Criminal Information for Void Delegation of

Authority and Criminal Liability

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals

September 6 of 2025
Aaron: Prince,
c/o 3616 Champion Drive
Rapid City, South Dakota

To all officers, agents, employees, contractors, and parties acting under color of law, statute, or
delegated authority of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION or its sub-corporate instrumentalities:

Let it be known:

This Criminal Information is executed and declared by the living man identified herein as Affiant,
operating in propria persona, sui juris, not a surety, resident, citizen, subject, or entity of any
municipal, corporate, or foreign jurisdiction.

Affiant stands as:

 Beneficiary and sole equitable titleholder of the private constructive trust and associated res
(legal name and estate) formed without Affiant’s knowledge, consent, or full disclosure, in
breach of lawful fiduciary duty and natural right.

 A living being, made in Divine image, not a vessel, corporation, debtor, transmitting utility,
or fictions created by the UNITED STATES or any of its subdivisions.

Pursuant to the supreme authority vested in the people by the Declaration of Independence (1776)
and the Constitution for the united States of America (1787, as lawfully amended by the Bill of
Rights 1791), and in strict adherence to Statutes at Large and foundational Public Law, Affiant
delivers this Criminal Information as formal and lawful Notice to all parties knowingly or
unknowingly participating in violations of Public Law, fiduciary breach, or constructive fraud.

This Notice shall be interpreted and enforced under the supremacy of Public Law over private
corporate statutes, codes, regulations, and administrative rules. No corporate immunity, limited
liability, or color-of-authority defense shall excuse the unlawful injury to the Affiant or to the People
of these United States.

Criminal Allegations Include, but Are Not Limited To:

 Peonage and Personage under conditions constituting involuntary servitude and constructive
fraud;
 Seditious Conspiracy to overthrow or subvert the foundational Law of the Land;
 Warring Against the Constitution, thereby triggering obligations under the Insurrection Act
and related constitutional remedies;
 Breach of Trust against the Public Trust established by oath, contract, or fiduciary role;
 Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1341;
 Misprision of Felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. §4;

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 1 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  Conspiracy Against Rights under 18 U.S.C. §241;
 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law under 18 U.S.C. §242;
 Treason and Misprision of Treason in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§2381, 2382.
 UCC 1-202 – Notice; Knowledge

"A person has 'notice' of a fact if the person: (1) has actual knowledge of it; (2) has
received a notice or notification of it; or (3) from all the facts and circumstances
known to the person at the time in question, has reason to know that it exists."

Therefore, all who receive this presentment, by operation of law, are on constructive and actual
notice and may no longer claim ignorance, immunity, or jurisdictional presumption.

These acts constitute high crimes, felonies, and violations of solemn fiduciary duties owed to the
People and the Constitution of the united States of America.

Invocation of Title 50 and Standing under Perpetual

Emergency Jurisdiction
Whereas, the corporate UNITED STATES and its instrumentalities have operated under a
continuous state of emergency since March 9, 1933, declared via Presidential Proclamation 2039 and
later formalized under Title 50 U.S.C. §§ 1601–1651, creating an undeclared but perpetual war
powers construct governing all civil and commercial processes;

Whereas, the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), 50 U.S.C. § 4305, originally designed to regulate
foreign enemy property, has been unlawfully extended to private American nationals, thereby
justifying administrative control over persons, estates, and contracts under commercial military
jurisdiction;

Whereas, Title 50, when invoked without lawful delegation of authority from a sovereign People or
constitutional convention, amounts to constructive martial law and unlawfully converts civilian
status into that of a quasi-combatant or enemy subject without consent or notice;

Whereas, this condition directly violates Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
and all known principles of lawful standing, due process, and equal protection, rendering all such
enforcement mechanisms repugnant to both the law of nations and natural law;

Therefore, the Affiant hereby:

1. Rejects all presumption of Title 50 jurisdiction unless proven by valid emergency authority
ratified under constitutional process;

2. Demands cessation of any administrative or judicial process relying on commercialized war

powers or corporate emergencies not transparently declared or lawfully ratified;

3. Affirms standing as a peaceful civilian non-combatant, beneficiary of the public trust, and
holder of unalienable rights beyond the reach of military or commercial jurisdiction;

4. Notifies all agents, officers, and agencies that further action under Title 50 pretenses
constitutes a breach of public trust, commercial warfare, and unlawful conversion, actionable
under:

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 2 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 o 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 2381–2385
o The Geneva Conventions regarding treatment of civilians during undeclared war
o Jus Cogens norms prohibiting military occupation and coercive contract enforcement

Let the record reflect that the Affiant does not consent to being governed under emergency
jurisdiction, and that all such applications of power are null and void ab initio without express
delegation, ratification, and lawful publication in accordance with the National Emergencies Act and
the Constitution for the united States of America (1787).

Affirmation of Good Faith and Standing

A copy, facsimile, or digital scan of this “Criminal Information for Void Delegation of Authority and
Criminal Liability” shall be equally valid, binding, and enforceable as the original. The facts and
assertions herein are true, complete, and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and belief. I
issue this document:

 Under Penalty of Perjury under the Public Law of The United States of America,
unincorporated;
 In good faith and with clean hands, not to mislead, defraud, deceive, or threaten any party;
 In common American English, not in legal fiction or statutory construction;
 As a solemn, voluntary, and lawful act, executed to the best of my ability.

Nature and Construct of Fraudulent Legal Fictions

Let it be known and duly noticed that all artificial entities created by the UNITED STATES
CORPORATION and its agents—namely but not limited to all-capital letter names, legal persons, or
strawman constructs—are legal fictions devoid of life, rights, or natural authority. These devices
were created without full disclosure, mutual consent, or lawful consideration and thus operate in
fraud ab initio.

Said artificial persons are used systematically to convert living people into debtor entities, compel
performance under undisclosed adhesion contracts, and deny the rights of the real, living man who is
the actual source of credit, labor, and energy.

This fraudulent overlay constitutes:

 Personage: misrepresentation of the living man or woman as a corporate entity;

 Barratry: repeated and unlawful initiation of legal proceedings for profit;
 False Claims: assertions of debt, liability, or obligation without lawful nexus or original wet-
ink contract.

All attempts to enforce statutes, codes, and commercial instruments against the Affiant absent
express, knowing, and voluntary consent shall be deemed a willful act of fraud, treason, and
commercial war against the People.

Let the record show: the living Affiant is not a surety, trustee, or agent for any legal fiction, debtor
entity, or franchise. The living man retains all rights, titles, and interests unalienable under Natural
Law and Public Law.

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 3 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 Constructive Notice of Fraud and Void Delegation of Authority
Whereas, Affiant has examined the systemic structure by which all UNITED STATES
CORPORATION instrumentalities—including municipal corporations, administrative courts, and
agents acting under "color of law"—assert jurisdiction and authority over natural persons through
undisclosed adhesion contracts, unrevealed trust arrangements, and misapplication of statutory
constructs upon the general public; and

Whereas, such presumption of authority is based upon the creation and exploitation of legal fictions,
such as the all-caps name (JOHN DOE), used without the full knowledge, informed consent, or
lawful disclosure to the living man to whom such designation is fraudulently attached; and

Whereas, no lawful delegation of authority exists granting private, foreign, or corporate entities the
power to administratively convert the natural rights of any living man into commercial liabilities,
surety obligations, or debtor status under foreign private contract law schemes;

Now Therefore, let it be known that any such presumption of authority or jurisdiction by any officer,
agency, court, or actor operating under the United States Corporation or its subsidiaries is hereby
formally challenged, rebutted, and declared null, void, and without lawful foundation unless proven
with:

1. Affidavit of Full Disclosure showing lawful basis and original constitutional authority for
claimed jurisdiction;

2. Wet-ink Signed Contract entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally by the Affiant
with full understanding and mutual consideration;

3. Proof of Lawful Delegation of power derived directly from the People by way of the original
Constitution (1787) and Public Laws published in the Statutes at Large.

Failure to provide such proof constitutes constructive fraud, bad faith, tacit procuration, and
material breach of trust.

Any further enforcement action, lien, levy, collection, detention, or adjudication arising from false
presumptions, unrevealed contracts, or colorable claims against the Affiant’s natural person, body,
labor, land, or estate constitutes:

 Involuntary Servitude, in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment;

 Fraudulent Conversion, actionable in both equity and law;
 Breach of Fiduciary Duty, by all officers or agents under public oath;
 Impersonation of Public Office, when no valid delegation exists;
 Violation of Public Trust, giving rise to immediate cause for lawful remedy.

Further, pursuant to Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution for the united States of
America (1787), “No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of
Debts; ... pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of
Contracts…”, it is evident and hereby declared:

That all statutes, regulations, administrative codes, and court practices operating under corporate
UNITED STATES or its STATE subsidiaries which:

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 4 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  Substitute Federal Reserve Notes for gold or silver coin as lawful tender in private or public
debt satisfaction;

 Presume the legitimacy of debt obligations created under duress, fraud, or without mutual
assent;

 Operate under ex post facto statutory frameworks to retroactively enforce liabilities upon the
People;

 Or impair the original intent, force, or validity of lawful contracts and trusts—

are facially unconstitutional, unlawful, and repugnant to the Supreme Law of the Land, and
therefore void ab initio.

Affiant demands that all such fraudulent claims and processes cease and desist immediately, and be
rectified according to the Law of the Land.

Demand for Remedy and Fiduciary Accounting

Whereas, Affiant is a living man endowed by the Creator with unalienable Rights, and is not a party
to any knowingly, voluntarily, or intentionally executed commercial contract binding him/her to
performance under any statutory code, commercial liability scheme, or administrative debt
instrument; and

Whereas, Affiant has neither received full and honest disclosure nor tendered knowing consent to
serve as surety, vessel, or trustee for any transmitting utility, STRAWMAN, or other construct
created by a foreign or domestic corporate body;

Now Therefore, Affiant does formally and lawfully demand:

1. Immediate Fiduciary Accounting of any and all accounts, trusts, or funds established, held,
pledged, hypothecated, or securitized in the name or derivative thereof of the Affiant,
whether publicly or privately maintained;

2. Verification of Beneficial Interest, including all accounts where Affiant may be named
principal, trustee, grantor, obligor, or surety without consent;

3. Proof of Lawful Authority, by which any agency, officer, court, or corporation has acted to
encumber, monetize, securitize, or administratively adjudicate rights, assets, labor, or
property of Affiant;

4. Remedy and Restitution, as required under Public Law, equity, and natural law, including
but not limited to: discharge of alleged debts, release of bonds, return of property, and
cessation of all proceedings based on fraud, mistake, or colorable claims.

Failure to honor this demand within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of this notice and
presentment shall constitute:
 Willful dishonor and bad faith,
 A material breach of trust,
 Default by inaction,

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 5 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  And tacit admission of all claims and facts stated herein,

and shall automatically trigger lawful enforcement of remedy as authorized under:

 Public Trust Doctrine,
 Commercial law, including but not limited to UCC 3-505, UCC 3-603, and UCC 1-308,
 Common Law Right to Redress,
 And international norms of peaceful remedy and notice-based process.

Affiant shall proceed, without further notice, to assert all lawful remedies including but not limited
to:
 Commercial lien recording,
 Publication of notice,
 Petitioning for writs of mandamus or declaratory relief,
 And lawful notice of liability in domestic or international forums as required for adjudication
or cure.

Notice of Breach of Trust, Conversion, and Constructive Fraud

Whereas, Affiant is the rightful Grantor, Executor, and Beneficiary of all property, energy, and
instruments derived from his/her living being, labor, and creative expression; and

Whereas, various agents, officers, trustees, and entities—foreign and domestic, public and private—
have acted or presumed to act as fiduciaries, custodians, or administrators over such property
without full disclosure, trust indenture, or express consent, thereby operating in violation of
fiduciary obligations; and

Whereas, the conversion of Affiant’s name, estate, energy, and identity into negotiable instruments,
securities, or bonded obligations without lawful authority constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty and
constructive fraud; and

Whereas, such actions are repugnant to public policy and violate foundational trust principles,
including but not limited to:

 The “clean hands doctrine” in equity;

 The maxim that fraud vitiates all contracts;
 The natural law prohibition against involuntary servitude, unjust enrichment, and peonage;

Now Therefore, it is hereby declared and noticed:

1. That any and all presumptions of agency, guardianship, or administrative jurisdiction over
the Affiant’s living estate are expressly repudiated, denied, and revoked;

2. That all accounts, bonds, claims, ledgers, or proceedings based upon such unauthorized use,
trafficking, or securitization of Affiant’s person, property, labor, or energy are null, void, and
unenforceable;

3. That such use and concealment constitutes willful breach of trust, violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1341 (Frauds and Swindles), and constructive treason under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2381–2382, to
wit: “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to
their enemies… is guilty of treason…”;

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 6 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 4. That lawful remedy is demanded in full, including but not limited to: restitution,
disgorgement, reconveyance of title, removal of liens or bonds, cessation of all administrative
processes, and immediate cessation of war powers jurisdiction being falsely applied against a
peaceful civilian.

Affiant reserves all rights, waives none, and proceeds only by special appearance under protest and
duress, preserving all rights secured by the Constitution and the Laws of Nature.

Denial of Consent to Presumed Surety, Personage, and

Collateralization
Whereas, the Affiant has never knowingly, voluntarily, nor intentionally granted consent to be
treated as a surety, vessel, trust res, legal fiction, or corporate entity under any incorporated
statutory scheme, commercial code, or administrative presumption; and

Whereas, the use of the Affiant’s given name in all capital letters (a typographical construct not
found in any natural law or lawful constitutional instrument) constitutes an act of personage, and
further use of such name on instruments of pledge, debt, or commercial liability constitutes
constructive fraud, securities fraud, and identity theft; and

Whereas, the issuance and use of negotiable instruments, certificates of birth, security documents,
and other administrative records tied to the Affiant’s living body and estate—absent full disclosure,
lawful trust indenture, informed consent, or just compensation—constitute constructive fraud,
breach of fiduciary obligation, and unauthorized hypothecation of private rights. Such acts violate
the supreme law of the land, including Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the united States
of America (1787), which prohibits Bills of Attainder, Titles of Nobility, and the impairment of
contracts. They further violate Article III, Section 2, which demands judicial authority be grounded
in real controversies with standing; the Fourth Amendment, which secures the right of the people to
be free from unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, houses, papers, and effects; and
the Fifth Amendment, which forbids deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of
law. These acts also transgress the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which reserve to the people all
rights not expressly delegated and affirm the foundational limitation of governmental power. The
cumulative effect of these violations constitutes a breach of public trust and private liberty,
enforceable under public law and international norms.; and

Whereas, all such collateralization schemes serve foreign interests through agencies, including but
not limited to:

 The International Monetary Fund (IMF),

 The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC),
 The Federal Reserve System,
 And various BAR associations operating under foreign allegiance,

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 7 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 Now Therefore, Affiant hereby gives lawful notice and declares:

1. That no presumed contract, adhesion contract, or instrument of suretyship exists that binds
the Affiant to any incorporated entity or administrative jurisdiction without the Affiant’s
explicit, contemporaneous, informed consent;

2. That any and all alleged debts, charges, taxes, or obligations—whether municipal, federal, or
international—presumed to attach to the Affiant by virtue of a legal name, social security
number, certificate, or statutory identity are hereby repudiated and voided for fraud and lack
of meeting of the minds;

3. That personage and peonage are criminal under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1581, and commercial
slavery is a crime under international law, including The Slavery Convention of 1926 and the
Nuremberg Principles;

4. That continued enforcement of such instruments, without remedy and full restitution,
constitutes a breach of trust, insurrection against the constitutional order, and seditious
conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 2384.

Affiant operates only under natural law, public law, and lawful contract—not colorable law, private
codes, or corporate policies.

War against the Constitution Is Treason and Fraud

Whereas, every public officer, agent, trustee, and corporate actor in service to the United States, its
subsidiaries, and instrumentalities has sworn or affirmed an Oath or Affirmation to uphold and
defend the Constitution for the United States of America, and

Whereas, said Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, binding upon all who exercise power
within or under the authority of the United States (pursuant to Article VI, Clause 2), and

Whereas, any act repugnant to that Constitution—whether by statute, code, executive action,
administrative procedure, or colorable policy—is null and void ab initio, as affirmed in Marbury v.
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), and

Whereas, actions which obstruct, subvert, or defraud the Constitution—such as:

 Denial of due process,

 Use of commercial instruments in lieu of lawful money,
 Collateralization of persons or property,
 Compelled performance under unrevealed adhesion contracts,
 Imposition of administrative penalties without a judicial forum,

are acts of fraud, sedition, and treason, in violation of:

 18 U.S.C. § 2381 – Treason,

 18 U.S.C. § 2382 – Misprision of Treason,
 18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy, and

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 8 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Mail Fraud, when conducted through the U.S. postal stream, and
 18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of Felony, when such acts are known but unreported.

Now Therefore, Affiant gives lawful notice that:

1. Any and all acts committed under color of law that oppose, undermine, obstruct, or supplant
the Constitution are hereby declared ultra vires, without force of law, and void;

2. Officers or agents complicit in such acts—whether by commission or omission—are subject to

criminal prosecution, personal liability, and removal from office, under Public Law 80-772
and constitutional due process;

3. Affiant asserts and defends unalienable rights, including the right to life, liberty, property,
and the pursuit of lawful remedy, and rejects all private corporate jurisdiction which
operates in violation of constitutional boundaries.

Unlawful Mercenary Enforcement by Commercial Actors

Whereas, enforcement actions executed by unbonded private contractors, foreign-aligned agencies, or

unaccountable administrative agents—operating without proper constitutional delegation or oath of
fidelity—constitute the use of mercenary force in violation of both the Constitution and the Law of
Nations; and

Whereas, the commercialization of enforcement and militarized policing by agencies funded or

directed through corporate interests—including but not limited to federal contracting corporations,
municipal subsidiaries, or foreign debt instruments—effectively converts law enforcement into
mercenary actors executing commercial policy, not constitutional law;

Therefore, any such enforcement shall be deemed an act of aggression, actionable under:

 Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 (Constitution for the United States),

 Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 2381–2385,
 Geneva Conventions (re: civilians under occupation), and
 Jus Cogens norms forbidding mercenary activity and involuntary subjugation of civilians.

Warring against the Constitution is not

administration—it is an act of war.

Collateralization of the People Is Peonage, Personage, and

Conversion
Whereas, the involuntary pledging of any living man—without full disclosure and knowing consent—
to secure performance on behalf of a legal fiction, corporation, or all-cap government construct,
constitutes:

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 9 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  Peonage under 18 U.S.C. § 1581,
 Unlawful personage, a fraudulent assignment of identity to a legal entity,
 Conversion of equity, wherein property and rights are seized or monetized without due
process or lawful authority, and
 A breach of express trust, if done under oath or fiduciary duty, and

Whereas, the conversion of natural persons into sureties for corporate debt, via undisclosed birth
registrations, CUSIP accounts, and monetization through the Federal Reserve System, is a violation
of:

 Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which prohibits the making of anything
but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts, and
 Public Law 94-564 (90 Stat. 2660), which acknowledges the loss of constitutional money, and
 The common law maxim: “Fraud vitiates all contracts.”

Whereas, no man may lawfully be forced into corporate obligation, financial servitude, or
administrative compliance via the misuse of:

 Social Security Numbers,

 Commercial codes,
 Certificates of birth,
 Or fraudulent adhesion contracts never openly disclosed or agreed to by both parties,

Therefore, Affiant declares:

1. The collateralization of the people by any agency, department, or financial system operating
under corporate charter or bankruptcy reorganization is hereby repudiated;

2. No presumed obligation exists between Affiant and any private corporation masquerading as
lawful government;

3. All acts of conversion, trafficking in persons, or assignment of value to living souls without
lawful consent is null, void, and actionable.

“The individual is not the property of the State.” — Constitutional maxim affirmed in Hale v.
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

Remedy Under Public Trust Doctrine and Express Fiduciary

Construct
Whereas, all lawful governance arises from consent and is held in Public Trust for the benefit of the
governed, and

Whereas, the fundamental duty of all trustees—including those operating within municipal
corporations, administrative agencies, and political subdivisions—is to:

 Preserve the substance of the trust estate,

 Avoid self-dealing or private enrichment,
 Provide full disclosure to beneficiaries,

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 10 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  And honor the separation between private persons and public capacity,

Whereas, the de facto assumption of jurisdiction over living souls by use of legal fictions (e.g., all-cap
names) without express voluntary consent constitutes:

 A Breach of Fiduciary Duty,

 Bad Faith Administration,
 Constructive Fraud, and
 A violation of the principles of constructive notice and estoppel by silence,

Therefore, Affiant invokes the Public Trust Doctrine and demands the following remedies in law and
equity:

Remedy Demanded
1. Termination of Presumed Suretyship
Affiant is not a trustee, surety, or grantor for any public debt instrument, legal fiction, or
implied contract arising from concealed adhesion agreements.

2. Equitable Reinstatement of Standing

Affiant stands as a beneficiary of the Public Trust, not as a debtor, taxpayer, ward, or subject
of any corporate agency or subsidiary of the UNITED STATES.

3. Demand for Fiduciary Accounting

Affiant demands a full, sworn accounting from any and all officers, agencies, or fiduciaries
who have acted on Affiant’s name, estate, or energy for commercial benefit.

4. Revocation of Signatures Obtained Under Duress

All presumed authorizations—Social Security, voter registration, driver’s licenses, bank
contracts, etc.—are revoked nunc pro tunc ab initio if obtained through fraud, nondisclosure,
or coercion.

5. Cease and Desist from Trust Trespass

Any further use, securitization, or exploitation of Affiant’s name, estate, biological property,
or energy for corporate gain is hereby forbidden under penalty of law.

“All political power is inherent in the People… Government is instituted for their protection,
security, and benefit.” — Declaration of Rights, foundational maxim

Remedy Enforcement Mechanisms — Public Trust Execution,

Notice of Estoppel, And Fee Schedule
Whereas, remedy without enforcement is illusion, and enforcement without lawful authority is
tyranny; and

Whereas, Affiant stands in lawful execution of remedy under the Public Trust Doctrine, express
irrevocable trust principles, and the foundational laws of this Land as articulated in:

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 11 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
  The Declaration of Independence
 The Constitution for the United States of America (1787)
 Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 — “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin
a Tender in Payment of Debts”
 Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1341, 2381, 2382, and
 Maxims of Equity and Common Law Jurisprudence

Enforcement Provisions
1. Notice of Estoppel by Acquiescence
Any failure to rebut the lawful claims and affidavits contained herein within thirty (30)
calendar days shall constitute:
o Permanent estoppel in pais,
o Tacit agreement to all statements and claims,
o Admission of breach of trust and constructive fraud,
o Confession to both civil and criminal liability.

2. Injunction against Unlawful Use of Legal Person

Affiant lawfully prohibits further trespass, misuse, or misrepresentation of the private Trust
res (e.g., the all-capital-letter legal name) in any commercial, financial, administrative, or
legal matter without express written consent.

3. Mandamus by Right of Beneficiary Standing

Affiant reserves the right to petition for:
o Writs of mandamus,
o Declaratory relief, or
o Specific performance,
to compel fiduciaries, trustees, agents, or officers to discharge their lawful duties
under Public Law and fiduciary obligations.

4. Commercial Lien Enforcement (If Necessary)

In the event of continued trespass, injury, or unlawful detention, Affiant may lawfully issue
and perfect:
o UCC-1 Financing Statements,
o Notices of Liability,
o Commercial Liens or
o Equitable Charging Instruments
against offending parties, agents, or officers in both private and public capacities.

5. Public Notice and International Recording

This record may be published in:
o Public and international notice registries,
o Blockchain-based ledgers,
o Embassy archives,
o Or customary repositories of affidavit and lien processes (such as county recorders or
international notary databases).

Schedule of Contractual Fees and Damages (Fee Schedule)

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 12 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 By accepting, receiving, processing, or failing to rebut this presentment, the parties named and
unnamed become liable by operation of law and tacit agreement under contract law, in the following
amounts:

Fee Amount (Payable in Lawful Money - Gold/Silver or

Violation / Breach
Equivalent)

Failure to rebut affidavit within 30 days $100,000 per instance

Unauthorized use of Trust res (legal name) $250,000 per occurrence

Denial of due process or obstruction of remedy $500,000 per act

Attempted forced performance under color of

$1,000,000 per act
law

Physical harm or unlawful detention $5,000,000 per day

Civil or religious rights deprivation $2,000,000 per occurrence

Psychological harassment or coercion $500,000 per day

Trespass to chattel, intellectual property, or

$250,000 per item or record
estate

Breach of fiduciary duty or oath of office $750,000 per offense

Collusion, racketeering, or conspiracy $2,500,000 per act

All charges are cumulative and non-dischargeable by bankruptcy, administrative evasion, or

sovereign immunity.

“Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak.”
— U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297

International Treaty Citations & Public Claim Filing Strategy

International Treaty Foundations
In accordance with customary international law and standing treaty obligations, this presentment
shall be recognized under the following enforceable agreements and norms:

1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948)

o Article 6: "Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the
law."
o Article 17: "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property."

2. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 13 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 o Article 26: “Pacta sunt servanda” – Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties
to it and must be performed in good faith.

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966)

o Article 2: States shall respect and ensure the rights recognized in the Covenant.
o Article 14: All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals.

4. Geneva Conventions (1949) & Protocols (1977)

o Protection of civilians and non-combatants, including unlawful detention, coercion, or
forced compliance.

5. Hague Conventions on Private International Law

o Protects legal recognition of affidavits, contracts, and identity across international
boundaries.

6. Treaty of Peace and Friendship (e.g., 1787 Treaty with Morocco, reaffirmed 1836)
o Ensures right of movement, religious freedom, commerce, and due protection of
nationals.

Whereas, under universally recognized principles of international law, jus cogens norms represent
the highest order of legal authority—binding on all nations, governments, and legal actors regardless
of consent, treaty, or custom. These include but are not limited to the prohibitions against
involuntary servitude, forced medical procedures, secret trusts, arbitrary detention, human
trafficking, genocide, and systematic denial of legal remedy.

Such norms are affirmed through instruments including the Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties (1969), which recognizes that no state may lawfully contract out of jus cogens obligations
(Article 53), and through the jurisprudence of international tribunals recognizing the supremacy of
these norms over conflicting domestic laws or corporate policy.

Therefore, any act committed under color of law, policy, or delegated authority—whether by public or
private actors—that imposes hidden commercial obligations, coerced compliance, or denies access to
meaningful remedy, stands in direct violation of jus cogens norms. No immunity, statute of
limitations, or claim of good faith may shield such actors from civil or criminal liability when these
peremptory norms are breached.

Affiant hereby invokes these superior principles to establish standing and lawful cause for remedy
and enforcement, as further expressed in this presentment and any attached affidavits or notices.

Final Declarations, Oaths, and Execution Clauses

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 14 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 I, the undersigned Affiant, do hereby solemnly affirm, testify, and declare the following:

1. Truth and Completeness

This Criminal Information for Void Delegation of Authority and Criminal Liability is true,
complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge, understanding, and ability. It reflects no
intention to mislead, defraud, deceive, coerce, or threaten.

2. Binding Nature
A copy, facsimile, or digital scan of this instrument shall be as lawfully binding as an
original, and shall have full effect in law and equity as if executed by hand.

3. Form and Substance

This document is presented:
o In good faith and with clean hands,
o In common American English, not legalese,
o In strict compliance with Public Law under the unincorporated United States of
America,
o And pursuant to the Law of Nations, Maxims of Equity, and express fiduciary
principles of lawful trust administration.

4. Standing and Capacity

I act not as a legal fiction, not as a U.S. person, nor surety for any corporate entity, but in my
natural private capacity as a living man and beneficiary of the Public Trust.

5. Execution Under Penalty of Perjury

I so declare under penalty of perjury as authorized and protected by:
o 18 U.S.C. § 1621,
o The First, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Amendments, and
o Public Law 93-579 (88 Stat. 1896), affirming my unalienable rights to privacy,
conscience, property, due process, and lawful remedy.

6. Effective Date and Applicability

This Declaration shall take immediate effect upon presentation, notice, or publication, and
shall apply to all present, future, and ongoing acts of the parties addressed herein.

So issued and affirmed without prejudice, without the United States and without the United States
of America this September 6 of 2025

Executed this ___ day of ____________, 2025

Without prejudice, all rights reserved,
UCC 1-308, nunc pro tunc, ab initio

By:_________________________________ ©TM
Aaron: Prince ©TM, sui juris
Private American National / Beneficiary

South Dakota State

Pennington County

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 15 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 I__________________________________________________, a Public Notary, was visited today
September 6th of 2025 by the man known to me to be Aaron: Prince, and said man did affirm and
sign this Criminal Information for Void Delegation of Authority and Criminal Liability in my
presence for the purposes stated.

By:___________________________________________

Public Notary; my Commission expires ______________

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 16 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 Evidence Attachment 1
https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/federal-record/#peace

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 17 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
 Evidence Attachment 2

Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 18 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 19 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 20 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 21 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956
Z
Declaration of Authority, Notice, and Intent Page 22 of 22
Z
Inte r na ti ona l La w Fi el d M a nua l 2 7-10/1956