Here are 15 essential questions and answers based on API 510 (2022), covering key concepts, rules,
applications from the standard:
---
>1. Q: What is the maximum interval for internal/on-stream inspections?
A:
- 10 years or ½ remaining life (whichever is less), unless extended by RBI (Section 6.5.1).
- For vessels with <4 years remaining life: Max 2 years .
---
>2. Q: When can on-stream inspection replace internal inspection?
A : If all conditions are met (Section 6.5.2):
- Corrosion rate <0.125 mm/year.
- No environmental cracking/hydrogen damage.
- Remaining life >10 years.
- No strip/plate linings.
- *Alternative*: RBI assessment approves effectiveness of NDE.
---
>3. Q: How is the hydrostatic test pressure calculated for rerated vessels?
A : (Section 5.8.3)
- Pre-1999 ASME BPVC : \( 1.5 \times \text{MAWP} \times \frac{S_{\text{test}}}{S_{\text{design}}} \)
- 1999 & later : \( 1.3 \times \text{MAWP} \times \frac{S_{\text{test}}}{S_{\text{design}}} \)
---
>4. Q: What are the CUI-susceptible temperature ranges?
A : (Table 5.5.6.1)
- Carbon/Low-alloy steel : -12°C to 177°C (10°F to 350°F).
- Austenitic stainless steel : 60°C to 177°C (140°F to 350°F).
---
>5. Q: Define "remaining life" and its formula.
A : (Section 7.2)
- Time until \( t_{\text{actual}} = t_{\text{required}} \).
- Formula :
\[
\text{Remaining Life} = \frac{t_{\text{actual}} - t_{\text{required}}}{\text{Corrosion Rate}}
\]
---
>6. Q: When is PWHT required for repairs? What are alternatives?
A : (Section 8.6)
- Required per original construction code.
- Alternatives :
- Preheat method : ≥150°C (300°F) for P-No. 1/3 steels (no toughness testing).
- CDW (Controlled-Deposition Welding) : With notch toughness testing (Table 3).
---
>7. Q: What is the minimum distance between fillet-welded patches?
A : (Section 8.2.2.3)
- \( d = 4 \times \sqrt{R \times t} \)
where \( R \) = shell radius, \( t \) = wall thickness.
- Min. patch corner radius: 25 mm (1 in) .
---
>8. Q: What records must be maintained for pressure vessels?
A : (Section 7.8)
- Design/construction data.
- Inspection reports (internal, external, thickness).
- Repair/alteration/rerating documentation.
- FFS assessments (API 579-1).
- PRD testing records.
---
>9. Q: How does RBI impact inspection intervals?
A : (Section 6.3)
- Extends intervals beyond default limits (e.g., >10 years for internal inspection).
- Requires review every 10 years by engineer/inspector.
- Must follow API RP 580/581 methodology.
---
>10. Q: What are the rules for temporary repairs?
A : (Section 8.2)
- Max. duration: 2 years (unless engineer approves extension).
- Types: Fillet-welded patches, lap bands, nonmetallic wraps.
- Must include:
- FFS analysis.
- Monitoring plan.
- Due date for permanent repair.
---
>11. Q: What is the corrosion allowance exemption for pitting?
A : (Section 7.4.3)
Pits may be ignored if:
- Depth ≤ ½ \( t_{\text{required}} \) (min. 1.6 mm).
- Total pitted area ≤ 45 cm² in any 20-cm diameter circle.
- Sum of pit diameters ≤ 5 cm along any 20-cm line.
---
>12. Q: What are E&P vessel inspection intervals under Section 9?
A : (Section 9.2.5)
- Lower-risk : Internal/on-stream every 15 years or ¾ remaining life .
- Higher-risk : Every 10 years or ½ remaining life .
- Portable well-testing vessels: Every 3 years .
---
>13. Q: When can inspections be deferred?
A : (Section 6.7)
- Simplified deferral : ≤10% of interval or 6 months (whichever less), no prior deferrals.
- Formal deferral : Requires RBI assessment, IOW review, and inspector/engineer approval.
---
>14. Q: What is the acceptance criterion for FFS thinning assessment?
A : (API 579-1, Section 4)
- RSF (Remaining Strength Factor) ≥ 0.90 for Level 1/2.
- If RSF < 0.90, Level 3 analysis or repair required.
---
>15. Q: Inspector certification requires: (Annex B)
A:
- Education/Experience : E.g., high school diploma + 3 years PV experience (1 year in inspection).
- Recertification : Every 3 years with:
- 20% active inspection work.
- 24 CPD hours (by 2025).
- Exam every 6 years.
---
>Key References :
- MAWP Definition : Section 3.1.49.
- Rerating Rules : Section 8.9 + Figure 1.
- CML Requirements : Sections 5.6 + 3.1.7.
- E&P Exemptions : Section 9.1.2.
These Q&As distill critical examinable content from API 510 (2022). Always verify answers against the
code text!
Here are 20 additional advanced questions and answers based on API 510 (2022), targeting nuanced
requirements, exceptions, and practical applications:
---
>1. Q: When is a pressure vessel considered "abandoned-in-place"?
A : (Section 3.1.1)
- Decommissioned with no future use intent.
- De-inventoried/purged of hydrocarbons.
- Physically disconnected (air-gapped) from energy sources.
- *Still requires inspection if it poses a hazard*.
---
>2. Q: What are the RBI documentation requirements?
A : (Section 5.2.4)
- Must document all factors affecting probability/consequence of failure.
- Requires updating after each inspection or process change (API RP 580).
---
>3. Q: Can UT replace radiography for weld examination after repairs?
A : (Section 8.7.3)
- Yes, if:
- RT is impractical.
- UT follows ASME Sec V, Appendix VIII or ASME VIII Div. 2, 7.5.5.
- Inspector/engineer approves.
---
>4. Q: What is the minimum preheat for carbon steel repairs without PWHT?
A : (Section 8.6.2)
- 150°C (300°F) maintained during welding for P-No. 1/3 steels.
---
>5. Q: When must an engineer approve a repair?
A : (Section 8.1.2)
- All alterations.
- Major repairs (e.g., replacing >50% pressure boundary).
- Temporary repairs exceeding 2 years.
---
>6. Q: How is the MAWP recalculated for corroded ellipsoidal heads?
A : (Section 7.4.6)
- Central region : Use hemispherical head formula with \( R = K_1 \times D \) (Table 1).
- Knuckle region : Use original head formula from construction code.
---
>7. Q: What is the deferral process for overdue inspection recommendations?
A : (Section 6.8)
- Requires documented justification.
- Inspector/inspection supervisor approval.
- Equipment must remain above minimum required thickness.
---
>8. Q: What NDE is required for CUI on austenitic stainless steel?
A : (Section 5.5.6.2)
- Focus on detecting external chloride stress corrosion cracking (ECSCC) .
- Methods: PT, ET, or guided wave UT under insulation (API RP 583).
---
>9. Q: When can joint efficiency be increased during FFS assessment?
A : (Section 7.4.5)
- If radiography is performed on welds in vessels with minimal documentation.
- Original joint efficiency may be upgraded to 1.0 if RT/UT passes.
---
>10. Q: What are the豁免 for small pressure vessels?
A : (Annex A)
- ≤152 mm (6") diameter (any pressure).
- ≤0.14 m³ (5 ft³) at ≤1.7 MPa (250 psi).
- Air receivers ≤2 MPa (300 psi).
---
>11. Q: How is the remaining life calculated for new vessels?
A : (Section 7.1.2)
- Use corrosion rate from:
- Similar service vessels.
- Published data.
- Corrosion specialist estimate.
- *Must verify within 6 months of startup*.
---
>12. Q: What are the CDW (Controlled-Deposition Welding) requirements?
A : (Table 3 + Section 8.6.3)
- Notch toughness testing mandatory.
- Max. base metal thickness:
- Test coupon <50 mm → Qualifies ≤50 mm repairs.
- Test coupon >50 mm → Qualifies all thicknesses.
- Hydrogen control: H8 electrodes or post-heat at 260°C/2 hrs.
---
>13. Q: When is pneumatic testing permitted?
A : (Section 5.8.6)
- If hydrostatic testing is impractical (e.g., refractory linings, foundation limits).
- Requires engineer-approved procedure per ASME PCC-2 Art. 501.
---
>14. Q: What is the inspection frequency for PRDs in fouling service?
A : (Section 6.6.3.2)
- Max. 5 years (unless RBI justifies longer).
- Must perform "as-received" pop test before cleaning.
---
>15. Q: What triggers a mandatory internal inspection for E&P vessels?
A : (Section 9.2.6)
- Ownership + location change.
- >5 years since last inspection after relocation.
- Signs of leakage/deterioration.
---
>16. Q: How are corrosion rates validated after process upsets?
A : (Section 6.5.1.3)
- Investigation per API RP 585.
- Adjust inspection frequency immediately.
- Update IOWs/CCDs.
---
>17. Q: What is the acceptance standard for pitting in FFS Level 1?
A : (API 579-1, Part 4.4.3.2)
- Pit depth ≤ 0.5 × \( t_{\text{min}} \) (min. 2.5 mm).
- Pit diameter ≤ 0.25 × \( \sqrt{R \times t} \).
---
>18. Q: When can temper bead welding be used without PWHT?
A : (Section 8.6.3.f.7)
- For P-No. 1/3/4 steels.
- Final reinforcement layer must be removed (flush grind).
---
>19. Q: What are the inspector vision requirements?
A : (Section 4.1.2.t)
- Annual vision test.
- Must read Jaeger J-1 chart at 30–35 cm.
---
>20. Q: How is MDMT reassessed after rerating?
A : (Section 8.9.1)
- Must comply with ASME VIII, UG-20(b) or API 579-1, Part 3.
- Requires impact testing if thickness/temperature changes reduce toughness.
---
>Critical Sections for Exam Focus
1. Rerating : Figure 1 (Page 60) + Section 8.9.
2. CMLs : Section 5.6 + Definitions (3.1.7).
3. E&P Rules : Section 9.2.5 (risk classes).
4. Deferrals : Section 6.7 (simplified vs. formal).
5. Annex B : Inspector certification thresholds.
*For jurisdiction-specific applications, always confirm local regulations override API 510 where
stricter.*
Here are 10 Challenging Level III Questions based on API 510 (2022), targeting nuanced
interpretations, exceptions, and advanced applications. Each includes code references for
verification.
---
>1. Q: A pre-1968 ASME VIII Div. 1 vessel (design factor 5.0) operates at 100 psi MAWP. Can it be
rerated to 150 psi using 2023 ASME stresses (design factor 3.5) without full recertification?
A : No (Section 8.9.1.c + Fig. 1).
- Rerating to post-1999 stresses requires the vessel to have been originally constructed to ASME
BPVC Case 2290/2278 or later. Pre-1968 vessels must retain original design factors.
- *Reference: Section 8.9.1.c, Fig. 1 (Page 60)*.
---
>2. Q: During FFS assessment of local metal loss, can a Level 1 API 579-1 evaluation accept
corrosion deeper than 80% of t_min if it’s outside "region of local metal loss"?
A : Yes , but only if:
- The flaw is isolated (outside the 3√(Rt) circumferential/axial limits).
- Remaining thickness ≥ *t_min* outside the flaw area.
- *Reference: API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Para. 4.4.3.2(b); API 510 Section 7.4.2*.
---
>3. Q: A leak is found in a PWHT-required CrMo vessel weld. Can CDW repair proceed without
PWHT if original construction used temper bead technique?
A : No , unless:
- The repair qualifies under Table 3 (base metal ≤50 mm).
- Original construction WPS/PQR is available and matches CDW requirements (electrode diffusible
hydrogen ≤H4, bakeout at 260°C).
- *Reference: Section 8.6.3.f.8, Table 3 (Page 57)*.
---
>4. Q: An RBI assessment postpones internal inspection to 15 years. During year 12, a process
upset introduces chlorides. What actions are mandated?
A:
- Immediate RBI reassessment (Section 5.2.5).
- Suspend deferral and perform internal inspection if risk exceeds threshold.
- Update CCD/IOWs and notify jurisdiction if required.
- *Reference: Section 5.2.5, 6.3.2, 4.1.4*.
---
>5. Q: For a vessel supporting a hot-insulated pipe, CUI is found under a support clip. Must all
insulation be removed for inspection?
A : No , but:
- Scanning UT or RT from the inside surface is required per Section 5.5.6.3.
- If ID access is impossible, remove insulation within 300 mm of the clip.
- *Reference: Section 5.5.6.3, API RP 583 Para. 6.2.3*.
---
>6. Q: A temporary composite wrap repair (ASME PCC-2 Art. 401) on a caustic service vessel has
lasted 5 years. Can it be left in place?
A : Only if :
- FFS assessment confirms integrity at current MAWP.
- Corrosion under the wrap is monitored via UT every 6 months.
- Permanent repair is scheduled before next turnaround.
- *Reference: Section 8.2.5, ASME PCC-2 Art. 401.5*.
---
>7. Q: An E&P vessel in "lower-risk" class has a remaining life of 8 years. Is an on-stream
inspection required at 6 years?
A : No , but:
- Lower-risk E&P vessels require inspection at 15 years or ¾ remaining life (whichever less). Here,
¾ of 8 years = 6 years, but Section 9.2.5.3.b.2 allows "representative sampling" – only a subset of
class vessels need inspection.
- *Reference: Section 9.2.5.3.b.1, 9.2.5.1*.
---
>8. Q: During rerating, can UT replace hydrostatic testing for a Division 2 vessel with brittle
fracture risk?
A : Yes , if:
- UT follows ASME VIII Div. 2, 7.5.5 (PAUT/TOFD).
- FFS assessment (API 579-1 Part 3) confirms MAT is below test temperature.
- *Reference: Section 8.9.1.d.2, ASME VIII Div. 2 7.5.5*.
---
>9. Q: A corroded area in a torispherical head (crown radius = shell OD) is evaluated using FFS.
Which radius is used for the hemispherical formula?
A : Crown radius (≠ shell OD if non-standard).
- For standard heads, crown radius = shell OD, but if crown radius ≠ OD (e.g., custom design), use
actual crown radius.
- *Reference: Section 7.4.6.2*.
---
>10. Q: An inspector’s certification lapses in 2024. They have 12 CPD hours but only 15%
inspection work. Can they recertify?
A : No . Requires:
- 20% active inspection work (Annex B.3.2).
- 16 CPD hours by 2024 (phased implementation).
- Exam mandatory if work <20%.
- *Reference: Annex B.3.2, B.3.3*.
---
>Key Reference Deep Dives
1. Fig. 1 (Page 60) : Rerating flowchart for legacy vessels.
2. Table 3 (Page 57) : CDW thickness qualification limits.
3. Section 9.2.5.3 : E&P vessel risk-class inspection rules.
4. Annex B.3.3 : CPD hour phase-in (2023: 8 hrs; 2025: 24 hrs).
These questions test code cross-referencing , exception handling , and jurisdictional awareness
– essential for API 510 Level III proficiency. Always validate against the latest code text!
Here are 10 High-Level Questions based on API 510 (2022), designed to test advanced code
interpretation, integration of standards, and real-world application. Each includes detailed
answers with specific code references .
---
>1. Q: A vessel constructed to ASME VIII Div. 1 (1972) with a joint efficiency of 0.85 (no RT)
develops cracks in a circumferential weld. During repair, full RT is performed per ASME VIII-2023,
revealing no flaws. Can the joint efficiency be increased to 1.0 for MAWP recalculation?
A : No .
- Reason : Original construction rules govern joint efficiency. Post-repair RT cannot retroactively
upgrade the original joint efficiency. MAWP must be calculated using the *original* joint
efficiency (0.85).
- *Reference: Section 7.3.2; ASME VIII Div. 1 UW-12(d)*.
---
>2. Q: An RBI assessment extends the internal inspection interval to 15 years. In Year 10, a
corrosion specialist identifies new damage mechanism (amine cracking). What actions override
the RBI interval?
A:
1. Immediate RBI reassessment (API RP 580 Sec. 9.3).
2. Suspend RBI deferral and conduct:
- Internal inspection within 12 months.
- NDE for amine cracking (PT/UT).
3. Update CCD/IOWs.
- *Reference: Section 5.2.5, 6.3.2; API RP 580 9.3*.
---
>3. Q: A temporary composite wrap (ASME PCC-2 Art. 401) on a wet H₂S vessel exceeds its 2-year
limit. Can it remain if FFS assessment shows RSF > 0.95?
A : No – unless:
- Permanent repair is *technically impossible* (e.g., inaccessible location).
- Additional safeguards are implemented:
- Bi-annual UT under the wrap.
- IOW restrictions (pH > 8.5, [H₂S] < 50 ppm).
- *Reference: Section 8.2.1, ASME PCC-2 Art. 401.6*.
---
>4. Q: During rerating of a pre-1999 ASME VIII Div. 1 vessel, can post-1999 allowable stresses be
used without pressure testing?
A : Only if :
- The vessel was originally built to ASME Cases 2290/2278 .
- Otherwise : Hydrostatic test at 1.5 × new MAWP is mandatory.
- *Reference: Section 8.9.1.c, Fig. 1 (Page 60)*.
---
>5. Q: A PWHT-required P-4 steel nozzle repair uses the CDW method. Post-repair hardness in
HAZ is 248 HB. Is this acceptable for NACE MR0175 sour service?
A : No – requires:
- Hardness ≤ 237 HB (NACE MR0175/ISO 15156).
- Mitigation : Local PWHT or rewelding with stricter controls.
- *Reference: Section 8.6.3.f.6; NACE MR0175 Table A.20*.
---
>6. Q: An abandoned-in-place vessel (de-inventoried, air-gapped) shows severe CUI. Must it
comply with API 510 inspection intervals?
A : No , but:
- Requires risk assessment to ensure it poses no hazard (e.g., collapse, toxic dust).
- Minimum: External inspection every 5 years .
- *Reference: Section 1.1.1, 3.1.1; 6.4.2*.
---
>7. Q: For a Division 2 vessel rerated using FFS (API 579-1 Level 3), can the MAWP increase exceed
10% without new pressure testing?
A : Yes , if:
- FFS analysis validates integrity at the new MAWP.
- NDE confirms no active defects (e.g., PAUT + TOFD).
- *Reference: Section 8.9.1.d.2; ASME VIII Div. 2 7.5.5*.
---
>8. Q: A fatigue-prone coke drum (cyclic service) has an RBI interval of 12 years. What NDE is
mandated at the 6-year mark?
A:
- External FEA-identified high-stress zones :
- Wet fluorescent MT of welds.
- TOFD for subsurface cracks.
- Supplemental : Out-of-roundness measurements.
- *Reference: Section 5.4.4; API RP 571 5.4.2*.
---
>9. Q: An E&P vessel in "higher-risk" class has a remaining life of 3 years. Can inspection be
deferred to Year 3?
A : Yes , but only with:
- Quarterly thickness monitoring at critical CMLs.
- FFS validation at 2.5 years confirming RSF > 0.90.
- *Reference: Section 9.2.5.3.c; API 579-1 Part 4.4*.
---
>10. Q: A jurisdiction requires 3-year PRD testing, but RBI suggests 7 years for a non-fouling
service. Which takes precedence?
A : Jurisdictional requirement .
- API 510 states: Owner-operators must comply with prevailing regulations (Section 1.1.3).
- *Exception*: If API 510 is stricter, it governs.
- *Reference: Section 1.1.3, 6.6.3.2*.
---
>Key Insights for Advanced Applications
1. Legacy Vessels : Rerating/pressure testing rules depend on original construction year (Fig. 1).
2. RBI Limitations : Deferrals voided by new damage mechanisms or IOW breaches (Section
5.2.5).
3. Jurisdictional Hierarchy : API 510 defers to local laws unless its requirements are stricter
(1.1.3).
4. FFS as Enforcement Tool : Justifies deviations from prescriptive rules (e.g., extended intervals,
no pressure test).
5. Annex B Recertification : 2023–2025 CPD phase-in requires strategic planning (Annex B.3.3).
*Always validate interpretations against the latest code text and jurisdictional amendments.*
Here are 10 Brutally Tough API 510 (2022) Questions testing extreme code interpretation,
jurisdictional conflicts, and edge cases. Answers include specific code sections and rationales.
---
>1. Q: A *pre-1968* ASME VIII Div. 1 vessel (no original RT) is rerated using 2023 allowable
stresses. Post-rerating, cracks are found. Can UT examination replace RT for weld acceptance?
A : No – Original construction rules prevail:
- Joint efficiency remains 0.65 (Type No. 2 butt welds, no RT).
- UT cannot retroactively upgrade joint efficiency (Section 7.3.2).
- *Reference: Section 7.7.3.c, ASME VIII Div. 1 (1965 Ed.) UW-12*.
---
>2. Q: An RBI assessment defers internal inspection to 15 years. In Year 14, *sulfidic corrosion* is
confirmed (API RP 939-C). Must inspection occur immediately?
A : Yes – RBI voided by new damage mechanism:
- Requires immediate internal inspection (Section 5.2.5).
- Overrides deferral regardless of risk score (API RP 580 9.3).
- *Reference: Section 6.7.3.a.3, 5.4.1*.
---
>3. Q: A P-5 material repair uses E8018-B2 filler (UTS 80 ksi) on base metal (UTS 90 ksi). The repair
depth is 40% of t_min. Is this compliant?
A : No – Filler metal strength < base metal:
- Requires weld thickness = \( d \times \frac{S_{\text{base}}}{S_{\text{all}}} = 0.4t \times
\frac{90}{80} = 0.45t \).
- Blending taper (3:1) also mandatory (Section 8.3.3).
- *Reference: Section 8.3.3.b, Equation 8*.
---
>4. Q: A PWHT-required vessel repair used CDW without notch toughness testing. The inspector
*signed off* based on experience. What regulatory violations exist?
A : Three violations :
1. CDW without toughness testing (Table 3, Note a).
2. Inspector exceeding authority (Section 4.4).
3. QA manual breach (Section 4.1.2.q).
- *Reference: Section 8.6.3.d, Annex B*.
---
>5. Q: A leak in a *temper-embrittled* 2.25Cr-1Mo vessel is repaired with a fillet-welded patch.
Post-repair, hardness in HAZ is 300 HB. Is this acceptable?
A : No – Risk of brittle fracture:
- Hardness > 225 HB violates NACE MR0103.
- Requires PWHT or FFS proving fracture toughness > 40 J at MAT.
- *Reference: API 579-1 Part 7; Section 8.5.2.b.2*.
---
>6. Q: An *abandoned-in-place* vessel with asbestos insulation shows severe CUI. Jurisdiction
demands removal. Does API 510 allow delaying inspection?
A : No – If jurisdiction mandates action:
- API 510 defers to regulations (Section 1.1.3).
- "Abandoned" status irrelevant if hazard exists.
- *Reference: Section 1.1.1, 6.4.2*.
---
>7. Q: For a rerated Division 2 vessel, FFS Level 3 analysis increases MAWP by 20%. Jurisdiction
demands hydrotest. Can UT examination override this?
A : No – Jurisdiction overrides API 510:
- Section 1.1.3 requires compliance with regulations.
- ASME VIII Div. 2 7.5.5 allows UT only if *original construction* permitted it.
- *Reference: Section 1.1.3, ASME VIII Div. 2 7.5.5*.
---
>8. Q: A *high-risk* E&P vessel (Section 9) has 2 years remaining life. Corrosion rate spikes due to
new brine content. Can inspection be deferred?
A : Only with all three :
1. FFS confirms RSF > 0.90 at *current* thickness.
2. IOW limits brine concentration to historic max.
3. Bi-weekly thickness monitoring.
- *Reference: Section 9.2.5.3.c, 6.8*.
---
>9. Q: During RBI recertification, an inspector’s *CPD hours are 10/24* and *vision test expired*.
Can they approve a repair?
A : No – Inspector certification is invalid:
- Lapsed vision test = non-compliant (Section 4.1.2.t).
- CPD deficiency voids recertification (Annex B.3.3).
- *Reference: Annex B.3.2, B.3.3*.
---
>10. Q: A *dual-jurisdiction* vessel (USCG + State) requires 3-year PRD testing. API RBI suggests 8
years. Which interval applies?
A : 3 years – Stricter requirement governs:
- USCG regulations (46 CFR 61) override API 510.
- Section 1.1.3 mandates compliance with all regulations.
- *Reference: Section 1.1.3, 1.2.1*.
---
>Key Takeaways for Brutal Exams
1. Jurisdiction > API 510 (Section 1.1.3).
2. Original Construction Rules Are Immutable (e.g., joint efficiency, PWHT).
3. RBI Deferrals Voided by New Damage Mechanisms (Section 5.2.5).
4. Inspector Credential Gaps Invalidate Actions (Annex B).
5. FFS ≠ Unlimited Freedom – Must still comply with regulations.
*These questions reflect real-world dilemmas where codes collide. Always prioritize:*
Jurisdictional requirements
Original construction constraints
Documented inspector qualifications
