Logic and Truth Tables
Logic and Truth Tables
What is a Truth
Table?
A truth table is a tool that helps you analyze statements or arguments in order to verify
whether or not they are logical, or true. There are five basic operations that you will
utilize when creating a truth table. These operations are the conjunction, disjunction,
negation, conditional, and bi-conditional. These operations are also referred to as “and,”
“or,” “not,” “if-then,” and “if and only if.” The rules for these operations are as follows:
Logic Operations
And Statements – These statements are true only when both p and q are true (as the
AND
rigorous definition of “and” implies.)
(conjunction)
Example: “I will bring both a pen AND a pencil to the tutoring session.” Only if I bring
bothpis thisq true. p q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F
Or Statements OR – These statements are false only when both
are false (follows the definition of “or”.) Example: “I will bring a pen OR
p and q (disjunction)
a pencil p q appointment.” Only if I don’t do either is this false.
p toqthe tutoring
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F
Not Statements
NOT ~ – The “not” is simply the opposite or complement
(negation)
of its original value.
p ~p Example: p = “It is raining”
T F ~p = “It is NOT raining”
F T
Provided by the Academic Center for Excellence 1 Logic and Truth Tables
Reviewed August 2017
If and
IF Only
AND If Statements
ONLY IF – These statements are true only when both p and q have the same
truth (bi-conditional)
values.
Example: “Taxes will go down IF AND ONLY IF I am elected.”
p q p↔q
Only if I am elected and taxes go down, or I am not elected and
T T T taxes do not go down is this true.
T F F
F T F
F F T
Constructing Truth Tables
To create a truth table, follow these steps:
n
1. Determine the number of variables; for n variables, create a table with 2 rows.
If there are two variables (p, q), then you will need 22 or 4 rows.
If there are three variables (p, q, and r), you will need 23 or 8 rows.
2. List the variable and every combination of T and F for the given variables.
TWO VARIABLE THREE VARIABLE
p q p q r
T T T T T
T F T T F
F T T F T
F F T F F
F T T
F T F
F F T
F F F
3. Then start with negations (“nots” or “~”), create a new column for each “piece” of the
statement or argument, filling in the truth values as you go. Work from simple pieces to
more difficult pieces until you have the truth values for the whole problem.
4. If two statements have the same truth values, then they are equivalent.
Equivalents
There are a number of equivalents in logic. This means that these statements have been
proven true, and you can use these statements without having to prove them. The
symbol for equivalent is ≡. The following are the most commonly used equivalents:
pT≡p pp≡p ~(p q) ≡ ~p ~q
pF≡F pp≡p DeMorgan’s Law
pT≡T p ~p ≡ F #1
pF≡p p ~p ≡ T ~(p q) ≡ ~p ~q
p q ≡ ~p q p (q r) ≡ (p q) DeMorgan’s Law
p q ≡ ~q ~p (p r) #2
p (q r) ≡ (p q)
(p r)
The entire statement is true only when the last column’s truth values are all “True.” In
this case, (p q) is not equivalent to (~p q) because they do not have the same truth
values.
If every cell in the last column is “True,” then the entire statement is true.
This is called a tautology.
A logical argument is made up of two parts: the premises and the conclusion.
Arguments are usually written in the following form:
Arguments of this form can be turned into a logical statement. First, assign variables to each
premise and conclusion.
“It is cold” = p
If it is cold, then my motorcycle will not start. “It is not cold” = ~p
My motorcycle started. It
“Myis not cold.
motorcycle will start” = q
“My motorcycle will not start” = ~q
You can now re-write the argument using logical operators. Look for keywords like “if” and
“not.”
Finally, the argument can be rewritten as a logical statement. Arguments can always be
written in the following form:
[ (p ~q) q ] ~p
This statement can then be proven valid or invalid using a truth table, as shown on the
following page.
Statement: [ (p ~q) q ] ~p
p q
T TStep 1:
T FDetermine the number of variables and rows
F Tneeded, then write down all possible combinations
of p and q.
F F
~p
p q
T F 2:
T Step
T F
F [ (p ~q) q ] ~p
F T
T Write down values of ~p (or “not p”)
F F T
p Step
q 3:~p ~q
T F~q) qF ] ~p
T [ (p
T Write
F F T
down values of ~q (or “not q”)
F T T F
F F TT
p T qTTFFStep
T 4:
~p ~q (p →q ~q)
[ (p ~q) ] ~p
F F F
Left Side: Start within the inner most parentheses. Is (p ~q) true? Use values from p and ~q colu
F T T
T F T
F F T T T
Step 5:
p q ~p ~q [ (p (p ~q) (p
→ ~q) q→ ] ~q)~p∧ q
T T F F Left Side: F Work outwards F towards the outer most parentheses. Is [ (p ~q) q ] true? Use
T F F T T F
F T T F T T
F F T T T F
p q6: ~p ~q (p → ~q)
Step (p ~q) q [ (p ~q) q ]
~p
[ (p ~q) q ]
T T F F F F T
~p
T F F T T F T
IsF theTentire
T statement true?
T T T
F
Yes. This is a tautology F T
F F T T T