Gas Natural Transmision
Gas Natural Transmision
Gas Natural Transmision
::;.
Fritzsche
b
Q, 1720(k)
llJ
5.145
-o
.!og( 37 t) .
-o
a
llJ
("
Turbulent Q, "" 0.4696 4 log (3. 7Dlk
e
) :;-
Panhandle B Q, 2.431
16.49(R,,)oOI%1
Colebrook-White Q, = 0.4696 D" -410g(&+ I
10T Distribution Q, 0.6643
4.6! 9 (R,,)o 100
Mueller Q, = 0.4937
3.35 (Re)OIlU
.._-_.---=-..
l
Panhandlc A b 'T)
Q, 6.872
Pipe Diameter, (in.)
ce
Pipe Diameter, (in.)
Pole Q,
3i4 to I 1.732 3/4 lo 1 956
1 1 '4 to 1 1'2 1.905 1 1/4 to I 1/2 10.51
2 2.078 2 11.47
3 2.252 3 1243
4 2.338 4 12.90
Q )1)0
SpJtzglass (Hgh Pressure)d Qh 3415
Sptzglass (Low Pressure)d Q/, 3.550
Weymouth Q, = 1.3124 11.19 D!"
z
, The units 01' the quantities in all ofthese equations are: D in, h, in. WC; L tl; P" P
2
, P
b
pSla; Q MCF:nr; J = Ibmift sec; and Tr, h R,
c:
b The constants 1.720 and 2450 include: ji 7.0 x 10'" lbm/f sec . ...,
e lncludcs: P
b
= 14,73 psia; T
h
492'R; and T
r
= 500'R.
d The constants 3.415 and 3.550 indudc: Ph 14.7 psia; T 520 R; and TI 520'R. ['
!l)
Vl
-!
-<
!l)
:::l
Vl
:::l
-'
Vl
Vl
(5'
:::l
C'
\.t:)
\,..
l
70 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practica I Approach
Equation (3-28) can be written in the following form, taking all constants as e',
therefore
(3 - 29)
In transmission lines, ifthe pipeline is horizontal or MI i8 insignificant compared to
the value of - or
2
2 2)) SBG . 6.H . P ave
P -- P
1 2 R T ave . Z ave '
then the elevation term can be omitted and Equation (3-29) becomes:
Q c. __.
(3 30)
. b Zave . r
ave
. G . L YJ
The aboye equation shows the efTect of jj and D on the flow _of gas in a pipeline. The
expression IJ is the transmission factor and is an important para meter that represents the
transmissivity of gas in a pipeline. Diameter is another major factor in pipeline design; it
can be seen that ifthe diameter ofthe pipeline is doubled, the gas flow rate will be increased
by (2)25 5.66 times.
This demonstrates the importance of considering possible future expansions when
selecting pipeline diameter. For example, if a 20 inches gas pipeline is changed to a 30
inches pipeline, gas flow rate is increased by almost 2.756 times, assuming the remaining
parameters are constant.
Unlike liquids, Equation (3-30) shows that a system operating at a lower temperature
results in higher flows or lower pressure drops. I!1 contrast, higher temperatures will
increase the gas viscosity, which will reduce fue flow capacity of the pipeline. The impact of
other parameters, such as G and Z, will be discussed Jater.
Considering the previous equation (3-30), Ql; can be calculated as
Q
2 C,,2. 15
b ---'---=--- . . D
. TaV<' . G . L f
Rearranging the equation:
2 2 . 2 1 f
PI P2 = Qh . e
2
' (Zave . Tave . G L) .
or in general
(3 31)
where PI pipeline inlet pressure
P
2
== pipeline exit pressure
K == pipeline total resistance. K == RxL, where R is resistance per foot of pipeline
and L is the length of pipeline in feet
Qb gas flow rate at base condition
n gas flow exponent (having values between 1.74 and 2)
Natural Gas Transmission 71
TABLE 3",3. Common flow equation resistance f,lCtorS (Courtesy IGTJ
Flow-Rate Exponent
Ilesistance Factor for Simplified flow
[qu.aliOtl (per fooWb,c
---'_.. .. ..
Equation
Fntzschc
4.82 x 10' 4 1J(;0859
Ul6
Flllly Tumulent (AGA) 3.639 x 10-
3
8GZ
avg
I (Iog ,UDKJl 2.00
Panhandle B 1.405 X
10-
4
TZsvgGO%1 ! /)4961
1.961
Colebrook White 3.li39 x BGZ
avg
! (log(K,.l3.7D + 1.4126FIRe2 2.00
IGT Distribution 3.418 x
10-
3
T(GO
SO
l20 / D4.80
UO
[vI ucl kr 6,922 X
10-
3
T
f
G
on9
10261 / D
4
.
73Q
1.74
Panhandlc NI 2.552 x
10.
4
TI z. cf>R55 / D 4856
1,855
vg
Palee G C
2
D
5
2,00
Spitzglass 8,575 X 10-
2
(1 + 3.6 I D + 0,03D) GID
5
2.00
rligh-Pn:':::,,,rJ'
:-'pilLglass 7,935 x 10-
2
(1 + 3.6 / D + 0,03D) GIIY 2,00
Low-Pressure
f
10-
4
Weyrnoutll 4.659 x 2.00
, The following standard condiltons are included in Ihe constant unlcss olhern';sc spccificd: T.
h JI
, /, )05
d C",,:,I;1nt indudcs: 7.0 x 10,6 Ib",/fl sec.
e V"iI",.'. (,1' e can be obtalOcd Irom Tab1e 3,2.
1 C'l(';!' 11 neludes: P
b
14.7 psia; Te 520 'R; and T 520 "R
11: aboye equation, K and n have different values dependng 011 the type of
,\ 1 l)f different pipeline equatons, together with the pipeline resistance and flow
exponent, is given in IGT's "Gas Distribution Horne Shldies Course" (Wilson et. al.
1991).
I
.MPACl'ur MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND COMPRESSIBILlTY
iACTOR ON FLOW CAPACITY \
1
The general flow equaton for a horizontal pipe (Equation 3-30) indicates that the pipeline
flow capacity is proportiooal to ,fi7az. This relationship shows that lighter natural gas
with a higher percentage of rnethane, and heoce lower gas gravity, exhibits a higher flow
capacity. lo this situation, the compressibility factor Z will also be high (close to unity).
However, when heavier hydrocarbons (e 2+) are introduced, the gas gravity begins to
increase, which decreases the value of JI /G. yet the presence of heavier hydrocarbons
also reduces the value of Z, hence increasing JI/Z,
The overall impact on JI/GZ is detennined by the rate at which Z is reduced
when C1+ are added. Ths rate is not only affected by gas cornposition, but also by
pressure and temperature conditions. Figure 3-4 shows the change in Z over a range
of different temperatures and pressures (base condition is 100% rnethane), At
fHC:;;illlt.:" in the range of 1,350-2,149 psia, the decrease in Z balances the increase
72 Pipeline Oesign and Construction: A Practica I Approach
0.9 ..,.-----,----,...------,---.......----,------------,
N
0.4 +----+----+---+---+-----.-----ii-----i-----l
0.7
0.5
O 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Ethane, mole %
Figllre 3-4. Compressibility factor lar methane-ethane mixtures al 35F fWciss 1998]
in G, whch means that thc overall value of Jl/GZ s changed very Httle.
However, at pressures exceedng 2,140 psa, the hgher rate of Z reduction results in
an overall increase of T / GZ. Likewise, at pressures bclow 1,350 psia, the dccrcase
in Z is relativcly nsignificant, so JI! GZ tends to decrease. For operating pressures
between XOO and 2,140 psia, it is recommendcd that careful analysis be perforrned to
condude how the flow capacity will he affected by the addition of cthanc or heavicr
hydrocarhons.
,
Figure 3-5 shows the way in which flow capacity, 1/GZ or J 1/MZ, responds as
a functon of mole perccnt of ethane added to methane for a range of pressures on a
li
standard volume bass. As expected, the flow decreases when only a small percentage of
1
cthane is present, and when operating pressures are low. For examp\c, a gas mixture of
25% ethane and 75% mcthane at 800 psia exhibits a reduction in standard volume flow
J
rate of 4%. However, at 1,150 psa there 1S no change, and al 1,350 psia, the standard
volume tlow rate is increased by nearly 2%.
1t is very important to remember that the bass for almost all pipeline transportation
comparisons is mass or energy (.e., heating value of the natural gas). Therefore, volume
flow capacity s not usualIy the best means to compare two difIerent conditions and could
sometimes be misleading.
Figure 3-6 plots mass flow capacty versus ethane percentages (or heavier
hydrocarbons) over a range of operating pressures. This is based on a mass flow
capacity of Qxp where standard density is only a function of molecular weight (M),
so if
flow capacity (XV~
Natural Gas Transmission 73
12
10
8
6
N
-
.,-'
?
4
2
O
-2
-4
6
10
.
1 "
---t--
!
;
I r I -_.
. " " r 1
__ --1- l--- I I / ,/ / I .' ,,'
O 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Ethane, mole %
Figure 3-5. Standard volume flow capacity for methane-ethane mixture at 35F rWeiss 1998]
-.- BOOpsia
. o 1150psia
---...- 1350 pSia
-v ' 1675 psia
____ 2140 psia
'l'
;+--
I ! I
t ; ,
I I 1 /' i
<lr
i- ___ 800 psia
'o 1150 psia
-....- 1350 psia I I
--v ' 1675 psia I----+-.---+----r---l-!
-- 2140 psia " " ./
'//
i j
+------_t_
! I
I
l.' t----j-----j
O 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Ethane, mole %
;: ',<MIl' 3-6. Mass flow capacity for methane-ethane mixtures at 35F [Weiss 1998J
74 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practical Approach
then
fM
mass fl ow capacity n VZ
On a total energy basis the approximate amount of energy that can be transported
with a methane-ethane mixture (or other heavier hydrocarbons) increases at the same
rate as the mass flow capacity increases. Now, if the same case as previously stated
for 25% ethane at 800 psia is consdered, it can be concluded that the heating value
has ncreased by almost 18%. Therefore, the net effect is a 14% merease in energy flow
(i.e., when a 4% decrease in standard volume flow rate is subtracted) or heating value
(Weiss 1998).
FLOW REGIMES
In high-pressure gas trnnsmission lines with moderate to high flow rates, two types of flow
regimes are normally observed:
Fully Turbulent Flow (Rough Pipe Flow)
PartiaIly Turbulent Flow (Smooth Pipe Flow)
The regime of flow is defined by the Reynolds number, which is a dimensionless
expression:
pDu
Re (3 -- 32)
where p fluid density, lb
m
/ft
3
D = pipeline intemal diameter, ft
u fluid average velocity. ft/sec.
Il = fluid viscosity, Ibmlft.scc
For Reynolds numbers less than 2,000 the flow is normally laminar, or stable. When
the Reynolds number exceeds 2,000, the flow is turbulent, or unstable. In high-pressure gas
transmission Iines, only two types of flow regimes are observed: fully turbulent flow and
partially turbulent flow.
Partially Turbulent Flow Regime
PartialIy Turbulent Flow is defined by the Prandtl Von Karman equation as follows:
(3 - 33)
where f = friction factor, dimensionless; and Re Reynolds number, dimensionless.
This equation is obtained based on theory and experiments for the case in which the
flow is fully turbulent in the central region of the pipe, with a laminar sublayer covering the
interior surface of the pipe.
Equation (3-33) is plotted on a semi-Iog gmph, where the straight line shows the
maximum limit ofpartially turbulent flow (see Figure 3-7). Al! points lo the right-hand side
Natural Gas Transmission 75
Partially Turbulent Zone
Fully
Turbulent
Zone
L.________________~ __________________~ ____~ ~
~ L J O ( ) O 100000 1000000
Re (in Log Scale)
Fgllrc 3-7. Representaton of fully turbulent/partalJy turbulent zones by the Prandtl-Von Karman
Equation
IJr the line exhibit fuJly turbulent flow, and those to the left side remain partially turbuient.
Points located on the lnc are in the transition zonc.
What is the maximum Re number for which a flow regime remains partially turbulent,
given a transmission factor of VII] = ) 8.
(Jsing the Prandtl - Von Karman Equation:
~ 4log" ( ~ ) - 06
~ ~ 18,
then
!ogo(Re) = 5.9053
76 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practical Approach
Re = 804,081
If the calculaled Re number for an achlal pipeline with transmission factor 18 exceeds
Ihis value, the flow regime is fully turbulent.
Fully Turbulent Flow Regime
The transmission factor for fully turbulent flow is given by the Nikuradse equation as
follows:
(3 - 34)
~ ~ 4log" [37 ~ l
where /l7l = transmission factor, dimensionless
D pipeline inside diameter, inch
Ke effective roughness, inch
K)D = relative roughness, dimensionless
Thc effective roughness term Ke is comprised of the following tcrms:
Ke Ks + K +Kd (3 - 35)
where K, = surface roughness
K, = nterfacial roughness
Kd roughness due to bends, welds, fittings, etc.
Generally, in high-pressure gas transmission Enes with high flow rates, where the
regime of flow 1S fully turbulent and the natural gas is almost dry, the values of K and
Kd are negligible compared 10 Ks. Therefore, lhe effective roughness of the pipeline is
almost equal 10 the intemal surface roughness of the pipe. The value of K, or Ke is
important in fully turbulent flow because without the laminar sublayer, the surface
roughness of tbe pipe plays an important role in determining the flow and pressure drop
in the pipe.
The Nikuradse equation shows that if the effective roughness of the pipeline is
increased, the transmission factor decreases and results in higher pressure drops. However,
by decreasing the value of Ke, higher transmission factors or lower pressure drops are
obtained. For intemally uncoated commercial pipes, when a number for Ke is unavailable, a
value of 700 jJ, ioches (micro inches 10-
6
inches) may be assumed.
The effective roughness values that are normally measured and used for uncoated
commercial pipes are within the range of 650-750 .L inches. Different studies (Golshan
and Narsing 1994) have proven that these values could be increased between a range of
30-50 J.L inches per year due to erosion, corrosion, contamination, and other associated
problems, which finally resuIt in higher fuel consumption and compression power
requirements to overcome the higher pressure drops. Another way to reduce the effective or
surface roughness of a pipeline is to intemaIly coat the pipes. Materials such as epoxy/
polyamide coatings reduce the surface roughness to within a range of 200-300 micro
~ inches. It has been further proven (Golshan and Narsing 1994) that the rate of deterioration
for intemally coated pipes is much slower than the uncoated pipes (i.e., within the range of
50-75 micro-inches for every five years).
Natural Gas Transmsson 77
Some of the benefits of internal coating have been confinned by experimental studies
conducted by various pipeline companies. The amount of reduction in surface roughness
could substantial1y increase the pipeline capacity (a comparison of the etTect 01' the change
of Kc on different transmission equations is presented later in this text)o Another benefit
associated with internal coating is the protection against cOITosion, which is caused by
atmospherc oxidaton during storage or the presence of cOITosivc components in the
transported material during service.
Due to the high cost of internally coating pipelines, the final deesion about whether or
not to coat is essentally an economic one. lt requires a detailed evaluation of the costs and
benefits of internal coating over Ihe projecled life of Ihe pipeline (Asan te 1994).
Simplified Equation for the Calculation of Reynolds Number in Gas
Transmission Systems
As discussed earlier, Reynolds number is defined as:
pD u
Re = ~ . __..
J..
where
Q
u = --...--
/4
therefore
JI . /4
where pQ PbQb at steady-state conditions
4Qh' p"
Re = ~ - - - - (3 - 36)
Ji . T . D
and if
P
b
. Iv!
Zb . R T
h
where the value of Z" ~ one, and Al = 29G
then
29GP"
Re
ji . 7r . D . R . T"
'
suh"tituting i'or - R - 1073 psiaji T - 520 cR P - 14 7
pSla, and
l' b - . Ibmoles."R' b - ,b - .
{I 7.23 X 10-
6
~ - . l l " " (viscosity nonnally assumed for natural gases);
.see
G
Re = 45 (3 37)
D
wnere Qb gas flow rate, ft3/hr (standard conditions)
G gas gravty, dmensionless
D = inside diameter of the pipe, inches
78 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practical Approach
This is a simplifed equation that gives the Re numba in tenns of pipeline parameters
with reasonable accuracy. The Re number can be used to check the flow regime of a gas
transmission line.
Example 3.3
What would be the re gime offlow in a 56 inches gas transmission line (ID 54 nehes),
G 0.64, when the gas flow rate is Qb = 1,500,000 rn
3
1hr?
1m
3
35.31 ft?
Re = :!2..:.
1
Re = 28,248,000
assume commercal pipe with Ke = 700 Il inches. Use tbe Nikuradse relationship to
calculate I7!:
jj log[3.7 0.g07J
IJ 21.82
Prandtl - Von Karman equation could now be use<! to find the Re number at the
transition zone, which is:
Re
41og- fi 0.6
Vl
21.82 = 0.6
lop; Re 6.94385
Re 8,787,291
The actua I Re obtained bascd on pipeline propertcs is much larger than 8, 7R7,291, so
the flow regime is ful/y turbulent.
WIDElY USED STEADY-STATE FlOW EQUATIONS
A more simplifico form ofthe general flow equation (3-28) in Imperial Units can be wriUcn
as follows:
1
Y- 2
0.0375G b.H .----""'"--j T .z 2.5
J ave av{' .D
(3 - 38)
Zave . T
ave
. G . L
assuming that the potential energy term is
E= O.0375Gt...H Z (3 - 39)
Tave ' ave
Natural Gas Transmission 79
thcn
f
[
]!
T 1 p'- r - E '.5
38 .-. ... 1 2 .o"
(3 40)
. P
h
f Zave . T
a
\(" . G . L
wherc Qb gas tlow rate at base conditions, SCFi D
T
h
temperature at base condition, 520 R
P
h
pressure at base condition, ] 4.7 psia
IJ transmission factor, dimensionless
PI = gas inlet pressurc, psa
P
2
= gas exit pressure, psia
G = gas gravity, dimensionless
t::.H eJevation change, ft.
P
ave
average pressure, pSIa
T.we avemge temperature, R
Z"ve average compressibility factor, dimensionless
L = pipeline length, miles
D = pipeline inside diameter, inch
lh,' fol1owing are sorne ofthemost cornmon and widely used flow equations that are
slJIlahlc x the design of large-diameter, high-pressure gas transmission Jincs. For further
inlum .! ion, see lGT "Borne Study Course" (Wilson et al. 1991) or IGT "Technical
Rl:;;r( ,)o Steady-Flow in Gas Pipelines."
., ":;'.llent Equations
die A
lile, diltlandle A equation is normally appropriate lor medium to relatively large diamctcr
pipelines with modcrate gas flow rate, opcrating under medium to high pressure.
" l' delined in Imperial Units as
I.OnS)2 2 - ] 0.5394
.0
261
435.83 (T.!!.) [____ '62
(3 - 41)
P GO.8539 1 T Z
b . ave' "ave ..l.
whcrc transmission factor is defined as
(1 0.07305
Vl
(3 42)
= 6.872 Re
or
(1 (Q .G) 0.07305
\/,-=7211 (3 43)
vi' D
wH:" is in SCFID. AH parameters are the same as in Equation 3-38.
..
80 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practica! Appmach
AGA Partially Turbulent
The AGA partialIy turbulent equation is highly dependent on the Reynolds number. It s
used for medium-diameter, medium-flow and high-pressure systems
In Imperial Units t s defined as follows:
" 0.5
P; - - E Re 2.5
L AD log __ . D (3 - 44)
[
:l,,, r,,,. . G L1 . L4126V}
where the transmission factor is:
fi Re
(3 - 45)
yr 4 Di .log-:'4;26/J
DI is the drag factor that norrnally appears in partialIy turoulent flow equations and
compensates for the inefficiencies due to the bends, welds, fittings, etc., and has a numerical
value in the range of 0.92 to 0.97. Qb is obtained in SCFlD; all other parameters are the
same as in Equation 3-38.
Fully Turbulent Equations
Panhandle B
The Panhandle B equation is norrnalIy suitable for high-flow-rate, large-diameter (i.e.,
pipes larger than NPS 24), and high-pressure systems. The degree of accuracy depends on
how precisely the pipeline efficiency is measured.
The equation has thc following form in Impcrial Units:
. _ 102 2..J. 0.510
1h) [ PI - 1'2 - E 1 2.53
737.02-- - D (3 - 46)
(
GO.
961
P 1 T Z'
h . .,; ave' .... ave
where the transmission factor is:
r
0.01961
\/-
16.49( Re) (3 47)
vI
or
Q .
16.70 -2_ (3 - 48)
(
D
The efficiency in Panhandle B cquations is defincd as:
Qactual
77 =
(3 -- 49)
Qtheoretcal
wherer could be multiplied in the equation to calculate more accurate values for Qb. Al!
other parameters are the same as in Equation 3-38 and Qb is in SCFID.
Weymouth
The Weymouth equation is norrnalIy used for high-flow-rate, large-diameter, and high
pressure systems. This equation tends to overestimatc the pressure drop predictions, and
contains a lower degree of accuracy relative to the other equations. Weymouth is commonly
used in distribution networks for the sake of safety in predicting pressure drop.
Natural Gas Transmission 81
The Weymouth equaron has the following form in Imperial Units:
(3 - 50)
where the transmission factor is defned as
(3 51)
Q is in SCF/D, and all other parameters have the same units as in Equation 3-38.
AGA Fully Turbulent
The AGA fully turbulent is the most frequently recommended and widely used equation in
high-pressure, high-flow-rate systems for medium- to large-diameter pipelines. It predicts
hoth flow and pressure drop with a high degree of accuracy, especially if the effective
roughness values used in the equation have becn measured accurately.
The AGA fuIly turbulent equation has the following form in Imperial Units:
T
b
[ - Y; - E 10.5 [ 3.7DJ 2.5.
Qb = 38.774- . . 4Iog-- D . (3 52)
Pb G . L . Tave . Zaw Ke
whcre he transmission factor is defined using the Nikuradse equation:
fl 3.7D
Vi = 4log Ke
Qi> is obtained in SO'ID, and alI other parameters are the same as Equation 3-38.
(nlebrook-White
Ihis equation combines both partialIy turbulent and fulIy turbulent flow regimes and is
Il),1 ';uitable for cases where the pipeline is operating in the transition zone. This equation
. again used for Jarge-diameter, high-pressure, and medium- to high-tlow-rate systems. It
predicts a higher pressure drop or lower flow rates than the AGA fully turbulent equation.
This equation has the following form in Imperial Unts:
38.774 T/y
2.5
. 5[--410
g
1.4126/j) j
D
P
b
Zavc' T
aw
. G . L 3.7 D Re
(3 - 53)
where the transmssion factor is defined as:
Ke 1.4126fj)
-410g --+ (3 - 54)
3.7 D Re
(
Qb is obtained in SCFID, and aH other parameters are the same as in Equation 3-38.
Fxample 3.4
Agas transmission line is to be constructed to transport 1,500,000 m
3
/brofnaturaI gas from
gil" refinery to the first compressor station located 100 km away. The route is almost
l,\qnzontaI with no considerable elevation changes. Determine the size of the pipeline
MI::'; '$<,
..
<32 Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practical Approach
requred to transport the gas if the pipeline inlet pressure is 1,140 psia, and a 300 psa
pressure drop is allowable. Use Weymouth, Panhandle B, and AGA fully turbulent
equations to compare the diameters predicated by each flow equation. Assume an effective
roughness value of Ke 700 micro nches for the lineo
Additional data:
T
ave
= 522.6 'R
G = 0.64
TI> 520 'R
PI> = 14.7 psa
Zavc = \.0
Solution: Usng equations in Imperial Units:
L 100 km = 62.1504 miles
PI = 1,140 psia
P
2
= 1,140 - 300 = 840 psia
D ? (inches, inside diameter)
Q 1,500,000 x 35.31 52,965,000 SCFIHR = 1,271,160,000 SCFlD
E = zero
A. Using Weymouth Equation:
".--2 jl/2
. TI> /""2 E 2.667
Qh = 432.7 _. D ..._.-.--:;--
PI>
[
Zav,' . T"vp . G L
upon substitution
ID 37.287 inches, NPS 40 or 42
B. Using Panhandle B Equation:
T
h
) 1.02 [ j(]'iIO 253
737.02 p- D
(
, G L . T"w . z,"'p
amI upon substitution of data
iD = 35.380 nches, NPS 36
using 100% etliciency for Panhandle B.
C. AGA fully turbulent equation:
-2 j0.5
T, P; - /"'2 E 3.7D 25
Qh = 38.774- . D
PI> [ Zave' T
ave
. G . L [ Ke ]
and upon substitution of data:
iD 36.765 inches, NPS 40 or 42
It can be concluded that the Weymouth equaton is normally the one that s the most
conservative type ofequation. An efficiency factor is always needed for the Panhandle B to
compare it with the AGA equation. In this case the efficiency has been assumed to be 1.0
Natural Gas Transrnission 83
!'(); <1n uncoated pipe with 700 micro inches of surface roughness, which is not a practical
;l:,:,urnption, The efficiency could be 1ess than 95%,
"'UMMARY Uf THE IMPACT OF OIFFERENT GAS ANO PIPELINE
ON THE GAS FlOW EFFICIENCY
The percentage impact of different parameters on the flow capacity of a pipeline is listed in
1:1 ile 3-4 (Asante 1996). A further numerical analysis on the perfonnance of the pipeline,
lIow capacity, using three different major gas flow equations (AGA tul1y turbulent.
B, and Colebrook-White), together with the impact of different gas/pipeline
:' :!!fIeters are given in Appendix B.
PARAlU1,
CAlCUlATION FOR PIPELlNES IN SERIES ANO
("ipdines in Series
For pipelines in series with different diameters and lengths (see Figure 3-8), pressure drops
are calculated as follows.
Using the simplified form of the general flow equation (3-31):
p2 p2 KQn
1 2 1 b
= K2 Q:
p2 ? r n
3 K3 Qb
Wherc K" Kb and K} are pipeline resistance at each segment and n is the flow
,,;( ponent depending on the type of equation.
r the three cquations are added together, then
(3 55)
Let
(3 56)
then
? 2 n
p- - p = Kr' Q (3 - 57)
1 4 b
Pipelines in Parallel (looping)
Consider two different pipe segments connected in parallel, as shown in Figure 3-9.
The govemng equation to caIculate pressure drop for each segment would be:
=K1 Q:l
? n r
F; 2 =K2 Qb2
where
1ABLE 34. Percent o different parar',E;'erS on A,ante1996J
::o
J;:.
Pipe Parameters Unit Variation of Parameter Percent Change in Flow Remarks Applicable AnalyticaJ Equation