Introduction Module 1
Introduction Module 1
INTRODUCTION TO
ABNORMAL
PSYCHOLOGY
Which of these behaviors do you regard as abnormal?
■ Finding a “lucky” seat in an exam
■ Being unable to sleep, eat, study, or talk to anyone else
for days after a lover says, “It’s over between us”
■ Breaking into a cold sweat at the thought of being
trapped in an elevator
■ Swearing, throwing pillows, and pounding fists on the
wall in the middle of an argument with a roommate
■ Refusing to eat solid food for days at a time in
order to stay thin
❑ Having to engage in a thorough hand-washing
after coming home from a ride on a bus
Believing that the government has agents who are
listening in on telephone conversations
Drinking a six-pack of beer a day in order to be
“sociable” with friends after work
Importance of the Definition
•Ensures mental disorders are identified based
on standardized clinical criteria.
(WHO, 2024)
Criteria of Abnormal Behavior
Suffering: One indicative of abnormality is
considered when people suffer
psychologically But it is neither a sufficient
condition (all that is needed) nor a necessary
condition (that all cases of abnormality must
show).
Criteria of Abnormal Behavior
Maladaptiveness: Maladaptive
behavior interferes with our well-being
& with our ability to enjoy work &
relationships. But not all disorders
involve maladaptive behavior. E.g.,
antisocial personalities.
Criteria of Abnormal Behavior
Statistical Deviancy: Statistically rare and
undesirable by the society is considered as
abnormal. E.g., a person with low IQ would be
considered as abnormal because low IQ is
statistically rare and undesirable.
Foundation The DSM emerged from The ICD, originated from the
Differences and American psychiatry's need for World Health Organization's
Origins standardized diagnostic criteria, broader mandate to classify all
beginning with DSM-I (1952) as a diseases globally.
relatively brief manual heavily
influenced by psychoanalytic ICD-1 (1948) included mental
theory (Sigmund Freud and disorders as one section within
Adolf Meyer). a comprehensive medical
classification system covering
Categorized mental disorders as all diseases rather than
"reactions" to psychological, focusing solely on psychiatric
social, and biological factors, conditions (understanding
(concepts were inherently physiological and public health
subjective and diagnostic concerns).
reliability inconsistent)
Facilitates international
epidemiological tracking.
Differences DSM ICD
Paradigmatic The most dramatic transformation The ICD's evolution has been
Shifts and occurred with DSM-III (1980), which more gradual building on previous
Scientific represented a revolutionary editions (disorders are grouped more
Evolution departure from psychoanalytic logically prevents overlap). While
frameworks toward descriptive, ICD-10 (1992) significantly
atheoretical criteria (operational expanded mental health
definition, multi-axial diagnosis, classifications and ICD-11 (2022)
and explicit diagnostic criteria) introduced important innovations
like Gaming Disorder and revised
The DSM became increasingly trauma-related categories
detailed and expansive, with (introduced complex PTSD), the
DSM-5 (2013) and DSM-5-TR ICD has maintained greater
(2022) incorporating dimensional continuity in its basic structure
approaches (existence of and approach.
psychiatric symptoms as
spectrum) alongside categorical The ICD-11's emphasis on clinical
diagnoses and integrating genetic, utility, global applicability, and
neurobiological, and socio-cultural cultural sensitivity reflects its
factors shaping expression of a international mandate (make
disorder. diagnosis and treatment more
accessible and adaptable across
regions).
Differences DSM ICD
Methodological The DSM's emphasis on explicit The ICD's approach reflects
and criteria has enhanced different priorities: international
Philosophical diagnostic reliability (consistency consensus, cultural
Tensions in diagnosing by using standardized adaptability, and integration with
guidelines) but has been criticized broader health systems.
for potentially creating artificial
categorical distinctions ICD-11's development involved
(disorders manifest gradually and extensive global field testing
vary in severity) that don't reflect and emphasized practical clinical
the dimensional nature of mental utility over research precision,
phenomena capturing varying resulting in a system that may be
intensities of mental condition. less detailed than the DSM but
potentially more universally
The proliferation of diagnostic applicable across regions,
categories—from 106 in DSM-I to accounting for differences in
over 400 in DSM-5—raises healthcare resources, cultural
questions about diagnostic perspectives, and contextual
inflation and the medicalization factors.
of normal human experiences.
Differences DSM ICD
Cultural and The ICD's international scope
Economic The DSM's development has necessitates accommodation of
Influences been significantly shaped by diverse cultural expressions of
American and Canadian distress and varying healthcare
healthcare systems, resources globally. International
pharmaceutical industry interests, applicability is a requirement
and research funding structures. because of ICD being official
WHO classification system.
The detailed categorical system
facilitates insurance This has led to more flexible
reimbursement and diagnostic guidelines and greater
pharmaceutical development but attention to cultural variability in
may inadvertently promote mental health influenced by belief
overdiagnosis in contexts where system, social norms, coping
specific diagnoses are required mechanism, particularly evident in
for treatment access ICD-11's emphasis on cultural
factors in diagnosis (cultural
expression of distress).
Challenges DSM and ICD
Self-diagnosis The proliferation of self-diagnosis facilitated by digital access to
as a challenge diagnostic criteria presents new challenges for both systems. The
detailed criteria originally designed for clinical training are now widely
accessible, potentially contributing to diagnostic inflation and
complicating the clinical diagnostic process.
Need for an
integrated There is a need for integration of biological markers, cultural
approach considerations, and dimensional approaches while maintaining
practical clinical utility—a challenge that will require continued
refinement of both systems
Self-reading
Crimenews2000.com
Measured amount of blood
removed from the body,
typically with leeches
Induction of Vomiting