank of Ravi river. Also the GIS surface 220 KV Switchyard has been proposed keeping in view the terrain and reliability of the system. The detail of power house and single line diagram has been shown in Drg. No. Chamba-PR-8,9 &10. 6.2.6 TAIL RACE CHANNEL The out flow from the end of draft tube will be taken through 3 nos. separate branch tail race channels. Vertical lift gates have been proposed in these branch tail race channels to prevent entry of silt etc. into draft tube and for facilitating repair in turbines. Down stream of this, all the branch tail race channels will be joined to one main tail race channels, 230 m long.

VI -

6.3

PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS Drawing No. Chamba-PR-1 Chamba-PR-2 Chamba-PR -3 Chamba-PR-4 Chamba-PR-5 Chamba-PR-6 Chamba-PR -7 Chamba-PR -8 Chamba-PR-9 Chamba-PR-10 Chamba-PR-11 Chamba-PR-12 Description Vicinity map Catchment Area Plan General Layout Plan Intake Shaft Plan & Sections Head Race Tunnel Plan & Sections Layout Plan Showing Surge Shaft , Pressure shaft / Penstock and Power House area Surge Shaft and Pressure Shaft / Penstock Power House Plan at Different Elevations Power House Cross Section Single Line Diagram Construction Facilities Construction Programme

VI -

VI -

PARA 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.2.1 6.2.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.3.1 6.2.3.2 6.2.3.3 6.2.4 6.2.4.1 6.2.4.2 6.2.5 6.2.5.1 6.2.5.2. 6.2.6 6.3 DRAWINGS CHAMBA-PR-1 CHAMBA-PR-2 CHAMBA-PR-3 CHAMBA-PR-4 CHAMBA-PR-5 CHAMBA-PR-6

DESCRIPTION CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF PROJECT COMPONENTS FINALIZATION OF CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT PRELIMINARY DESIGN FEATURES INTAKE SHAFT HEAD RACE TUNNEL GENERAL CROSS SECTION SURGE SHAFT GENERAL HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS CONCRETE LINING PRESSURE SHAFT GENERAL ECONOMIC DIAMETER POWER HOUSE GENERAL TYPE TAIL RACE CHANNEL PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS

PAGE VI-1 VI-1 VI-1 VI-1 VI-2 VI-2 VI-2 VI-2 VI-2-3 VI-3 VI- 3 VI-3 VI-3 VI- 4 VI-4 VI-4 VI- 4-5 VI-5 VI-5

VICINITY MAP CATCHMENT AREA PLAN GENERAL LAYOUT PLAN INTAKE SHAFT PLAN & SECTIONS HEAD RACE TUNNEL PLAN & SECTIONS LAYOUT PLAN SHOWING SURGE SHAFT , PRESSURE SHAFT / PENSTOCK AND POWER HOUSE AREA CHAMBA-PR -7 SURGE SHAFT AND PRESSURE SHAFT / PENSTOCK CHAMBA-PR -8 POWER HOUSE PLAN AT DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS CHAMBA-PR-9 POWER HOUSE CROSS SECTION CHAMBA-PR-10 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM CHAMBA-PR-11 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES CHAMBA-PR-12 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME

CHAPTER VII
POWER POTENTIAL STUDIES

7.0

GENERAL Chamba Hydro-electric Project has been proposed as a run- of- the river development for generation of hydro-power on Ravi river in Himachal Pradesh. It has been contemplated to operate in tandem with Chamera Stage-II (300 MW) (an up-stream scheme) as a peaking station to operate in western part of Northern Regional Grid. Installed capacity of the project has been presently kept as 126 MW comprising 3 units of 42 MW each with overall efficiency of generation as 0.92.

7.1

PATTERN OF FLOWS IN 90% DEPENDABLE AND 50% MEAN YEAR

24 years discharge data from June 1972 to May, 1997 in respect of Ravi river at Chamera-II Dam site has been used to develop a flow series for Chamba HEP for power generation. Energy generation has been worked out for all the years as appended in Table 7.1. .Pattern of flows in 90% dependable and 50% mean years has been worked out on the basis of energy generation in 24 years by using Welbulls relationship P= n/m+1, where P is percentage exceeding of occurrence, n is the event no. in descending order and m is total no. of events, presented in Table 7.2. Flows in 90% dependable and 50% mean years, so worked out are given in Table 7.3.

VII -

7.2 7.2.1

HEAD FOR POWER GENERATION DESIGN HEAD Gross head for power generation has been worked as 130.00 m between Normal Tail water level of Chamera-II (u/s scheme) El. 895.00 and maximum reservoir level of Chamera Stage-I (d/s scheme) El. 765.00. Losses in water conductor system corresponding to design discharge of 127 cumecs from intake to generating units has been worked out as 20.00 m. Design net head therefore has been taken as 110 m. The calculations are as follows: Normal Tail water level at u/s scheme (Chamera-II) Max. water level of d/s scheme (Chamera Stage-I) Gross Head Losses Net Head = 895.00 765.00 = = = Gross Head Losses = 130 20 = 110.00 m 130.00 m 20.00 m = 765.00 m = 895.00 m

7.3

POWER GENERATION IN A 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR AND 50% MEAN YEAR Power generation studies in a 90% dependable year corresponding to installed capacity varying from 99 MW to 180 MW are given in Table 7.4 The energy generation in 90% dependable year corresponding to the installed capacity of 126 MW is 646.82 GWH. The energy generation in 90% dependable year corresponding to 95% machine availability works out to be 630.00 GWH as shown in Table 7.5.

VII -

Power generation studies in a 50% mean year corresponding to installed capacity varying from 99 MW to 180 MW are given in Table 7.6 The energy generation in 50% mean year corresponding to the installed capacity of 126 MW is 811.20 GWH. The energy generation in 50% mean year corresponding to 95% machine availability works out to be 789.58 GWH as shown in Table 7.7.

7.4

INSTALLED CAPACITY STUDIES Power generation studies for 90% dependable and 50% mean year pattern of flows with installed capacity varying from 99 MW to 180 MW have been done. From the study, the incremental increase v/s installed capacity curve & total energy v/s installed capacity curve have been drawn as shown in Plate 7.1 and Plate 7.2 respectively. In 90% dependable year fall in incremental energy occurs beyond 120 MW. Moreover the plant load factor for lean season ( Dec. to Feb. ) is 22% for 126 MW. While deciding the installed capacity of the project it was seen that during 90% dependable year (1983-84), minimum available discharge was 32.51 cumecs and design flow was available in ten no. 10 daily blocks. The project has been planned to utilize the available head between two under operation schemes with NHPC Ltd. namely Chamera Stage-II 300 MW (upstream scheme) and Chamera Stage-I (540 MW) down stream scheme. For Index Plan, showing all the three schemes, refer Plate-7.5. This scheme will be operated in tandem with upstream scheme i.e Chamera Stage-II (300 MW) which contemplates a peaking of 4 hours to meet with peaking power shortage in the country. The installed capacity of the project has been fixed at 126 MW with over all PLF of 59%. It was further studied that the minimum discharge during lean season ( Dec. to Feb.) in 90% dependable year is 26.13 cumecs.

VII -

It is, therefore, concluded that the installed capacity of 126 MW shall be economically optimum. An overview of hydrological & Power studies has been given in summary table 7.8, 7.9 and 7.10 respectively.

VII -

VII PARA 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.2.1 7.3 7.4 TABLE 7.1 TABLE 7.2 TABLE 7.3 TABLE 7.4 TABLE 7.5 TABLE 7.6 TABLE 7.7 TABLE -7.8 TABLE- 7.9 TABLE-7.10 PLATE-7.1 PLATE-7.2 PLATE-7.3 PLATE-7.4 PLATE-7.5 DESCRIPTION GENERAL PATTERN OF FLOWS IN 90% AND 50% YEARS HEAD FOR POWER GENERATION DESIGN HEAD POWER GENERATION IN A 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR AND 50% MEAN YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY STUDIES UNRESTRICTED ENERGY GENERATION FOR ALL THE YEARS. COMPUTATION FOR DEPENDABLE YEAR ON THE BASIS OF ENERGY. 90% DEPENDABLE AND 50% MEAN YEAR DISCHARGES ENERGY GENERATION IN 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR (1983-84). ENERGY GENERATION IN 90% DEPENDABLE CORRESPONDING TO 95% M/C AVAILABILITY. ENERGY GENERATION IN 50% MEAN YEAR (197879). ENERGY GENERATION IN 50% MEAN YEAR CORRESPONDING TO 95% M/C AVAILABILITY SUMMARY SUMMARY 90% YEAR SUMMARY 50% YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CURVE - 90% YEAR TOTAL ENERGY V/S INSTALLED CAPACITY CURVE 90% YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CURVE 50% YEAR TOTAL ENERGY V/S INSTALLED CAPACITY CURVE 50% YEAR CHAMBA HEP 126 MW - INDEX PLAN COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM DIRECTOR HP & I, CEA ON DRAFT PFR AND REPLIES THEREOF VII-10 VII-9 PAGE VII-1 VII-1 VII-2 VII-2

VII-2 TO VII-3 VII-3 TO VII-4 VII-5 TO VII-8

VII-11 TO VII-20 VII- 21 VII- 22 TO VII-31 VII- 32 VII- 33 VII- 34 VII- 35 VII- 36 VII- 37 VII- 38 VII- 39 VII- 40 VII-41 TO VII-45

VII -

PARAWISE REPLIES TO THE COMMENTS RAISED BY DIRECTOR (HP &I), CEA, NEW DELHI VIDE LETTER No. 7/9/(HPSEB)/HP&I/ 2004/1315 dated 19.7.04 IN RESPECT OF DRAFT PFR OF CHAMBA HEP (126 MW) IN HIMACHAL PRADESH GENERAL COMMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Initial Environmental Studies carried out by NRSA and incorporated in the PFR, are as per scope of work. Financial parameters adopted are as per guidelines sent by CEA in this regard. Cost Estimate has been attempted as per guidelines of CEA conveyed vide referred letter. Recommendations :i) ii) iii) The feasibility of balancing reservoir at the intake site will be checked at the DPR stage. Geological aspects of each component will be got established from GSI in detail, at the DPR stage. The layout of the project has been sent to field unit for checking the feasibility of project components at site and due care will be given to this aspect. Model studies of the project components for studying their hydraulic behaviour will be got carried out during DPR stage. Environmental aspects will also be addressed in detail. Further detailing of cost estimate viz. Analysis of Rates for machinery & principle items of works, will be carried out as per directions/guidelines of CEA in this regard. Construction material will be got tested from the laboratory along with ensuring their exact availability. Construction programme shall be reviewed in the light of detailed construction planning based on construction methodology & equipment planning.

iv) v) vi)

vii) viii)

5.

The replies to the comments raised by Director Hydrology (N), CWC on the hydrological studies vide letter No. 1/HP/30/2004/Hyd. (N)/267 dated 9.7.04 are being appended in the PFR. Comments of CWC on the layout planning of project components have not been received in this office however, if any, same will be taken care of during DPR studies.

6.

VII -

7. 8. 9.

Power evacuation arrangement considered in the PFR shall also be got cleared from SP&PA division of CEA. Executive Summary of the project is being appended at the start of PFR which has been prepared as per general guidelines of CEA in this regard. The GSI report on the project has been discussed in Chapter IV Geotechnical Aspects which has been received from Sh. S. Chopra, Director, (DPR Unit), GSI, New Delhi. Power Potential Studies

1. 2. 3.

As desired, the aspects relating to co-coordinated operation of Chamera-II and Chamba HEP will be kept in view. As discussed, the installation of 126 MW (3x42 MW) has been considered generally in order. The summary of studies indicating yearly inflows, annual energy generation, load factor of operation during monsoon, non-monsoon and lean flow period has been given in Table 7.8. under chapter-7-Power Potential Studies. Summary indicating incremental increase in energy for various installed capacities has been given in Table 7.9 & 7.10 for 90% dependable year and 50% mean years, respectively. Recommendations for further studies i) The consistency of the observed data w.e.f. 1985-1997 will be got checked at the DPR stage as the concurrent data of other site in the basin is being collected. The layout of the project has been finalized on the SOI sheet in the scale of 1:10,000. The detailed surveys on the larger scale will be carried out and any change in gross head/layout will be taken care of.

4.

5.

ii)

VII HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NO.HPSEB/DP/CHAMBA/2004To The Chief Engineer (HP & I), Central Electricity Authority, Room No. 407 (N), Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram, New Delhi-66. Sub: Ref: Sir, PFR of Chamba HEP Submission thereof. This office letter No. HPSEB/DP/Chamba/04-720-23 dated 30.6.04. Dated____/8/04

In continuation to this office letter under reference, enclosed please find herewith PFR of Chamba HEP (25 copies) for kind reference at your end, please. It is further added that the replies to the comments conveyed by your office in respect of hydrology, power studies and general, have been attended and replies thereof appended in PFR. This is for your kind information. DA: As above (25 Copies) Yours faithfully, Alternate Nodal Officer-Cum Director Planning, Circle No.1, HPSEB, Sundernagar (HP). Copy to above for kind information forwarded to : i) ii) iii) Nodal Officer -Cum Chief Engineer (I&P), HPSEB, Sundernagar Chief Engineer (P&M), HPSEB, Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla-4. Chief Engineer (SP), HPSEB, Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla-4.

Alternate Nodal Officer-Cum Director Planning, Circle No.1, HPSEB, Sundernagar (HP).

CHAPTER VIII
POWER EVACUATION
8.0 8.1 POWER EVACUATION POWER EVACUATION ARRANGEMENT The Chamba HEP is being developed between Chamera Stage-I HEP (540 MW) and Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW). Due to inhospitable terrain & corridor problem, the power from Chamba HEP (126 MW) has to be evacuated through LILO of 400 KV Chamera Stage-I and Chamera StageII D/C transmission line. 8.2 TRANSMISSION OF POWER It is proposed to evacuate the power generated at Chamba hydroelectric project by LILO of 400 KV Chamera Stage-I HEP (540 MW) and Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW) by 10 Kms, D/C transmission line. 8.3 8.3.1 ELECTRO MECHANICAL WORKS GENERAL Chamba Hydel Project envisages utilization of silt free water from TRT of Chamera Stage-II HEP (300 MW) through a maximum gross head of 130 m for generation of 126 MW power in a surface power house near village Rajpura. This project comprises a intake shaft near village Karian. HRT 6.50 m dia, 10320 m long opening into 20.5 m dia. surge shaft, a 5.30 m dia. penstock trifurcating near surface power house with dia. 3.05 m each and a surface power house to accommodate three vertical axis francis turbine generating units each of 42 MW installed capacity.

The project shall utilize silt free water from TRT of Chamera Stage-II with the design discharge of 127 Cumecs. The salient features of Chamba HEP are as under:Design discharge Net Head Installed capacity No. and size of units Type of Power House Cost of Electrical Works: P-Production T- Transmission 8.3.2 SCOPE This project report incorporates the detailed abstract of cost under the head P- Production (Cost Estimate of Electro-mechanical Works for PFR) and T- Transmission (Transmission lines for evacuation of power). For electro-mechanical works, the rates have been adopted as per the CEA guidelines for estimating the cost of E&M Works for the preparation of Pre-feasibility Report of HEPs. 8.3.3 POWER HOUSE The power house site is located on the right bank of Ravi river and is approachable from Pathankot (nearest Broad Gauge Railway station). With the initial specific speed of 222.54 rpm, the region is ideally suited for Francis Turbine. The live storage available is for about 4 hours peaking at Chamera stage II and this project will operate in tandem. Keeping hydrology in consideration, machine size has been kept as 42 MW each. Rs. 14131.38 Lacs. Rs. 1178.47 Lacs. 127.00 Cumecs 110 Meters 126 MW 3 units of 42 MW each. Surface.

The Surface power house will have 3 generating units of 42 MW each along with all the auxiliary facilities such as cooling water / potable water supply system, fire protection system, compressed air supply , oil system, ventilation and Air conditioning system etc. The control room , LT room, Battery room, air conditioning plant, offices, cable spreading area will be accommodated in different floors on the upstream side of the machine hall. The service bay shall be located on one end of the machine hall. Provision for the lubricating oil handling plant, the water treatment and filtration plant and store etc. has also been made. The generator transformers will be located in the open switchyard and will be connected to generating units through 11 kV bus ducts. 400 KV Switchyard will be conventional surface Switchyard towards the right side of the power house and 400 KV cable from the generator transformer shall be taken out through cable ducts. Main dimension of power house up to crane hook will be (LxBxH = 57m x 17m x 29m. Electrical Control System Panels & offices shall be houses on the down stream side of the power house building. It will be a double storey building of size 35m x 7m . 8.3.4 8.3.4.1 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TURBINES The vertical shaft, Francis turbine of 42.85 MW capacity with a rated synchronous speed of 300 rpm has been found to be suitable in view of the over all economy of the power house. As per the study, there is only minor difference in the width of power house, but the suction head increases greatly with the increase in rotational speed, hence lower speed has been adopted which has resulted in a suction head of 4.80 m below the minimum tail water level. Lower speed has however increased the overall cost of the equipment marginally, but will be compensated with the reduction in the wear & tear of underwater parts of turbine due to silt which is usually high in himalayan rivers. Each turbine shall be provided with suitable oil pressure unit, electro hydraulic governor and other requisite control equipment.

8.3.4.2

GOVERNOR Since Chamba power house will be connected with 400 KV evacuation system of Chamera Stage-I and Chamera Stage-II. It is of great importance that the governor accuracy and sensitivity is of high order so as to ensure proper behavior of the regulators for any change in the system load to avoid hunting and over regulation, it is proposed to provide Electro Hydraulic governor. The governing system for each unit will have an individual oil pressure system consisting of oil to air mixer and an oil tank with two pumps as well as the automatic control equipment. Speed etc. would be indicated both on the governor cubicle and on the unit control board to facilitate supervision of operation of the unit. The controls would include provision for emergency shut down of unit in case of :Loss of Pressure in the oil pressure vessel of Governor oil system. Excessive temperature rise in Bearing. Excessive speed rise of the unit. Electrical faults.

8.3.4.3

MAIN INLET VALVES A main inlet valve of the Butterfly with flow guides type would be provided at each turbine inlet for maintenance of the turbine and for emergency isolation of the turbine in the event of governor failure. Each valve shall be actuated by means of servomotor which shall be fed from an independent oil pressure unit. Closing of the valve shall be through counter weights. Each valve unit shall constitute a complete independent unit with its own operating system for opening and closing, which will be connected to the automatic start and stop sequence of the respective turbine unit.

8.3.4.4

COOLING WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM A pumping system would be provided to supply adequate quantity of water from the tail race for cooling of the turbine and generator bearings, generator air coolers and selected plant services. Water for fire protection would be taken from an elevated reservoir providing both reliable operation and ample capacity to fight fire in the power house. A back up water supply to this reservoir would also be provided.

8.3.4.5

POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY DRAINAGE Water from the cooling water system would be used to supply the plants potable and sanitary water needs. The potable water would be filtered and chemically treated as required. Sanitary sewerage would be treated in a septic system before discharge in to tail race of power plant.

8.3.4.6

DRAINAGE AND DEWATERING SYSTEM A separate drainage and de-watering system with suitable number of pumps would be provided to drain and pump out miscellaneous inflows and ground water seepage in the power house. Starting and stopping of the pumps would be automatic and controlled by level switches in the drainage sump.

8.3.4.7

COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM A high pressure compressed air plant would be installed to meet the requirement of the governor oil system and the oil pressure system of the butterfly valves.

A low pressure compressed air plant would also be installed to meet the requirements of the station pneumatic tools, breaking and other general purpose in the power house. 8.3.4.8 OIL SYSTEM A portable dehydration unit comprising of oil heaters, filters, tank etc. would be provided in the power station for the treatment of governor/ bearings and switch gear oils. 8.3.4.9 VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING Power house would be provided with ventilation system as required for the surface power house work areas and offices. An air conditioning system would be provided to maintain the control room at the selected design temperature and humidity levels. The temperature and humidity level would be selected to suit the requirements of equipment and staff. 8.3.4.10 POWER HOUSE CRANE In order to expedite the completion of various construction activities of the power house and keeping in view the dimension of power house, 1 No. electric over head traveling bridge crane having capacity of 130/30 tonne with provision of tandem control would be installed in the power house primarily for erection, maintenance and repair of the generating units. The cranes would be equipped with motor control system providing suitable procedure for equipment erection. 8.4 8.4.1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT GENERATOR Each generator shall be of vertical shaft, salient pole type, synchronous generator directly coupled to the hydro turbine and having a rated out put

of 46.67 MVA with 0.9 lag power factor. The generator bearing arrangement shall be of conventional type i.e. suspended type. It is proposed to equip the generators with dynamic braking in addition to the friction brakes. The generator shall have class-F insulation in line with modern practice and temperature restricted to class-B insulation. The generator will be air cooled with a closed ventilation system using air water heat exchanger placed around the stator frame. The generators are proposed to be equipped with the following electrical protection equipment:High speed differential protection for generator. Generator Over Voltage protection. Back up over current protection. Stator earth fault relay protection. Negative Phase Sequence Current protection. Rotor Field Circuit earth Fault Relay & protection. Loss of excitation relay schemes. Generator thermal relay protection. Phase balance relay. 8.4.2 EXCITATION SYSTEM The excitation system of the generator will be of static type and will include static type voltage regulator of latest design, field suppression equipment and the associated accessories. The power for the excitation system will be taken from the generator main bus by means of a dry type or epoxy encased step down transformer. The excitation system will be self contained requiring only an external power source for field flashing at unit starting. The field flashing supply will be taken from the station battery.

The excitation system including the voltage regulator will be placed in the cubicles adjacent to the generator pit. 8.4.3 GENERATOR SWITCH GEAR AND CONNECTING CABLES Each generator shall be connected to its step up transformer by means of 11 kV bus ducts. Current transformers required for protection, control and metering will be located and form part of the bus ducts assemblies. The generator switch gear will be of the metal enclosed type placed in a separate room close to the generator. It will include the generator phase equipment and connections shown in the attached single line diagram. The equipment for the generator neutral side will be placed in a cubicle adjacent to the generator pit. 8.4.4 GENERATOR TRANSFORMERS 10 Nos. generator transformers of 18 MVA , 11/ 400 / 3 KV , single phase , 50 Hz rating will be provided and placed on the upstream side of power house. The OFWF type of cooling is proposed for generator transformer. 8.4.5 CONTROL AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT The plant will be designed to be operated as an attended type. Unit control will be provided locally while central control will be from various control panels located in the control and relay room of the power house. Control equipment will include metering and control panels, protections for supervision and operation of the generator turbine, 11 kV switch gear , auxiliary power system, transformers and 400 KV switch gear. The control equipment will also include the PLCC and

Telecommunication equipment required for the transmission lines.

Provision for connection to the State Load Dispatch Center will also be provided. The control system shall be fully computerized.

8.4.6

STATION SERVICE/ AUXILIARY SUPPLY The station service supply is proposed to be taken through 11 kV Local Distribution system. In addition, for reliability, 500 KVA DG sets shall also be provided for the black start capability. This will also feed local area,Colony, head works etc. The unit auxiliaries shall be fed through 11/0.415 kV, 630 KVA transformers connected to each generator. The auxiliaries can also be fed from 2 Nos., 11/0.415 kV, 1 MVA station service transformers, which are connected to 11 kV bus connected to 11 kV local supply.

8.4.7

POWER PLANT GROUNDING The power station will be provided with a complete earthing system. All exposed conductive parts and equipment in the power house and switch yard will be connected to the grounding system. The grounding system will be designed to minimize the Step and Touch potential within acceptable limits.

8.4.8

LIGHTING The power plant lighting , following normal practice, will comprise of interior and exterior lights as appropriate. While the majority of the illuminiaries will be AC powered, emergency lighting will be DC supplied from station battery system. The emergency lighting will be provided only for essential locations e.g. control room, exits etc.

8.4.9

SWITCH YARD AND SWITCHING SCHEME Keeping in view the space availability on left side of power house towards the down stream and reliability of the system, Conventional outdoor 400 KV Switchyard with double bus and single breaker has been envisaged. Provision of Bus Coupler has also been made. The outdoor switchyard shall be connected to the generator transformers through 400 KV cables passing through cable trenches of suitable size, space requirement of Switchyard will be app. 220m x 180mtrs.

8. 50

ESTABLISHMENT The electrical works of the project are proposed to be completed with in 4 years time. Accordingly, the provision of regular establishment required for to carry out electrical works in this time frame has been made in the estimate. The design procurement, inspection, erection and commissioning of electrical works of the project shall be done departmentally.

PARA 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3.1 8.3.2 8.3.3 8.3.4 8.3.4.1 8.3.4.2 8.3.4.3 8.3.4.4 8.3.4.5 8.3.4.6 8.3.4.7 8.3.4.8 8.3.4.9 8.3.4.10 8.4 8.4.1 8.4.2 8.4.3 8.4.4 8.4.5 8.4.6 8.4.7 8.4.8 8.4.9 8.5

DESCRIPTION POWER EVACUATION POWER EVACUATION ARRANGEMENT TRANSMISSION OF POWER ELECTRO-MECHANICAL WORKS. GENERAL SCOPE POWER HOUSE. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TURBINES GOVERNOR MAIN INLET VALVES COOLING WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM. POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY DRAINAGE DRAINAGE AND DEWATERING SYSTEM COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM OIL SYSTEM VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING POWER HOUSE CRANE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT GENERATOR EXCITATION SYSTEM GENERATOR SWITCH GEAR AND CONNECTING CABLES. GENERATOR TRANSFORMERS CONTROL AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT STATION SERVICE/AUXILIARY SUPPLY POWER PLANT GROUNDING LIGHTING SWITCH YARD AND SWITCHING SCHEME ESTABLISHMENT

PAGE VIII-1 VIII-1 VIII-1 VIII-1 VIII-1 TO VIII-2 VIII-3 VIII-2 TO VIII-3 VIII-3 VIII-3 VIII-4 VIII-4 VIII-5 VIII-5 VIII-5 VIII-5 TO VIII-6 VIII-6 VIII-6 VIII-6 VIII-6 VIII-6 TO VIII-7 VIII-7 VIII-8 VIII-8 VIII-8 TO VIII-9 VIII-9 VIII-9 VIII-9 VIII-10 VIII-10

CHAPTER - IX
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

9.0

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The proposed Chamba Hydel Project envisages diversion of tail waters of Chamera stage- II HEP (300 MW) near Chamba town in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh. The silt free inflows will be further carried to surge tank 100 m high, 20.5 m diameter through 6.5 m dia circular head race tunnel 10.32 km long. From surge tank the inflows will be carried to power house located on the right bank of Ravi river near village Rajpura through a 5.3 m dia penstock trifurcating near the power house to feed 3 numbers vertical axis francis turbine units. The installed capacity will be 42 MW each utilising a design discharge of 127 cumecs and net head of 110 m. The water shall be further discharged to Ravi river through a tail race channel

9.1 9.2.1 9.2.1.1

DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT PHYSICAL RESOURCE HYDROLOGY The area in question is drained mainly by Ravi river. A large number of nallahas drain directly in to the Ravi river. In the proposed project area, Sarontha Nallah and Sal Nallah drains into the Ravi river.

IX 9.2.1.2 GEOLOGY

The area from the confluence of Suil river with the Ravi river south of Bhalai-Koti-Pukhri-Masrund-Kiani, between Chamba-Braur along the Saho Nallha and between Chamba-Gehra- Chatrari along Ravi river is underlain by the interstratified sequence of slate, phyllite, Schist, siltstone, quartzite of the Vaikrita Group. The conglomerate of the Manjir Formation is exposed south of Manjir, a little east of Masrund, between Baraur-Saho and east of the Saho and east of Balu nallah with Ravi River , north of Gehra. Further east Masrund, east of Saho and east of Balu nullah the area is underlain by carbonaceous slate, phyllite, Schistone quartzite, siltstone, limestone/magnesite of the Katarigali Formation. The basic volcanics (Panjal Formation) is exposed as linear belt east of Masrund and Saho and show closure upstream of Kiri nallah. Further east, the carbonaceous shale, state siltstone, phyllite, quartzite and limestone of the Salooni Formation are exposed and show closure upstream of Kiri nallah east of Saho. The Kalhel Chhatri area is dominated by the limestone of kalhel Formation which show closure north of Saho around ShillaGharat area.Further east, the area is underlain by the rocks of Katarigali Formation. Then a big stretch of area extending from a little south of Mangla and Mehla along the higher reaches bordering Kangra District is underlain by granite gneiss and granite. Further west of Rajnagar towards Bhalai, these granites extend as narrow belt. The lithology of this formation is predominantly characterised by intersbedded grey to green malasilt stone, quartzite, slate, phyllite and greywake. In Sangned area, this formation is exposed in a series of low plunging anticlines and synclines with fold axes trending in NW-SE direction. The slate bear limonitic encrustations due to leaching of ferruginous matter. The schist in general consists of quartz, sericite, biotite and chlorite . Chlorite at places is developed as an altered product of

IX -

biotite. Because of highly foliated and jointed rocks, water may penetrate leading to weathering and formation of soil. 9.2.1.3 SOIL No detailed work on soil classification has been carriedout by Geological Survey of India. However, following generalisation can be made regarding the possibility of formation of different type of soils. The area underlain by sand stone, quartzite, siltstone yield sandy soils, those underlain by slate, phyllite, schist or by granite and gneiss yield clayey to sandy clayey soil, while those underlain by a lime stone shale lithoassemblages yield a loamy soil. On the southern aspects, the soil tends to be shallow and dry with numerous out crops of bare rocks. 9.2.2 9.2.2.1 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCE FORESTS The character of the underlying rocks/soil influences the composition of the forest vegetation and its evolution. The intake site of the project is almost barren. There are a few Chil saplings and some bushes. At the site of power house, the land to be used is mostly private. Just below the temple, some forest land will be involved. This land has very poor vegetation. Mainly Dodonia, Thor and some chil plants are present. Drek is also seen. The surface above the head race tunnel is also sparsely covered. There is no natural forest in this area. The sparse vegetation seen is mainly plantation raised by the Forest Department under various schemes. The species is predominantly Chil. The reasons for poor vegetation is attributed to shallow unstable soil and lack of moisture.

IX 9.2.2.2 FLORA AND FAUNA The area of the proposed project is almost barren to sparsely covered. There are almost no natural forests. Most of the vegetation is planted. Some natural associates have also come up. There is practically no wild life in the area.

Some important plant species (tree, shrub and herbs) found in the area and vicinity are as under: S.N. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.3 9.3.1 Common Name Chil Drek Mehndu Basuti Ramban Kasmal Kasmal Datura Botanical name Pinus roxburghii Melia azadirachta Dodonia viscosa Adhatoda vasica Agave americana Burberis aristata Burberis vulgaris Datura metel

BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS CLIMATE AND TEMPERATURE The climate is in general temperate with well marked seasons. However, there are local variations depending up on altitude and other aspect. The places at higher elevation and on northern aspects are colder than those situated at lower elevation and on southern aspects. The winter lasts from December to February (both months inclusive). March and April are generally cool and bright. The temperature begins to rise rapidly from middle of April to last week of June or first week of July when monsoon breaks. Monsoon continues till the end of August. or middle of September. October and November are comparatively dry but cold.

IX 9.3.1.1

Average Rainfall (mm) and Snowfall (mm) data of 3 stationsMasrund, Kalhel and Bakani.

Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Masrund- Elev 1550 m Rainfall 51.8 109.2 156.8 55.4 26.0 41.8 96.2 143.8 81.5 12.7 2.5 48.8 Snowfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kalhel- Elev 1200 m Rainfall 50.6 140.5 197.7 54.2 75.8 83.1 222.1 139.0 75.7 37.1 9.1 51.9 Snowfall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bakani- Elv 1220 m Rainfall 93.3 166.4 209.9 103.7 98.5 82.3 217.2 195.0 115.7 21.4 32.8 87.4 Snowfall 93.3 75.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73.0

Air, Water, Soil and Sound data will be collected at the time of doing detailed EIA. Since this is pre feasibility report, this has not been done at this stage. 9.4 9.4.1 ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IMPACT IDENTIFICATION Environmental impacts both direct and indirect on various environmental attributes due to Chamba Hydropower project in the surrounding environment, during construction & operational Phase are discussed. 9.4.1.1 IMPACT IDENTIFICATION DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

IX -

The impacts due to the construction of Chamba HEP and power house installation commence from the exploration activities, construction of tunnels and approach roads, etc., and may continue up to generation of hydel power, with the nature and extent of impacts varying throughout the stage of project development. Activities like site preparation, approach roads, excavation, drilling, blasting, foundations, tunneling, deployment of machinery, erection, transportation, dumping are taken up during construction phase. The likely impacts on the environment due to these activities are listed in the table. Tunneling and foundation works will involve land excavation, filling and concrete works affecting environment by noise and dust pollution. Structural, deployment of machinery, approach roads construction and erection work will also result in dust, noise pollution and vehicular traffic. Material handling and transportation may significantly increase noise pollution. The main problem will be posed by the muck generated by excavation of Tunnel. The labour for various activities during the construction phase shall be engaged from the surrounding villages. Some essential services are also required to be provided. This will have an impact on drinking water supply and sanitary facilities. Economy of the nearby area will be improved due to increased job opportunities with corresponding increase in income. Other associated business activities like transport, hotels, consumer goods etc., will also be benefited. The major environmental parameters likely to be effected during construction phase are noise, dust pollution and sanitation. Water spraying during high dust will minimise the dust level to some extent. A proper temporary housing with water supply and sanitation for workers will be

IX -

planned. The effect due to construction phase is however, of temporary in nature and has no permanent effect on environment. Construction Phase Activity Potential Environmental Impact Negligible Dust emission and change in traffic intensity. Soil erosion, run off, increase in traffic, Dust emission Dust, visual and noise pollution Dust and noise pollution Dust, noise and visual impact. Muck generation, Dust, soil erosion, waste water generation and noise Muck generation, Dust, noise and health hazards Dust, noise and visual Dust, noise and visual

Clearing and grading Temporary facilities, such as, sheds approach roads, sanitary facilities. Earth work comprising of Site work / providing other excavation and trenches. facilities. Foundation work, piling and construction of check dams. Construction of permanent structures like roads, colony etc Mechanical erection and utility systems. Excavation Construction of approach roads, tunneling works and construction of under ground Power Station Drilling and blasting Dumping Transportation

9.4.1.2

IMPACT IDENTIFICATION DURING OPERATIONAL PHASE There would be little environmental and ecological changes during the operational phase. The main activities that may cause environmental impact on the surrounding environment during project execution and after completion are: i. ii. Transportation of excessive solid waste material (muck) Dumping of solid waste material

iii. Removal of temporary facilities, cleaning etc.

IX -

During the project completion, the likely potential environmental impacts are due to dust and noise. Operation Phase Release of water Down stream flow variation Accumulation of back water Accumulation of water Activity Potential Environmental Impact Down stream erosion of River bank and bottom Impairment of water quality Silting in the area of accumulation will be negligible as the source is silt free water

9.4.2

PREDICTION OF IMPACTS The impact during the construction of Chamba HEP on environment (air, water, noise, land etc. are predicted in this section. The construction activity may cause some adverse impacts on the surrounding environment unless proper environmental management plan is adopted.

9.4.2.1

IMPACT ON AIR ENVIRONMENT. Considerable amount of air pollution will be caused during different stages of construction of tunnels, roads and other operations such as excavation, drilling, blasting, loading and transportation of material. Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) is the main pollutant during construction. Lot of the dust arises from drilling, blasting, excavation, crushing and transportation operations. Large quantities of dust become wind borne and are carried away from overburden dumps. The fugitive dust released during the construction activities may cause immediate effect on the construction workers who are directly exposed to the fugitive dust. Vegetation will also be adversely affected as deposition of dust on the leaves will choke the photosynthesis activity, which, in turn, will have

IX -

adverse effect on the health of the plants. However, the dust does not travel to longer distance because the project site is located in between hills and V-shaped valleys. 9.4.2.2 IMPACT ON NOISE ENVIRONMENT The noise will be generated at the time of construction of barrage, powerhouse, tunnel operations, pumps, drilling machines, dumpers, etc. Continuous exposure of workers to high level of noise may result in annoyance, fatigue, and may cause temporary shift of threshold limit of hearing and even permanent loss of hearing. During operational phase, noise level will be increased due to trouncing machinery and vehicular movement in the area. However, these impacts are only localised. 9.4.2.3 IMPACT ON WATER ENVIRONMENT During the construction of tunnel, and power house surface water (river water) may get polluted due to the generation of large quantities of suspended particulate matter at the time of transportation of muck and waste water (sewage) coming from temporary arrangements like offices, labour camp sheds, etc., 9.4.2.4 IMPACTS ON FLORA AND FAUNA It has already been mentioned that the area involved has very sparse vegetation. There is practically no wild life in the area. There is no Wild Life Sanctuary or National Park in the Project area. Every Plant species and wild life species whether mammal, bird, reptile, aquatic or amphibian plays an important role in the maintenance of balance of nature and are useful to mankind in many ways. Every

IX - 10 individual animal, bird or insect has been endowed with certain specific protective measures so that it can protect itself and reproduce, thus ensuring the existence of the species. However, the project activities will not have any significant effect on the Forest and Wild Life except for removal of bare minimum number of trees. However, Compensatory afforestation will be done as per the general stipulations given by the Govt of India MOEF at the time of sanction of diversion of Forest land 9.5 R & R ASPECTS Since the Project is using tail race water, there is no storage, therefore, there is no submergence. Hence, no dwellings, houses or hamlets will be submerged. So, no displacement and resettlement is involved. 9.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (MITIGATION MEASURES) Environmental Management Plan (EMP) aims at the preservation of ecological system by considering certain mitigating measures at the proposed site. The mitigation measures are used to minimize or prevent adverse impacts on environment due to the proposed development activity. Some of the major criteria governing the environmental measures will be adopted, and the same is described in the following paragraphs. 9.6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT The EMP is required to ensure sustainable development in the study area of 10 Km radius of the proposed Chamba HEP site. Government regulating agencies like State Pollution Control Board working in the

IX - 11 region and more importantly the people living in the area need to extend their co-operation and contribution in this direction. It is expected that the study area shall not be affected adversely with the proposed activity and likely to get new economical fillip due to hydel power generation, not only for the study area but also for the region as a whole. The majority of the environmental impact pertains to the construction phase. It is planned to take corrective measures to ensure that these effects are kept to bare minimum. The EMP will therefore, be initiated during planning stage itself. Since the Project is utilising the tail race water of existing project Chamera Stage II, water from open catchment is not being utilised. Hence, Catchment Area Treatment Plan does not appear to be prepared. A case will be required to be moved to Govt of India requesting exemption from CAT Plan. 9.6.1.1 9.6.1.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL STAGE SITE PREPARATION Dust emission (fugitive) and solid waste will be generated during initial site preparation activity and there will be slight increase in the noise levels around the site. The environmental impacts during the site clearing or clearing for site preparation will be temporary, localised and negligible. Water sprays at appropriate location will be provided for dust suppression, hence reducing the impacts. Solid waste will be disposed off along with the muck at the designated sites. MANAGEMENT AT CONSTRUCTION

IX - 12 9.6.1.1.2 CONSTRUCTION AIR ENVIRONMENT As discussed earlier, construction of Chamba HEP and powerhouse activities will generate large quantities of dust during drilling, blasting, loading and transportation operations. The following measures are required be taken to mitigate the fugitive dust from different operations. To avoid the dust generation from the drilling operations, wetdrilling methods will be adopted. Ceasing dust -generating activities during high winds Covering of vehicles carrying solid waste (muck). Watering of haul roads and other roads at regular intervals Plantation near muck disposal places and dumping yards. NOISE ENVIRONMENT The major noise-generating sources from the proposed activity are working machinery, blasting and movement of vehicles. The following control measures are to be undertaken to bring down the noise levels. Traffic (vehicular movement) to be managed to produce a smooth flow instead of a noisier stop -and start flow. Ensuring timely preventive maintenance of the equipment involved. Since a well maintained equipment is generally quieter than poorly maintained equipment. Ensuring usage of personal protective devices i.e., earmuffs and earplugs by workers, working in high noise activity centers. Plantation in the vicinity of the construction area will further reduce the noise levels.

IX - 13 WATER ENVIRONMENT During construction phase, the wastewater (sewage) coming from temporary arrangements like offices, labour camp sheds, canteens etc., and impact due to soil erosion during monsoon period may cause surface water pollution. Some of the control measures adopted for controlling water pollution are as follows: Establishing septic tanks followed by soak pits to treat the domestic waste water generated from the offices, canteens , labour camp sheds. Construction of Check dams /rock fill dams, wherever necessary to reduce siltation and suspended solids. GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT (COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION) Afforestation is proposed to be done in open areas with moderate slope. This has to be supplemented with engineering/vegetative works like gully plugging and check dams etc where ever required. The planting area should be protected against grazing, lopping quarrying etc. For proper protection, it is necessary that the area is fenced and the fence is maintained properly. Plants need to be protected till they attain a height, which is above grazing level. MUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN The quantity of muck generated will be very high and management of this muck is very important. The detailed EIA/ EMP which shall be carried

IX - 14 later on will take care of this aspect in detail. The management plan should give design and details of each muck disposal site. Cement Concrete structure should be preferred instead of Wire Crate. 9.7 REPORT OF SATELLITE DATA ANALYSIS BY NRSA STUDY BACKGROUND Central Electricity Authority (CEA) under Ministry of Power, Govt. of India has earlier identified 399 potential hydroelectric sites in the country with an installed capacity of 1,07,000 Megawatt (MW). With a view to preparing an action plan to develop this hydroelectric potential and prioritizing the implementation of hydro-electric projects, a Ranking Study was taken up by the CEA in 2001. This Ranking Study identified 162 most potential sites with a total installed capacity of 50,560 MW for development. Preparation of Pre-Feasibility Reports (PFR) of these 162 sites has been initiated by the CEA in 2002 with works entrusted to a number of Consultants, namely, National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC), North Eastern Electric Power Corporation (NEEPCO), Water And Power Consultancy Services India Limited (WAPCOS), Satluj Jal Vidut Nigam Limited ( SVJNL) , Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board ( HPSEB), Uttaranchal Jal Vidut Nigam Limited ( UJVNL) and Kerala Power Corporation Limited ( KPCL) with time target of completion of the whole exercise by September 2003. To oversee the progress of the PFRs preparation in time and with full cooperation of the Central Government agencies, a Central Coordination Committee consisting of Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Central Water Commission (CWC), India Meteorological Department (IMD), Ministry of Environment & Forest, Survey of India, Geological Survey of India (GSI) and National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) was constituted by the CEA with Member

9.7.1

IX - 15 (Hydro-power) as its Chairman. The Committee is sitting periodically in presence of the representatives of the Consultants to take stock of the completion of the studies. One of the mandates of PFR preparation is Initial Environmental Study with respect to each of the 162 proposed sites using satellite remote sensing data. As is well known in India and elsewhere in the world, space technology plays a very important role in terrain mapping and scientific assessment of the ground condition at speed, and is ideally suitable for inaccessible mountainous regions where majority of these hydroelectric dam/diversion sites are located. Computer processing of satellite digital data of the dam / diversion sites and their immediate environ provides wealth of information for preparation of the Pre-Feasibility Reports. The Potential of this technology was amply demonstrated in the preliminary ranking study of the 81 proposed hydro-electric sites in Indus Basin completed by NRSA in October 2001 on behalf of CEA. In view of this, NRSA has been approached by a number of consultants, namely, NHPC and HPSEB to take up Initial Environmental Studies in respect of 37 proposed hydropower sites located in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Madhya Pradesh using most recent satellite remote sensing data. NRSA in the recent month 9 Jan-May 2004) has completed initial environmental studies with respect to 6 hydro-electric schemes located in Chenab river basin for HPSEB, Sundernagar. Further, HPSEB has requested NRSA for similar studies for additional two sites viz. Chamba and Bajoli Holi in Ravi river basin. This Report deals with Chamba hydro-power site.

IX - 16 9.7.2 OBJECTIVE Principal objective of the satellite based study is to acquire Indian Remote Sensing satellites (IRS 1C/1D) LISS-III and PAN sensor digital data of the hydro-power sites and to make quick analysis of these data in terms of estimation of the submergence area at proposed Full Reservoir Level (FRL) and mapping of land use - land cover information within and in immediate surrounding of the proposed submergence area as inputs for Initial Environmental Study (IES) of the Pre-Feasibility Report. The specific objectives and scope of the study are: To estimate the area of submergence at proposed FRL of the proposed hydro-power sites

To analyse the satellite data for identifying broad land-use and landcover categories like agricultural land, forest land, barren land, scrub land, water bodies, settlements, infrastructural features (roads and bridges) and to estimate the area under each of the categories within and in immediate surrounding of the proposed submergence area at FRL.

9.7.3

SALIENT FEATURES OF THE CHAMBA HYDRO-POWER SITE Proposed hydro-power site is located at Chamba in Ravi River Basin in Himachal Pradesh falling in Survey of India topo sheets No.52 D/2, 52 D/3. The proposed project scheme at Chamba envisages construction of a diversion structure on Ravi river, and a power house. The Head-Race Tunnel from the dam to the power house is proposed to be 12 km in length. The river water will be diverted through the Head-Race tunnel to the Power House for hydro-power generation.

IX - 17

The geographic location of Intake and Power House for this hydro-power site is given here : Intake Latitude : Longitude: 9.7.4 32 31 N 76 09 E Power House 32 37 N 76 06 E

SATELLITE DATA USED Indian Remote Sensing Satellite, IRS-ID LISS III and PAN sensors data of 21st February 2002 covering the study site were procured from the NRSA Data Centre (NDC) after intensive browsing of the available satellite data for cloud-free and radiometric suitability. IRS-1d covers the study site by satellite geo-reference number Path 94 and Row 48. These data are geometrically and radiometrically corrected digital data products which can be used readily in Window based image analysis platform.

9.7.5

BRIEF METHODOLOGY OF SATELLITE DATA ANALYSIS Image processing and analysis was done using ERDAS Imagine image analysis software in Windows platform. Satellite data of IRS 1D LISS III sensor provides 23.5 m spatial resolution and PAN sensor provides 5.8m spatial resolution. The two sensor data were geocoded and digitally merged using IHS transformation technique. Baseline information layers (like rivers/ streams) and infrastructural features (like roads and bridges), settlements / villages were initially interpreted on the digital image scene. Subsequently, image classification technique was performed to obtain the land use-land cover categories of the study area. Output maps were composed in the image processing system which provide the land-use / land-cover information along with other interpreted

IX - 18 information such as roads, settlements etc., within the 7 Km radius from the intake site. The location of the diversion structure and power house from the index map provided by HPSEB, Sundernagar was superimposed on the satellite data as well as on the land use - land cover map. Area statistics of different land-use and land-cover categories were generated within the 7 km radius circle from the diversion point on the river. Since the proposed Chamba HEP is run of the river type scheme with no pondage area ( confined to river course only), the satellite data analysis is restricted to the 7 km radius circle around the diversion structure. 9.7.6 OUTPUTS PROVIDED Based on the analysis of satellite data and other available ancillary

information, the following outputs were generated : Map 1 (a) Shows IRS 1 D PAN + LISS III merged satellite image of 21st February 2002 on 1:50,000 scale covering 7 km radius from the dam site overlaid with FRL , location of dam site and power house. Map 1(b) Shows satellite derived land-use and land-cover map on 1:50,000 scale covering 7 km radius from the dam site overlaid with FRL, location of dam site and power house. Land use /land cover map shows the following categories : Forest (High Dense Forest), Agricultural Land, Open Scrub, Barren, Snow, River Course/ Dry River Bed. Map 1(d) Shows the location of the National parks / Wildlife

Sanctuaries vis--vis the location of the dam/ Power House and 7 km radius from the location of diversion structure .

IX - 19

Table.1 Land-use and land-cover Information within the 7 Km Radius from the Diversion structure at Chamba
S.No Landuse-landcover Category Total Area ( ha) 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. High Dense Forest Open Scrub Barren Agricultural Area Settlements Snow River Course including dry river bed Total area 9.7.7 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 15393 SATELLITE BASED 100.00 INITIAL 3374 4043 6543 1099 159 32 143 % of the total area 21.92 26.27 42.51 7.14 1.03 0.21 0.93

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Present analysis is done for the 7 km radius area from the diversion structure ( 7 Km radius) proposed on Ravi river for the development of hydropower. Since the proposed HEP is run of the river scheme, there is no additional area ( submergence are is nil) is submerged other than the river course. Hence, the submergence area is nil. This is a positive sign for the development of the proposed HES.

IX - 20 It is observed that the land-use and land-cover in 7 km radius area surrounding of the proposed diversion structure dominated by barren land which is 6543 ha( 42.51 % ) followed by Open scrub / scattered plantations which is 4043 ha ( 26.27 %) High dense forest is found be in an area extent of 3374ha ( 21.92%) . Agricultural area is present to an extent of 1099 ha scattered mostly along the valley portions of Ravi river and its tributaries. Based on the satellite data, identifiable clusters of settlements were mapped and the area is found to be 159ha. In addition to this, it is found from the satellite data that numerous isolated settlements are present and well spread across the 7 km radius area. It is observed that the concentration of the settlements is high along the roads. There are no surface water bodies other than the river course. The area under river course including dry river bed is estimated to be 143ha. In the absence of available information from other sources about the existence and spatial extent of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries, best efforts were made to collect information from the Internet. The information available in website of United Nations Environment programme World Conservation Monitoring Center (http://www.unepwcmc.org) regarding Himachal Pradesh State and its National Parks / Wild Sanctuaries, were browsed through. The information at hand is made use in preparing map 1(c) which depicts the latitude and longitude of proposed diversion structure and sanctuaries/national parks. 7 km radius circle around the diversion point is plotted and the radial distance to the various national park/ sanctuary were estimated around the nearest national park/ sanctuary which are of significant only are measured on the map 1(c). The following points are observed NO national park is observed to be located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed hydro electric scheme.

IX - 21 The nearest sanctuaries are Gamgul Saihbehi, Kalatop & Khajjiar, Pong Dam, Kugti which are at a distance of 35 Km, 53km and 55 km and 59 km respectively whose sizes in terms of aerial extent are in the figure 1(c). Since the present scheme does not envisage any submergence are ( run of the river scheme), generally it is least likely to have any significant effect on these sanctuaries. However, the power house of the proposed HES is 12 km away from the western direction from the diversion point. The Gamgul Saihbehi sanctuary is also observed to be located in the same direction at 35 km which is 10885 ha in spatial extent, in the absence of the exact spatial distribution of this sanctuary it is recommended that a detailed analysis may be carried out. 9.7.8 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Since the submergence area is nil, there is no major problem of rehabilitation and reconstruction aspects involved in development of this site. This is a positive sign for taking this site further up for detailed investigations. The area is highly inhabited and major settlements are spread across the area. Hence , a detailed study on socio-economic impact of the proposed HES may be carried out. The immediate vicinity of the proposed diversion structure is mostly consists of barren and open scrub land with isolated plantations and trees. It is also observed that there exists a dense forest to the tune of 21.92 %. Agricultural crops area is also observed to be significant ( 7.10%) in the immediate vicinity.

IX - 22

Since there is no submergence area proposed for the development of hydropower site , and also the nearest sanctuaries are Gamgul Saihbehi, Kalatop & Khajjiar, Pong Dam, Kugti which are at a distance of 35 Km, 53km and 55 km and 59 km, there may not be any significant impact of development of hydropower site on these sanctuaries. However, a detailed analysis with respect to Gamgul Saihbehi is recommended.

IX - 23

IX - 24

PARA 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4

DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT PHYSICAL RESOURCE BASE LINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESMENT AND EVALUATION

PAGE IX-I IX-I IX-2 TO IX-4 IX-4 TO IX-5 IX-5 TO IX-10

9.5 9.6

R & R ASPECTS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (MITIGATION MEASURES)

IX-I0 IX-I0 TO IX-14

9.7

REPORT OF SATELLITE DATA ANALYSIS BY NRSA

IX-14

TO IX-22

PLATE 9.1

IRS 1D PAN +LISS III MERGED SATELLITE IMAGE OF 21


ST

IX-23

FEB. 2002 IX-24

PLATE 9.2

LANDUSE- LAND COVER MAP SHOWING THE SURROUNDINGS OF PROPOSED DIVERSION SITE AT CHAMBA

PLATE 9.3

MAP OF NATIONAL PARKS/ SANCTUARIES AND THE LOCATION OF CHAMBA HYDROPOWER SITE AND 7 KM RADIUS CIRCLE FROM DIVERSION SITE

IX-25

IX - 25

CHAPTER X
INFRASTRUCTURE

10.0

IDENTIFICATION OF THE BROAD INFRASTRUCTURAL REQUIREMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT Chamba Hydel Project is situated in Chamba Distt. of Himachal Pradesh. The intake site is about 10 km. u/s of Chamba town about 120 Kms. from Pathankot, which is approachable through all weather road up to Chamba by state highway. Power House site is approachable by a link road about 10 km down stream on Chamba-Tissa road near village Rajpura. Adequate provision for residential and non-residential buildings with necessary amenities has been made for construction and design staff proposed for the project. Workshop, stores, POL pumps, explosive magazine and other infrastructural facilities have also been provided in the estimate. Necessary provision for telecommunication, medical , educational facilities and safety /security measures have also been made in the report. All infrastructure facilities proposed for this project have been shown in Drg. No. Chamba- PR-11

10.1 10.1.1

ROADS GENERAL A total of about 19 km. length of (5/7m. wide) road shall be needed to

connect the existing motorable road with the various project components and job facilities. The widening of existing roads for total length of 10 kms., has also been proposed.

X-

10.1.2

PROJECT ROADS

Approach road 5/7 m. wide, 19 Km. long will connect different work sites of the project with the existing motorable road. The following roads have been proposed. 1. 2. 3. Proposed road to intake area, Surge shaft, spill tunnel and power house Proposed road to adits of HRT & aqueduct on Sal nallah Proposed road from main road to colony, dumping areas & quarry site etc. Total 4. Widening of existing motorable road from Chamba to power house site Total 5. 6. Provision of R..C.C. bridge on river Ravi near power house site Provision of suspension bridge near aqueduct on Sal Nallah = 1 No. = 1 No. = = 10.00 km. 10.00 km. = = 8.00 km. 19.00 km. = 7.00 km = 4.00 km.

10.2

BUILDINGS It is proposed to construct permanent residential and non-residential buildings for this project at village Rajpura in private land/Govt. land. The existing HPSEB workshop, offices and other buildings at Chamba and Bhuri Singh Complex may also be made available for use in this project.

X10.2.1 COLONY AT SUNDERNAGAR

A permanent residential/non-residential complex for design organization will be constructed at Sundernagar. The same can be used for monitoring/planning and liaison purpose after the completion of the project. 10.2.2 COLONY AT VILLAGE RAJPURA Residential / non-residential colony for the construction of the project is proposed to be constructed at village Rajpura which is about 12 km from Chamba and 2.00 km. from power house. Labour huts, stores and field offices will be constructed near the project components on the available small terraces. 10.2.3 OFFICE BUILDING FOR OUTLET SIDE WORKS Office building for the construction of power house complex, penstock, surge shaft and tunnel from outlet end is proposed on the terrace available near village Rajpura. 10.2.4 SCHOOL & HOSPITAL Adequate provision of buildings for Hospital, school etc. has been made in the project estimate under Sub-Head K-buildings to cater for construction force. First aid posts shall be provided at all project sites. 10.2.5 FIELD HOSTEL & REST HOUSE Field hostel is proposed to be constructed in the project area near residential colony. Existing HPSEB Rest House at Chamba may also be used for the project execution.

X10.3 DUMP AREA

The muck of open & underground excavation shall be dumped in dump areas identified at each project component site. The dumping area for power house muck may be proposed at 1.0 km upstream from power house. Dump areas chosen will be located much above the river/nallah banks and provided with suitable retaining walls etc. Bull dozers shall be deployed in dump areas for spreading and compaction of dumped material. 10.4 JOB FACILTIES Flat terraces available near the project components wherever possible shall be utilized for job facilities like stacking of construction material, D.G. sets, truck, trailers, cement carriers, road rollers and site office, stores etc. 10.5 QUARRY SITES The material in the river bed may be suitable their suitability for manufacturing aggregate. 10.6 10.6.1 TELECOMMUNICATION INTERNAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM It is proposed to have an independent telephone exchange for this project. All important work sites, offices within the project area will be connected by internal telephones. A 50-lines capacity private automatic exchange (PBX) for the project, will be provided . 10.6.2 EXTERNAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM Telecommunication link between project sites and outside places will be Post & Telegraph for aggregate. Rock from

different quarries in the vicinity of the project will also be tested, to assess

provided by existing communication net work of

X-

Department connected to the nearest P&T exchange at Chamba. This system would be operated and maintained by P&T Department on rental basis. Power Line Communication Carrier (PLCC) system is also proposed for the project. 10.7 WIRELESS SYSTEM On the pattern of other ongoing hydel projects in H.P., fixed type VHF Wireless link is proposed to be provided between project sites and design office at Sundernagar, which will be further connected to existing wireless system of HPSEB at Shimla. 10.8 PLANT AREAS Plant areas at different sites of work have been proposed near respective sites. It is proposed to install two nos central aggregate crushing, processing and classification plants near quarry site proposed at power house site and intake site which will fulfill the requirements of aggregates for intake works, powerhouse site, HRT, surge shaft, penstock and appurtenant works. An adequate capacity batching and mixing plant will be installed near intake to cater the requirements of concrete for all inlet side works including tunnel lining. Other batching and mixing plant of adequate capacity will be provided near power house site for concreting work in power house complex , penstock, head race tunnel and surge shaft. Central compressor houses will be located near tunnel portal to meet up the requirements of the compressed air. 10.9 FIELD WORKSHOP The existing HPSEB workshop at Chamba will be utilized for this project on job order basis. More workshops/repair shops are proposed to be established

Xnear intake site & power house site as per requirement. 10.10 CONSTRUCTION POWER

Requirement of construction power will be met from existing transmission net work in the area by suitably augmenting the same to meet requirement of the project at various sites. Necessary provision for providing construction power lines and distribution system, has been made in the project estimate. Adequate provision for stand by diesel generating sets has been made in the project estimate to meet up power requirements in the event of power failures, shutdowns / breakdowns etc. 10.11 SAFETY Safety is an essential job requirement for a highly mechanized work set up. Adequate provision for fire fighting arrangements and security arrangements has been made in the project estimate by way of police post/check-post and check barriers etc. Fencing of the project area workshops stores, offices, plant areas, colony and other job facilities has been proposed to check the pilferages etc. Adequate safety/preventive measures against accidents are proposed to be taken in accordance with the following Indian Standard Codes: IS: IS 4756 3996 For safety in tunneling work. For scaffolds and ladders.

(Part I&II) IS: IS: IS: 3764 4081 4138 For excavation work. For blasting and related drilling operations. For working in compressed air.

X-

X-

PARA 10.0

DESCRIPTION IDENTIFICATION OF THE BROAD INFRASTRUCTURAL REQUIREMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT

PAGE X-1

10.1 10.1.1 10.1.2 10.2 10.2.1 10.2.2 10.2.3 10.2.4 10.2.5 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.6.1 10.6.2 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11

ROADS GENERAL PROJECT ROADS BUILDINGS COLONY AT SUNDERNAGAR COLONY AT VILLAGE CHAMBA OFFICE COMPLEX FOR OUTLET SIDE WORKS SCHOOL & HOSPITAL FIELD HOSTEL AND REST HOUSE DUMP AREA JOB FACILITIES QUARRY SITES TELECOMMUNICATION INTERNAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM EXTERNAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM WIRELESS SYSTEM PLANT AREA FIELD WORKSHOP CONSTRUCTION POWER SAFETY

X-1 X-1 X-2 X-2 X-3 X-3 X-3 X-3 X-3 X-4 X-4 X-4 X-4 X-4 X-4 TO X-5 X-5 X-5 X-5 TO X-6 X-6 X-6

CHAPTER XI
CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE

11.0 11.1

CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE GENERAL APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF PROJECT COMPONENTS

11.1.1 11.1.2

CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY & EQUIPMENT PLANNING GENERAL Chamba Hydel Project is a run of the river scheme in Chamba District of H.P envisages utilization of 127 cumecs of design discharge and 130 m of gross head to generate 126 MW of power. Intake structure is about 10 km. u/s of Chamba town and power house about 2.00 km d/s of Rajpura village has been proposed. The project comprises following main civil structures: Intake shaft Head Race Tunnel Surge Shaft Pressure Shaft / Penstock Power House Tail race channel

11.1.3

COMPLETION TIME AND AVAILABLE WORKING SEASON Construction programme, selection of methodology and equipment have been planned with the aim of commissioning of the project in four and

half years. Available working season in a year shall be of 12 months for all works, and eight months for the works in the river bed. 11.1.4 APPROACH ROAD AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT A total of about 19 Km road (5/7 m wide) shall be needed to connect the existing motorable road with the project components i.e. Adits to HRT, surge shaft area, power house, colony area, dump areas and other facilities. 11.1.5 11.1.5.1 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL CEMENT ACC cement factory located at Barmana in Distt. Bilaspur (HP), on NH21 and at a distance of 350 Kms from the project site shall be the main source of cement for meeting the entire cement requirement of the project. Bagged cement shall be transported in trucks and stored in project stores at different sites. 11.1.5.2 STEEL SAIL stockyard at Jalandhar, 250 Kms. from main project store, shall be the main source of structural and reinforcement/ tor. steel. Sizeable quantities of reinforcement steel and structural steel shall have to be stocked and replenished regularly. Penstock steel plates if not available indigenously however, may have to be imported to suit the design specifications. 11.1.5.3 AGGREGATE The material in the river bed may be suitable for aggregate, however, the same has to be got tested at detailed investigation stage.

Rock from different quarries in the vicinity of the project may also be got identified and tested, to assess their suitability for manufacturing aggregate. Rock extracted from the quarries as well as from tunnel will be crushed and classified to various sizes of aggregate in batching and mixing plant one near the intake site and other near power house ( for excavated material from tunnel). 11.1.6 STORES, LUBRICATION & WORK SHOP The Petrol/diesel pumps, explosives magazine, workshops and other

construction facilities shall be provided to facilitate execution of the project. While central stores for storage of cement, T&P articles, steel yard as well as timber yard and main workshop shall be provided . Site stores and field workshops will be established near respective sites. Petrol/diesel pump shall be established near the power house site. 11.1.7 AGGREGATE PROCESSING PLANTS Two aggregate crushing classification and sand manufacturing plants shall be installed near intake and power house site and 2 nos. batching and mixing plants shall be located near Power house & intake site respectively. 11.1.8 PLANT AREAS Plant areas for locating air compressor house, cement, aggregate, T&P, stores and water storage tanks etc., shall be located near each site of work. 11.1.9 DUMP AREAS The muck of underground excavation shall be dumped in dump areas located within 1 km to 4.5 km from each portal. Dump areas for surface excavation in surge shaft shall be at a maximum distance of 1 km and power house area at a distance of 1.50 km. Dump areas chosen shall be

located much above the river/nallah banks and provided with suitable retaining walls etc. Bull dozers shall be deployed in dump areas for spreading and compaction of dumped material. 11.1.10 PRE-CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES Pre construction facilities such as land acquisition for labour huts, plant areas, stores, residential and non residential buildings, approach roads, construction of bridges and explosive magazine in the area shall be made available to facilitate construction of the project. 11.1.11 EQUIPMENT PROVISION Since main works of the project are proposed to be executed on contract basis except the required infrastructural facilities, as such, the necessary provision of machinery like material trucks, trailors, cement carriers, motor grader and road rollers etc. has been made under Q-special-T&P, for carrying out the works of infrastructural facilities. Provisions for personal carriers, ambulance and field workshop equipment have also been made in the project estimate. 11.2 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

The project has been proposed to be completed in 4 years. Method of execution of various components and selection of equipments have been done with the object of commissioning first hydro unit by the end of 3rd month of the fifth year, the second unit by the end of 5th month of fifth year and the third unit by the end of 6th month of fifth year. 11.2.1 INFRASTRUCTURAL

It is proposed that all infrastructural works on the project comprising roads, buildings, adits, workshops, stores, utility works, surveys, development of quarries, leveling of area for installation of equipment and plants, prequalification of tenders, award of contracts, detailed design of components and other preliminary works shall be continued up to 4th year of project execution. 11.2.2 INTAKE STRUCTURE i) Excavation of intake shaft. From 8th month to 13th month of project construction. ii) Concreting of intake shaft From 12th month to 21st month 11.2.3 HYDRO-MECHANICAL WORKS From 18th month to 45th month. 11.2.4 HEAD RACE TUNNEL Excavation from RD 0 to 5320m and 5390m to 10320m From 4th month to 37th month. Concreting from RD 0 to 5320m and 5390m to 10320m. From 34th month to 46th month. Grouting :- From 43rd month to 48th month. 11.2.5 SURGE SHAFT Excavation from 13th month to 23rd month. Concreting:- From 24th month to 31st month.

Grouting & Clean up:- From 32nd month to 36th month. 11.2.6 PENSTOCK Excavation:- From 13th month to 21st month. Concreting& liner:- From 22nd month to 38th months.

11.2.7

POWER HOUSE Excavation:- From 13th month to 25th month. Concreting:- From 26th month to 40th months.

11.2.8

INSTALLATION, TESTING AND COMMISSIONING Installation of hydro units shall be started from the 32nd month. A period of 3 months for testing and commissioning of each unit has been provided with first unit proposed to be commissioned in 51st month and second unit in 53rd month of construction and 3rd unit in 54th month thus completing the construction of the project as a whole in 54 month duration.

PARA 11.0 11.1 11.1.1 11.1.2 11.1.3 11.1.4 11.1.5 11.1.5.1 11.1.5.2 11.1.5.3 11.1.6 11.1.7 11.1.8 11.1.9 11.1.10 11.1.11 11.2 11.2.1 11.2.2 11.2.3 11.2.4 11.2.5 11.2.6 11.2.7 11.2.8

DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULE GENERAL APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING FOR EXECUTION OF PROJECT COMPONENTS CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY & EQUIPMENT PLANNING GENERAL COMPLETION TIME AND AVAILABLE WORKING SEASON APPROACH ROAD AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL CEMENT STEEL AGGREGATE STORES, LUBRICATION& WORK SHOP AGGREGATE PROCESSING PLANTS. PLANT AREAS DUMP AREAS PRE-CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT PROVISION CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE INFRASTRUCTURAL WORKS INTAKE STRUCTURE HEAD RACE TUNNEL SURGE SHAFT PENSTOCK POWER HOUSE TAIL RACE TUNNEL INSTALLATION TESTING AND COMMISSIONING

PAGE XI-1 XI-1 XI-1 XI-1 XI-1 TO XI-2 XI-2 XI-2 XI-2 XI-2 XI-2 TO XI-3 XI-3 XI-3 XI-3 XI-3 TO XI-4 XI-4 XI-4 XI-4 XI-4 TO XI-5 XI-5 XI-5 XI-5 XI-6 XI-6 XI-6 XI-6

CHAPTER XII COST ESTIMATE


12.0 12.1 GENERAL BASIS OF ESTIMATE The estimate of Unit-I Civil Works has been prepared to arrive at the capital cost of the Chamba Hydro Electric Project basis of June., 2004 price level. It is presumed that major civil works will be executed on contract basis. The cost estimate does not include following items:Escalation after June, 2004 Interest during construction.

Detailed estimate of cost for Unit-I civil works is based mainly upon various designs/drawings finalized for appurtenant structures and the rates for principal items of works as per guide lines furnished by CEA vide letter dt. 24th Oct. 2003. A provision of 3% has been made for contingencies for C-works under Unit-I works. Guidelines for preparation of project estimate issued by CWC during March, 1997 have been generally followed for formulation of the estimate. 12.2 12.2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT-I CIVIL WORKS Under the head/civil works, provision has been made for various components of the project as detailed here under:

XII -

A-Preliminary Under this sub-head, provision of Rs. 958.55 lac has been made for surveys and investigations conducted or to be conducted to arrive at the optimum designs of project components. B- Land This covers the provision for acquisition of land for construction of the project components, colonies, offices and store complexes and compensation for trees and standing crops. Provision for forest trees in the project area has also been included. A provision for Rs. 797.38 lac has been made under this sub-head. J-Power Plant civil works This covers the cost of civil engineering structures comprising intake structure, head race tunnel, surge shaft, pressure shaft/ surge shaft, surface power house complex and tail race channel. The total cost works to be Rs. 13365.95 lac. K- Buildings Buildings both residential and non- residential have been grouped

separately under permanent and temporary categories Under the permanent categories, all those buildings have been included which will be subsequently utilized for the operation and maintenance of project. Whereas, under the temporary category, credit to the extent of 15% has been given to the project on account of resale thereof. The cost has been worked out on basis of plinth area rates as notified by HPPWD.. A provision of Rs.1378.14 lac has been made under this sub-head.

XII -

M-Plantation This covers the cost of plantation and protection of plants along project roads, colonies and in project area. Accordingly a provision of 25.00 lac has been made under this sub-head. O- Miscellaneous A provision of Rs. 995.70 lac has been made for meeting cost of various items listed therein. Q-Special T&P As the major civil works have been proposed to be got done on contract basis. Machinery required for departmental activities like infrastructural works, their subsequent repair/ maintenance and supervision works have mainly been included under this sub-head. A provision of Rs. 496.71 lac has been made under this sub-head. R-Communication A provision of Rs. 429.40 lac under this sub-head covers the cost of roads. The road width have been planned to cater to the anticipated traffic including movement of heavy trailors. Cost of roads is based on the rates as notified by State HPPWD . Thus a provision of Rs. 22481.73 Lac. has been made to cover the costs under this unit (civil works)

XII -

X-Environment & Ecology A provision of Rs. 502 lac has been made under this sub-head for maintaining and improving the environmental status of the project area and fir afforestation of affected area. II-Establishment A provision under this head has been made for Rs. 1468.68 lac @ 8% of IWorks. V-Receipts & Recoveries This provision covers estimated recoveries by way of resale or transfer of special T&P and temporary buildings. The amount thus works out to Rs. 293.02 lac only. 12.2.2 12.2.2.1 UNIT-III ELECTRICAL WORKS P-PRODUCTION Cost of generating plants and equipments is based on current budgetory prices. Prices of auxiliary equipments and services are based on historical prices. Excise duty has been considered @ 16% of the component. CST, Insurance and transport to site has been taken @ 6% of the cost of respective component. Erection and commissioning charges have also been taken @ 10% as per experience gained on similar installations in the state. A provision of Rs. 14131.38 lac has been made to cover the cost under this sub-head.

XII -

12.2.2.2

T-TRANSMISSION The cost based on detailed analysis on actual requirement under this sub head amounts to Rs. 1178.47 lacs.

12.3

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF COST Detailed estimate of cost as explained in above paras is given in succeeding pages :

XII -

XII -

PARA 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.2.1 12.2.2 12.2.2.1 12.2.2.2 12.3

DESCRIPTION GENERAL BASIS OF THE ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT-I CIVIL WORKS UNIT-III ELECTRICAL WORKS P-PRODUCTION T-TRANSMISSION DETAILED ESTIMATE OF COST

PAGE XII-1 XII-1 XII-1 XII-1 TO XII-4 XII-4 XII-4 XII-5 XII-5 TO XII-36

XII -

APPENDIX-A

RATES FOR MAJOR ITEMS OF CIVIL WORKS


S. NO. A 1 2 3 4 DESCRIPTION EXCAVATION Common excavation Excavation in hard rock Excavation in rock in tunnel Surge shaft excavation Without raise climber With raise climber Rock support Rock bolting (including drilling) 25 mm 32 mm 36mm Shotcret rate without wiremesh Wiremesh Steel supprt Earth dam/Rockfill dam Rate per cum earth fill in Dam (for lead 1 km. Rate per cum rock fill in Dam (for lead 1 km.) From excavated material From quarry Rate per cum of impervious core in Dam( lead 1 km.) Inverted filter (for lead 1 km) Stone pitching (for lead 1 km Incremental rate for each additional lead of 1 km. or par Concreteing (including form work) Concrete lead 10 km (For lead of 10 Km. for aggegate quarry) M 25 M 20 M 15 M 10 Incremental rate for each additional lead of 5 km. or par Concrete Cut-off wall Precast lagging including cost of reinforcement Concrete linging in DT & HRT ( M 20) Reinforcement Steel and Steel and Structural Steel Reforcement Penstock liner Hydro-Mechanical Work Radial gate Sluicegate Stoplog gate Trashrack Embedded parts Hoist (Based on lifting capacity) UNIT RATE

Cum Cum Cum Cum Cum

125.00 300.00 1000.00 1200.00 1500.00

RM RM RM Cum Sq M MT Cum Cum Cum Cum Cum Cum Cum

400.00 525.00 625.00 4000.00 200 42000.00 142.00 156.00 318.00 154.00 701.00 581.00 20.00

C 1 2

3 4 5 6 D 1

2 3 4 5 E 1 2 F 1 2 3 4 5 6

Cum Cum Cum Cum Cum Sq m Cum Cum MT MT

3610.00 3390.00 2930.00 2560.00 100.00 20000.00 7000.00 4000.00 27000.00 70000.00

MT MT MT MT MT MT

100000.00 100000.00 60000.00 50000.00 50000.00 100000.00

ABSTRACT OF COST OF CIVIL WORKS S.No. CIVIL WORKS DIRECT CHARGES I-Works A-Preliminary B-Land J-Power Plant Civil Works K- Buildings M-Plantation O-Miscellaneous P- Maintenance Q- Special Tools & Plants R- Communication X- Environment & Ecology Y- Losses on Stock Total of I-Works II - Establishment @ 8% of cost of I-Works Less B- Land III - Tools & Plants @ 1% of cost of I - Works IV _ Suspense V - Receipts & Recoveries (-) TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES B. INDIRECT CHARGES a) Capitalized Value of Abatement of Land Revenue @5% of cost of land b) Audit & Account Charges @ 1% of cost of I - Works 27.05 Description Amount (Rs. In lac)

958.55 797.38 13,365.95 1378.14 25.00 995.70 169.03 496.71 429.40 502.00 38.03 19155.90 1468.68 191.56 1740.00 293.02 22263.12

191.56

TOTAL INDIRECT CHARGES TOTAL DIRECT & INDIRECT CHARGES

218.61 22481.73 lac

ABSTRACT OF COST UNIT -I Civil Works UNIT - III Electrical Works P- Production T-Transmission 14131.38 Lac. 1178.47 Lac. 22481.73 Lac.

TOTAL COST

37791.58 Lac.

B - LAND S.N. Name of Project Component Forest/Govt Rates in . /Pvt. Area in Hac. Land Rs.Lac/Hect . Amount Rs.Lac.

1 Land Required for A. Intake structures Govt./Pvt. 18.00 10.25 184.50

B. Project feature C. Township, store area and roads

Govt./Pvt. Govt./Pvt. Govt./Pvt.

12.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 10.00

7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75

93.00 23.25 38.75 15.50 15.50 46.50 46.50 77.50 541.00 15.00 556.00

D. Quarry site E. Muck disposal Area & Job facilities

Govt./Pvt. Govt./Pvt. Govt./Pvt.

F. Transit Camp And Guest Houses & Colony G. Land for Rehabilitation Purpose Total A

Govt./Pvt. NIL L.S

2 Cost for implementation of R&R Plan B Total 3 Cost of establishment for land acquisition and Rehabilitation @6.25 % of item B 4 Solatium Charges @30 % of the cost of the private land 5 Interest Charges on amount of award for the period between taking over the possession of land date of award @12 % per annum on 25% of cost of total compensation for the 2 years of the cost of the private land

6.25% 30%

556.00 541.00

34.75 162.3

12% 6 7 Legal charges @1 % of total compensation Labour and material charges for measurement & demarcation of land /Properties @ 1% of cost of land acquisition Total

139.00 1%

2 556.00

33.36 5.56

1%

541.00

5.41 797.38

K -BUILDINGS S.N. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING UNIT TOTAL PLINTH AREA 9200 RATE IN Rs. 4200 31% Sq. m. 6100 3780 27% AMOUNT

1.0 Residential Buildings 1.1 Permanent residential buildings Service Charges @ 1.2 Temporary Buildings Service Charges @ Total Residential buildings 2.0 Non - Residential Buildings 2.1 Permanent Non - Residential Buildings Service Charges @ 2.2 Temporary Non Residential Buildings Service Charges @ Total Non - Residential buildings

Sq. m.

Sq. m.

9900

3800 22.50%

Sq. m.

2870

3420 20.50%

Grand Total (Residential + Non - Residential )

O-MISCELLANEOUS S.N. 1.0 DESCRIPTION CAPITAL COST 1.1 Electrification 1.2 Water supply, purification and distribution arrangements including purchase of water tankers, cost of tanks and chlorination 1.3 Providing sewerage disposal and storm water drains at various colony sites. 1.4 Furnishing & equipping rest houses field hostels, hospitals schools etc. Maintenance & Service charges during execution period 2.1 Maintenance & Power arrangements 2.2 R &M of water supply facilities 2.3 R & M of sanitation & drainage facilities 2.4 R & M of Telecommunication system and post office 2.5 R & M of Hospital 2.6 R & M of rest house and field hostel 2.7 R & M of Research & Quality control laboratories 5 5 YEAR YEAR 3.40 3.40 17.00 17.00 5 YEAR 90000 4.5 QTY. UNIT RATE AMOUNT

LS

45

LS

45

LS

55

2.0

5 5 5 5 5

YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR

0.42 10.00 1.00 25.00 15.00

2.10 50.00 5.00 125.00 75.00

2.8 Labour welfare compensation and retrenchment benefits 2.9 Providing security police including R & M of Posts

YEAR

5.00

25.00

S.N.

DESCRIPTION

QTY. 5

UNIT YEAR

RATE 35.00

AMOUNT 175.00

2.10 R & M of inspection vehicles and staff cars @ 2.11 R & M of school buses and staff buses @ 2.5 lac per vehicle 2.12 R & M of Ambulance @ RS 2.50 Lac per Year per Vehicle 2.13 R &M of field workshops 2.14 Maintenance & Running of schools 3.0 Miscellaneous 3.1 Foundation stone laying ceremony, inaguration 3.2 Model exhibition 3.3 Group insurance 3.4 Compensation of accidents 3.5 Training of personnel abroad including study courses and visits 3.6 Others TOTAL

YEAR

10.00

50.00

5 5 5

YEAR YEAR YEAR

8.00 0.42 35.00

40.00 2.10 175.00

L.S L.S L.S L.S

7.00 10.00 17.00 32.00

L.S L.S

12.00 10.00 995.70

lac

AMT. IN LAC. 386.40 119.78 230.58 62.26 799.02

376.20 84.65 98.15 20.12 579.12

1378.14

S. NO.

INTAKE STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

UNIT

QTY.

RATE (Rs.)

Amt.in Lac

1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 Underground excavation Surge shaft 3.0 Support System 3.1 Rock bolts 3.2 Steel Rib Supports 3.3 Shotcreting 3.4 Concrete lagging if required 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Concrete M-10 M 15 M 20 M 25

Cum Cum

227 227

125.00 300.00

0.28 0.68

Cum M Ton Cum Cum.

22244 6750 64.64 400 NIL

1000 625 42000 4000

222.44 42.19 27.15 16.00

Cum Cum Cum Cum

383 NIL 3829 NIL

2560.00 3390

9.80 129.80

5.0 Steel 5.1 (i) Reinforcing Steel 5.2 (Ii) Structural Steel Sub-Total (A) of 1 to 5 6.0 Miscellaneous and Ancillary Works 6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like wiremesh/steel fiber reinforcement , drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for drainage, slope protection works etc. (1-2% of Sub-Total (A) depending upon the site conditions & type of structure) Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 6 7.0 Instrumentation ( 1% of Sub -Total )B) 8.0 Dewatering (1% of Sub-Total (B) 9.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 10.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 10

Ton Ton

306.3 NIL

27000.00 27000.00

82.70

531.05

1 to 2% Cum

1.50%

531.05

7.97 539.02

1% 1% 3% 2%

539.02 539.02 539.02 539.02

5.39 5.39 16.17 10.78 576.75

HEAD RACE & TAIL RACE CHANNEL S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 Underground excavation 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Support System Rock bolts Steel Rib Supports Shotcreting

Cum Cum Cum

150 475 432000

125.00 300.00 1000.00

0.19 1.43 4320.00

M Ton Cum Cum.

165000 1240 9500 3600

625.00 42000.00 4000.00 2930

1031.25 520.80 380.00 105.48

3.4 Concrete lagging if required 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.4 Concrete M 15 M 20 M 25

Cum Cum Cum Ton

17750 21400 NIL 620

2930.00 3390.00

520.08 725.46

5.0 Reinforcing Steel Sub-Total (A) of 1 to 5 6.0 Miscellaneous and Ancillary Works 6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like wiremesh/steel fiber reinforcement , drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for drainage etc. (7-8% of Sub-Total (A) depending upon the site conditions & type of structure) Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 6 7.0 Instrumentation ( 1% of Sub -Total )B) 8.0 Dewatering (2% of Sub-Total (B) 9.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 10.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 10

27000.00

167.40 7772.08

7 to 8%

8%

7772.08

621.77 8393.84

1% 2% 3% 2%

8393.84 8393.84 8393.84 8393.84

83.94 167.88 251.82 167.88 9065.35

SURGE SHAFT S. NO. DESCRIPTION 1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Underground excavation Surge Shaft excavation Surge shaft excavation with raise borer Concrete lagging if required Support System Rock bolts Steel Rib Supports Shotcreting UNIT Cum Cum QTY. 3000 NIL RATE (Rs.) 125.00 300.00 Amt.in Lac 3.75

Cum Cum Cum

31200 NIL NIL

1200.00

374.40

M Ton Cum

16600 45 610

525.00 42000.00 4000.00

87.15 18.90 24.40

4.0 Concrete 4.1 M 20 4.2 M 25 5.0 Steel Works 5.1 Reinforcing Steel 5.2 Steel liner Sub-Total (A) of 1 to 5 6.0 Miscellaneous 6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like site clearance , drilling & grouting, wire mesh reinforcement, Air pipes, Lift arrangement, other steel works etc. (1-2% of Sub-Total (A) depending upon the site conditions & type of structure) Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 6 7.0 Instrumentation ( 1% of Sub -Total )B) 8.0 Dewatering (2% of Sub-Total (B) 9.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 10.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 10

Cum Cum

1370 1200

3390.00 3610.00

49.46 40.68

Ton Ton

20 100

27000.00 70000.00

5.40 70.00 670.39

1 to 2%

1.50%

670.39

10.06 680.44

1% 2% 3%

680.44 680.44 680.44

6.80 13.61 20.41

2%

680.44

13.61 734.88

PRESSURE SHAFT/ PENSTOCK S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 Underground excavation Common excavation 2.0 Support System 2.1 Rock bolts 2.2 Steel ribs Support 2.3 Shotcreting 3.0 Concrete 3.1 M 15 backfill concrete 4.0 Pressure shaft / Penstock steel liners Sub-Total A) of 1 to 4 5.0 Miscellaneous and Ancillary Works 5.1 Various Miscellaneous works like wire mesh/steel fiber reinforcement , drilling & grouting, PVC pipes for drainage, slope protection works etc. (2-3% of Sub-Total (A) depending upon the site conditions & type of structure) Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 5 6.0 Instrumentation ( 1% of Sub -Total )B) 7.0 Dewatering (1% of Sub-Total (B) 8.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 9.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 9

Cum Cum M Ton Cum

5100 1650 2200 18.25 160

1000.00 125 525.00 42000.00 4000.00

51.00 2.06 11.55 6.40

Cum Ton

2710 960

2930.00 70000.00

79.40 672.00 822.42

2- 3%

2.50%

822.42

20.56 842.98

1% 1% 3% 2%

842.98 842.98 842.98 842.98

8.43 8.43 25.29 16.86 901.98

POWER HOUSE COMPLEX S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 Underground excavation if underground Power House 2.1 Excavation of P/H cavern, transformer cum MIV cavern and draft tube gate 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Support System Rock bolts Steel Rib Supports Shotcreting Concrete lagging if required Concrete M 15 M 20 M 25

Cum Cum

51000 NIL

125.00 300.00

63.75 0.00

Cum

19380

1000.00

193.80

M Ton Cum Cum

5000 NIL 240 NIL

625.00 42000.00 4000.00

31.25 9.60

Cum Cum Cum. Ton Ton

1500 6500 2000 800 NIL

2930.00 3390.00 3610.00 27000.00

43.95 220.35 72.20 216.00 0.00 787.15

5.0 Reinforcing Steel 6.0 Structural Steel for roof trusses etc. Sub-Total A) of 1 to 6 7.0 Miscellaneous and Ancillary Works 7.1 Various Miscellaneous works like site clearance, wiremesh/steel fiber reinforcement , drilling & grouting, flooring, water proofing system, swellex anchor, doors & windows, painting , lift arrangement, architectural works, other metal works etc. (4-5% of Sub-Total (A) depending upon the site conditions & type of structure)

4 to 5 % Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 7 8.0 Instrumentation ( 1% of Sub -Total )B) 9.0 Dewatering (2% of Sub-Total (B) 10.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 11.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 11 1% 2% 3% 2%

5%

787.15

39.36 826.51

826.51 826.51 826.51 826.51

8.27 16.53 24.80 16.53 892.63

SWITCHYARD S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Supports System Rock bolts Steel ribs supports (if required) Shotcreting

Cum Cum

75000 NIL

125.00

93.75

M Ton Cum

1200 NIL 650

525.00 4000.00

6.30 26.00

3.0 Earth work in filling if required 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Concrete M 15 M 20 M 25

Cum Cum Cum. Ton

1500 150 NIL 45

2930.00 3390.00

43.95 5.09

5.0 Reinforcing Steel

27000.00

12.15

6.0 Stone/Brick Masonry Sub-Total (A) of 1 to 6 7.0 Miscellaneous 7.1 Various Miscellaneous works like Site clearance, PVC pipes, Control block building work like flooring, doors, windows etc. including water supply and sewerage, Boulder pitching, Metal works etc. (4-5 % of Sub Total(A) depending on the site conditions & type pf structure) Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 7

Cum

NIL 187.24

4 to 5%

4.50%

187.24

8.43 195.66

8.0 Dewatering (2% of Sub-Total (B) 9.0 Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total (B) except on L.S. items) 10.0 Work Charged Establishment (2% of SubTotal(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 10

2% 3% 2%

195.66 195.66 195.66

3.91 5.87 3.91 209.36

ADITS S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 Surface Excavation 1.1 Common excavation 1.2 Rock excavation 2.0 Under ground excavation 2.1 Excavation of adits 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3 Supports System Rock bolts Steel ribs supports (if required) Shotcreting Concrete lagging if required Concrete M 10 M 15 M 20 M 25

Cum Cum

300 500

125.00 300.00

0.38 1.50

Cum

49000

1000.00

490.00

M Ton Cum Cum

20900 150 1350 NIL

625.00 42000.00 4000.00

130.63 63.00 54.00

Cum Cum Cum. Cum. Ton

NIL 1470 NIL NIL NIL

2930.00

43.07

5.0 Reinforcing Steel Sub-Total (A) of 1 to 5 6.0 Miscellaneous 6.1 Various Miscellaneous works like drilling & grouting, wire mesh reinforcement ,masonry works,PVC pipes for drainage etc. (3-4 % of Sub Total(A) depending on the site conditions & type pf structure)

782.57

3 to 4% Sub-Total (B) of 1 to 6

3.50%

782.57

27.39 809.96

7.0 Instrumentation (1% of Sub-Total (B) 8.0 Dewatering (2% of Sub-Total (B) Contingencies (3% of Sub-Total(B) except on 9.0 L.S. items) Work Charged Establishment (2% of Sub10.0 Total(B) except on L.S. items) Total of 1 to 10

1% 2% 3% 2%

809.96 809.96 809.96 809.96

8.10 16.20 24.30 16.20 874.76

Hydro-Mechaniocal Works S. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac

1.0 INTAKE STRUCTURE a Intake Gate (size) Embedded parts for Intake gates Rope Drum Hoist (as per capacity) Hoist Plateform & trustle b Bulk head gates (size) 11.5mx7.50m Embedded Parts For Bulk Head Gates Gantry Crane as per capacity

Ton Ton Set Set Ton Ton Set

NIL NIL NIL NIL 40 12.50 1 100000.00 50000.00 500000.00 40.00 6.25 5.00

2.0 DRAFT TUBE GATE Gates (size) 7mx7m Embedded Parts For Draft Tube Gates Gantry Crane (as per capacity) 3.0 TAIL RACE a Outlet Stoplogs b Embedded parts 4.0 a b c SURGE SHAFT Stoplogs Embedded parts Travelling Hoist G/Total (1to4)

Ton Ton Set

22.00 8..00 1

100000.00 50000.00 500000.00

22.00 4.00 5.00

Set Ton

NIL NIL

Ton Ton Set

30 10 1

60000.00 50000.00 500000.00

18.00 5.00 5.00 110.25

J- Power Plant civil works S.No. I II III IV V VI VII VIII Description Intakes Structure Head Race Tunnel & Tailrace Tunnel Surge Shaft Pressure Shaft/Pen Stock Power House Complex Switch Yard Adits Hydro-Mechaniocal Works Total Unit Qty. RATE (Rs.) Amt.in Lac 576.75 9,065.35 734.88 901.98 892.63 209.36 874.76 110.25 13,365.95

A-Preliminary Sr.No. 1. 2. I) ii) Description Expenditure on investigation already incurred Pre-construction and const. Stage investigations: Topographical surveys by the deptt. and survey of India Hydro-meteorological data collection for 5 years including establishing self recording rain/snow gauge stations, climate-logical laboratory, silt laboratory and conducting sediment silt & water tests etc. Geological and geophysical explorations, geotechnical testing and data collection seismological observations and laboratories Construction material testing, establishing soil and rock testing laboratory Environment and ecological surveys Hydraulic model studies and testing Training of engineers and technicians Construction of access paths and jeep able roads, for investigation. Inspection vehicles for investigation i/c R/M charges Surveys, drawing mathematical and office equipment like photo-copier, ammonia printing machine etc. Consultants fees Publication of brochures, project reports . comprising design reports, estimates, bulletins completion reports, history of the project etc Personal computer along with CGA, printer and plotter etc. Unit Qty. Rate Amount (lacs) 481.55

L.S.

55.00

L.S.

45.00

iii)

L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S.

42.00 45.00 10.00 55.00 30.00 40.00 25.00

iv) v) vi) 3. 4. 5. 6.

7. 8.

L.S. L.S.

35.00 30.00

L.S. L.S. Total

38.00 27.00 958.55

9.

S.No.

Q- Special T&P Description

Unit

Qty.

Rate (in Rs.) 2 8 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 20 20 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 5 5 5 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 9 20 4 2 7500000 3200000 4000000 700000 1500000 1500000 10000000 4500000 6500000 1900000 75000 50000 30000 215000 8000000 5000000 4800000 2200000 4050000 750000 750000 30000 30000 80000 130000 100000 700000 630000 800000 3000000 800000 800000 400000 400000 450000 450000

Amount (lacs) 150 256 80 7 15 30 100 90 65 19 15 10 0.3 6.45 80 50 96 22 40.5 37.5 37.5 1.5 0.3 3.2 1.3 1 7 6.3 8 60 8 24 36 80 18 9 15 1485.85 167 1318.85

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34 35 36 37

Hydraulic excavator Bucket capacity 2.0 cum Dumper 20 ton capacity Working platform Grouting pump Grout hole drilling crawler Hydraulic rubber-wheel based drilling 2-boom jumbo Tower crane 25m/3 tons Concrete pump 40 cum/hr. Motor grader 10 tons 145 HP Concrete lorry with 2.5 cum rotary drum mixer 2.5 rotary drum mixer Draining pump (8 bar water hydrophore) 30 HP Draining pump 10 HP Internal vibrator with electric motor & converter Transformer 315 KVA Shotcreting robot Hydraulic excavator 1.0 cum Batching plant Wheel loader 1.15 cum Crawler dozer 180 HP Air compressor electric 500 cfm Air compressor diesel 500 cfm 148 HP Jack hammer 52 lbs Pavement breaker Concrete mixer 10/7 cft Transit mixer 14/10 cft Pneumatic concrtete placer Grout pump Tipper 4.5 cum Material truck Coarse aggregate processing plant 30 ton wagon drill Bus Car Jeep Pick up van Ambulance Workshop equipment

Nos " " " " " " " " " " " "

" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "

L.S

Total cost of Q-Special T&P Cost of personal carriers Cost of Q-Special T& P other than personal carriers Cost of Q-Special T & P chargeable to estimate 25% of (cost of Q-Special T&P other than personal carriers) Cost of personal carrier chargeable to estimate=100%

1318.85 167 Total

25% 100%

329.71 167.00 496.71

R-Communication S.No. Description Unit Qty. Rate (in lacs) Amount (lacs)

1 C/O proposed road from Chamba Bharmour highway to intake strructure. 2 C/O proposed roads to various adits , surge shaft and power house. 3 C/O proposed road to quarry sites.

Km.

1.50

17.90

26.85

Km.

9.50

17.90

170.05

Km. 4 C/O proposed road to dumping areas. Km. 5 Widening of existing roads in project area. Km.

2.50

17.90

44.75

2.50

17.90

44.75

10.00

14.30

143.00

Total

429.40

S.No.

X-Environment and Ecology Description

Unit

Qty.

Rate (in Rs.)

Amount (lacs) 25.00 30.00 3.00 425.00 10.00 9.00

I) Cost of compensatory afforestation in project 2) Cost of fuel wood 3)Cost of health facility 4) Cost of catchment area treatment plan 5) Cost of reclamation and plantation 60 Cost of environment monitoring cell

L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. Total

502.00

V-Receipt & Recoveries S.No. Description Unit Qty. Rate (in Rs.) Amount (lacs)

I)

Temporary Buildings Cost of temporary buildings Credit @15 %

82.22 329.71 75% 247.28 15% 12.33

ii)

Q-Special T&P Recoveries under the sub-head '@ 75% of Q-Special T&P charged to estimate other than personal carriers

iii)

Cost recoverable on a/c of resale value of personal carrier @20% of capital cost

167 Total

20%

33.40 293.02

Y- Losses on stock

Provision made @ 0.25% on the cost of I-Works less A-Preliminary, B-Land, M-Plantation, O-Misc., P-Maintenance, Q-Special T&P and X-Environment & Eco 15,211.52
I-Works Less: 19,155.90 958.55 797.38 25.00 995.70 169.03 496.71 502.00 3944.38

0.25%

38.03

A-Preliminary B-Land M-Plantation O-Miscellaneous, % of I Works less (A+B+Q) P-Maintenance Q-Speci8al Tools & Plant X-Environment and Ecology
Total

P - Maintenance

1% of I- works less (A+B+Q) I-Works less - A- Preliminary B-Land Q- Special T&P Net Total

1% 19155.90 958.55 797.38 496.71 16903.26

16903.26

169.03

CHAMBA HYDRO-ELECTRIC-PROJECT (126 MW)


Sl.No. COST ESTIMATES OF ELECTRO-MECHANICAL WORKS FOR PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT Item Qty Rate Amount Excise Rs.(Lakhs) Rate
2 Generating Unit and 11 KV Bus Duct 42MW, 300 RPM with net Head of 110 mtrs. Step-up transformer, 11/400/ /3KV,18MVA, single phase Auxiliary Electrical Equipment for Power Stations (Except transformer) (5% of item 1). Auxiliary Equipment and Services for Power Stations (5% of item-1) 400 KV Switchyard (Conventional). Spares (5% of 1 and 3% of 2-5) Sub-Total-1: Central Sales Tax ** 4% of item 1 to 6 Transportation & Insurance 6% of item-7 Erection and Commissioning 8% of item-7 (except spares) Sub-Total-2 : Establishment, Contingency, other charges 11% of item-7 (excluding duties) Grand Total :Say Rs. 14131 Lacs 3 3 10 4 Rs.5200/KW Rs.260/KVA 5 6552.00 468.00 327.60 327.60 6 bays 250 lacs/bay 1500.00 406.3 9581.50 6 16% 16% 16% 16% 16% 16%

Duty* Amount (Rs. Lakhs)


7 1048.32 74.88 52.416 52.416 240 65.00

Total Amount (Rs. Lakhs)


8 7600.32 542.88 380.02 380.02 1740.00 471.3 11114.53 444.58 666.87 851.46 13077.44 1053.97

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

14131.41

BARDANG HYDRO-ELECTRIC-PROJECT (114 MW)


COST ESTIMATES OF ELECTRO-MECHANICAL WORKS FOR PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT Duty* Total Sl.No. Item Qty Rate Amount Excise Amount Amount Rs.(Lakhs) Rate (Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
1 1 2 Generating Unit and 11 KV Bus Duct 38MW, 200 RPM with net Head of 55 mtrs. Step-up transformer, 11/220KV,16MVA single phase Auxiliary Electrical Equipment for Power Stations (Except transformer) (5% of item 1). Auxiliary Equipment and Services for Power Stations (5% of item-1) 220 KV Switchyard (Conventional). Spares (5% of 1 and 3% of 2-5) Sub-Total-1: Central Sales Tax ** 4% of item 1 to 6 Transportation & Insurance 6% of item-7 Erection and Commissioning 8% of item7 (except spares) Sub-Total-2 : Establishment, Contingency, other charges 11% of item-7 (excluding duties) Grand Total :3 3 4 Rs.5600/KW 5 6384.00 6 16% 7 1021.44 8 7405.44

2 3

10

Rs.260/KVA

416.00 319.20

16% 16%

66.56 51.07

482.56 370.27

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

319.20 5 bays 120 Lacs/bay 720.00 372.43 8530.83

16% 16% 16%

51.07 115.20 59.59

370.27 835.20 432.02 9895.76 395.83 593.75 757.10 11642.44 938.39

12580.83 Say Rs. 12581/- Lacs

GONDALA HYDRO-ELECTRIC-PROJECT (144 MW)


COST ESTIMATES OF ELECTRO-MECHANICAL WORKS FOR PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT Sl.No. Item Qty Rate Amount Excise Duty* Total Amount Amount Rs.(Lakhs) Rate (Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
1 1 2 3 2 Generating Unit and 11 KV Bus Duct 48MW, 333.33 RPM with net Head of 134 mtrs. Step-up transformer, 11/220KV,20MVA single phase Auxiliary Electrical Equipment for Power Stations (Except transformer) (5% of item 1). Auxiliary Equipment and Services for Power Stations (5% of item-1) 220 KV Switchyard (Conventional). Spares (5% of 1 and 3% of 2-5) Sub-Total-1: Central Sales Tax ** 4% of item 1 to 6 Transportation & Insurance 6% of item-7 Erection and Commissioning 8% of item-7 (except spares) Sub-Total-2 : Establishment, Contingency, other charges 11% of item-7 (excluding duties) Grand Total :Say Rs. 14126/- Lacs 3 3 10 4 Rs.5000/KW Rs.260/KVA 5 7200.00 520.00 360.00 6 16% 16% 16% 7 1152.00 83.20 57.60 8 8352 603.2 417.6

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

360.00 5 bays 120 Lacs/bay 720.00 418.8 9578.80

16% 16% 16%

57.60 115.20 67.01

417.6 835.20 485.81 11111.41 444.46 666.68 850.05 13072.60 1053.67

14126.27

Annexure-13.1 ( c )

MAIN ABSTRACT OF COST OF 400 kV (TWIN COND.) TRANSMISSION


TOTAL LENGTH OF LINE- Kms

10 Total Amount in Lacs


6.65 1.16 9.00

Sr.N
1 2 3

Description
Preliminary Works (Annex. 1) Detailed Surveying ( Annex. 2) Compensation for land, trees,crops, tree cutting and afforestation (Annex. 3) Transmission Line (Annex. 4) Buildings PLCC equipment Vehicles and workshop machinery (Annex. 12) Sub Total-I Contingency @ 3% on Sub Total-I Sub Total-II Establishment charges @4%, Tools & Plants @1%, Losses on stock @ 0.25%, maintenance during construction @1%, Audit and Acounts charges @1% of Sub Total-II Grand Total

4 5 6 7

931.40 15.00 69.60 34.00 1066.81 32.00 1098.81 79.66

8 9

1178.47 lac

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-1
COST OF PRELIMINARY WORKS 5 Description Qty Total Amount in Lacs 1.25 Cost of temporary sheds and camping requirement (Annex.-1.1) cost of reconnaisance and preliminary survey ( Annex.- 1.2) PTCC Clearance LS 0.40

Sr.N 1

5.00

Total

6.65

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-1
COST OF PRELIMINARY WORKS 5 Description Qty Total Amount in Lacs 1.25 Cost of temporary sheds and camping requirement (Annex.-1.1) cost of reconnaisance and preliminary survey ( Annex.- 1.2) PTCC Clearance LS 0.40

Sr.N 1

5.00

Total

6.65

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Page 1

Annex. 1.2

Annexure 1.2
ABSTRACT OF COST FOR RECONNAISANCE & PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF 400 KV D/C LINE
Sr.N 1 Description Reconnaisance and Preliminary survey (Unit 1 Km of length) SURVYING PARTY Surveyor (regular) Beldar Chowkidar Qty Rate Unit Amount in Rs

A I) ii) iii) B

1 6 2

6000 2250 2250

No Nos Nos

6000 13500 4500

Sub Total
LABOUR FOR RECONNAISANCE AND PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF 1 KM OF LINE Assuming 4 days for 1 Km of line and 25 working days in a month C Wooden pegs Total (B+C) Cost of conducting Preliminary survey per km of line length. 16 9 Nos

24000

3840

144 3984 3984

Cost of conducting Preliminary survey for whole line length

10

3984

Kms

39840

Say Rs

0.40 Lacs

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Page 1

Annexure-2
COST OF DETAILED SURVEYING OF 400 KV D/C LINE
Sr.N A Description SURVEYING PARTY Assuming 4 days for conducting survey of 1 km of line I) ii) iii) iv) Surveyor regular Beldar (D/Wages) Chowkidar (D/Wages) Labpur for 4 days ( Assuming 4 days for 1 Km and 25 working days in a month) Wooden Pegs 1 6 2 6000 2250 2250 No Nos Nos 6000 13500 4500 3840 Qty Rate Unit Amount in Rs

v) B I) ii) iii) iv)

16

Nos

144

Total
STACKING ( 1 KM OF LINE) Surveyor regular Beldar (D/Wages) Chowkidars Labour for 4 days ( Assuming 4 days for 1 km and 25 working days in a month) Stone marking pillars 1 12 2 6000 2250 2250 Nos Nos Nos

3984
6000 27000 4500 6000

v)

80

Nos

640

Total
C TRANSPORTATION Camp Shifting etc

6640
1000

Total A+B+C
Cost of detailed surveying of whole Line 10 11624 Kms

11624
116240

Say Rs

1.16 Lacs

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-3
COST OF COMPENSATION FOR LAND, TREES,CROPS, TREE CUTTING AND AFFORESTATION 5 Sr.N Description Qty Rate Unit Amount in Rs 1 Compensation for tree cutting and afforestation Compensation for land falling under the towers and rent for camping site Compensation for damage to crops under the line. 10 20000 Kms 200000

10

50000

Kms

500000

10

20000

Kms

200000

Total
Say Rs

900000
9.0 Lacs

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-4
ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 400 KV D/C LINE 5 Qty 10

Sr.N 1

Description LILO of 400 KV LINE FROM Chamera-I to Chamera-II (D/C line) Retaining Walls Benching for towers

Rate 87.94

Unit Kms

Amount in Lacs 879.40

2 3

35 17

Total

931.4

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-5
BREAKUP ESTIMATE FOR 1 KM OF 400 KV D/C LINE Conductor Size= Earth wire Size= Sr.N
1 I) Steel for towers (Prefabricated galvanised/painted) Annex. 6 Nuts and Bolts ( Annex. 6) Tower Accessories ( Annex. 7) Conductor (Allowing 1.5% for sag and wastage) Conductor Accessories ( Annex. 8) 56.67 31000 M.T. 1756723.50

ACSR "SNOW BIRD" 7/3.66 MM G.S Qty Rate Unit Amount in Rs

Item

ii) iii) 2 I)

2.83

60000

M.T.

170005.50 13845.00

12.18

180000

Kms

2192400.00

ii)

30450.00

3 I) Ground wire Allowing 1.5% for sag and wastage Ground wire Accessories ( Annex. 9) 2.03 30000 Kms 60900.00

ii)

7747.25

4 I) ii) 5

I) ii) 6

INSULATORS(ANNEX. 10) Pilot I String 39.1 Tension 1076.4 INSULATOR HARDWARE (ANNEX. 10) Pilot I String 1.7 Tension 23.4 Foundation material, 1 Sand, Bajri and concrete

280 1000

Nos Nos

10948.00 1076400.00

3000 10000 500000

Set Set Kms

5100.00 234000.00 500000.00

Sub Total
7 Transportation @6%, Insurance @1% and CST @4% ( Total 10%) on Item 1 to 6)

6058519.25
605851.93

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP
Sr.N
8

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Item
Erection Charges (Annex11)

Qty

Rate

Unit

Amount in Rs
2130000.00

Grand Total
Rs

8794371.18
87.94 Lacs

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-7
TOWER FIXTURES FOR 400 KV D/C LINE

Sr.N 1 2 3 4 5 6

Item Earthing Set Danger Plate Number Plate Phase Plate Anti Climbing Devices Circuit Plates

Qty 39 39 39 78 39 78

Rate 3000 300 300 250 2500 250

Unit Nos Nos Nos Set Nos Nos

Amount in Rs 117000 11700 11700 19500 97500 19500

Total Cost per 20 Kms Cost per Km

276900 13845

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-8
CONDUCTOR ACCESSORIES FOR 400 KV D/C LINE
Sr.N 1 Item Spacers with suitable anti abrasion sleeve. Rigid Spacers for Jumpers Mid span compression joints with anti Corona fittings. Repair Sleeves Qty 400 Rate 600 Unit Nos Amount in Rs 240000

2 3

84 25

500 580

Nos Nos

42000 14500

40

200

Nos

8000

5 6

Total Cost per 10 Kms Cost of Conductor Accessories per Km.

304500 30450

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-9
EARTH WIRE ACCESSORIES

Sr.N 1

Item Mid span Compression Joint Assembly Earth wire tension clamps Bonding Pieces Vibration Dampers for Earth wire

Qty 2.75

Rate 150

Unit Nos

Amount in Rs 412.5

2 3 4

76 76 184

300 375 140

Nos Nos Nos

22800 28500 25760

5 6

Total Cost per 10 Km Cost per Kms

77473 7747.3

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-10
QUANTITIES OF HARDWARE AND INSULATORS FOR 400 KV D/C LINE
Sr.N 1 2 3 4 5 Description Pilot I String Discs per 20 Kms (120 KN) Pilot I String Discs per Km (120 KN) Pilot I String Hardware per 20 Kms Pilot I string Hardware per Km Number of tension insulator strings per 20 Kms Qty 782 39.1 34 1.7 468 Unit Nos Nos Nos Nos Nos

6 7 8 9 10

Number of tension discs per 46 string (210 KN) Number of tension discs per 21528 20 Kms (210 KN) Number of tension discs per 1076.4 Km (210 KN) Number of tension hardware 468 per 20 Kms Number of tension hardware 23.4 per Km

Nos Nos Nos Nos Nos

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-6
AMOUNT OF STEEL REQUIRED PER KM FOR 400 KV D/C (TWIN SNOWBIRD BUNDLE) TRANSMISSION LINE (HILLY ZONE)

Sr.N

Tower Type/ Extn. Tower Extn

Weight of Tower/ Extn. (MT)


19.00 1.52 4.90 6.42

Number of Towers/ Extns. 16 1 2

Total weight (MT) 304.00 1.52 9.80 0.00

C
3 mtr 6 mtr 9 mtr

Tower Extn

Total for C 26.00 D


3 mtr 6 mtr 9 mtr 18 mtr 2.36 9.32 11.00 26.50

315.32
11 2 1 2 286.00 4.72 9.32 22.00

Tower Extn

Total for D 40.00 E


3 mtr 6 mtr 3.21 12.80

322.04
12 1 1 480.00 3.21 12.80

Total for E Total for 20 Kms of Line Total for 1 km of Line Nuts and Bolts for 1 km Line ( 5% of tower Steel)

496.01 1133.37 56.67 2.83

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

TIDONG-II HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure 12

TERMINAL EQUIPMENT AT JANGI THOPAN END


Sr.N Description Qty Unit Rate in Lacs Excise Duty/ Custom Duty (%) 22 22 Amount in Excise Duty Lacs Amount in Lacs 1200 240 264 52.8

1 2

400 KV GIS Feeder Bays Single phase SF6/Air Out door Bushing complete with Mounting Structures , Terminal Connections , Other accessories with Bus duct connection to line feeder and Galvanized structures for mounting etc.

2 6

Nos Nos

600 40

3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

400 KV Isolators with earth Switch 400 KV LAs 400/.11 KV 3 phase CVTs PLCC Equipment

2 6 2 2 1893.68

Sets Nos Sets Sets

6 2 7 40

16 16 16 16

12 12 14 80

1.92 1.92 2.24 12.8

Total
Total including ED

1558 1756.8 136.88 5.48 113.62

335.68

Imported Item Indigenous Item CST @ 4% on indigenous Item Transportation and Insurance @6% on 9
Erection and Commissioning charges @8% on indigeneous and 6 % on imported item

14

116.36

15

G. Total

2129.13

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

TIDONG-II HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAMBA HEP

Transmission Works

Cost Estimate

Annexure-12
VEHICLES AND WORK SHOP MACHINERY

Sr.N 1 2 3 4

Description 7.5 Tonn Truck Jeep/Car Maintenance Van Workshop equipment such as Lathe, Welding set, drilling machines, Powerrt hack saw etc. Total

Qty 2 2 1 1

Rate 8.5 3.5 4.5 LS

Unit Nos Nos Nos

Amount in Lacs 17 7 4.5 5.5

34

Electrical (Annexures) Ch-XII

H.P. State Electricity Board

CHAPTER-XIII
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
13.0 GENERAL Chamba Hydro- electric Project has been contemplated as a run of the river development on Ravi river in Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh. This project is estimated to cost Rs. 377.92 Cr. at price level of June, 2004. The cost at power bus bar worksout to Rs. 366.13 Cr.Abstract of cost estimate of Civil works, P-Production and T-Transmission have been given as per Annexure13.1-(a) to13.1-(c). Year wise phasing of expenditure for capital required on this project is given as per Annexure-13.2. Interest during construction has been considered as per Annexure- 13.3. Depreciation on Civil and Electrical works has been worked out as 3.00% as per Annexure13.4.The levelised tariff of energy generated at power house bus bars has been worked out as Rs. 1.17 per unit during 90% dependable year as per Annexure-13.5. The cost of energy in the Ist year of operation works out to Rs. 1.48 per unit. 13.1 CAPITAL COST OF THE PROJECT Abstract of the capital cost of the project, to the price level of June, 2004 is as under: -

XIII - 2 S.No. Description 1. 2. Unit-I Civil works P-Production (Electrical works) Total Generation Cost 3. Transmission Grand total 13.2 ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION Chamba HEP has been conceived in between Chamera-I and Chamera-II HEPs which are presently under operation with NHPC Ltd. and power therefrom is being evacuated through 400 KV D/C line upto PGCIL substation in the Northern grid As laid down in CEA and CERC Guidelines, economic justification of a hydel project is to be done by comparing cost of alternative source of energy in that region. The levelized tariff of this project in 90% dependable year works out as Rs. 1.17/unit at power use bus bars as per Annexure-13.5). This project will provide power at cheaper rates in comparison to thermal power rate which, at present is more than Rs.3.75 / unit. Additionally this project will provide pollution free power for years together at much cheaper rates considering the escalation in coal prices for Thermal Power. 13.3 CAPITAL STRUCTURE Capital structure has been assumed as 70% debt from Financial Institutions and 30% equity from Govt. Amount (Rs. in lac.) 22481.00 14131.38 36613.10 1178.47 37791.58

XIII - 3 13.4 REVENUE ANTICIPATION Power tariff for supply of power at powerhouse bus bars has been assumed as Rs. 2.75 per unit. Revenue has been assessed accordingly for 90% dependable year as Rs. 173.25 Cr. 13.5 REPAYMENT PERIOD Normally, the leading financial institutions in India prescribe a repayment period of 15 years including 3 to 4 years moratorium period. A period of 12 years has, therefore, been taken into account, as repayment period for fixation of tariff. . 13.6 COST PER MW The estimated cost of the project at June, 2004 price level is Rs. 377.92 Cr. including transmission and Rs. 366.13 Cr. at power house bus bars for an installed capacity of 126 MW. This gives a capital cost of Rs. 3.0 Cr.per MW of installed capacity including cost of transmission and Rs. 2.90 Cr. per MW at generation. At present price level, the cost of medium hydroelectric project at Rs. 6.00 crore per MW is considered to be reasonable. From this criterion, the cost per MW for Chamba Hydel Project is reasonable, making the project suitable for exploitation. 13.7 INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION The detail of expenditure during the construction period and the calculation of interest during construction has been shown in Annexure-13.3. It is seen that IDC @ 10.00 % on loan works out to Rs. 41.97 at power house bus bars.

XIII - 4 13.8 ENERGY AVAILABLE FOR SALE As per power studies of the project, the total energy generation in 90% dependable year has been arrived at 646.82 MUs. As per Govt. of India Guide Lines, an auxiliary consumption @ 0.7% and transformation losses @ 0.5% have been considered at power house bus bars . 13.9 RATE OF DEPRECIATION As per the revised guidelines circulated by Govt. of India, Ministry of Power, Vide notification dated 29th March, 1994, the weighted rate of depreciation has been worked out on the basis of straight line formula. The rate of depreciation works Annexure-13.4. 13.10 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES As per the guide lines of Ministry of Power, Govt. of India, the Operation and Maintenance charges inclusive of insurance have been taken as 1.50 % of the capital cost. 13.11 CALCULATION OF TARIFF Calculation of tariff for primary energy during 35 years of operation for 90% dependable year has been worked out as per GOI guidelines and shown in Annexure-13.5 comprising the following. i) ii) Interest on loan from PFC @ 10.00 % p.a. Interest on working capital @ 9.75 % required for 2 months of average billing for sale of electricity and operation & maintenance expenses for one month. out to 3.00% of the project cost as per

XIII - 5 iii) iv) v) O&M charges including insurance charges @ 1.5% p.a. Income tax @ 35% and surcharge @ 10% on income tax has been considered. Discounting rate @ 12% for tariff calculation .

At power house bus bar, it will be seen that sale rate of power shall be Rs. 1.48 per unit during Ist year of operation and Rs. 0.71 per unit during 13th year i.e after repayment of loan. The levelised tariff rate works out to Rs. 1.17 per unit at power house bus bars. 13.12 INDIRECT BENEFITS Besides providing pollution free power at a cheap rate to the Northern Grid; discussed in preceding paras, this project, located in Chamba district of HP, will help in the overall development of the people of the area.. Employment to skilled/non-skilled labour of the area, industrial and economic development are additional benefits from this project. Keeping these points in view, this project merits consideration for an implementation. 13.13 MERITS OF THE PROJECT Chamba HEP (126 MW) is a down stream development of proposed Chamera-II HEP (300 MW). Following are the strengths and weaknesses of the project. i) ii) iii) Project sites are located on the right bank of existing motorable road. No major resettlement of people is required for construction of project. Construction material is locally available.

XIII - 6 iv) Almost all the major sites of the project viz. intake, inlet portal and adit portals of HRT and power house are connected with motorable road. v) The levellised tariff works out to be Rs. 1.17 per unit at power house bus bar which is on lower side. 13.14 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The construction of the project has been proposed to be completed in four and half years. The construction schedule has been presented in drawing No. Chamba-PR-12 .

XIII - 7

XIII - 8

PARA 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 13.10 13.11 13.12 13.13 13.14 ANNEXURE-13.1-(a) TO 13.1(c) ANNEXURE-13.2 ANNEXURE-13.3

DESCRIPTION GENERAL CAPITAL COST OF THE PROJECT ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION CAPITAL STRUCTURE REVENUE ANTICIPATION REPAYMENT PERIOD COST PER MW INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION ENERGY AVAILABLE FOR SALE RATE OF DEPRECIATION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES CALCULATION OF TARIFF INDIRECT BENEFITS MERITS OF THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ABSTRACT OF COST OF CIVIL WORKS, P-PRODUCTION & TTRANSMISSION YEARWISE PHASING OF FUNDS CONSTRUCTION AT POWER HOUSE BUS BARS

PAGE XIII-1 XIII-1 TO XIII-2 XIII-2 XIII-2 XIII-3 XIII-3 XIII-3 XIII-3 XIII-4 XIII-4 XIII-4 XIII-4 TO XIII-5 XIII-5 XIII-5 TO XIII-6 XIII-6 XIII-7 TO XIII-9

XIII-10

CALCULATION OF INTEREST DURING XIII-11

ANNEXURE-13.4 ANNEXURE-13.5

WEIGHTED AVERAGE DEPRECIATION XIII-12 LEVELLISED TARIFF OF ENERGY FOR 90% DEPENDABLE YEAR AT POWER HOUSE BUS BARS. XIII-13 TO XIII14

XIII - 9

You might also like