Module 2 Introduction To Robotics
Module 2 Introduction To Robotics
Types of Grippers
Mechanical Grippers:
o Use fingers or jaws to grasp objects via friction or clamping.
o Subtypes: Two-finger, three-finger, parallel jaw, angular jaw.
o Advantages: Simple, robust, versatile for rigid objects.
o Disadvantages: Limited to specific shapes/sizes, may damage delicate objects.
o Applications: Pick-and-place, assembly, material handling.
Vacuum Grippers:
o Use suction cups to hold objects via vacuum pressure.
o Advantages: Ideal for flat, non-porous surfaces; gentle handling.
o Disadvantages: Requires smooth surfaces, limited to lightweight objects.
o Applications: Handling glass, sheet metal, electronics.
Magnetic Grippers:
o Use electromagnets or permanent magnets to hold ferromagnetic objects.
o Advantages: Fast, no physical contact, high holding force.
o Disadvantages: Limited to magnetic materials, residual magnetism issues.
o Applications: Scrap metal handling, automotive parts.
Adhesive Grippers:
o Use sticky surfaces or materials (e.g., gecko-inspired adhesives) to grasp.
o Advantages: Handles irregular, delicate objects; no power needed for some designs.
o Disadvantages: Limited reusability, adhesive wear.
o Applications: Micro-assembly, space robotics.
Soft Grippers:
o Use flexible, compliant materials (e.g., silicone, pneumatic bladders).
o Advantages: Adapts to irregular shapes, gentle on fragile objects.
o Disadvantages: Lower precision, complex control.
o Applications: Food handling, medical robotics.
Specialized Grippers:
o Custom designs for specific tasks (e.g., needle grippers for textiles).
o Advantages: Task-specific efficiency.
o Disadvantages: Non-versatile, high design cost.
o Applications: Textile, agriculture, surgical robots.
Task Requirements:
o Match gripper type to object properties (size, shape, weight, material).
o Example: Vacuum grippers for flat surfaces, soft grippers for delicate items.
Force and Stability:
o Ensure sufficient gripping force to prevent slipping without damaging objects.
o Design for stable grasp under dynamic conditions (e.g., acceleration).
Adaptability:
o Incorporate adjustable fingers or modular designs for versatility.
o Use compliant mechanisms (e.g., springs, soft materials) for variable shapes.
Weight and Size:
o Minimize gripper weight to reduce robot payload and energy use.
o Ensure compact design for confined workspaces.
Material Selection:
o Use durable, lightweight materials (e.g., aluminum, composites).
o Select contact surfaces (e.g., rubber pads) for friction and object safety.
Actuation Mechanism:
o Choose actuators (electric, pneumatic, hydraulic) based on speed, force, and control needs.
o Example: Pneumatic for fast, simple tasks; electric for precise control.
Ease of Maintenance:
o Design for quick replacement of wear-prone parts (e.g., suction cups).
o Ensure accessibility for cleaning or repairs.
Integration with Sensors:
o Incorporate force, tactile, or proximity sensors for feedback.
o Example: Tactile sensors detect grasp success.
Cost Efficiency:
o Balance performance with cost; use off-the-shelf components where possible.
Force analysis ensures grippers hold objects securely without slipping or damage.
Key Forces:
o Gripping Force (F_g): Force exerted by gripper jaws/fingers to hold the object.
o Frictional Force (F_f): Prevents slipping; F_f = μ * F_g (μ = coefficient of friction).
o Object Weight (W): Gravitational force; W = m * g (m = mass, g = 9.81 m/s²).
o External Forces: Include acceleration, vibration, or external impacts.
Force Balance for Stable Grasp:
o Static Equilibrium: F_f ≥ W + F_ext (external forces).
o Safety Factor: Apply 1.5–2x the minimum force to account for uncertainties.
Two-Finger Gripper Analysis:
o Model: Two parallel jaws with normal force F_n per jaw.
o Equation: Total gripping force F_g = 2 * F_n; F_f = 2 * μ * F_n.
o Condition for No Slip: 2 * μ * F_n ≥ m * g.
o Example: For a 1 kg object (W = 9.81 N) with μ = 0.4, F_n ≥ 12.26 N per jaw.
Vacuum Gripper Analysis:
o Model: Suction force F_s = P * A (P = pressure difference, A = suction cup area).
o Condition: F_s ≥ W + F_ext.
o Example: For a 5 kg object (W = 49.05 N), with P = 0.8 bar (80,000 Pa) and A = 0.001 m²,
F_s = 80 N (sufficient).
Design Considerations:
o Account for dynamic forces (e.g., robot acceleration).
o Ensure force distribution to avoid object deformation.
o Use sensors to monitor and adjust force dynamically.
Proprioceptive Sensors:
o Measure internal robot states.
o Examples: Encoders (joint position), IMU (acceleration/orientation), potentiometers.
o Applications: Motion control, odometry.
Exteroceptive Sensors:
o Measure external environment.
o Examples: Cameras (vision), ultrasonic sensors (distance), LiDAR (3D mapping).
o Applications: Object detection, navigation.
Tactile Sensors:
o Detect contact, pressure, or texture.
o Examples: Force/torque sensors, capacitive touch sensors.
o Applications: Grasping, collision detection.
Proximity Sensors:
o Detect objects without contact.
o Examples: Infrared, ultrasonic, capacitive sensors.
o Applications: Obstacle avoidance, safety.
Environmental Sensors:
o Measure ambient conditions.
o Examples: Temperature, humidity, gas sensors.
o Applications: Hazardous environment monitoring.
Classification of Sensors
By Measurement Type:
o Position (encoders, GPS), velocity (tachometers), force (strain gauges), vision (cameras).
By Technology:
o Optical (cameras, LiDAR), acoustic (ultrasonic), electromagnetic (magnetic field sensors).
By Output:
o Analog (continuous signals, e.g., potentiometers), digital (discrete signals, e.g., encoders).
By Application:
o Navigation (IMU, LiDAR), manipulation (tactile, force), safety (proximity).
Applications of Sensors
Navigation: LiDAR and cameras for SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping).
Manipulation: Tactile sensors for precise grasping.
Inspection: Vision sensors for defect detection.
Safety: Proximity sensors for human-robot collaboration.
Monitoring: Environmental sensors in hazardous areas (e.g., chemical plants).
Task Requirements:
o Match sensor to application (e.g., LiDAR for navigation, tactile for grasping).
Environmental Conditions:
o Choose sensors resistant to temperature, humidity, or dust (e.g., IP-rated sensors).
Range and Resolution:
o Ensure sensor meets task precision needs (e.g., high-resolution encoders for precision).
Cost vs. Performance:
o Balance budget with required accuracy (e.g., ultrasonic vs. LiDAR for distance).
Compatibility:
o Ensure sensor interfaces with robot’s controller (e.g., I2C, SPI, analog outputs).
Power Constraints:
o Select low-power sensors for battery-operated robots.
Reliability:
o Choose sensors with proven durability for long-term use.
Example: A warehouse robot may use LiDAR for navigation (long range, high accuracy) and tactile
sensors for package handling (high sensitivity).