Scribd
Upload
25 views5 pages

Flask Vs Django Vs FastAPI

This document compares three Python web frameworks: Flask, Django, and FastAPI, highlighting their unique features and ideal use cases. Flask is a lightweight micro framework suitable for small to medium applications, Django is a full-stack framework best for large applications with built-in tools, and FastAPI is designed for high-performance APIs with async capabilities. Each framework has its pros and cons, making them suitable for different types of projects.

Uploaded by

Fela Ornella
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views5 pages

Flask Vs Django Vs FastAPI

This document compares three Python web frameworks: Flask, Django, and FastAPI, highlighting their unique features and ideal use cases. Flask is a lightweight micro framework suitable for small to medium applications, Django is a full-stack framework best for large applications with built-in tools, and FastAPI is designed for high-performance APIs with async capabilities. Each framework has its pros and cons, making them suitable for different types of projects.

Uploaded by

Fela Ornella
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Flask vs Django vs FastAPI

1. Introduction

This document provides a comparative overview of three popular Python web frameworks: Flask, Django,

and FastAPI.

Each of these frameworks offers different philosophies, feature sets, and use-cases, making them ideal for

varying

types of projects.

Flask is a lightweight, micro web framework that's easy to get started with. Django is a full-stack web

framework

that includes everything needed to build a robust web application. FastAPI is a modern, high-performance

framework

built for APIs with automatic OpenAPI support and async capabilities.
Flask vs Django vs FastAPI

2. Flask

Flask is a micro web framework for Python based on Werkzeug and Jinja2. It provides the basics to build a

web app

without enforcing dependencies or structure, which gives developers more control and flexibility.

Pros:

- Lightweight and simple to use

- Extensive documentation and community support

- Flexible with extensions for ORM, form validation, etc.

Cons:

- Not as scalable as Django out of the box

- Requires more decisions and configuration for large projects

- Lacks built-in tools like admin panels or authentication

Best For:

- Small to medium web applications

- Developers who prefer more control and customization


Flask vs Django vs FastAPI

3. Django

Django is a high-level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic

design. It comes

with a full suite of tools including an ORM, admin interface, authentication, and more.

Pros:

- Full-featured and batteries-included

- Secure by default (prevents common vulnerabilities)

- Scalable and production-ready

Cons:

- Steeper learning curve

- Less flexibility in structure

- Heavier than Flask or FastAPI

Best For:

- Large, scalable web applications

- Projects needing built-in admin and user management


Flask vs Django vs FastAPI

4. FastAPI

FastAPI is a modern, high-performance web framework for building APIs with Python 3.7+ using standard

Python type hints.

It is built on top of Starlette for the web parts and Pydantic for data validation.

Pros:

- Automatic generation of interactive API docs (Swagger, ReDoc)

- Async support and great performance

- Type-safe with editor support

Cons:

- Smaller community than Flask/Django

- Less mature ecosystem

- Not ideal for full-stack apps (API-only)

Best For:

- High-performance APIs

- Projects requiring async capabilities and automatic validation


Flask vs Django vs FastAPI

5. Summary Comparison

| Feature | Flask | Django | FastAPI |

|----------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|

| Type | Micro | Full-stack | API-focused |

| Performance | Moderate | Moderate | High |

| Learning Curve | Low | Medium-High | Medium |

| Async Support | Limited | Limited | Excellent |

| Built-in Tools | Few | Many | Few |

| Best For | Small Apps | Full Apps | APIs |

You might also like