Scribd
Upload
4 views2 pages

Improved MongoDB Vs MySQL Study

This paper compares MySQL, a relational database, and MongoDB, a NoSQL document store, highlighting their architectural differences, use cases, and performance implications. MySQL is suited for structured data requiring consistency, while MongoDB excels in handling unstructured or semi-structured data with flexibility and scalability. The study aims to guide developers and researchers in choosing the appropriate database based on data nature and application needs.

Uploaded by

aashsohail
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views2 pages

Improved MongoDB Vs MySQL Study

This paper compares MySQL, a relational database, and MongoDB, a NoSQL document store, highlighting their architectural differences, use cases, and performance implications. MySQL is suited for structured data requiring consistency, while MongoDB excels in handling unstructured or semi-structured data with flexibility and scalability. The study aims to guide developers and researchers in choosing the appropriate database based on data nature and application needs.

Uploaded by

aashsohail
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Comparative Study of MongoDB and MySQL: Architecture, Use Cases, and

1. Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of two popular database management systems--MySQL, a

relational database, and MongoDB, a NoSQL document store. The aim is to help developers,

students, and researchers understand the fundamental differences, use cases, and performance

implications of each.

2. Introduction

As data complexity and volume have grown, so has the need for databases that support scalable,

flexible data management. MySQL is a structured, schema-based RDBMS, while MongoDB is a

document-oriented NoSQL database. Each has unique strengths depending on the application

domain.

3. System Architecture

MySQL uses a table-based model with ACID compliance. It supports joins, stored procedures, and

strong consistency. MongoDB uses a document-based architecture, allowing for flexible schemas

and horizontal scalability via sharding.

4. Data Modeling

In MySQL, data is normalized into tables with strict schemas. MongoDB allows embedded

documents and arrays, reducing the need for complex joins and enabling better performance for

hierarchical data.

5. Query Language

MySQL uses SQL for querying structured data. MongoDB uses a JSON-like query language that

allows nested document retrieval and manipulation. Example queries are included to highlight

syntax and function differences.


6. Performance and Scalability

MongoDB generally performs better for high-volume, unstructured or semi-structured data due to its

horizontal scaling model. MySQL performs optimally for structured transactional data requiring

relational integrity.

7. Real-World Use Cases

MySQL: Banking systems, ERP platforms, and eCommerce where data consistency is critical.

MongoDB: Real-time analytics, IoT data collection, and social media applications requiring flexibility

and speed.

8. Conclusion

Both MySQL and MongoDB are powerful in their domains. Selection should be based on the nature

of the data, scalability needs, and consistency requirements. Understanding their architecture and

use cases helps make informed decisions.

9. References

[1] MongoDB Documentation

[2] MySQL Reference Manual

[3] Academic journals on database performance benchmarking

You might also like