Original
Original
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
CERTIFICATE i
CERTIFICATE ii
CERTIFICATE iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
DECLARATION v
LIST OF FIGURES 1
LIST OF TABLES 2
ABBREVIATIONS 3
ABSTRACT 4
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………5-9
1.1 MOTIVATION…………………………………………………………………......5
1.2 OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………………….…...7
1.4 LIMITATIONS………………………………………………………………....…...7
3.1 MATLAB……………………………………………...……………………………...20
3.2 MAIN FEATURES OF MATLAB………………………………………………….20
3.3 KEY COMPONENTS OF MATLAB SOFTWARE…………………………………21
3.3.1 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE BLOCKS USED IN MATLAB…………….…….21
3.4 WHAT IS SIMULATION……………………………………………………...…….22
3.4.1 WHY WE USE SIMULATION……………………………………………………23
3.4.2 BASIC SIMULATION PROCEDURE…………………………………………….23
CHAPTER 4 MODELING…………………………………………………………25-47
4.3 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………….31
4.4 ADVANTAGES……………………………………………………………………32
4.5 DISADVANTGES………………………………………………………………….33
4.6 APPLICATIONS……………………………………………………………………34
RESULTS…………………………………………………….…..…………………..48-49
CONCLUSION…………………..………………………………………………………50
REFFERENCES…………………… ………..……………………………………….....51
LIST OF FIGURES
AC Alternating Current
DC Direct Current
DER Distributed Energy Resource
DG Distributed Generator
HVDC High Voltage Direct Current
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IGBT Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
PCC Point of Common Coupling
PQ Power Quality
PLL Phase Locked Loop
PWM Pulse width modulation
SG Synchronous Generator
SM Synchronous Machine
SRF Synchronous Reference Frame
VSC Voltage Source Converter
VSG Virtual Synchronous Generator
Index Terms-Grid connected inverter, smart grid, transient stability, virtual synchronous
generator (VSG), voltage source inverter.
1.1 MOTIVATION:
In classical power systems, the Synchronous Machine (SM)
with speed governor and excitation control offers favorable features to support the system
operation within a dis- tributed control scheme. Indeed, SMs contribute to the system
damping through their inertia, participate in the primary frequency regulation through the
droop response of the speed controller, and provide local control of voltage or reactive
power flow.Thesecapabilities, and especially the inertial and damping response common
to all SMs, are not inherently offered by the power electronics interfaces commonly
adopted for the integration of renewable energy sources.
A distributed model for production and local control is also opening the possibility
of islanded operation, which is inherently feasiblewith one or more controllable SMs in the
islanded area. Such islanding operation is usually more complex to achieve with power
converter interfaces designed for integrationwith a large-scale power system.Power from
many traditional large-scale generation facilities is currently being replacedby distributed
generation capacity from wind power and photovoltaics.
The traditional control structures implemented in the power converters for these
applications rely on the synchronization to a stable grid frequency supported by large
rotating inertias and are not inherently suitable in a Smart Grid context. Thus, from an
implementation perspective, significant research efforts are still devoted towards
development of controlschemes for power electronic converters explicitly conceived to
address the conditionsemerging in future Smart Grids.
Given the inherent benefits of the SMs outlined above,a captivating approach is the
control of power electronic converters to replicate the most essential properties of the SM
and by that gain equivalent features from a functional point of view.Thus, several
alternatives for providing auxiliary services like reactive power control, damping of
oscillations and emulation of rotating inertia with power electronic converters have been
proposed. Some of these control strategies are explicitly designed to mimic the dynamic
response of the traditional SM, and can therefore be classified in broad terms as Virtual
Synchronous Generators (VSG). Conventional enormous synchronous generators (SGs)
comprise rotating inertia dueto their rotating parts. These generators are capable of
injecting the kinetic potential energy preserved in their rotating parts to the power grid in
the case of disturbancesor sudden changes.
Therefore, the system is robust against instability. On the other hand, penetration of
distributed generating (DG) units in power systems is increasing rapidly. The most
challenging issue with the inverter-based units is to synchronize theinverter with the grid
and then to keep it in step with the grid even when disturbances or changes happen . A power
system with a big portion of inverter based DGs is proneto instability due to the lack of
adequate balancing energy injection within the proper time interval. The solution can be
found in the control scheme of inverter based DGs.
1.2 OBJECTIVES:
1.4 LIMITATIONS:
when modeling in order to better fit the scope, and to make the modeling
easier. The modeling is covered in detail in Chapter 3, so this section will cover what
limitations the model has, and why it has them. As mentioned in the scope of work, the
modeling of the physical components themselves has not been a priority. The power
electronic converters in the model for example, is based on average models. The average
model ofa converter cannot represent harmonics, so harmonics cannot be studied.The
average model also assumes the converter to be ideal, which implies that there are no
lossesin the electronics.
The power system studied in this thesis is not very complex and has been
simplified to a great extent in order to make analysis and simulations easier.This low
complexity imposes limitations on how advanced the test cases can be. It alsolimits the
relevancy of the findings to real life cases by making them more theoretical and related to
only a small part of an actual system. This is of course all related tothe scope of work
and a design and analysis of much more complex system would nothave been feasible with
the time and resources at hand. The system do not contain any infrastructure for
reconnecting the VSG to the grid if it initially was running in island operation.The system
would need to have a synchronization controller suchas the one described in [10] in order
to make reconnection possible. The lack of this technology in the system means that
scenarios such as synchronization of the VSG with an already operational synchronous
generator.
Chapter 2 covers the background for the technologies and concepts of the subject matter
studied in the thesis. A detailed information about the VSGs and its characteristic behavior in
different aspects has been discussed. The role of virtual inertia in the working of VSG has been
broadly discussed. Lastly, it mentions about the VSG control unitand how it generates the
necessary control signals.
Chapter 3 gives an overview of the system description and also the modeling of the system
has been covered. Here the possible configuration of the VSG with the rest of the system such
as the Grid and other machines has been discussed.
Chapter 4 discusses all the results of the simulations of the relevant test cases while
presenting graphical plots for the same. Various comparisons are done for the enhancement of
performance of the VSG and the same will be proved with the help of the results.
Chapter 5 presents the important conclusions of the work.
EXISTING SYSTEM
This chapter covers all the technical aspects of the various concepts studied in this thesis and
also all the state of the different technologies are discussed.
Within the distributed control structure, traditional power generation units support
traditional power system operation in different ways. They participate in the system damping
via their inertia, contribute in the primary frequency regulation by means of their governor
droop characteristics, and take part in the local control of voltage or reactive power flow
through their excitation controls. Such features are not intrinsic to the conventional control
of the renewable energy sources (RES) power electronics interfaces,which depend on the
synchronization to a stable grid frequency.
Simplifying assumptions are made to concentrate on the aspects determining the specific
kinds of stability problems. Stability in traditional power systems has been consequently
classified into various categories. This facilitates the identification of essentialaspects that
contribute to instability and the development of methods for enhancing stability.
For SMs to be interconnected, the frequency of their stator voltages and currents has tobe the
same, and, since their rotors mechanical angular speed is synchronized to that angular
frequency, the rotors of all interconnected SMs need to be in synchronism.
The stability category concerned with the capacity of the interconnected SMs of a power
system to stay in synchronism after undergoing a disturbance is called rotor angle stability.
Such ability is determined by the capacity of each SM to sustain or regain equilibrium even
after small disturbances. That operating equilibrium is disrupted when the powersystem
undergoes a disturbance, which causes the acceleration or deceleration of the rotors.
The stability category concerned with the capacity of a power system to keep
voltage levels within their limits at all buses after undergoing a disturbance is called voltage
stability. Such ability is determined by the capacity to sustain or regain equilibrium between
power (load) supply and demand. Corresponding instability arises as a gradualvoltage drop
or increase in some buses. Voltage instability occurs often together with rotor angle stability.
One can result in the other, and it can be difficult to differentiate them. The distinction has
been made nevertheless in the traditional classification of power system stability with the
purpose of comprehending the factors causing the problems, so that suitable design and
operating methods can be elaborated.
A distributed power source that is connected to the grid with a VSC does not introduce
properties such as inertia and damping of which the power system relies on. The idea of the
VSG is therefore to control the VSC in such a way that it mimics the behavior of a
synchronous machine, and in that way provide the propertiesof damping and inertia that the
power system is wanting as shown in Fig 2.1.
The underlying idea behind the VSG concept is to emulate the essential behavior of a real
SMby controlling a power electronic converter. Thus, any VSG implementation contains
more or less explicitly a mathematical model of a SM. The specific model of the SM and its
parameters is largely an arbitrary design choice as proved by the many differentsolutions
discussed in literature. However, the emulation of the inertial characteristic and damping of
the electromechanical oscillations are common features for every VSGimplementation.
Additional aspects as the transient and sub-transient dynamics can be included or
neglected, depending on the desired degree of complexity and accuracy inreproducing the
SM dynamics. Furthermore, the parameters selected for VSG implementations are not
constrained by the physical design of any real SM. Thus, the VSG parameters can be selected
to replicate the behavior of a particular SM design or can bespecified during the control system
design to achieve a desired behavior.
If the purpose of VSG is to accurately replicate the dynamic behavior of a SM, a full order
model of the SM has to be included in the converter control system. This includesa 5th order
electrical model with dq-representation of stator windings, damper windingsand the field
winding, together with a 2nd order model resulting in a 7th order model.
The VSG concept can offer a basis for realizing flexible decentralized converter control
schemes that can operate both in grid connected and islanded conditions, and that can almost
seamlessly switch between the corresponding operating modes.
Furthermore, the inherent inertial characteristic of the VSG can provide services as
frequency support and transient power sharing as primary control actions. These are indeed
based only on local measurement and do not depend on external communications as in typical
alternative schemes.
Still, there is no conflict between this local controllability and the ability to operate
in a hierarchical structure while following external referencesand set-points provided by a
centralized controller for optimizing the system operation.Moreover, a further advantage of
the VSG approach lies in its conceptual simplicity, due to the immediate and intuitive physical
interpretation of its behavior with analogy to the corresponding behavior of a physical
machine.The dominant behavior of SMs in terms of inertia response and damping can be
modelled by the traditional swing equation. Considering these general characteristics, several
control strategies have been developed for allowing power electronic convertersto provide
synthetic or virtual inertia to the power system, and have been proposed fora variety of
applications like for instance wind turbines, energy storage systems and HVDC transmission
schemes.
Some of these control methods provide a synthetic inertial response to variations in the
grid frequency and only a few aims to explicitly replicate the features of the traditional SMs.
However, emulation of the inertia and damping effects requires an energy buffer with
sufficient capacity to represent the energy storage effect of the emulated rotating inertia
available. Thus, the amount of virtual inertiathat can be added to the system by a single VSG
unit will be limited by the DC-side configuration and by the current rating of the converter.
𝑑𝑤𝑛
Pin – Pout = Jwn ( )+ 0Δw
𝑑𝑡
where Pin, Pout Fig. 2.1 Simplified block diagram of a VSG unit [15], J, ωm and
D are the input power (as same as the prime mover power in a SG), the output power of the
VSG, the moment of inertia of the virtual rotor, the virtual angular velocity of the virtual
rotor, and the damping factor, respectively. ∆ω is given by ∆ω = ωm - ωgrid, ωgrid being the
grid frequency or the reference frequency when the grid is not available. Having the essential
parameters, (2.1) can be solved bynumerical integration.
Consider the power-angle curve of Fig. 2.2. After a change in system, for
example,a change in prime mover power from Pin0 to Pin1, the operating point moves along
the power curve, from point a to c and then from c to a. The machine condition during each
phase of an oscillation cycle is summarized in Fig 2.3. One cycle of the oscillationconsists of
four segments. During each segment, the sign of the dωm/dt together with the sign of the
relative angular velocity ∆ω defines the acceleration or deceleration. Forexample, in segment
3 of Fig. 2.2, during transition from points c to b, both dωm/dt and ∆ω are negative and act in
the same direction; therefore, it is an acceleration periods wheareas, when they have opposite
signs like segment 4, it is a deceleration period.
Based on this fact, one can select a large value of J during acceleration phases (a to b and c
to b) to reduce theacceleration and a small value of J during deceleration phases (b to c and b to
a) to boost the deceleration.
The big moment of inertia Jbig and the small one Jsmall can be chosen within a wide range
depending on the rated power so that the difference between Jbig and Jsmall determines the
damped power in each half-cycle of oscillation by alternatinginertia. The value of Jbig can be
equal to the normal value of J.
However, applying a very larger value than the normal J will result in a smaller frequency
excursion at the first quarter-cycle but a sluggish response. The value of Jsmall determines the
transient of the second quarter-cycle of oscillation. A very small value of Jsmall (<0.1kgm2) will
result in a satisfactory response.
During each cycle of oscillations, the value of J is switched four times. Each switchinghappens
at the points that the sign of either ∆ω or dωm/dt varies. Before the disturbance, the VSG is
operating with the normal value of J. When the disturbance happens, the transition from a to
b starts with ∆ω > 0 and dωm/dt > 0.
In this condition, the Jbig is adopted. At the end of the first quarter-cycle, that is point b, the sign
of dωm/dt changes.It means that the small value for J is adopted at this point. At point c, the
sign of ∆ω changes and J retrieves it big value.
It will be the end of the first half-cycle. During the second half-cycle, the value of J is
switched to the Jsmall at point b, and again at theend of one cycle at point a, Jbig is adopted.
This procedure is repeated for each cycle ofoscillation until the transients are suppressed and
∆ω equals zero at the new equilibrium point, that is, point b. A threshold for ∆ω can be applied
to avoid the chattering of J during normal operation. However, this threshold is set to zero
in this paper.
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENT
3.1 MATLAB
• Numerical computation
• Data analysis
• Algorithm development
• Visualization
Feature Description
Matrix-based Core data element is a matrix—ideal for linear algebra and system
language modeling.
Data visualization Powerful tools for plotting and data representation in 2D/3D.
Interactivity Easy-to-use interface with code, plots, and apps in one window.
1. Open Simulink
• Open MATLAB.
o Constant
o Sum
o Gain
o Scope
o Integrator
4. Connect Blocks
• Click and drag from the output port of one block to the input port of
another.
5. Set Parameters
o Use the model's "Simulation Settings" to choose time step, duration, solver.
8. Analyze Results
MODELING
In this chapter a detailed analysis of the considered system has been carried out, as wellas a
description on how it has been modeled has been discussed.
model shown in Fig. 3.2 is implemented to tune the input power command based on the
frequency deviation. Having the essential parameters, the Swing Equation can be solved by
numerical integration. By solving this equation in each control cycle, the momentary ωm is
calculated and by passing through an integrator, the virtual mechanical phase angle θm is
produced. Vre f in Fig. 3.1 is the voltage reference that determines thevoltage magnitude at the
inverter terminal. Implementing a controller for Vre f results ina regulated voltage and reactive
power at the VSG terminal.
However, Vre f is set con- stant in the simulations and experiments because voltage
control does not affect the ideaof this paper. The phase angle and the voltage magnitude
reference are used as the VSGoutput voltage angle and magnitude commands for generating
pulse width modulation pulses for the inverter. The value of J together with D determines the
time constantof the VSG unit. Selecting the proper value of them is a challenging issue
without a routine. Mimicking a synchronous machine, J is given by J = 2HSbase/ω2 where
0
H is the machine inertia constant, Sbase is the base power of the machine, and ω is the system
frequency. The parameter H tells that for which period of time the machine is able to supply
the nominal load based solely on the energy stored in the rotating mass.The higher H, the
bigger the time constant, resulting in a slower response but smaller frequency deviation after
a change or disturbance.
Although it depends on the machinesize and power, for typical synchronous machines H
varies between 2 and 10 secs. Voltage source converter is used as an interface of the grid
with a battery storage unit. Itwill be controlled as a virtual synchronous machine and the
combination of the VSC and battery may sometimes be referred to as simply "the VSG". A
voltage source converter
Frequency Tracking:
It tracks the grid's frequency and adjusts the VSG's output frequency accordingly, ensuring
they remain in sync.
Synchronization Mechanism:
The PLL uses a phase detector, a loop filter, and a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) to
track the grid's frequency.
Stability:
By maintaining the correct frequency, the PLL helps prevent oscillations and ensures stable
power transfer between the VSG and the grid.
Grid Synchronization:
PLL is essential for ensuring that the VSG's output frequency matches the grid's, which is
crucial for power transfer and stability.
The PLL helps the VSG maintain its output frequency even when the grid frequency
fluctuates, supporting grid stability.
Complementary Control:
PLL often works in conjunction with other VSG control loops (like power and voltage loops)
to provide comprehensive control and stabilization of the grid.
Enhanced Stability:
The alternating moment of inertia in the VSG, combined with the PLL, can improve the
damping of oscillations and enhance the overall stability of the power system.
Adaptive Control:
The alternating inertia can be adjusted based on system conditions, allowing the VSG to
adapt its behavior to changing grid conditions, which can further improve stability.
By combining the PLL's synchronization capabilities with the adaptive inertia, the VSG can
effectively reduce oscillations and improve the overall stability of the power system.
It compares the phases o two signals, and generators a voltage according to the phase
differences. It multiplies the reference input and the voltage controlled oscillator output.
Function:
Phase comparators essentially act as frequency mixers or multipliers, generating a signal that
represents the phase difference between the input signals.
Applications:
Phase-Locked Loops (PLLs): A core component in PLLs, which are used to synchronize
oscillators or other signals.
Power Systems: Used in protective relays to determine the direction of power flow.
High Voltage Applications: Used to check phase coincidence in medium and high voltage
systems.
Output:
The output signal from a phase comparator can be a slowly varying component that provides
information about the phase difference or a series of output pulses whose width is
proportional to the phase difference.
In essence, a phase comparator is a versatile tool for measuring and comparing the phase
relationships between signals, finding applications in diverse fields like electronics, power
systems, and communication.
A loop filter in a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) is a critical component that determines the
dynamic behavior and stability of the PLL system. It processes the output of the phase
detector and shapes the control signal applied to the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO).
Noise Reduction: It smooths out high-frequency noise and spurious signals from the phase
detector output, ensuring a clean control signal for the VCO.
Stability: It helps maintain the stability of the PLL by controlling the loop dynamics, such
as damping and bandwidth.
Frequency Response: It defines the trade-off between the PLL's lock time (speed of
response) and its ability to reject noise.
4.3 SUMMARY
The system as shown in Fig. 3.1 has been modelled in Matlab Simulink to study the
performance of the VSG. Also two more configurations of the system are considered.
i.e VSG in parallel with an SG and VSG as an interface between SG and Grid. In all the
cases the performance characteristic of the VSG has been studied.
The performanceof the VSG with fixed moment of inertia and with alternating inertia
has been focused.And it has been confirmed in Chapter 4 that the VSG with alternating
inertia has the capacity to maintain stability in the mentioned .
The alternating moment of inertia can adjust to the system's needs, providing a more flexible
response compared to static inertia.
3. Integration of Renewable Energy Sources:
Variable Renewable Energy (VRE): The integration of renewable sources like solar
and wind is often challenged by their variability and intermittent nature. VSGs can enhance
the grid’s ability to handle these fluctuations by providing virtual inertia, which smooths out
the rapid changes in power output from renewable sources.
Wind and Solar Power Stabilization: VSGs can be particularly beneficial in wind
and solar power plants, where energy generation can be variable. By adjusting their inertia
characteristics, VSGs can help mitigate the impacts of sudden generation changes or
fluctuations in renewable generation.
4. Load-Frequency Control (LFC):
Dynamic Load Balancing: In systems with high penetration of renewable
energy, where conventional synchronous generators might not be able to respond rapidly
enough to load fluctuations, VSGs can act as a supplementary dynamic resource to control
the load-frequency balance in real time.
Frequency Restoration: VSGs with alternating inertia can also assist in
frequency restoration after a disturbance by gradually adjusting the power output, mimicking
the role of traditional generators in stabilizing the grid frequency.
Resilient Operation: These systems can maintain stable operation even during
faults or transitions, helping microgrids function autonomously without the need for
conventional generators
The image displays a Simscape model, likely simulating a power system with an inverter.
Here's a breakdown of the components and their probable functions:
Discrete 2.0e-06 s. (Top Left): This block likely indicates the discrete time step used for
the simulation, which is 2×10−6 seconds.
PLL1 (Phase-Locked Loop): This block, receiving three-phase input (likely from the grid
or an AC source), is essential for synchronizing the inverter with the utility grid. It outputs
Uabc, which probably represents the synchronized three-phase voltage.
Loads (LOAD and LOAD2): Two load blocks are visible at the bottom left, connected to
the three-phase lines. These represent electrical loads drawing power from the system. One
load (LOAD2) appears to be connected via a switch, indicating it might be switched on or
off during the simulation.
VSG (Virtual Synchronous Generator): This is a key component, likely representing an
inverter operating as a Virtual Synchronous Generator. It takes the synchronized Uabc and
a DC voltage (Vdc) as inputs. Its outputs include Ua,Ub,Uc (three-phase voltages), Pe
(electrical power), and V+ (DC voltage). The VSG aims to emulate the characteristics of a
traditional synchronous generator, contributing to grid stability.
The image displays a Simulink model, and the block you're asking about is a Phase-Locked
Loop (PLL), likely designed for grid synchronization or frequency/phase estimation in a
three-phase system.
Let's break down the components and their likely functions within this PLL:
Vabc Input (leftmost): This is the three-phase AC voltage input to the PLL.
abc to dq0 Transformation Block: This crucial block converts the three-phase (abc) input
voltages into a rotating dq0 (direct, quadrature, zero sequence) reference frame. In a balanced
three-phase system, the direct (d) and quadrature (q) components represent the magnitude
and phase of the voltage vector.
Udp and Uq Outputs: These are the direct (d) and quadrature (q) components of the input
voltage in the rotating reference frame.
Multiplier (*) and Summation (+) Blocks for Mag Output:
The Udp and Uq components are squared and summed, and then a square root is taken. This
calculates the instantaneous magnitude of the voltage vector (Mag). This output can be used
to monitor the voltage amplitude.
Uq Path for Phase Detection:
The Uq component (quadrature component) is typically used as the error signal for the PLL.
When the PLL is perfectly synchronized, Uq should be zero. Any deviation from zero
indicates a phase difference between the input voltage and the PLL's internal reference.
Gain Block (0.0009447): This likely represents a proportional gain or a scaling factor
applied to the Uq error signal.
Transfer Function Block (num(z)/den(z)): This is a discrete-time transfer function. It acts
as a filter (often a low-pass filter) to smooth out the Uq error signal and remove high-
frequency noise. The output of this block is labeled euq, which stands for error in Uq.
The Simulink model depicts a power electronic converter system, most likely a grid-
connected inverter with control mechanisms. Here's a breakdown of the key components and
their inferred roles:
1. AC Grid / Source (Leftmost):
Three-Phase Inputs (1, 2, 3 labeled Ua, Ub, Uc): These represent the three-phase AC
voltages from the utility grid or a similar AC source.
Three-Phase Resistor/Inductor Block: This component acts as an interface between the
grid and the rest of the system, potentially modeling grid impedance or a filter.
PLL1 (Phase-Locked Loop): This block receives the three-phase grid voltage and is crucial
for synchronizing the inverter with the grid. It typically outputs the grid frequency and phase
angle (implied by the connection to Controller2), which are essential for proper control of
the inverter.
2. AC Side Measurements and Loads:
abc to dq0 Transformations: Several instances of this block are visible. These convert
three-phase AC signals into a rotating dq0 reference frame, which simplifies control of AC
quantities by transforming them into DC quantities under steady-state conditions.
Current Measurement Blocks (i_load1, i_inv1_measr): These blocks measure currents at
different points, likely monitoring load currents and inverter output currents.
Voltage Measurement Blocks (v_load1, v_dc_link): These measure voltages, such as load
voltages and the DC link voltage.
OUTPUTGRAPHS
In this work, the concept of using a Virtual Synchronous Generator (VSG) with an
alternating moment of inertia has been explored for enhancing power system stability. The
VSG emulates the dynamic behavior of a traditional synchronous generator, providing
inertia and damping characteristics necessary for frequency and voltage regulation in
modern power systems with high penetration of renewable energy sources.
Simulation results from the MATLAB/Simulink model demonstrate that the VSG with
variable inertia significantly reduces frequency deviations and stabilizes the system faster
compared to conventional control methods.
Overall, the use of VSG with an alternating moment of inertia is an effective solution for
maintaining grid stability in low-inertia systems and supports the reliable integration of
renewable energy sources into the power grid.
[1] Alipoor, Jaber and Miura, Yushi and Ise, Toshifumi. "Power system stabilization using
virtual synchronous generator with alternating moment of inertia." IEEE Journel of
Emerging and selected topics in Power Electronics, 2015: 451-458.
[2] Zhong, Qing-Chang and Hornik, Tomas. Control of power inverters in renewable
energy and smart grid integration. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[3] Driesen J and Visscher K. "Virtual synchronous generator." In Proceedings of the IEEE
PES Meeting, 20-24. 2008.
[4] Zhong, Qing-Chang and Weiss, George. "Synchronverters: Inverters that mimic
synchronous generators." IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011: 1259- 1267.
[5] Van Wesenbeeck, MPN and De Haan, SWH and Varela, Pablo and Visscher, Klaas.
"Grid tied converter with virtual kinetic storage." In PowerTech, 2009 IEEE Bucharest, 1-7.
2009.
[6] Hesse, Ralf and Turschner, Dirk and Beck, Hans-Peter. "Micro grid stabilization using
the Virtual Synchronous Machine (VISMA)." In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality, 15-17. Valencia, Spain, 2009.
[7] Xiang-Zhen, Yang and Jian-hui, Su and Ming, Ding and Jin-Wei, Li and Yan, Du.
"Control strategy for virtual synchronous generator in microgrid." Electric Utility
Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, 1633-1637. IEEE, 2011
PERSONAL DETAILS
NAME : GUDEM SAI TEJA
ROLL NO : 22RS5A0213
FATHER NAME : GUDEM KRISHNA
PHONE NO : 8886873826
MAIL ID : [email protected]
PERSONAL DETAILS
NAME : VELGAM VAMSHI
ROLL NO : 21RS1A0233
FATHER NAME : SRINIVAS
PHONE NO : 9347510574
MAIL ID : [email protected]
PERSONAL DETAILS
NAME : Ponnam Akhila
ROLL NO : 21RS1A0224
FATHER NAME : THIRUPATHI
PHONE NO : 9014922609
MAIL ID : [email protected]