0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

6appendixdbit21303 Finalreport and Product

The document is an evaluation form for a final project at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, specifically for the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology. It outlines the criteria and weightage for assessing the final report, product usability, and project presentation, including sections on introduction, literature survey, methodology, interface design, and discussion. Each evaluation criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with specific marks allocated for each section.

Uploaded by

Aisyah Hanis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

6appendixdbit21303 Finalreport and Product

The document is an evaluation form for a final project at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, specifically for the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology. It outlines the criteria and weightage for assessing the final report, product usability, and project presentation, including sections on introduction, literature survey, methodology, interface design, and discussion. Each evaluation criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with specific marks allocated for each section.

Uploaded by

Aisyah Hanis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA APPENDIX D1: Final Project

FAKULTI SAINS KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT Evaluation Form

TASK 3: FINAL REPORT, PRODUCT EVALUATION & PROJECT PRESENTATION

Group Name : …………………………………………………………………………………


Group ID : …………………………………………………………………………………
Project Title : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Group members (1) ………………………………………………………………………………
name / Matric No. (2) ………………………………………………………………………………
(3) ………………………………………………………………………………
(4) ………………………………………………………………………………
(5) ………………………………………………………………………………

improvem
Excellent

Needs
Good

N/A
Fair

ent
Cognitive TOS Total
No Evaluation Criteria Weight
Domain Level Distribution

5 4 3 2-1 0
FINAL REPORT (35 marks) – 5%

Section 1: Introduction (Item in proposal except


1. 1
for Expected Result) (5m)
5
Section 2: Literature Survey
- Competitive analysis - Explain the problem
2. 1
in the existing app & the proposed
C2-
solution. (5m) 1 5
Comprehension
Section 3: Methodology
- User Research and UI Design (5 marks)
3. 3
- UI Components (5 marks)
- Wireframe (5 marks) 15
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA APPENDIX D1: Final Project
FAKULTI SAINS KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT Evaluation Form

improvem
Excellent

Needs
Good

N/A
Fair

ent
Cognitive TOS Total
No Evaluation Criteria Weight
Domain Level Distribution

5 4 3 2-1 0
FINAL REPORT (35 marks) – 5%

Section 4: Interface Design Description (10m)


4. - Explain the improved UI based on the HCI
1
principle
5
C3-Application 3
Section 5: Discussion and Conclusion (3m)
5.
Discussion on the final outcome of the project 0.6
3
Writing format & References (2m) - strictly follow
the template, free from typo and grammatical C2-
6.
errors, well-organized content and sentence Comprehension 1 0.4
structure. 2

SCORE FINAL REPORT (35 marks)

SCORE FINAL REPORT (5 %)


UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA APPENDIX D1: Final Project
FAKULTI SAINS KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT Evaluation Form

improvem
Excellent

Needs
Good

N/A
Fair

ent
Cognitive TOS Total
No Evaluation Criteria Weight
Domain Level Distribution

5 4 3 2-1 0
PRODUCT (20 marks)

Usability: The user interface is easy to use, easy


1. to learn and provides enjoyable experiences. P2-Set 2 1
(5m)
5

Visibility: All content elements are presented


2. 1
and organized logically. (5m)
5

Aesthetic: Metaphor design clearly presents


3. P4-Mechanism 4 1
and communicates information. (5m)
5

Consistency: Font type, size, and color are


4. readable and consistent throughout the site. 1
(5m)
5

SCORE PRODUCT (20 marks)


UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA APPENDIX D1: Final Project
FAKULTI SAINS KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT Evaluation Form

improvem
Excellent

Needs
Good

N/A
Fair

ent
Cognitive TOS
No Evaluation Criteria Weight
Domain Level Distribution

5 4 3 2-1 0
PROJECT PRESENTATION (10 marks)- 5%

Involvement: student actively involved in group


1. discussion, idea contribution and project A1-Attention 1 0.4
development. (2m)

Knowledge and Skills: student demonstrated full


knowledge and skills of the information
2.
contained in the presentation and shared 0.8
relevant and accurate information. (4m)
Presentation Organization: student presented A2-Response
the information in a logical, thoughtful 1
3.
sequence that is easy for the audience to follow. 0.4
(2m)

Presentation Delivery: student communicates


the presentation with confidence, poise,
4.
volume, pace, visuals, personal appearance A3-Value 3 0.4
and effective body language. (2m)
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA APPENDIX D1: Final Project
FAKULTI SAINS KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT Evaluation Form

SCORE PRESENTATION (10 marks)


Knowledge Presentation Presentation TOTAL SCORE
Involvement
Group members name / Matric No. and Skills Organization Delivery PRESENTATION
(2m)
(4m) (2m) (2m) (INDIVIDUAL)

You might also like