AISC Seismic Design Steel Structures Essential
AISC Seismic Design Steel Structures Essential
Brief Overview
Prepared by: Michael D. Engelhardt University of Texas at Austin with the support of the American Institute of Steel Construction.
Version 1 - March 2007
Earthquake Effects on Structures Performance of Steel Buildings in Past Earthquakes Importance of Ductility Design Earthquake Forces: ASCE-7 Steel Seismic Load Resisting Systems AISC Seismic Provisions
Collapse of RC Buildings
Collapse of RC Buildings
Landslides
Earthquake Effects on Structures Performance of Steel Buildings in Past Earthquakes Building Code Philosophy for Earthquake-Resistant Design and Importance of Ductility Design Earthquake Forces: ASCE-7 Steel Seismic Load Resisting Systems AISC Seismic Provisions
Earthquake Fatalities: 1900 - 1949 (795,000 Fatalities)
Collapse of Timber Buildings Fire
Fire
Other Causes
Earthquake Effects on Structures Performance of Steel Buildings in Past Earthquakes Building Code Philosophy for Earthquake-Resistant Design and Importance of Ductility Design Earthquake Forces: ASCE-7 Steel Seismic Load Resisting Systems AISC Seismic Provisions
Objectives are not to: - limit damage - maintain function - provide for easy repair
H
H
H
Helastic
3/4 *Helastic
yield
failure
1/2 *Helastic
Ductility Factor =
failure yield
1/4 *Helastic
MAX
SCBF (Special Concentrically Braced Frames): OCBF (Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames): BRBF (Buckling Restrained Braced Frame): SPSW (Special Plate Shear Walls):
Earthquake Effects on Structures Performance of Steel Buildings in Past Earthquakes Building Code Philosophy for Earthquake-Resistant Design and Importance of Ductility Design Earthquake Forces: ASCE-7 Steel Seismic Load Resisting Systems AISC Seismic Provisions
Undetailed Steel Systems in Seismic Design Categories A, B or C (AISC Seismic Provisions not needed)
R=3
Moment Resisting Frames Concentrically Braced Frames Eccentrically Braced Frames Buckling Restrained Braced Frames Special Plate Shear Walls
Advantages Architectural Versatility High Ductility and Safety Disadvantages Low Elastic Stiffness
Develop ductility through inelastic action in braces. - braces yield in tension - braces buckle in compression Advantages - high elastic stiffness Disadvantages - less ductile than other systems (SMFs, EBFs, BRBFs) - reduced architectural versatility
Types of CBFs
Single Diagonal
Inverted V- Bracing
V- Bracing
X- Bracing
EBFs can supply high levels of ductility (similar to MRFs), but can also provide high levels of elastic stiffness (similar to CBFs)
Link
Link
Link
Link
e e
Buckling-Restrained Brace
BucklingRestrained Brace: Steel Core + Casing
Type of concentrically braced frame. Beams, columns and braces arranged to form a vertical truss.
Resist lateral earthquake forces by truss action.
Casing
Steel Core
Buckling-Restrained Brace
BucklingRestrained Brace: Steel Core + Casing
Buckling-Restrained Brace
Steel Core
Steel core resists entire axial force P Casing is debonded from steel core - casing does not resist axial force P - flexural stiffness of casing restrains buckling of core
Single Diagonal
Inverted V- Bracing
V- Bracing
X- Bracing
Shear buckling
Earthquake Effects on Structures Performance of Steel Buildings in Past Earthquakes Building Code Philosophy for Earthquake-Resistant Design and Importance of Ductility Design Earthquake Forces: ASCE-7 Steel Seismic Load Resisting Systems AISC Seismic Provisions
10