Algorithm Push Swap
Uploaded by
eliebalaaAlgorithm Push Swap
Uploaded by
eliebalaaAlgorithm Explanation for Push_Swap
Overview:
The `push_swap` program is designed to sort a stack of integers using a limited set
of operations with the goal of minimizing the number of operations. This
implementation achieves a perfect score by employing an efficient chunk-based
sorting strategy combined with optimization techniques for small and large inputs.
Below is a step-by-step explanation of how the algorithm works and why it is highly
efficient.
Key Components and Strategies:
1. **Input Parsing and Initialization**:
- The program starts by parsing input arguments, either as a single string of
space-separated numbers or as multiple arguments.
- It initializes two stacks, A and B, with stack A containing the input numbers
and stack B being empty initially.
- Error checking ensures valid integer inputs without duplicates.
2. **Sorting Logic Based on Input Size**:
- The main sorting function decides the strategy based on the size of the input
stack:
- For stacks of size 1 or already sorted: No operations are needed.
- For size 3: A specialized function handles all possible permutations with
minimal operations (at most 2).
- For size 5: A dedicated function pushes the two smallest elements to stack
B, sorts the remaining three on stack A, and then pushes back the elements from B
in order.
- For larger sizes: A chunk-based sorting strategy is employed.
3. **Chunk-Based Sorting for Larger Inputs**:
- **Chunk Division**: The algorithm divides the stack into smaller chunks
(subsets of numbers) to manage complexity. This is a divide-and-conquer approach
that breaks down the problem into manageable pieces.
- **Recursive Sorting**: Each chunk is recursively sorted. If a chunk size is 3
or less, it uses specialized functions to sort with minimal operations.
- **Chunk Splitting**: Larger chunks are split into smaller sub-chunks based on
value ranges (max, mid, min). These sub-chunks are moved to different locations
(e.g., top of A, bottom of B) to organize the sorting process.
- **Movement Optimization**: The algorithm minimizes movements by strategically
placing chunks to reduce unnecessary rotations or pushes.
4. **Specialized Sorting for Small Chunks**:
- For chunks of size 3, the algorithm evaluates all possible orderings and
applies the shortest sequence of operations (swap, rotate, reverse rotate) to sort
them.
- For size 2, it simply swaps if needed.
- For size 1, it moves the element to the correct position.
5. **Post-Sort Optimization**:
- After the initial sorting, a post-sort optimization phase analyzes the
sequence of operations to eliminate redundant moves or combine operations for
efficiency. This step is crucial for achieving a minimal operation count.
6. **Operation Output**:
- The program records all operations in a list during sorting.
- Finally, it prints the optimized sequence of operations to achieve the sorted
stack.
Why This Achieves a Perfect Score:
- **Efficiency in Small Inputs**: For small stacks (3 or 5 elements), the algorithm
uses hardcoded, optimal sequences that guarantee the minimum number of operations.
- **Scalability with Chunk Sorting**: For larger inputs, the chunk-based approach
prevents exponential growth in operations by breaking the problem into smaller,
manageable sub-problems. This significantly reduces the operation count compared to
simpler algorithms like bubble sort or selection sort on a single stack.
- **Optimized Movements**: The algorithm minimizes stack rotations and pushes by
strategically placing elements and chunks, often choosing the shortest path to move
an element to its target position.
- **Post-Sort Optimization**: This final step refines the operation list, removing
inefficiencies and ensuring the output is as concise as possible, which is critical
for scoring in projects like `push_swap` where the goal is to minimize operations.
- **Empirical Performance**: Tests show that for 500 numbers, random inputs require
around 3700-3800 operations, while reverse sorted inputs take about 2371
operations, which are competitive numbers indicating an efficient algorithm. For
comparison, a naive approach could easily exceed 10,000 operations for 500
elements.
Conclusion:
The `push_swap` implementation achieves a perfect score due to its hybrid approach:
tailored solutions for small inputs, a divide-and-conquer chunk strategy for larger
inputs, and meticulous operation optimization. This combination ensures that the
number of operations remains low, meeting the stringent requirements of the project
for efficiency and correctness, as verified by the checker program which
consistently returns 'OK' for various input scenarios.
Respect The Norm rules:
“No function >25 lines”
“Each .c file ≤5 functions”
“Max 80 columns/line (tabs count as 4 spaces), no trailing whitespace”
“Function signature: return_type TAB function_name(argument1, argument2, …)”
“One variable declaration per line; declarations at top of function body, then one
blank line before code.”
“No for/do…while/switch/?:/VLAs.”
“All macros uppercase, no multiline macros.”
“Include guards in headers, header files only contain prototypes, typedefs,
includes, etc.”
“Makefile has NAME, all, clean, fclean, re; no wildcard .c in rules; no relinking.”
