Module 3
Module 3
B. Historical Evolution of CD
⮚ Contemporary Era
1990s2000s:
▪ Participatory Approaches: Shift towards more inclusive methods like assetbased
community development, faithbased community development, and
communitybased participatory research (CBPR).
▪ Social Capital Formation: Influenced by Robert Putnam’s work, emphasizing social
capital. Muhammad Yunus' Grameen Bank in Bangladesh popularized
microenterprise credit schemes, earning the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize.
2010s:
▪ Big Local Program, UK: Allocated £1 million to 150 areas for communityled change,
marking a significant shift towards communityled development.
Community development in the Philippines has a rich history dating back to the 1950s
and 1960s when it was adopted as an official strategy by the government. This period
saw significant efforts to enhance the socioeconomic conditions of rural communities
through various programs and initiatives.
Summary
Community development emerged as a key strategy for rural and national development in
the Philippines during the mid20th century. It began as a governmentled initiative under
President Ramon Magsaysay, focusing on selfhelp, infrastructure development, and social
services improvement. Over time, the approach shifted towards a more participatory,
grassrootsdriven model, empowering local communities to take charge of their
development. This historical trajectory highlights the evolving nature of community
development in response to the sociopolitical context of the Philippines.
References:
1. https://www.coursehero.com/file/68399215/HandoutsinComDev1docx/
2.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/428981882issuesincommunitydevelopmentplannin
ginthephilippinespptx/253850731
3. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/thehistoricaldevelopmentofcommunity
organization/237777414
4. https://www.aisf.or.jp/sgrainenglish/seminar14/DrsMedinaBaconguis.pdf
5. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43540988.pdf
The six month training at UPLB was successful, but formal professional training in the
community development discipline was deemed necessary. According to Luis Ladonga,
former dean of CDPA at MSU and a pioneer of PACD professional education:
“...if we may take the liberty of comparing the professional of the discipline and the worker,
it is about the difference between an electrical engineer and the electrician; the civil
engineer and the chief mechanic. The professional of the discipline is not only a doer
hence, he may work as a worker in the program but is an idea man, an intellectual imbued
with the scientific habit of thought and action who can plan, organize, and manage
programs, educate, do researches necessary for preplanning and evaluation of programs.
The professionals of the discipline are those who hold baccalaureate, graduate, and
postgraduate degrees in community development science.”
Summary
Community development in the Philippines evolved significantly from its inception in the
1950s under President Ramon Magsaysay. Initially a governmentled initiative, it aimed to
improve rural socioeconomic conditions through selfhelp, infrastructure development, and
social services. Over time, CD became more participatory and grassrootsdriven, especially
after the People Power Revolution. Academic institutions played a crucial role in
professionalizing the field, offering formal education and training programs to develop
skilled community development professionals. Despite political challenges, the spirit of
community empowerment and organizing persisted, shaping the development landscape
of the Philippines.
Citations:
[1] https://www.scribd.com/document/532319934/Nationbuilding
[2]
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whycommunitydevelopmentimportantnationbuildinghap
uarachchi
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_development
[4] https://www.future.edu/2022/10/communitydevelopment/
[5]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297465785_The_importance_of_community_de
velopment
Citations:
[1] https://ced.msu.edu/aboutcced/principlesofcommunitydevelopment
[2]
https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/communitydevelopmentpractice/chapter/27/
i. Improving quality of life and wellbeing: Community development aims to enhance the
overall living conditions and socioeconomic status of community members through
initiatives in areas like education, healthcare, housing, and infrastructure [1][2].
iii. Promoting social inclusion and empowerment: A key goal is to empower marginalized
or vulnerable groups like women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities
by ensuring their rights, and voices are heard, and they have equal opportunities
[2][4].
Citations:
[1]
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/objectivesofcommunitydevelopment/20099542
2
[2]
https://howtoapplyforgrants.com/continue/objectivesgoalsofcommunitydevelopment
project/
[3] http://starr.tamu.edu/files/2013/01/cg_color.pdf
[4] https://www.cityofnapa.org/184/CommunityDevelopmentObjectivesGoals
[5]
https://www.agoodcommunity.org/aimsandobjectivesofcommunitydevelopment.html
E. The Difference between Community Development and other related fields and Concepts
(e.g., social work, urban planning, sociology, public administration, community
engagement, etc.)
Here is a summary of the key differences and similarities between community development,
social work, public administration, and environmental planning:
Differences:
1. Focus:
▪ Community development focuses on improving the overall wellbeing and
capacity of entire communities.
▪ Social work focuses on helping and empowering individuals, families, and
small groups.
▪ Public administration focuses on the management and operation of
government agencies and public organizations.
▪ Environmental planning focuses on ensuring the environmental sustainability
of development projects and creating sustainable communities.
2. Approach:
▪ Community development emphasizes a collective, participatory, and
grassroots approach.
▪ Social work often takes a more individualized, case by case approach.
3. Scope:
▪ Community development works at the macro level, tackling systemic and
structural problems in communities.
▪ Social work operates at the micro level, addressing personal and interpersonal
issues.
▪ Public administration operates at the micro level, managing the internal
operations and policies of public organizations.
▪ Environmental planning operates at the micro level, evaluating the
environmental impacts of specific development projects.
4. Objectives:
▪ Community development aims to foster economic, social, political, and
environmental improvements for the entire community.
▪ Social work aims to enhance individual and family well-being.
▪ Public administration aims to ensure efficient, effective, and ethical governance
and public service delivery.
▪ Environmental planning aims to conserve natural resources, protect
undeveloped land, and restore environmental degradation caused by
development.
Similarities:
1. Shared Values: All four disciplines share common values of social justice, human
rights, and empowerment of people and communities.
4. Promoting Positive Change: The ultimate goal of all these disciplines is to bring
about positive, sustainable change that improves the lives of community members.
Citations:
Justice
HUM
AN
DIGNI
Participation TY Empowerment
HUMAN DIGNITY
At its most basic, the concept of human dignity is the belief that all people hold a special value
that’s tied solely to their humanity. It has nothing to do with their class, race, gender, religion,
abilities, or any other factor other than their being human.
The term “dignity” has evolved over the years. Originally, the Latin, English, and French words for
“dignity” did not have anything to do with a person’s inherent value. It aligned much closer with
someone’s “merit.” If someone was “dignified,” it meant they had a high status. They belonged
to royalty or the church, or, at the very least, they had money. For this reason, “human dignity”
does not appear in the US Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. The phrase as we
understand it today wasn’t recognized until 1948. The United Nations ratified the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted in 1966, continued this
understanding. The preamble reads that “…these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the
human person.” This belief goes hand in hand with the universality of human rights. In the past,
only people made dignified by their status were given respect and rights. By redefining dignity as
something inherent to everyone, it also establishes universal rights.
The concept of human dignity isn’t limited to human rights. In fact, for centuries, religions around
the world have recognized a form of human dignity as we now understand it. Most (if not all)
religions teach that humans are essentially equal for one reason or another. In Christianity,
Islam, and Judaism, it’s because humans were created in the image of God, becoming children
of God. Dignity is something that a divine being gives to people. In Catholic social teaching, the
phrase “Human Dignity” is used specifically to support the church’s belief that every human life
is sacred. This defines the denomination’s dedication to social issues like ending the death
penalty.
In Hinduism and Buddhism, respectively, dignity is inherent because humans are manifestations
of the Divine or on a universal journey to happiness. In the Shvetasvatara Upanishad, an ancient
Sanskrit text, it reads “We are all begotten of the immortal,” or “We are children of immortality.”
Buddhism begins with the understanding that humans are “rare” because they can make
choices that lead to enlightenment. Our dignity arises from this responsibility and ability, uniting
all humans in their quest.
When everyone is equal, they are all equally deserving of basic respect and rights, at least in
theory. Countless people have had their dignity disrespected over the years by religious
institutions and others using religion as justification.
Why is human dignity so important when it comes to human rights? Human dignity justifies
human rights. When people are divided and given a value based on characteristics like class,
gender, religion, and so on, it creates unequal societies where discrimination runs rampant.
People assigned a higher value get preferential treatment. Anyone who doesn’t fit into the
privileged category is abandoned or oppressed. We’ve seen what happens in places where
human dignity isn’t seen as inherent and human rights aren’t universal. While the privileged few
in these societies flourish, society as a whole suffers significantly. Inevitably, violence erupts. If
a new group takes power and also fails to recognize human dignity, the cycle of destruction
continues, only with different participants.
HUMAN DIGNITY is the core from which the above three principles emanate. It is the point
behind all development. The sum of man’s inherent potential to be fully human. A reason for
respecting everyone for what he/she is. The basis for protecting human rights. Both the social
order and individual rights emanate from the dignity of each person, who by nature is
endowed with intelligence and free will.
By virtue of this, he (the human person) has rights and qualities which are universal, inviolable,
and inalienable. These rights include the means which are necessary for the proper
development of life
● Planned change should be guided by principles.
● The complete development of man, following human dignity, is to be more rather than
merely to have more.
Poverty and Misery are a result of not according to the human person's centrality in the
organization of social order. Development is not measured only by the amount of money
spent or the amount of macro-economic benefits generated, but by how much people
can take responsibility for development as their own.
A community of rural poor taking an active part in developing their village and
demonstrating their worth is putting their dignity into practice.
PARTICIPATION
Participation refers to the act of taking part in an event, activity, or process. It involves actively
engaging, contributing, or being involved in something. Some key points about participation:
● Participation is vital for the success of an investigation or project, as it requires the active
involvement of all relevant individuals or groups [1][2][4].
● Full participation by all members is often compulsory or necessary for the proper
functioning of a group or organization [2].
● Participation in extracurricular activities can make a person well-rounded, and
educational, and help them make lifelong friends [3].
● Meaningful participation goes beyond symbolic gestures and ensures that individuals or
groups have a real say in decision-making processes that affect them [4].
● Tokenism, on the other hand, is a form of fake participation that is merely a perfunctory
effort or symbolic gesture without real impact [4].
● Participation can take place at different stages of a process, and it is important to ensure
that there is still time and possibility for changes based on the feedback provided [4].
● In a political context, participation refers to the involvement of citizens through elections,
political party activities, demonstrations, and protest culture [4].
Citations:
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/participation
[2] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/participation
[3] https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/participation
[4] https://participation.cbm.org/why/disability-participation/participation
[5] https://www.dictionary.com/browse/participation
According to the search results, there are several key aspects and types of participation:
Types of Participation
▪ Social participation: Involvement in formal voluntary organizations, informal
community groups, and mutual aid/self-help groups [2].
▪ Public participation: Engagement with democratic structures like voting, contacting
representatives, campaigning, consultations, and demonstrations [2].
▪ Individual participation: Personal actions and choices that reflect the kind of society
one wants to live in, such as ethical consumption, recycling, petitions, and informal
helping gestures [2].
Qualities of Participation
▪ Voluntary: Participation is a free choice without coercion [2].
▪ About action: Participation requires some action, even if relatively passive [2].
▪ Collective or connected: Participation means being part of something collective, even if
the action is individual [2].
▪ Purposeful: Participation aims to do something worthwhile and have consequences, at
least for the individual [2].
Levels of Participation
▪ Nominal participation: Participation that gives legitimacy but results in little change [4].
▪ Instrumental participation: Using community participation as a means to an end, like
efficient project implementation [4].
▪ Representative participation: Giving a voice in decisions that affect people, increasing
sustainability for the powerful, and offering leverage for the less powerful [4].
▪ Transformative participation: Results in empowerment and alters structures that lead
to marginalization, with the powerful in solidarity with the less powerful[4].
Citations:
[1]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258101920_Important_aspects_of_participation_an
d_participation_restrictions_in_people_with_a_mild_intellectual_disability
[2] https://www.involve.org.uk/resources/knowledge-base/what/participation
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24160858/
[4] https://www.participatorymethods.org/method/levels-participation
[5]
https://cdpp.ca/sites/default/files/CDPP%20Measure%20of%20Experiential%20Aspects%20o
f%20Participation%20%28MeEAP%29%20%26%20Guide.pdf
Citations:
[1] https://granicus.com/blog/participation-phenomenon-getting-involved-in-your-community/
1 Lack of Trust - Negative experiences with past participation programs and a lack of trust
in community leaders and officials are major barriers to participation. People may be
hesitant to get involved if they feel their input will not be valued or acted upon [1][4].
4 Socioeconomic Factors - Poverty, illiteracy, and low socioeconomic status can prevent
people from participating meaningfully in community activities. Lack of resources and
civic education are obstacles [3].
To overcome these barriers, community engagement efforts need to build trust over time through
open communication and by demonstrating that participation is valued. Flexible, inclusive
methods, targeted outreach, and providing resources to marginalized groups can also increase
participation [1][5].
Citations:
[1] https://blog.jambo.cloud/how-to-remove-barriers-to-participation-inclusivity-in-
community-engagement
[2] https://bmcprimcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-023-02062-0
[3] https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=127788
[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186278/
[5] https://www.commonplace.is/blog/barriers-to-community-engagement
JUSTICE
Fairness and Impartiality - Justice involves treating people fairly and impartially, without
discrimination or favoritism. It means upholding the principle of equal rights and ensuring that
everyone is subject to the same laws and standards [1][2][3].
Moral Rightness - Justice is closely tied to morality and doing what is right. A just society is one
that upholds moral principles like honesty, integrity, and respect for human dignity [1][2][4].
Legal System - The justice system, including courts and law enforcement, is responsible for
administering justice by determining rights, meting out punishments for crimes, and ensuring the
rule of law is followed [2][4].
Philosophical Theories - Philosophers have long grappled with defining justice. Plato saw it as
harmony and balance, with each person doing what they are responsible for. Social contract
theory holds that justice derives from the mutual agreement of society to be governed [5].
Types of Justice - Modern frameworks include distributive justice (fair allocation of benefits and
burdens), retributive justice (punishment of wrongdoers), and restorative justice (repairing harm
and restoring relationships)[5].
In summary, justice is a multifaceted concept that involves fairness, morality, the legal system,
and philosophical ideals. Achieving justice is a fundamental goal of any society.
Citations:
[1] https://www.dictionary.com/browse/justice
[2] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/justice
[3] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/learner-english/justice
[4] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/justice
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice
According to the search results, there are several key aspects and types of justice:
Types of Justice
1 Distributive justice: Determining who gets what and ensuring a fair allocation of benefits
and burdens in society[1][2][4].
2 Procedural justice: Ensuring people are treated fairly and impartially by the legal system
and decision-making processes[3][4].
3 Retributive justice: Punishing wrongdoers and meting out consequences for crimes and
transgressions[3][4].
4 Restorative justice: Repairing harm, restoring relationships, and healing victims,
offenders and communities affected by crime and conflict[3][4].
Levels of Justice
1 Moral justice: Upholding moral principles and doing what is right [2].
2 Social justice: Ensuring a fair distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges in
society [2][5].
3 Legal justice: Administering justice through the legal system and courts [2].
In summary, justice encompasses fairness, equity, rights, punishment, restoration, and moral
philosophy. Distributive, procedural, retributive, and restorative justice are key frameworks for
analyzing issues of justice in society. Achieving justice requires balancing competing
philosophical perspectives and ensuring fair treatment at the moral, social, and legal levels.
Citations:
[1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/42761831
[2] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1978.tb00062.x
[3] https://jswve.org/volume-18/issue-1/item-06/
[4] https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/types_of_justice
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
Upholding the Rule of Law - The judicial system is responsible for ensuring everyone follows
the law and resolving disputes fairly. Impartial enforcement of the law is essential for social
stability[1].
Promoting Fairness and Equity - Justice involves treating all people fairly and providing equal
access to opportunities and resources. Unfairness and discrimination undermine social
cohesion [4].
Securing Human Rights - Protecting fundamental human rights is a core principle of social
justice. Respecting the rights and dignity of all individuals is necessary for a well-functioning
society[4][5].
Providing a Social Contract - Justice, along with order and power, forms the basis of the social
contract that binds society together. A just social contract creates trust and commitment to
shared values [2].
In summary, justice is a fundamental pillar of social order. By upholding the rule of law,
promoting fairness, securing rights, empowering the marginalized, enabling participation, and
providing a social contract, justice helps maintain a stable and cohesive society. Injustice, on
the other hand, breeds disorder, conflict and chaos.
Citations:
[1] https://study.com/learn/lesson/social-order-overview-examples.html
[2] https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/TJP.CHAP8.HTM
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
[4] https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/social-justice/
[5] https://onlinesocialwork.vcu.edu/blog/social-work-and-social-justice/
In summary, the shift to sustainable community development represents a move away from
conventional growth-oriented models towards more holistic, participatory, and ecologically
grounded approaches. It requires rethinking development priorities, planning processes, and
the relationship between people and the environment. Achieving sustainable communities is
an ongoing challenge that necessitates a fundamental shift in thinking and worldviews [5].
Citations:
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305900600000039
[2]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275543281_Learning_about_Sustainable_Commun
ity_Development
[3] https://www.viurrspace.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/66730274-0a9d-44b9-83f4-
e58e94f0fd15/content
[4] https://www.jstor.org/stable/44257342
[5] https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/42386
Shifting away from traditional development models that prioritize growth at all costs requires
overcoming powerful vested interests and changing mindsets that are resistant to new ways of
thinking[4].
While many communities have pioneered innovative sustainable development projects, scaling
these up to achieve systemic change is difficult. Replicating successes in different contexts
requires adaptation [4].
In summary, the key challenges are reconciling competing priorities, overcoming resistance to
change, ensuring equity, building capacity, measuring impact, and scaling up. Overcoming
these barriers requires sustained commitment, collaboration, and innovation in communities
transitioning to sustainable development.
Citations:
[1] https://academic.oup.com/cdj/article-abstract/32/3/210/350280
[2] http://sustainablecommunitydevelopmentgroup.org/wordpress/issues/
[3] https://www.jstor.org/stable/44257342
[4] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227736698_Challenges_to_Community-
Based_Sustainable_Development_Dynamics_Entitlements_Institutions
[5] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sustainable-community-development-why-needed-how-
achieve-aditya-ayy3c
This figure depicts the CD chain. The solid lines show the primary flow of causality. However,
there is a feedback loop shown by the dotted lines. Progress in the outcome of community
development (taking positive action resulting in physical and social improvements in the
community) contributes to capacity building (the process of CD) and social capital. For example,
better infrastructure (e.g., public transportation, internet access) facilitates public interaction,
communications, and group meetings. Individuals who are materially, socially, and
psychologically better off are likely to have more time to spend on community issues because
they have to devote less time to meeting basic human and family needs. Success begets success
in community development. When local citizens see positive results (outcome), they generally
more enthused and plow more energy into the process because they see payoff.