PD CIG 023 - June 2004-Eng
PD CIG 023 - June 2004-Eng
PD CIG 023 - June 2004-Eng
PERMANENT DOCUMENT
CIG 023
WARNING : THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS.
Date of issue : June 2004 This documents supersedes CIG 023 issue January 2001
This document contains a cover page, a report form of 5 pages and: RECEIVING INSPECTION DATA SHEET TEST DATA SHEET Routine Tests and PVT IDENTIFICATION OF SELECTED SAMPLES Inspectors Evaluation - Informative Inspectors Evaluation - Findings
Secretariat held by EEPCA, the European Electrical Products Certification Association 142, rue du Faubourg Saint-Denis F 75010 Paris E-mail: [email protected] Document issued and distributed by EEPCA EEPCA 2004 Copyright all rights reserved
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
1
1.1
General Information
Manufacturer's registered name: ..................................................................................................................................................
and factory location: .......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1.2
Record below the names and position held of the main people involved in the inspection
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
If any details such as address, contact person, tel., fax, etc. have changed since the last visit, record them. 1.3 1.4 Pre-Licence Routine ENEC Key Mark HAR EMC Special yes no
Pre-Licence only: Is the information given in the Questionnaire CIG 022 Section B accurate and complete? If 'no', amend the Questionnaire as appropriate and attach a copy to this report. Inspection Details: Inspection
1of 1, 1of 2, etc.
1.5
Product Category
Type of Product
Page 1 of 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
2
2.1
2.2
If the manufacturer relies on Certificates of Conformity, do they clearly identify the product, quantity of items covered, the specification to which the products conform, the production date and are they signed or stamped by a person authorised by the supplier? Are non-conforming products clearly identified and/or segregated to prevent unauthorised use?
yes
no
2.3
yes
no
3
3.1
3.1.1 Do they have readily available up-to-date documents, assembly and test instructions, photographs, drawings or samples on all those parts which have a impact on the safety of the finished products? Give details of all test and inspections performed by the manufacturer and enter in the table TEST DATA SHEET. 3.2 Do the Production Line Inspection and Routine Tests entered on TEST DATA SHEET sufficiently cover all the Certification Bodies requirements? Is there a documented procedure to ensure that all products will be tested or inspected according to the manufacturers requirements? Are non-conforming products clearly identified or segregated to prevent unauthorised use? Are trends of test results monitored and reported to the production and management authorities? Are repaired and reworked products re-inspected in accordance with documented procedures?
yes
no
no no no no
4
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4
Functional Check on Test and Measuring Equipment used for Safety Tests
Did the inspector witness the correct functioning of the equipment even if certified products were not in production? Is a functional check conducted with intervals which will allow previous production to be retested if incorrect functioning is detected? Is there a documented procedure for the functional checks? Is there a documented procedure describing actions to be taken if a functional check is found to be unsatisfactory? yes yes yes yes no no no no
Page 2 of 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
6
6.1 6.2 6.3
7
7.1
8
8.1
8.2 8.3
yes yes
no no
8.4 8.5
yes yes
no no
9
9.1 9.2
Records
Are records kept at least for the period between two inspection visits? Are the records listed below maintained and satisfactory? yes yes yes yes yes no no no no no yes no
9.2.1 Incoming inspection records. 9.2.2 Test records of the routine tests. 9.2.3 Test records of product verification tests (if required). 9.2.4 Records of results of functioning checks of test and measuring equipment. 9.2.5 Records of calibration of test and measuring equipment. If records were countersigned, provide details below. If not, explain below why not.
10
Corrective Actions
If there were any unsatisfactory findings entered in the previous inspection report, have these been corrected? Provide details regarding the corrective actions that have been taken . yes no
Page 3 of 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
11
Quality System
If the manufacturer has a Quality System certified or assessed by an accredited Body, provide details of QMS standard, scope, name of certification body and certificate expiry date.
12
12.1 Does the manufacturer regularly check that all documented procedures as required by the Certification Body(ies) are followed? 12.2 Are records regarding results and actions taken available? 12.3 Is the personnel carrying out above required checks appropriately trained and independent of the process being audited?
yes yes
no no
13
13.1 13.2
Non-Conforming Products
Is there a documented procedure covering the way to handle non-conforming products? If no, then describe the process on the INSPECTORS EVALUATION page. Is the procedure and the way in which it is applied satisfactory? yes yes no no
14
14.1 14.2 14.3
Customer Complaint
If no customer complaints have been received then the following questions should be applied to the process Are records kept of customer complaints? Are corrective actions regarding customer complaints recorded? Does the manufacturer review customer complaints? yes yes yes no no no
15
15.1
15.2 15.3
yes yes
no no
15.4
yes
no
15.5
yes
no
16
16.1
If you did not personally select the samples, explain why not and who did?
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.2
If the selected sample(s) do not bear the Certification Mark then provide the reason for selection in the table IDENTIFICATION OF SELECTED SAMPLES
Page 4 of 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
17
17.1
Inspectors Evaluation
List your findings on the INSPECTORS EVALUATION page(s) by referencing the applicable clauses in this report (including comments, recommendations, etc.) and explain them to the manufacturer. If possible indicate also the corrective actions the manufacturer intends to take. Give your recommendations by ticking the appropriate box: 1. No unsatisfactory findings. 2. Minor unsatisfactory finding(s). Grant or continue certification. Manufacturers corrective action(s) will be checked at next visit. Grant or continue certification. Manufacturer shall confirm corrective action(s). Grant or continue certification. Special or early routine inspection recommended for checking corrective action(s). Certification refused/suspended and repeated factory inspection recommended after the manufacturer has confirmed implementation of corrective action(s).
17.2
17.3
Attachments: RECEIVING INSPECTION DATA SHEET TEST DATA SHEET- Routine Tests and PVT IDENTIFICATION OF SELECTED SAMPLES
Signature:
Signature:
Page 5 of 5
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
% check
Factory limits. Failure applied indicated by Ohm max. MOhm min. mA max. mA max. mA max. mA max.
Basic insulation V V V s s s
e. Indicate method used (hot/cold, at mains voltage, low voltage resistance check, etc.). f. Are all controls and components checked during the test ? W = Test witnessed by the inspector, R = according to records
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
Inspectors Evaluation
=Related paragraph number of this report:
Findings
Inspectors points requiring corrective action from the manufacturer Use separate Supplementary Page for different Certification Bodies if necessary
THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF USED BY CIG MEMBERS AND THEIR AUTHORISED AGENTS
at manufacturer:
Product/Type/Technical data
date:
Licence Ref. No. Production period Code letters
Code letters: P = Sample from Production or S = Stock; F = Forwarded by the Manufacturer; T = Transported to the Certification Body by the Inspector; A = Shipped by the Inspection Agency * If requested samples for particular CB were not selected, please explain why in the table.