Module 3
Module 3
Contents
1
3.1 Connected Spaces
Definition 1. Let X be a topological space. A separation of X is a pair U, V of disjoint
nonempty open subsets of X whose union is X. The topological space X is said to be connected
if there does not exist a separation of X.
Another way of formulating the definition of connectedness is the following:
A topological space X is connected if and only if the only subsets of X that are both open
and closed in X are the empty set and X itself.
Lemma 3.1. If Y is a subspace of X, a separation of Y is a pair of disjoint nonempty sets
A and B whose union Y , neither of which contains a limit point of the other. The space Y is
connected if there exists no separation of Y .
Proof. Assume that A and B form a separation of Y . Then A is both open and closed in Y . By
Theorem 2.4, the closure of A in Y is A ∩ Y . Since A is closed in Y , A = closure of A in Y =
A ∩ Y . So A ∩ B = A ∩ (B ∩ Y ) = (A ∩ Y ) ∩ B = A ∩ B = ∅. Since A contains all limit points of
A, B contains no limit points of A. A similar argument shows that A contains no limit points
of B.
Conversely, assume that A and B are disjoint nonempty sets whose union is Y , neither of
which contains the a limit point of the other. Then A ∩ B = ∅ and B ∩ A = ∅. Therefore
A ∩ Y = A ∩ (A ∪ B) = (A ∩ A) ∪ (A ∩ B) = (A ∩ A) ∪ ∅ = A and B ∩ Y = B. Thus both A
and B are closed in Y . Since A = Y − B and B = Y − A, they are open in Y . Thus A and B
form a separation of Y .
Example 3.1. Let X be an indiscrete space with more than one point. Then X has no
separation. So X is connected.
Example 3.2. Let X be a discrete space with more than one point. If a ∈ X, then {a} and
X − {a} is a separation X. So X is disconnected.
Example 3.3. Let Y denote the subspace [−1, 0) ∪ (0, 1] of the real line R. Since [−1, 0) and
(0, 1] are nonempty and open in Y (not open in R), they form a separation of Y . Note that
neither of these sets contains a limit point of the other.
Example 3.4. Let X = [−1, 1] be the subspace of R. Each of the sets [−1, 0) and (0, 1] are
disjoint and nonempty, but they do not form a separation of X, because the first set is not
open in X. Note that the first set contains the limit point of the second.
√
Example 3.5. The rationals Q are not connected, because the sets (−∞, 2) ∩ Q and
√
( 2, +∞) ∩ Q form a separation of Q. The only connected subspaces of Q are the one-
point sets: If Y is a subspace of Q containing two points p and q, then there exists a irrational
number a such that p < a < q. In this case (−∞, a) ∩ Y and (a, +∞) ∩ Y forms separation
of Y . So all connected subspaces of Q are singleton sets.
Example 3.6. Consider the following subset of the plane R2 :
X = {x × y | y = 0} ∪ {x × y | x > 0 and y = 1/x}.
Then X is not connected, because the sets {x × y | y = 0} and {x × y | x > 0 and y = 1/x}
forms a separation for X.
Example 3.7. An infinite set X with finite complement topology is connected, because there
is no disjoint, nonempty open sets.
Lemma 3.2. If the sets C and D form a separation of a topological space X, and if Y is a
connected subspace of X, then Y lies entirely within either C or D.
Proof. Since C and D are both open in X, then sets C ∩ Y and D ∩ Y are open in Y . These
two sets are disjoint and
Y = (C ∩ Y ) ∪ (D ∩ Y ).
If both the sets C ∩ Y and D ∩ Y are nonempty, then they form a separation of Y . Since Y
is connected, either C ∩ Y or D ∩ Y is empty. If C ∩ Y = ∅, then D ∩ Y = Y and so Y ⊂ D.
Similarly, if D ∩ Y = ∅, then Y ⊂ C.
Theorem 3.3. The union of a collection of connected subspaces of a topological space X that
have a point in common is connected.
Proof. Let {Aα } be a collection of connected subspaces of a topological space X and let
p ∈ ∩Aα . We prove that Y = ∪Aα is connected. Suppose that Y = C ∪ D is a separation
of Y . The point p belongs one of the sets C or D. Suppose that p ∈ C. Since Aα is connected,
it must lie entirely in either C or D, by Lemma 3.2. Since p ∈ C, Aα ⊂ C for every α. So
∪Aα ⊂ C. This contradicts the fact that D is nonempty. Thus Y is connected.
From the above theorem it follows that the closure of a connected set is connected. The
following example shows that the interior of a connected need not be connected.
Its interior is
Int (X) = {x × y | x2 + y 2 < 1} ∪ {x × 0 | 0 < x < 1}
.
Since {x × y | x2 + y 2 < 1} and {x × 0 | 0 < x < 1} form a separation for Int (X), Int (X) is
not connected.
Theorem 3.5. The image of a connected space under a continuous map is connected.
Proof. Let X and Y be two connected spaces. We prove that X × Y is connected. Let
a × b ∈ X × Y . Since X × b is homeomorphic to X, X × b is connected. Similarly, x × Y is
connected for each x ∈ X. Let
Tx = (X × b) ∪ (x × Y ).
[
Since x×b is in X×b and x×Y , Tx is connected, by Theorem 3.3. Now consider the union Tx .
[ [ x∈X
Since a × b ∈ Tx for each x ∈ X, Tx is connected, by Theorem 3.3. As Tx = X × Y , it
x∈X x∈X
follows that X × Y is connected. Assume that product of n − 1 connected sets is connected. Let
X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn be a collection of n connected spaces. Then X1 × X2 × · · · × Xn−1 is connected.
Since
X1 × X2 × · · · × Xn−1 × Xn = (X1 × X2 × · · · × Xn−1 ) × Xn ,
X1 × X2 × · · · × Xn−1 × Xn is connected. By induction any finite product of connected spaces
is connected.
Definition 3. A simply ordered set L having more than one element is called a Linear Con-
tinuum if the following hold:
Example 3.9. R is a linear continuum. But Q is not a linear continuum, because Q does not
have least upper bound property.
Theorem 3.7. If L is a linear continuum in the order topology, then L is connected and so
are intervals and rays in L.
each of which is open in [a, b] in the subspace topology. The sets A0 and B0 are nonempty
because a ∈ A0 and b ∈ B0 . Thus A0 and B0 constitute a separation of [a, b].
Let c = sup A0 . We show that c belongs neither to A0 nor to B0 , which contradicts the fact
that [a, b] is the union of A0 and B0 .
Case 1. Suppose that c ∈ B0 . Then c ̸= a, so either c = b or a < c < b. In either case it follows
from the the fact that B0 is open in [a, b] that there is some interval of the form (d, c] contained
in B0 . If c = b, then d is a smaller upper bound on A0 than c. This gives a contradiction to the
fact that c = sup A0 . If c < b, then, since c is an upper bound of A0 , (c, b] does not intersect
A0 . Then
(d, b] = (d, c] ∪ (c, b]
does not intersect A0 . Again, d is a smaller upper bound on A0 than c, contrary to construction.
So c ̸∈ B0 .
Case 2. Suppose that c ∈ A0 . Then c ̸= b, so either c = a or a < c < b. Since A0 is open in
[a, b], there must be some interval of the form [c, e) contained in A0 . By order property (ii) of
the linear continuum L, there exists a point z ∈ L such that c < z < e. Then z ∈ A0 , contrary
to the fact that c is an upper bound for A0 . So c ̸∈ A0 .
From the above two cases it follows that [a, b] is not the union of A0 and B0 . Therefore A
and B is not a separation of Y . Thus Y is connected. Since L, intervals and rays in L are
convex, the result follows.
Corollary 3.8. The real line R is connected and so are intervals and rays in R.
Proof. Since R is a linear continuum in the order topology, R, intervals and rays in R are
connected, by Theorem 3.7.
are disjoint. Since f (a) ∈ A and f (b) ∈ B, A and B are nonempty. The sets A and B are open
in f (X), because they are intersections of an open ray in Y with f (X). If there were no point
c of X such that f (c) = r, then f (X) is the union of A and B. So A and B form a separation
of f (X), contradicting the fact that f (X) is connected. Thus there exists a point c of X such
that f (c) = r.
B n = {x | ∥x∥ ≤ 1},
where
1/2
∥x∥ = ∥(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn )∥ = x21 + x22 + · · · + x2n .
Let x, y ∈ B n . The the straight line path f : [0, 1] → Rn defined by
f (t) = (1 − t)x + ty
A similar argument shows that every open ball Bd (x, ϵ) and every closed ball B d (x, ϵ) in Rn is
path connected.
Example 3.11. Define the punctured Euclidean plane to be the space Rn − {0}, where 0 is
the origin in Rn . If n > 1, this space is path connected: Given x and y different from 0, we can
join x and y by a straight line path between them if that path does not go through the origin.
Otherwise, we can choose a point z not on the line joining x and y, and take the broken line
path from x to z, and then from z to y.
Example 3.12. Define the unit sphere S n−1 in Rn by the equation
Because S is the image of the connected set (0, 1] under a continuous map, S is connected.
Therefore, its closure S in R2 is also connected. The set S is called topologist’s sine curve. It
is illustrated in the following figure.
−1
It equals the union of S and the vertical interval 0 × [−1, 1]. We show that S is not path
connected.
Suppose there is a path f : [a, c] → S beginning at the origin and ending at a point of S.
The set {t | f (t) ∈ 0 × [−1, 1]} is closed. So it has a largest element b. Then f : [b, c] → S is a
path that maps b into the vertical interval 0 × [−1, 1] and maps other points of [b, c] to points
of S.
Replace [b, c] by [0, 1] for convenience. Let f (t) = (x(t), y(t)). Then x(0) = 0, while
x(t) > 0 and y(t) = sin(1/x(t)) for t > 0. Given n, choose u with 0 < u < x(1/n) such that
sin(1/u) = (−1)n . Then by intermediate value theorem to find tn with 0 < tn < 1/n such that
x(tn ) = u. So tn → 0 but y(tn ) = sin(1/u) = (−1)n . This contradicts the continuity of f . So
S is not path connected.
Clearly ∼ is reflexive and symmetric. Suppose that x ∼ y and y ∼ z. Then there exist
subspaces A and B of X such that x, y ∈ A and y, z ∈ B. Then, by Theorem 3.3, A ∪ B is a
connected subspace containing x, z. So ∼ is transitive. Thus ∼ is an equivalence relation on
X.
Definition 5. Let X be a topological space and ∼ be the equivalence relation given in equation
(3.1). The equivalence classes of ∼ are called the components of X.
Theorem 3.10. Let X be a topological space. The components of X are connected disjoint
subspaces of X whose union is X, such that each nonempty connected subspace of X intersects
only one of them.
Proof. Being equivalence classes, the components of X are disjoint and their union is X. If a
connected subspace A of X intersects the components C1 and C2 of X in points x1 and x2 ,
then x1 ∼ x2 , by definition. So C1 = C2 . Thus every connected subspace of X intersects only
one of the components.
Let C be a component of X and let x0 ∈ C. If x ∈ C, then x0 ∼ x. So there is a connected
subspace Ax containing x0 and x. By the result just proved in the previous paragraph, Ax ⊂ C.
Therefore, [
C= Ax .
x∈C
Since the subspaces Ax are connected and have the point x0 in common, their union is connected.
Thus components of X are connected.
First note that if there exists a path f : [a, b] → X from x to y whose domain is [a, b], then
there is also a path g from x to y having the closed interval [c, d] as its domain. This follows
from the fact that any two closed and bounded intervals are homeomorphic. The fact that
x ∼ x for all x ∈ X follows from the existence of the constant path f : [a, b] → X defined by
the equation f (t) = x for all x ∈ X. Symmetry follows from the fact that if f : [a, b] → X is
a path from x to y, then the reverse path g : [0, 1] → X defined by g(t) = f (1 − t) is a path
from y to x. Suppose that x ∼ y and y ∼ z. Then there exists a path f : [0, 1] → X from x to
y and a path g : [1, 2] → X from y to z. Define a function h : [0, 2] → X by
f (x) if x ∈ [0, 1]
h(x) = .
g(x) if x ∈ [1, 2]
Then, since f (1) = y = g(0), h is continuous by the pasting lemma. Also h(0) = f (0) = x and
h(2) = g(2) = z. Thus h is path in X from x to z. So ∼ is transitive. Thus ∼ is a reflexive
relation on X.
Definition 6. Let X be a topological space and ∼ be the equivalence relation given equation
(3.2). The equivalence classes of ∼ are called the path components of X.
Theorem 3.11. Let X be a topological space. The path components of X are path connected
disjoint subspaces of X whose union is X, such that each nonempty path connected subspace of
X intersects only one of them.
Proof. Being equivalence classes, the path components of X are disjoint and their union is X.
If a path connected subspace A of X intersects the path components C1 and C2 of X in points
x1 and x2 , then x1 ∼ x2 , by definition. So C1 = C2 . Thus every path connected subspace of X
intersects only one of the components.
Let C be a path component of X and let x0 ∈ C. If x ∈ C, then x0 ∼ x. So there is a
path connected subspace Ax containing x0 and x. By the result just proved in the previous
paragraph, Ax ⊂ C. Therefore, [
C= Ax .
x∈C
Since the subspaces Ax are path connected and have the point x0 in common, their union is
path connected. Thus path components of X are path connected.
Example 3.14. If Q is the subspace of R consisting of the rational numbers, then each com-
ponents of Q consists of a single point. None of the components of Q is open in Q.
Theorem 3.12. A topological space X is locally connected if and only if for every open set U
of X, each component of U is open in X.
Proof. Assume that X is locally connected. Let U be an open set in X and let C be a component
of U . If x ∈ C, then there exists a connected neighborhood V of x such that V ⊂ U . Since V
is connected, V ⊂ C, by Lemma 3.2. Therefore, C is open in X.
Conversely, assume that components of open sets in X are open. Given a point x of X and
a neighborhood U of x. Let C be the component of U containing x. Now C is connected. Since
C is open in X by hypothesis, X is locally connected at x. As x is an arbitrary point of X, it
follows that X is locally connected.
Theorem 3.13. A topological space space X is locally path connected if and only for every
open set U of X, each path component of U is open in X.
Proof. Assume that X is locally path connected. Let U be an open set in X and let C be a
path component of U . If x ∈ C, then there exists a path connected neighborhood V of x such
that V ⊂ U . Since V is path connected, V ⊂ C. Therefore, C is open in X.
Conversely, assume that path components of open sets in X are open. Given a point x of
X and a neighborhood U of x. Let C be the path component of U containing x. Now C is
path connected. Since C is open in X by hypothesis, X is locally path connected at x. As x is
an arbitrary point of X, it follows that X is locally path connected.
C = P ∪ Q.
Since X is locally path connected, each path component of X is open in X. Therefore P and
Q are open in X, so they constitute a separation of C. This contradicts the fact that C is
connected. Thus P = C.