Chapter 05 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 1229869805849562 1
Chapter 05 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 1229869805849562 1
Chapter 05 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 1229869805849562 1
An instrument may be negotiable either by (1) Statute - Promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques are negotiable instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; or (2) By usage - Bank notes, bank drafts, share warrants, bearer debentures, dividend warrants, scripts and treasury bills An instrument is to be called 'negotiable' if it possesses the following characteristic features: 1) Freely transferable - Transferability may be by (a) delivery, or (b) by endorsement and delivery. 2) Holder's title free from defects: The holder (of the negotiable instrument) in due course acquires a good title not withstanding any defect in a previous holder's title. A holder in due course is one who receives the instrument for value and without any notice as to the defect in title of the transferor. 3) The Holder can sue in his own Name - Another characteristic feature of a negotiable instrument, is that its holder in due course, can sue on the instrument in his own name. 4) A negotiable instrument can be transferred infinitum, i.e., can be transferred any number of times till its maturity. 5) A negotiable instrument is subject to certain presumptions.
Presumptions as to negotiable instruments [Sections 118-119] 1) As to Consideration - Every negotiable instrument is deemed to have been made, drawn, and accepted
endorsed, negotiated or transferred for consideration. 2) As to date- Every negotiable instrument bear the date on which it is made or drawn. 3) As to Acceptance- Every bill of exchange was accepted within a reasonable time after the date mentioned therein and before the date of its maturity. 4) As to Transfer- Every transfer of a negotiable instrument was made before the date of its maturity in case of an instrument payable otherwise than on demand. 5) As to the order of Endorsements - The endorsements appearing on it were made in the order in which they appear thereon. 6) As to lost Instruments - Where an instrument has been lost or destroyed, that it was duly stamped and the stamp was duly cancelled. 7) As to holder-in-due course - The holder of the instrument is a holder in due course. 8) As to dishonour - If a suit is filed upon an instrument, which has been dishonoured, the Court shall, on proof of the protest, presume the fact of dishonour unless it is disproved.
IIPM ACT
31
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
A signs instruments in the following terms: "I acknowledge myself to be indebted to 'B' in Rs. 1000, to be paid on demand, for value received." Followings are Not Promissory Notes. (i) "Mr. B, I.O.U. (I owe you) Rs. 1000." (ii) "I promise to pay B Rs. 1500 on D's death, provided he leaves me enough to pay that sum," (iii) "I promise to pay B Rs. 500 seven days after my marriage with C."
From the definition, it is clear that a promissory note must have the following essential elements. (1) In writing - A promissory note must be in writing. Writing includes print and typewriting. (2) Promise to pay - It must contain an undertaking or promise to pay. Thus, a mere acknowledgement of indebtedness is not sufficient. Notice that the use of the word `promise' is not essential to constitute an instrument as promissory note. (3) Unconditional - The promise to pay must not be conditional. Thus, instruments payable on performance or nonperformance of a particular act or on the happening or non-happening of an event are not promissory notes. (4) Signed by the Maker The promissory note must be signed by the maker, otherwise it is of no effect. (5) Certain Parties - The instrument must point out with certainty the maker and the payee of the promissory note. (6) Certain sum of money - The sum payable must be certain or capable of being made certain. (7) Promise to pay money only - If the instrument contains a promise to pay something in addition money, it cannot be a promissory note. (8) Number, place, date etc - These are usually found in a promissory note but are not essential in law. If a promissory note does not bear a date, it is deemed to have been made when it was delivered. (9) It may be payable in installments (10) It may be payable on demand or after a definite period - Payable 'on demand' means payable immediately or any time till it becomes time-barred. A demand promissory note becomes time barred on expiry of 3 years from the date it bears. (11) It cannot be made payable to bearer on demand or even payable to bearer after a certain period (12) It must be duly stamped under the Indian Stamp Act - It means that the stamps of the requisite amount must have been affixed on the instrument and duly cancelled either before or at the time of its execution. A promissory note, which is not so stamped, is a nullity.
1)
IIPM ACT
32
The amount is always payable on demand. The cheque is not entitled to days of grace.
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
2) 3) 4) 5) 6)
Acceptance is not needed. A cheque can be crossed Notice of dishonour is not necessary. The parties thereon remain liable, even if no notice of dishonour is given.
7)
A cheque is not to be noted or protested in case of dishonour. 8) The protection given to the paying banker in respect of crossed cheques is peculiar to this instrument.
banker. 2) The amount may be payable on demand or after a. specified time. 3) A usance (time) bill is entitled to three days of grace. 4) A bill payable after sight must be accepted. 5) Crossing of a bill of exchange is not possible. 6) Notice of dishonour is necessary to hold the parties liable thereon. A party who does not receive a notice of dishonour can generally escape its liability thereon. 7) A bill is noted or protested to establish dishonour. 8) No such protection is available in the case of bills.
A note contains an unconditional promise by the maker to pay the payee. 3) No prior acceptance is needed. 4) The liability of the maker or drawer is primary and absolute. 5) No notice of dishonour need be given. 6) The maker of the note stands in immediate relation with the payee.
A 'holder in-due-course'
A holder of a negotiable instrument is a person entitled in his own name to the possession of that negotiable instrument and to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto. A 'holder in-doe-course', on the other hand, is a person who for consideration became the possessor of a negotiable instrument before the due date of payment of that instrument and without having sufficient cause to believe that any defect existed in the title of the person from whom he derived his title. Thus, where a person receives a negotiable instrument without consideration, he may be a holder but will not be called as a holder in due course.
5.6 CERTAIN IMPORTANT CONCEPTS AND EXPLANATIONS Ambiguous Instrument (Section 17) - the holder may at his election treat it as either and the instrument shall be
thenceforward treated accordingly. Where Amount is stated differently in Figures and Words (Section 18) - the amount stated in words shall be the amount undertaken or ordered to be paid. Inchoate Instruments (Section 20) - It means an instrument that is incomplete in certain respects. Where one person signs and delivers to another person a duly stamped negotiable instruments and however, that negotiable instrument is either wholly blank or having written thereon. Such an instrument is thus incomplete (inchoate).
LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
IIPM ACT
33
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
The maker of the instrument has thereby prima facie authorises the holder thereof to make or complete, for any amount therein but not exceeding the amount covered by the stamp. Lost or Stolen Instruments (Sec. 58) - In such instances, the possessor or endorsee who has found or had obtained the instrument by fraud shall not be entitled to receive the amount due thereon from such maker of the lost instrument. (Exception when the later (finder) person is holder in due course). Forged Instruments - As a general rule, a forged signature does not confer a good title. Even a holder in due course cannot claim payment on a forged instrument.
Features of a Cheque
Dating of cheques
Crossing of cheques
IIPM ACT
34
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
with or without the words 'not negotiable', that addition shall be deemed a crossing and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally (2) Special - implies the specification of the name of the banker on the face of the cheque The object of special crossing is to direct the drawee banker to pay the cheque only if it is presented through the particular bank mentioned therein. Thus, it makes the cheque system still safer. A person who takes such a cheque shall not have and shall not be capable of giving a better title to the cheque than that which the person, from whom he took it in the first instance, had. Thus, by including the words 'not negotiable', the cheque is deprived of its special feature of negotiability. A bank, therefore, should be extra careful in paying such cheques. An A/c payee crossing signifies that the drawer intends the payment to be credited only to the payees account and in none else. The addition of 'A/c payee' to a crossing has no legal sanctity and the paying banker may ignore such a direction without being liable for any damages. The instrument is rendered not negotiable (making the 'paying banker' responsible to see that payment is made to the person who is entitled to receive it) plus A/c payee crossing directs the collecting banker to collect it for the payee only. A cheque may be crossed by any of the following: 1. The drawer of a cheque. 2. The holder of a cheque. 3. The Banker, in whose favour the cheque has been crossed specially. Marking or certification is a method adopted when the paying banker verifies the customer's account and indicates thereon that there are enough funds in his account torn that cheque. [Sita Ram v. Bombay Bullion Association (1965)]. Marking only certifies the genuineness of the drawer's signature and the sufficiency of funds. An alteration is material if it alters materially or substantially the operation of the instrument and thereby the rights and liabilities of the parties. In Aldons v. Cornwall, a material alteration was defined as "an alteration, which alters the business effect of the instrument if used for any business purpose.
Marking of cheques
Material alterations
Ex(i) date; (ii) the time of payment; (iii) the place of payment; (iv) the sum payable; (v) the number of parties; (vi) the relationship between parties; (vii) legal character of the instrument; (viii) opening a crossed cheque; (ix) converting an order cheque into a bearer cheque. It is immaterial as to who makes the alteration. An alteration made by an outsider or stranger to the instrument will be considered as an alteration made by the holder himself as it is the duty of the holder to preserve the instrument, free from such forgeries.
Any material alteration of a negotiable instrument, which has not been, consented to by either the drawee or the payee is void as against them.
IIPM ACT
35
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
(v) (vi)
canceling the word bearer and making the cheque payable to order; and alteration made with the consent of the parties.
The drawee of a cheque having sufficient funds of the drawer in his hands must pay the cheque when duly required so to do. In default of such payment, the paying bank must compensate the drawer for any loss or damage caused by such default Ex In Rolin v. Steward it was held that even though the default arose through inadvertence, and in fact the cheque was subsequently paid, the Court will not award merely nominal damages, because credit of the customer was seriously affected. This would be the case even if the customer's account was overdrawn but the banker had agreed to pay his cheques on an overdraft within certain limits. [Fleming v. Bank of New Zealand]. A banker paying the cheques crossed generally to a banker or to the specified banker, is protected even if it turns out to be a payment to a wrong payee. Payment in due course means payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument made in good faith and without negligence. They are as follows: -
1. Payment must be in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument 2. Payment must be made in good faith and without negligence 3. Payment must be made to the person in possession of the instrument 4. Payment must be made to the person entitled to receive. 5. Payment must be made in money only. When banker must refuse payment
A paying banker must refuse payment on cheques if any of the following circumstances exist: 1. Where the customer countermands the payment (stopped by the drawer) 2. On receipt of a notice of customer's death 3. On customer's becoming insolvent 4. On receipt of a notice of the customer's insanity 5. On receipt of Garnishee order 5. On assignment of Credit balance 7. On suspicious misuse by trustee Where the cheque is post-dated. Where the funds of the customer are insufficient. Where a cheque is not duly presented. Not properly signed joint holders Material alteration or irregularity Presented after validity period
IIPM ACT
36
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
Steel vs. Nagarjuna Investments (1997) and N.E.P. C. Micon Ltd. vs. Magna Leasing Ltd. (1999)].
(2).Payment against an enforceable debt (3). Cheque should be presented to the paying bank within the validity period (generally 6 months from the date on
which it is drawn)
(4). Payee to serve Default Notice, demanding payment within 30 days (5). Drawer liable upon failure to pay within 30 days` Upon failure Complaint in writing; Offence triable by 1st Magistrate
The payee having failed to receive the payment within 30 days` of notice of dishonour of the cheuqe, shall have to make a police complaint in this regard. This is a cognizable offence and shall be tried by a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class. A director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly in case the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance, or is attributable to any neglect on his part in this regard. - Rajneesh Aggarwal v. Anil Bhalla (2001). However, a person will not be liable in a case. (i) where such person proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or (ii) where he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence; (iii) where he is nominated as a Director of a company by the Central Government or State Government or financial institutions.
Offences by companies
This is a non-obstante clause. It overrides the provisions contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It has been now provided that offences for dishonour of cheques shall be tried by a Judicial magistrate of the first class or by a Metropolitan Magistrate. In the case of summary trial, the maximum sentence that may be passed by the Magistrate shall be imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year and an amount of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees. The trial shall, so far as practicable, consistent with the interests of justice, be continued from day to day. Further, every trial shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. Every offence punishable under Negotiable Instruments Act shall be compoundable (Section 147)
1. Inland Bill
2. Foreign Bills
LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
IIPM ACT
37
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
A foreign bill of exchange is (a) drawn in India upon a person resident outside India and made payable outside India, or (b) drawn outside India and payable in India. ExX of Bombay draws a bill of exchange on Y of London payable at London.
A trade bill is a bill of exchange issued in respect of a genuine trade transaction. Such bills are drawn by the seller on the buyer in respect of payment of the price of the goods sold and purchased. Since an accommodation bill is drawn and accepted without any consideration, it creates no obligation of payment between the parties to the transaction. But, however, all bills are not genuine bills i.e., they do not represent a trade transaction but are drawn as a convenient mode of accommodating a friend. Ex - Thus, X may be in need of money and approaches his friend Y who instead of lending money directly, draws and accepts a bill of exchange, say, for Rs. 5,000. If the credit of Y is good it lends a currency to the bill and it can be discounted with the bankers or any other person. On maturity, X remits the amount with Y who in turn pays it in honouring the bill of exchange on presentment. Thus, it provides an accommodation to the party and is, therefore, called an 'Accommodation Bill'. The language and form of an accommodation bill is, however, similar to a genuine trade bill.
Time bills, also called as usance bills, are bills payable at a fixed period after date or sight of the bills. Thus, a bill of exchange drawn payable at 3 months after the date it is drawn is a time or usance bill. Similarly, a bill drawn payable at 90 days after sight is again a time or usance bill. A time bill may also be made payable at a fixed period after an event which is certain to happen. Hence, a bill payable at 90 days after the death of the drawer will be a valid time bill. A bill of exchange or a promissory note is payable on demand when It is made payable 'on demand' or 'at sight' or 'on presentation. No time for payment is mentioned therein (Section 19). It is a common practice in home as well as foreign trade to deliver to the banker along with the bills of exchange, the documents of title to the goods. (Ex- Lorry Receipt, Railway Receipt or Bill or Lading). Where the banker is instructed to deliver to the drawee of the bill the documents of title against acceptance of the bill, the bill is called as Documents against Acceptance of Bill (D/A Bill) and where the documents are to be released only against payment, it is called as Documents against Payment ad Bill (DIP Bill).
5. Demands Bills
(i) (ii)
1. The Drawer - the person who draws or makes the bill. 2. The Drawee - the person on whom the bill is drawn. 3. The Payee - the person to whom the amount of the bill is payable. 4. The Holder - is the original payee but where the bill has been endorsed, the endorsee. 5. The endorser - is the person who endorses a bill. 6. The endorsee - is the person to whom the bill is negotiated by endorsement. An acceptor for honour is a person who, on the refusal by the original drawee to accept the bill or to furnish better security when demanded by the notary, accepts the bill in order to safeguard the honour of the drawer or any endorser. Acceptor for honour must specify as to whose honour he is accepting the bill of exchange . Where the acceptor does not express for whose honour it is made, it shall be
1. The Maker - the person who makes the note promising 'to pay the amount stated therein. 2. The Payee - the person to whom the amount of the note is payable. 3. The Holder - is either the original payee or any other person in whose favour the note been endorsed. 4. The Endorser - the person who indorses the note in favour of another person. 5. The Endorsee - the person in whose favour the note is negotiated by indorsement.
ACCEPTANCE
The acceptance of a bill is the indication by the drawee of his assent to the order of the drawer. It has been defined as the signature of the drawee of a bill who has signed his assent upon bill and delivered it or
LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
IIPM ACT
38
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
given notice of such signing to the holder to some person on his behalf. An acceptance to be valid must be (a) in writing, (b) signed by the drawee or his agent, (c) on bill of exchange, and (d) completed by delivery to the holder or by notice of acceptance to him or some person on his behalf [Jagjivan Mauji Vithlani v. M/s Ranchahodas Meghaji, 1945] An acceptance of a bill may be general or qualified.
PRESENTMENT
1. 2.
Presentment of a negotiable instrument is made for two purposes. Presentment for acceptance - It is only bills of exchange that require presentment for acceptance and that too not all but certain kind of bills only. Bill payable on demand or on a fixed date need not be presented for acceptance. Presentment for payment - A negotiable instrument must be presented for payment to the maker, acceptor or drawee, thereof, as the case may be, by the holder or his agent.
DISHONOUR
IIPM ACT
39
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS
(8) When the party entitled to notice, knowing the facts, promises unconditionally to pay the amount due on the instrument.
NOTING
Noting is a convenient method of authenticating the fact of dishonour. Where an instrument is dishonoured, the holder, besides giving the above notice, should get the bill or promissory note 'noted' by the notary public. The notary public presents the instrument, notes down in his register date of its dishonour and the reason, if any, given by the acceptor. If the instrument has been expressly dishonoured, the reason why the holder treats it as dishonoured and the notary's charges should be metioned. 'Noting' must be made within a reasonable time after dishonour. Noting is not compulsory in the case of an inland bill or note, but foreign bills must be protested, if s required by the law of the place where drawn.
PROTESTING
The protest is the formal notarial certificate attesting the dishonour of the bill and based upon the noting. After the noting has been made, the formal protest may be drawn up by the notary at his leisure. When the protest is drawn up it relates back to the date of noting. A protest to be valid must contain the following particulars: 1. The instrument itself, or a literal transcript thereof. 2. The names of the parties against whom the instrument is protested. 3. The fact and reason/reasons for dishonour. 4. Place and time of dishonour or refusal to give better security. 5. Signature of the notary public. 5. In the event of an acceptance for honour or of a payment for honour, the name of the person by whom or the person for whom, and the manner in which, such acceptance or payment was offered and effected.
COMPENSATION
Compensation to holder
Compensation to Endorser
The holder is entitled to the amount due upon the instrument with interest plus the expenses properly incurred in noting and protesting it. If an endorser of a bill has paid the amount due thereon, he is entitled to the amount so paid plus expenses with interest @ 6 per cent per annum from the date of his paying to the date of his receiving back amount. Compensation that may be claimed include damages to credit and reputation of the drawer, and the Court would normally award exemplary or vindictive damages.
5.12 HUNDIS
Hundis are instruments written in an oriental language. The word 'hundi' appears to have been derived, from the Sanskrit work 'hund' which means 'to collect'. These hundis were, therefore, originally used for the collection of debts. Hundis have been in circulation in India from very early times, long before the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. It is to be noted that The Negotiable Instruments Act does not apply to hundis, but where, by any words in the instrument itself, the usages regarding such instruments are excluded, or where it is expressly indicated that the legal relations of the parties thereto shall be governed by the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, the Act becomes applicable. In the absence of any of the above indications, hundis shall be governed by local usages applying to such documents [Kanhyalal v. Ramkumar, 1956].
Kinds of hundis Shah-Jog Hundi - A Shah-jog hundi is drawn by one merchant on another asking the latter to pay the said hundi
to a 'Shah'. 'Shah' is a respectable and responsible person, a man of worth and known in the bazar.
Darshni Hundi (payable at sight) - A darshni hundi must be presented for payment within a reasonable
IIPM ACT
40
CH. 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS