Development and Implementation of A Mobile Robot For Grouting Floor Tile Joints
Development and Implementation of A Mobile Robot For Grouting Floor Tile Joints
Corresponding Author:
Wael A. Salah
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Palestine Technical
University - Kadoorie
Tulkarm, Palestine
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
Technology is used in all areas of practical life these days [1], [2]. We are getting more and more
reliant on the utilization of various forms of technology on a daily basis [3], [4]. Technology is now
beginning to play a more significant role than ever in influencing the future, both in the lives of individuals
and directly affecting the work environment [5], [6]. This technology has grown indispensable in our life,
encompassing communication, transportation, information retrieval, and entertainment [7], [8]. In addition,
utilization of modern technology plays a major role in the medical and educational sectors to ensure
smoothness and effective operations [9]–[11]. Among these technologies is the mobile robot which has
rapidly developed utilizing different technological tools [12]–[14]. All these developments aimed to realize
contortedness to human and safer living environment [11], [15].
In order to achieve more comfort in the work that requires physical effort to complete, especially
construction work, the trend towards using robots has begun to increase in recent decades [16]–[18]. And the
use of such technology in the field of construction to improve productivity and reduce labor costs as well as
to complete tasks more accurately [19]–[21]. An example of this is the process of grouting tiles as an
alternative to manual injection and the resulting problems such as inconsistency due to worker fatigue in
addition to the difference in the viscosity of the grout [22].
According to statistics, about 80% of people suffer from lower back pain. Also, about 1% to 3% of
the population suffers from lumbar disc herniation associated with lower back pain every year. These
symptoms lead to the inability to perform their various daily tasks in a normal way [23], [24]. Also, other
statistics indicate a high incidence of osteoporosis in the knee, with approximately 86.7 million people
worldwide suffering from this chronic disease in 2020 [25]. Consequently, there is an immediate necessity
for surgical operation that necessitates substantial financial resources to fund the requisite medical care.
The main use of robots has emerged widely to help perform movements or services that are difficult
for humans to perform easily, accurately and quickly [26], [27]. Many applications of robots have also spread
in different areas of life to facilitate the completion of tasks and save time and effort [28], [29].
The growing utilization of service robots seeks to enhance individuals' quality of life. Their
application has recently broadened to encompass fence-free settings in locations such as restaurants,
factories, distribution hubs, and hospitals. The research introduced a proposed classification system for
service robots, emphasizing their propulsion methods and examining their applications, advantages, and
drawbacks. This is to promote the advancement of more dependable robotic solutions [30].
Robots perform functions that are pre-programmed and controlled directly by humans or by
commands from computer programs. One of the most important advantages provided by robotic systems is
the ability to perform difficult or dangerous tasks accurately and increase productivity [31], [32]. Hand
gesture recognition facilitates the control of a wheeled mobile robot by identifying human upper body
gestures across various operational contexts. The outcomes of the identified gestures are transmitted to the
robot, which is maneuvered according to the data from the recognized gestures, enabling the mobile robot to
be operated using hand gestures without any physical intervention [33].
In addition to using equipment efficiently and reducing labor costs by completing work in a shorter
time. Robotic systems are also characterized by flexibility and ease of programming, and can be used to work
in dangerous conditions that are difficult for humans to work in [34], [35]. The brain-computer interface
facilitates direct communication between the human brain and its associated devices by converting
electroencephalogram signals into control commands. A self-learning neuro-fuzzy controller and an obstacle
avoidance controller are employed to facilitate joint control of mobile robotics by the brain, thereby
improving safety, control performance, and durability. The user's intentions are tracked robustly by this
controller, which ensures the safety of the mobile automaton by adhering to the necessary commands [36].
A study presented a dynamic model utilizing computational methods to enhance the stability and
performance of wheelchairs for the elderly and disabled. The results of the used control systems indicated
that the PSO-optimized PID fuzzy logic controller surpassed the PD controller. The minimization of settling
time, overshoot, and steady-state error was accomplished, hence improving the safety and comfort of users
when utilizing wheelchairs [37].
Tile grouting is the process of filling the gaps between tiles. This process is usually done by
manually injecting the grout material, where the worker fills the gaps between the tiles and then returns to
clean the tiles after the grout dries [38], [39]. Hence the idea of designing a robot that helps to complete this
process in an easy and simple way through a specific programming of the robot that depends on choosing the
work area and coordinates using a microcontroller where the starting point and work line of the robot are
determined so that it walks over the gaps between the tiles and performs the grouting process [22].
The grout process requires a lot of time and effort from the worker to fill the gaps between the tiles
and also to clean them again from the grout residue. Hence the importance of employing robotic systems to
solve this problem and save time and effort in addition to accuracy in work. The main goal of the project is to
reduce human intervention by completing some tasks that may be difficult, such as grouting. The worker
places the robot at the beginning of the area and gives it the coordinates of this area, then the robot works
alone and completes the work with less effort, less energy, less manpower and less cost. In addition to higher
accuracy, the tasks required for all spaces are executed according to the coordinates used.
The proposed system for the grouting process works in three stages. The first stage is the pre-
grouting tiles joint cleaning from dust and concrete residues between the tile’s joints. Then, grouting filling in
which the spaces between the tiles are filled with the grouting material. The last stage is the post-grouting
cleaning. In this stage, the robot cleans the floor surface of the working area after the completion of the tile
grouting process. Figure 1 presents a diagram that illustrates the grouting process.
First, the robot is placed at the beginning of the work line, then we enter the tile coordinates (width).
Then we turn on the machine, the robot starts walking on the edge of the tile and puts the grouting inside the
empty space between the tiles, where the on/off sensor stops the robot from working if it is not pumping the
grouting and turns it on if it is pumping the grouting. During the tile grouting process, when reaching a dead
end, the distance sensor senses the distance between the robot and the obstruction, the robot changes its
direction and completes the process.
IAES Int J Rob & Autom, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2025: 151-161
IAES Int J Rob & Autom ISSN: 2722-2586 153
Development and implementation of a mobile robot for grouting floor tile joints (Anees Abu Sneineh)
154 ISSN: 2722-2586
e. L298N Driver: it is an integrated circuit that has a dual full-bridge driver designed to drive the DC
motors. The microcontroller processes the encoder inputs and sends output instructions to the H-Bridges,
and the H-bridges then control the motion speed and direction of the DC motors. The L298N driver is
shown in Figure 4.
f. Ultrasonic Sensor: is an electronic module that is used to detect the obstacles based on sending and
receiving of ultrasonic waves [40], [41]. This module is used to detect obstacles near the robot by sending
and receiving ultrasonic waves at high frequencies. Based on the received wave, the microcontroller
determines the distance between the robot and the obstructing object and issues commands to avoid the
obstacle. The ultrasonic sensor module is illustrated as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 6 shows the electrical parts of the proposed grouting robot composed at which the
aforementioned parts are assembled: 1: Battery, 2: On-off Switch, 3: Regulator, 4: Keypad, 5: LCD, 6:
Ultrasound Sensor, 7: Arduino microcontroller, 8: Motor driver, 9: The Encoder, 10: DC motor for cleaning
brush 11: Two DC motor for moving the robot wheels, 12: Servomotor for moving dustpan up and down, 13:
DC motor to move the screw conveyor.
IAES Int J Rob & Autom, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2025: 151-161
IAES Int J Rob & Autom ISSN: 2722-2586 155
c. Base structure: The internal frame structure of the proposed grouting robot base is made of solid iron
metal, which is used to install and assemble most of the electronic and mechanical parts on it. The
internal base structure of the proposed system is shown in Figure 8.
d. The grout tank: In order for the robot to inject the grout, there must be enough grout for a longitudinal or
transverse work cycle of the place. Therefore, a grout tank made of stainless steel in the form of a conical
container was used, inside which the grout filler for the tiles is placed as shown in Figure 9.
e. The screw conveyor: It is placed at the bottom of the grouting tank and moves the grout material out of
the tank as a mechanical pump in order to push the grout into the tile joints as shown in Figure 10.
f. The Dustpan: It is a tool installed at the bottom of the robot to compress the tile grout and insert it into the
space between the tile joints. The dustpan is shown as in Figure 11.
Development and implementation of a mobile robot for grouting floor tile joints (Anees Abu Sneineh)
156 ISSN: 2722-2586
g. Cleaning brush: It is a cleaning tool installed at the bottom of the robot’s front. It cleans the work area
before starting the grouting process, and also after the grout material dries in the tile joints, the brush is
shown in Figure 12.
All of the electrical and mechanical components of the mobile grouting robot that was developed are shown
in Figure 13, which depicts the final complete construction of the robot.
3. METHOD
In this section, clarification is offered regarding the particulars of the procedure that is implemented
in order for the robot to function. An illustration is provided of the procedures that are carried out in order to
initiate and run the system that is being presented.
First, the microcontroller is defined with the dimensions of the tile in the room that needs to be
grouted by entering them through the keypad and displaying them on the robot's LCD screen. The tank is
filled with the appropriate amount of the required grouting material. Then the robot is placed at the beginning
of the work area and then turned on to start. While the robot is performing cleaning or injection tasks, the
ultrasonic sensor prevents the robot from hitting the wall to complete the required task. The robot moves and
starts pumping the grouting material into the spaces between the tiles, by the bottom valve, then the dustpan
presses the grout filler.
The Arduino controller is programmed so that the robot starts its task (cleaning or grouting) by
walking longitudinally at the work site, and after finishing that, it moves to walk in the transverse direction.
When the robot is placed at the beginning of the longitudinal track, it continues to walk in the forward
direction until it reaches the end of the work area. The ultrasonic sensor located at the front of the robot
detects the approach to the end of the path, and as a result, the robot stops the grouting pump or lifts the
dustpan. The longitudinal injection path of the robot is shown in Figure 14.
Then the robot turns left into the work area at a 90-degree angle, walks a distance equal to the length
of one tile, turns left again, and then completes the walking process and pumping the grout until the end of
the longitudinal path again. It continues in the same way to finish all the longitudinal joints within the
workspace to be filled with grout.
After completing the longitudinal joints, the robot turns to the right at a 90-degree angle and then
continues to inject the grout into the transverse joints in the same manner as described in the previous
longitudinal direction until the end of all transverse lines. The transverse path of the robot's movement and
grout injection is shown in Figure 15.
IAES Int J Rob & Autom, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2025: 151-161
IAES Int J Rob & Autom ISSN: 2722-2586 157
Figure 14. Longitudinal track of the grouting robot Figure 15. Transverse track of the grouting robot
After the end of the grouting operation, the robot returned to the same starting point to start cleaning
the remnants of the grout material. A cleaning brush is installed on the DC motor to move the brush at high
speed to ensure cleaning the working area effectively. The flowchart in Figure 16 explains the flow of the
grouting robot’s grout and clean operations.
Start
Initialize system
Enter tile
dimensions
Enter grout
direction
Operation
mode
Grout Brushing
No No
Reach wall?
Yes
Rotate then
continue
End
For example, when grouting a room with dimensions of 4m*4m, the time required for the grouting
process in its three stages of cleaning, grouting, and cleaning after grouting by hand ranges from two and a
half to three hours. While this time was reduced to less than half when this work was completed with the help
of the proposed robot. Moreover, performing the grout work manually requires the presence of at least three
workers, where the main worker injects the grout, the second worker prepares the grout, and the third worker
cleans.
When comparing the quality of work done by the proposed model to the manual method, the quality
of work done by using the robot was comparable to the quality of work done by hand. In addition,
completing the process using the robot requires only one worker to prepare the materials and supervise the
work of the robot. Get good results for the grouting and cleaning process. The worker's effort is reduced by
approximately 80%. Thus, enabling the worker to complete more than one task at the same time. As well as
reduce consumption of grout material and provide more clean and efficient work.
5. CONCLUSION
The construction process requires high effort and time from workers to accomplish it. Tiles grouting
is found among these duties that suffer from inefficiency, in addition to the high labor effort required. This
paper describes the design and development of a mobile robot model that is designed to complete the
grouting process to ensure that the grout is injected uniformly and effectively in the tiled areas. Furthermore,
the proposed robot is capable of cleansing tiles in a rapid and precise manner. The robot fills based on user-
defined workspace coordinates. Set the robot at the start location to begin grouting. The robot then follows
the user-defined code and coordinates to fill the requirement. After grout filling, the robot returned to the
starting position to clean. When compared to manual approaches, this model produced results that
demonstrated an increase in both the speed and accuracy of the grouting process, as well as a reduction in the
amount of time necessary to finish the injection process. Overall, the findings were positive in terms that the
tile grouting was satisfactorily done.
IAES Int J Rob & Autom, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2025: 151-161
IAES Int J Rob & Autom ISSN: 2722-2586 159
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to Palestine Technical University - Kadoorie for their financial support to
conduct this research and for providing the needed laboratory facilities to conduct this project. The authors
also thank the technicians and undergraduate students who provided technical assistance and supported the
work in the laboratory.
FUNDING INFORMATION
The authors are grateful to Palestine Technical University - Kadoorie for their financial support to
conduct this research under PTUK-research 2025.
Name of Author C M So Va Fo I R D O E Vi Su P Fu
Anees Abu Sneineh ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Wael A. Salah ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Mohamed Elnaggar ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Mai Abuhelwa ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data availability is not applicable to this paper as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Abu Sneineh and A. A. A. Shabaneh, “Design of a smart hydroponics monitoring system using an ESP32 microcontroller and
the internet of things,” MethodsX, vol. 11, p. 102401, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102401.
[2] J. Jallad and O. Badran, “Implement a multifunction smart miniature circuit breaker based on the internet of things,” International
Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185–200, 2024, doi: 10.1504/IJVICS.2024.137873.
[3] D. A. Stephen, “Technology and its role in shaping the future of workLife balance,” Educational Administration: Theory and
Practice, pp. 1045–1053, May 2024, doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3005.
[4] Nur Akmal Haniffah, Mohamad Shahrizan Mohd Kamal, and Syafawati Hasbi, “Design and fabrication of a simple device for
folding towel,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 221–233, May
2024, doi: 10.37934/araset.44.2.221233.
[5] Q. Hussain, A. S. Mohd Noor, A. Mumtaz, and S. Ahmed, “Energy efficient and throughput oriented route optimization models in
the internet of vehicles: a survey,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, pp. 237–246,
Sep. 2024, doi: 10.37934/araset.52.2.237246.
[6] R. Poceviciene and D. Daugirdas, “Harnessing of technology for social skills development: case studies of the SKU model and its
plug-in for students’ self-regulation,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 858 LNNS, pp. 476–485, 2025, doi:
10.1007/978-3-031-74751-9_45.
[7] A. A. El-Saleh, A. M. Sheikh, M. A. M. Albreem, and M. S. Honnurvali, “The internet of medical things (IoMT): opportunities
and challenges,” Wireless Networks, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 327–344, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11276-024-03764-8.
[8] W. A. Salah, M. A. M. Albreem, and B. A. B. U. Zneid, “Implementation of smart house digital applications for safety and
health,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2679–2695, 2020.
[9] A. A. Shabaneh, “Automatic class attendance system using biometric facial recognition technique based on Raspberry Pi,” Optica
Pura y Aplicada, vol. 56, no. 3, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.7149/OPA.56.3.51152.
[10] W. A. Salah, B. A. Zneid, A. Abu_Al_Aish, and M. Nofal, “Development of smart and portable controllable syringe pump system
for medical applications,” Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 300–312, Aug. 2023, doi:
10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.3.7.
[11] I. Rokhim, N. J. Ramadhan, and Z. Najakh, “CURe-Mi mobile manipulator robot for contact-less COVID-19 patients serving
missions,” IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation (IJRA), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 262–273, Sep. 2023, doi:
10.11591/ijra.v12i3.pp262-273.
[12] F. R. Seke and I. P. Tamba, “Development of robot motion direction based on microcontroller with compass sensor,” IAES
Development and implementation of a mobile robot for grouting floor tile joints (Anees Abu Sneineh)
160 ISSN: 2722-2586
International Journal of Robotics and Automation (IJRA), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 122–130, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijra.v13i2.pp122-130.
[13] Y. Liu, S. Wang, Y. Xie, T. Xiong, and M. Wu, “A review of sensing technologies for indoor autonomous mobile robots,”
Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 1222, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24041222.
[14] S. Al Mahmud, A. Kamarulariffin, A. M. Ibrahim, and A. J. H. Mohideen, “Advancements and challenges in mobile robot
navigation: a comprehensive review of algorithms and potential for self-learning approaches,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic
Systems, vol. 110, no. 3, p. 120, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10846-024-02149-5.
[15] A. Muneer and Z. Dairabayev, “Design and implementation of automatic painting mobile robot,” IAES International Journal of
Robotics and Automation (IJRA), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 68–74, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijra.v10i1.pp68-74.
[16] W. A. Salah, A. A. Sneineh, and A. A. A. Shabaneh, “Smartphone sensor-based development and implementation of a remotely
controlled robot arm,” Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1180–1188, 2024, doi: 10.18196/jrc.v5i4.21987.
[17] J. Bhuvana, V. K. Kharbas, and P. Rajendra Pandey, “A randomized clinical trial to evaluate transoral head and neck surgery
using a single-port flexible robotic system,” Multidisciplinary Science Journal, vol. 5, 2023, doi:
10.31893/multiscience.2023ss0110.
[18] A. A. Sneineh and W. A. Salah, “Modelling of a high-speed precision robot for microelectromechanical systems bonding process
application,” Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–69, 2018.
[19] I. Technology, I. Technology, and I. Technology, “Automatic road roughness detection and ranking using deep learning and
computer vision,” vol. 102, no. 13, pp. 5118–5135, 2024.
[20] M. A. Rebelo, F. R. Silveira, E. Czarnocka, and K. Czarnocki, “Construction safety on scaffolding: building information
modeling (BIM) and safety management-a systematic review,” U.Porto Journal of Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 46–60, Nov.
2019, doi: 10.24840/2183-6493_005.002_0006.
[21] Y. Li, J. Xu, F. Nan, H. Su, and T. Zhao, “Dynamic simulation and experimental study of the HDPE double-walled corrugated
pipe grouting robot,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 6776, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116776.
[22] R. Zhang, R. Ren, G. Luo, S. Li, L. Bi, and B. Yuan, “Research on trajectory planning of closed loop grouting robot,” Advances
in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 11, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1177/16878140211053414.
[23] A. S. Zhang et al., “Lumbar disc herniation: diagnosis and management,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 136, no. 7, pp.
645–651, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.03.024.
[24] W. Brinjikji et al., “Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations,”
American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 811–816, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173.
[25] A. Cui, H. Li, D. Wang, J. Zhong, Y. Chen, and H. Lu, “Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee
osteoarthritis in population-based studies,” EClinicalMedicine, vol. 29–30, p. 100587, Dec. 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587.
[26] C. J. H. Rikhof et al., “Combining robotics and functional electrical stimulation for assist-as-needed support of leg movements in
stroke patients: a feasibility study,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 130, p. 104216, Aug. 2024, doi:
10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104216.
[27] S. Kumar and S. Choudhury, “Exploring the concept of AI humanoids as an ‘artificial person’: contemplating the human-robot
relationship in society and the identity of humanoids,” Global Philosophy, vol. 34, no. 1–6, p. 13, Dec. 2024, doi:
10.1007/s10516-024-09719-0.
[28] D. Rekha and H. K. Kaliyappan, “Collaborative robot acting as scrub nurse for cataract surgery (CRASCS),” Journal of Robotic
Surgery, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 339, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02089-0.
[29] A. T. Oyelami, J. A. Oyadokun, O. A. Akintunlaji, and G. C. Ihenacho, “Low-cost multi-sensing fire-fighting robot with obstacle
avoidance mechanism,” IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation (IJRA), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 373–379, Dec. 2024,
doi: 10.11591/ijra.v13i4.pp373-379.
[30] W. Lee, J. Won, G. Park, and T. Seo, “Mechanical survey on wheeled mobile robot platform for industrial and personal service
robots,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1739–1753, Aug. 2024, doi:
10.1007/s12541-024-01014-7.
[31] A. Saha, Z. Islam, and S. Mondal, “Hazard hunter: a low cost search and rescue robot,” in 2024 International Conference on
Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication, IConSCEPT 2024 - Proceedings, 2024, pp. 1–6.
doi: 10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627850.
[32] A. A. Sneineh and W. A. Salah, “Development of a sensor-based glove-controlled mobile robot for firefighting and rescue
operations,” International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1641–1655, 2024, doi:
10.31763/ijrcs.v4i4.1553.
[33] S. Yun, H. Park, and H. S. Lee, “Hand gesture recognition framework for indoor wheeled mobile robots using hand shape and
pose,” International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 1349–1352, 2024, doi:
10.23919/ICCAS63016.2024.10773185.
[34] D. Jen, “Dangerous job? send in the SMuRFs,” Civil Engineering Magazine, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 24–25, Mar. 2024, doi:
10.1061/ciegag.0001709.
[35] T. Choudhury, X. A. Mary, S. Chowdhury, C. Karthik, and C. S. Evangeline, “Modeling, simulation, and control of AI robotics
and sutonomous systems,” Modeling, Simulation, and Control of AI Robotics and Autonomous Systems, pp. 1–295, 2024, doi:
10.4018/979-8-3693-1962-8.
[36] Z. Razzaq, N. Brahimi, H. Z. U. Rehman, and Z. H. Khan, “Intelligent control system for brain-controlled mobile robot using self-
learning neuro-fuzzy approach,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 18, p. 5875, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24185875.
[37] Ni. M. Nasir, N. M. A. Ghani, A. N. K. Nasir, M. A. Ahmad, and M. O. Tokhi, “Neuro-modelling and fuzzy logic control of a
two-wheeled wheelchair system,” Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, Oct. 2024, doi:
10.1177/14613484241287608.
[38] M. Bin Mobarak, M. S. Hossain, M. Mahmud, and S. Ahmed, “Redispersible polymer powder modified cementitious tile
adhesive as an alternative to ordinary cement-sand grout,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08411, Nov. 2021, doi:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08411.
[39] L. Wu, Z. Wu, L. Weng, Y. Liu, Z. Chu, and X. Xu, “Investigation on the pore size characteristics and mechanical properties of
grouting materials scoured by flow water,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 183, p. 105923,
Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105923.
[40] B. Henning and J. Rautenberg, “Process monitoring using ultrasonic sensor systems,” Ultrasonics, vol. 44, pp. e1395--e1399,
Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.048.
[41] Z. Qiu, Y. Lu, and Z. Qiu, “Review of ultrasonic ranging methods and their current challenges,” Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 4, p.
520, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13040520.
IAES Int J Rob & Autom, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2025: 151-161
IAES Int J Rob & Autom ISSN: 2722-2586 161
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Anees Abu Sneineh earned his MS in Mechatronics Engineering and his PhD in
Power Electronics and Electrical Drives Engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology,
China in 2004 and 2007, respectively. He is currently an Associate Professor in Palestine
Technical University-Kadoorie. He received Best Research Award, Palestine Technical
University - Kadoorie yearly since 2018-2020. His research interests are power electronics
and drives, renewable energy systems, electrical machines and their automation, robotic and
its applications, applied electronics, and smart systems. Dr. Abu Sneineh has published many
papers in international journals and conferences. He can be contacted at
[email protected].
Development and implementation of a mobile robot for grouting floor tile joints (Anees Abu Sneineh)