0571 Physics
0571 Physics
Physics
General Comments
The performance of the candidates was better than that of the 2023 cohort with a mean of 29.28 which is
very good for the paper. The candidates did extremely well in 24 items where at least 70% of them got the
item correct. There was only one item where less than 50% of the candidates got the item correct.
Centres are encouraged to give candidates more opportunities for them to interact with questions where
application of skills rather than recalling is required. The item reports are given as tables that include key
information as indicated:
Item 5: Pressure
Option N Key Comment
A 132
Well done. Almost all the candidates remembered that the manometer
B 1735
B is used to measure gas pressure. Very few candidates selected options
C 40
A and C.
D 3
Item 7: Pressure
Option N Key Comment
A 108 Fairly done. The candidates were aware that when one the distances
B 658 increases the other increases, but they failed to note which one was
C
C 1110 decreasing. Pressure decreases as you move higher hence the column
D 34 height should also decrease.
Item 8: Pressure
Option N Key Comment
A 395
Fairly done. Candidates were able to remember that the direction is
B 199
C anticlockwise in the Southern hemisphere but did not know whether the
C 1055
pressure was high or low.
D 261
Item 9: Pressure
Option N Key Comment
A 498
Fairly done. Most of the candidates were split between options B and A.
B 1102
B Thus, the candidates who selected option A calculated pressure due to the
C 225
hight of the water above the fish but did not add the atmospheric pressure.
D 85
General Comments
Candidates are still presenting poor quality diagrams and generally have poor memory of theories, laws and
equations. Centres are urged to avail time to address inadequacies that are prevalent in candidates’
responses. More attention should be paid to comprehension.
(b) (i) Fairly done. Most candidates tended to use speed to describe the sections of the graph
instead of the stated acceleration. Centres are urged to advice their candidates to read
questions thoroughly in order to respond accordingly.
(ii) Well done. Candidates showed familiarity with area under a speed time graph for calculation
of distance travelled.
2 (a) (i) Well done. Most candidates were able to deduce that an empty can has air inside.
(ii) Poorly done. Candidates failed to recognise that pressure inside the can decreased instead
only referred to difference in pressure inside the can and outside without justifying the
difference
(b) (i) Well done. Most candidates identified the formula for use in calculating the pressure, P = ρgh
and used it correctly to determine the pressure at the top surface of the cylinder.
(ii) Well done. The candidates noted that a similar approach used in (b)(i) was also applicable to
determining the pressure at the bottom surface.
(iii) Poorly done. Candidates failed to realise that the pressure at the bottom is pushing upwards
while pressure at the top is pushing downwards thereby creating a pressure difference. Most
candidates summed up the values. The resultant force could be determined using F = PA
where A is the surface area of the cylinder and P is the pressure difference between top and
the bottom.
Answers: (b) (i) 14 000 Pa (b) (ii) 32 000 Pa (b) (iii) 8100 N
3 (a) (i) Fairly done. The candidates recalled the formula to use when calculating the energy, E = Pt.
However, most candidates failed to change the time, which was given in minutes, to seconds
yet still gave their answers in joules.
(ii) Fairly done. The candidates recalled the equation to for use, Q = ml. Most candidates were
challenged by the unit as they used 31 g in their calculations but gave their answer with a unit
of J / kg. The unit would have been correct if they had converted 31 g to kg.
(b) Well done. Generally, candidates were able to note that in answering (a)(ii) it is assumed that there
is no energy loss with all energy being transferred to the ice.
(c) Poorly done. The candidates failed to realise that some of the thermal energy is now used to raise
the temperature of ice from –20 °C to 0 °C. The ice will start to melt once the temperature has
increased to the melting point.
4 (a) Well done. Candidates were able to differentiate between gas and a liquid, even though some
compared unrelated properties hence making their comparisons incomplete. Centres are advised
to inform candidates that when comparing they should always cover both sides i.e. if they say
particles in gas have very high kinetic energy then the difference is completed by stating how the
energy is for particles in liquids.
(b) Fairly done. While on the main candidates noted that pressure increases, they failed to correctly
explain the statement. Most candidates stated Boyle’s law thereby not addressing the question.
Centres urged to advice candidates that laws are not assumptions and also that pressure is due
to particles colliding with walls of a container, increase in pressure is due to increased frequency
of collisions with walls.
5 (a) Poorly done. Candidates failed to state the necessary conditions for total internal reflection to
occur. They easily accessed the mark about critical angle being less than angle of incidence but
failed to recognise that total internal reflection occurs inside a more optically dense medium.
(b) Well done. Candidates readily identified the angle as critical angle.
sin i
(c) Fairly done. Candidates showed familiarity with the equation for refractive index, n = but their
sin r
failure to identify the medium in which total internal reflection will occur meant they could not adapt
the equation to the situation. Those that used the equation with the critical angle had no problem
in accessing marks.
(d) Poorly done. Even though candidates showed some bit of understanding of the concept, they failed
to present neat diagrams. It was evident that some candidates did not bring appropriate tools to
the examination. There was evidence of free hand drawing and not paying attention to detail.
6 (a) Well done. The candidates easily recalled the examples for transverse and longitudinal waves.
(b) Fairly done. The diagram showed reducing frequency and reducing amplitude. Most candidates
were able to note that loudness decreases but failed to identify how frequency affected the pitch.
When frequency decreases the pitch increases.
(c) Poorly done. Even though candidates had an idea of using echo sounding they failed to describe
how the depth is measured. The candidates should always identify the variables that they need to
measure and the variables that are known. The candidates were required to determine the depth,
d of a river. The candidates should use the speed v of sound in water and measure the time t it
takes for ultra-sonic waves to move from the source to the bottom of the river and back. Either
candidates failed to note that the speed of ultra-sonic sound is the same as the speed of sound
hence vt = 2s can be used to determine the depth or they did not have an idea about the
experimental set-up.
7 (a) Well done. Most candidates were able to recall the unit of charge as coulomb. There were a few
candidates who answered by giving a symbol. Centres should encourage candidates to pay
attention to command words used and respond to the questions accordingly.
(b) Well done. Most candidates were aware that the negative charges should move from cloth to
plastic for the rod to become negatively charged.
(c) Poorly done. Candidates showed understanding of induction but failed to demonstrate charging
by induction and transfer of charge when the sphere touches the metal plate. Most candidates
described separation of charges thereby not scoring. Centres are urged to advice candidates to
differentiate between electrostatic induction and transfer of charge.
(d) Fairly done. Most candidates showed understanding that negative charges are transferred into the
sphere but failed to show that the sphere becomes neutral, instead, a sizeable candidature stated
that the sphere becomes negatively charged whereas it is neutralised by negative charges from
the earth.
8 (a) Very well done. Candidates determined the combined resistance of the parallel resistors mainly
R1 R2
using the equation R = . The candidates presented their answer with correct units.
R1 + R2
(b) Well done. The candidates used Ohm’s Law accordingly to determine the current. Most candidates
who got a wrong value of resistance in (a) were still able to determine current correctly and scored
all the marks.
(c) Poorly done. The candidates were aware of the formula they were to use, V = IR to determine the
potential difference but mixed up the currents. The candidates were supposed to determine the
current in the branch of the 4 resistor which is 2 A to score the first mark. Most candidates used
the wrong current, 6 A determined in (b), to calculate the potential difference hence failed to score
a mark for the question.
V2
9 (a) Well done. A few candidates were not able to recall the formula R = for calculation of the
P
resistance of the heater. Some candidates wrote the equation well but failed to square the potential
difference, V when doing the actual calculation.
ρl
(b) Fairly done. Candidates recalled the equation, R = and substituted well in the equation. It seems
A
the candidates failed to use their calculators correctly to find the right answer. Centres are urged
to give candidates practice on the use of calculators.
(c) Poorly done. Most candidates stated that current in the second material would be more than in the
first material but did not quantify it as expected. When the length is reduced by half, and diameter
maintained the resistance reduces by half thereby making the current to double. Centres are
advised to encourage candidates to use all the equations that can assist them to make quantitative
analysis of the different quantities in a formula.
10 (a) Well done. Most candidates were aware that there is current in the circuit when switch S is closed.
The current results in soft-iron core being magnetised. However, the candidates stated that the
soft-iron armature is attracted to soft-iron core and failed to indicate that the soft-iron armature
moves towards the core. Centres should encourage candidates to indicate clearly when attraction
(or repulsion) is accompanied by movement, the resulting movement of the material since either
one of them alone does not necessarily imply that there is motion.
(b) (i) Well done. Most candidates correctly indicated that the resistance of the LDR would decrease
with an increase in light intensity.
(ii) Poorly done. Most candidates fitted the lamp in the gap seen on the circuit diagram instead
of drawing it across the LDR. Most candidates seemed distracted by the gap.
11 (a) Well done. Most candidates used alternative words to unpredictable. Centres encouraged to be
clear on descriptive terms / words in radioactivity. Teachers should explain in detail and give
meaning to terms.
(b) Well done. Almost all the candidates were able to determine that Q is 54. There were some
candidates who failed to determine R the number of neutrons produced in the reaction which is 2
for the equation to be balanced.
(c) Fairly done. The property which was key is the penetrating power of radiation. Most candidates
included properties that did not address the question. Candidates should be encouraged to focus
on properties that address the question. Ionisation has no effect in the use of alpha particles in
monitoring uptake of fertilisers.
General Comments
The candidates generally performed well in this paper. Mostly they were able to record their findings to the
accuracy of the instrument they used. They also substituted their values well in the equations given and
were able to obtain correct answers. The candidates mostly paid attention to the significant figures on their
final answers. They were able to round-off their answers to 2 or 3 significant figures or to 2 or 3 decimal
places which ever was most appropriate to give a meaningful answer i.e. an answer like 234.91027 is better
rounded to decimal places, and 0.025718 to significant figures. Centres are advised to advice their
candidates to round off indefinite answers appropriately. Candidates generally have challenges when it
comes to worded questions, like precautions, or any follow up question. Generally, candidates have good
tabulation and graphing skills, which are basically observed in question 4.
2 This question was fairly done by most candidates. Most candidates were able to draw a correct diagram
with evidence of where they inserted their pins. Most candidates were able to use a protractor to
measure and draw angles correctly, they even recorded their measured angles to the correct precision
of the protractor which is 1°. Most candidates were able to calculate the refractive index accurately and
rounded off infinite answers correctly. Mostly their answers were between 1.4 and 1.6 showing that
they did the experiment accurately. For part (d) most candidates gave the answer which related to
parallax error positioning the eyes directly above the point where the reading is taken on the ruler.
Other expected answers for the precaution are observing the base of the pins, ensuring the pins are
vertical and drawing thin lines. Some candidates said to avoid parallax error. Centres are advised to
inform their candidates that experimental errors are reduced but cannot be completely eliminated.
3 This question was fairly done by most candidates. Records for voltage, V and current, I were with
correct units. Most candidates recorded V to the correct accuracy of the voltmeter, which is 0.1 V, but
for current a lot of candidates failed to record current to the correct accuracy of the ammeter which is
0.02 A. Part (b) was poorly done by most candidates since most of them failed to pick the trend from
part (a). The expected answer is the voltage across wires W, Y and Z is less than V2 the reason is from
(a) V2 < V1 or there is lower voltage drop for resistors in parallel, or there is low resistance for resistors
in parallel. Most candidates said the voltages would be the same because voltage across resistors in
parallel is the same.
4 This question was generally well done. There were three main sections being records, graph and
deductions.
Records
Most candidates were able to give their records of mass and time with correct units. Most candidates
were able to the draw a proper table for recording their results with headings, m, t, T and T2 with correct
units and at the top of the table only. Some candidates failed to give units for T2 hence lost a mark for
tabulation. Most candidates were able to calculate the period T and square of the period T2 correctly
and to the same rounding offs (consistent).
Graph
Mostly the graph was well done. Most candidates were able to draw and label the axes correctly with
correct units and correct orientation. Most candidates were able to make readable scales (the smallest
division on their scale was easy to obtain) for the horizontal but were a bit challenged by the vertical
scale. Mostly of the scales were suitable, i.e. the points to be plotted would cover more than half the
graph sheet. Most points were plotted accurately to within half a small square of the exact position
where they should be. They also used the correct notation (small cross (×) or encircled dots (ʘ)). Most
candidates were able to draw the line of best fit (passing through most points, straight and thin). Some
candidates ignored the trend of their points and drew a forced line to pass through the origin. A few
candidates drew free hand lines and with such lines the gradient cannot be determined.
Deductions
This part of the question was fairly done by most candidates. For part (c), most candidates were able
to draw a big triangle or used points which were on their line when calculating the gradient of the line.
Some candidates ignored their line and used points from their table which were not even on the line.
Nevertheless, they were mostly able to calculate the gradient correctly. A few candidates swapped the
axes when calculating the gradient. Candidates are advised to write the units for their gradient as this
helps them determine the correct units for the next steps.
Part (d) most candidates failed to obtain the correct calculation for the spring constant k. Majority lost
the mark due to wrong units and being out of range.
Part (e), this one was well done. The most common source of inaccuracy was human reaction,
stopwatch accuracy, and difficulty to time a complete oscillation.
Part (f), the expected effects are oscillations not harmonic, force not proportional to the load or the
spring being damaged the reason being elastic limit might be exceeded or limit of proportionality
exceeded.
General Comments
The candidates generally performed well in this paper. Mostly they were able to record their findings to the
accuracy of the instrument given in the paper. They also substituted their value well in the equations given
and were able to obtain correct answers. Candidates were able to round their answers to 2 or 3 significant
figures or to 2 or 3 decimal places which ever was most appropriate to give a meaningful answer i.e. an
answer like 234.91027 is better rounded to decimal places, and 0.025718 to significant figures.. Centres
are advised to advice their candidates to round off indefinite answers appropriately. Candidates generally
have challenges when it comes to worded questions, like precautions, or any follow up question.
(a) Most candidates were able to read and record the temperatures with correct units and accuracy.
(b) The question was well done by most candidates. Most candidates were able to calculate
temperature drops (ΔTA and ΔTB correctly)
(c) Most candidates were able to draw the correct conclusion of the experiment which the expected
answer was volume is inversely proportional to cooling rates.
(d) This question was fairly done. The expected improvements were performing the experiment one
at a time to obtain the temperature at the exact set time or to eliminate time lapse between taking
readings, using a quick responding thermometer or a thermocouple to obtain the temperature at
the exact set time or to eliminate time lapse between taking readings, repeating the experiment
several times and use average value to minimise errors, using a digital or a more accurate
thermometer to minimise errors, for instant temperature measurements etc.
2 (a) This question was mostly well done by most candidates. They were able to draw the correct
diagram with LM, AE, EL and LG at the right places.
(b) Most candidates were able to read and record the lengths q, r, and s correctly and to the correct
accuracy of a rule which is to 1 mm.
(c) The question was fairly done by most candidates. The candidates were able to calculate the
refractive index, n correctly and gave their answers correctly without units.
(d) Most candidates gave the answer which related to parallax error positioning the eyes directly
above the point where the reading is taken on the ruler. Other expected answers for the precaution
are observing the base of the pins, ensuring the pins are vertical and drawing thin lines. Some
candidates said to avoid parallax error. Centres are advised to advice their candidates that
experimental errors are reduced but cannot be completely eliminated.
(a) Most candidates were able to record current and voltage well with correct unit and to the correct
accuracy of the meters. Current to 0.02 A and voltage to 0.1 V.
(b) This question was poorly done by most candidates as they failed to pick the trend from part (a).
The expected answer is the voltage across wires W, Y and Z is less than V2 the reason is from (a)
V < 1.4 V or there is lower voltage drop for resistors in parallel, or there is low resistance for
resistors in parallel. Most candidates said the voltages would be the same because voltage across
resistors in parallel is the same.
(c) This question was well done by most candidates. The expected answers were type of wire /
resistivity, cross sectional area / diameter / thickness, temperature.
4 (a) This question was well done. Most candidates were able to give time from the stopwatch.
(b) Most candidates were able to write the correct units for T and for T2. They were able to calculate
T and for T2 and correctly rounded off their answers to 2 or 3 significant figures or to 1 or 2 decimal
places.
(c) Most candidates were able to draw and label the axes correctly with correct units and correct
orientation. Most candidates used readable (the smallest division on their scale was easy to obtain)
and suitable scales (the points to be plotted would cover more than half the graph sheet). Most
points were plotted accurately to within half a small square of the exact position where they should
be. They also used the correct notation (small cross (×) or encircled dots (ʘ)). Most candidates
were able to draw the line of best fit (passing through most points, straight and thin). A few
candidates drew free hand lines, with such lines the gradient cannot be determined.
(d) Most candidates were able to draw a big triangle or used points which were on their line when
calculating the gradient of the line. Some candidates ignored their line and used points from their
table which are not even on the line. Nevertheless, they were able to calculate the gradient
correctly.
(e) Most candidates failed to obtain the correct calculation for the spring constant k. Majority of the
candidates lost the mark due to wrong units.
(f) This question was fairly done. The expected effects are oscillations not harmonic, force not
proportional to the load or the spring being damaged the reason being elastic limit might be
exceeded or limit of proportionality exceeded.