09 Compensation & Pay For Performance
09 Compensation & Pay For Performance
Sixteenth Edition
Compensation
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
11.1 List the basic factors determining pay rates.
11.2 Define and give an example of how to conduct a job
evaluation.
11.3 Explain in detail how to establish a market-competitive
pay plan.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
11.4 Explain how to price managerial and professional jobs.
11.5 Explain the difference between competency-based and
traditional pay plans.
11.6 Describe the importance of total rewards for improving
employee engagement.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 11.1: List the Basic
Factors Determining Pay Rates
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Employee Compensation
Basic Factors in Determining Pay Rates
Employee compensation refers to all forms of pay or rewards
going to employees, which include direct financial payments
and indirect payments.
• Direct financial payments include wages, salaries,
incentives, commissions, and bonuses.
• Indirect payments include financial benefits like employer-
paid insurance and vacations.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Aligning Total Rewards with Organizational Strategy
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–7
Equity and Its Impact on Pay Rates – the equity theory of motivation
postulates that people are motivated to maintain a balance between what
they perceive as their contributions and their rewards.
Contd…
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–8
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–9
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–10
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–11
• Professional associations
• Government agencies
– U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) conducts three
annual surveys:
▪ Area wage surveys
▪ Industry wage surveys
▪ Professional, administrative, technical, and clerical (PATC) surveys.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–12
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–13
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–14
• Ranking each job relative to all other jobs, usually based on some
overall factor.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights
reserved.
11–15
Table 11–3
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–16
• Raters categorize jobs into groups or classes of jobs that are of roughly the same
value for pay purposes.
– Classes contain similar jobs.
– Grades are jobs that are similar in difficulty but otherwise different.
– Jobs are classed by the amount or level of compensable factors they
contain.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights
reserved.
This is a summary chart of the key grade level criteria for the GS-7
level of clerical and assistance work. Do not use this chart alone for
classification purposes; additional grade level criteria are in the Web-
based chart.
11–17
Source: http://www.opm.gov/fedclass. gscler.pdf. August 29, 2001. Figure 11–3
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–18
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–19
• Each job is ranked several times—once for each of several compensable factors.
• The rankings for each job are combined into an overall numerical rating for the
job.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–20
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–21
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–22
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights
reserved.
11–23
Figure 11–4
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–24
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights
reserved.
Wage
Structure
11–25
Figure 11–5
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–26
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–27
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–28
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–29
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–30
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–31
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–32
• Cons
– Pay program implementation problems
– Cost implications of paying for unused knowledge, skills and behaviors
– Complexity of program
– Uncertainty that the program improves productivity
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–33
• Broadbanding
– Consolidating salary grades and ranges into just a few wide levels or
“bands,” each of which contains a relatively wide range of jobs and
salary levels.
▪ Wide bands provide more flexibility in assigning workers to different job
grades.
▪ Lack of permanence in job responsibilities can be unsettling to new
employees.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights
reserved.
Broadbanded
Structure and How It
Relates to Traditional
Pay Grades and
Ranges
11–34
Figure 11–7
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–35
Strategic Compensation
• Strategic compensation
– Using the compensation plan to support the company’s strategic aims.
– Focuses employees’ attention on the values of winning, execution, and speed,
and on being better, faster, and more competitive..
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–36
Comparable Worth
• Comparable worth
– Refers to the requirement to pay men and women equal wages for jobs that are
of comparable (rather than strictly equal) value to the employer.
– Seeks to address the issue that women have jobs that are dissimilar to those of
men and those jobs often consistently valued less than men’s jobs.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
11–37
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Human Resource Management
Sixteenth Edition
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
12.1 Explain how you would apply four motivation theories
in formulating an incentive plan.
12.2 Discuss the main incentives for individual employees.
12.3 Discuss the pros and cons of commissions versus
straight pay for salespeople.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
12.4 Describe the main incentives for managers and
executives.
12.5 Name and describe the most popular organization-wide
incentive plans.
12.6 Explain how to use incentives to improve employee
engagement.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Money’s Role in Motivation
$$$
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Terminology
• Pay-for Performance
– Tie employees’ pay to the employees’ performance
• Variable Pay
– Performance-based incentive plan
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Linking Strategy, Performance, and
Incentive Pay
• Frederick Taylor made three contributions in the late 1800s:
• 1) formulating a “fair day’s work,” namely precise output
standards for each job
• 2) the scientific management movement, which emphasized
improvement of work through observation and analysis,
3) using incentives pay to reward employees who produce
over standards.
Don’t motivate everyone - – the law of individual differences means that people
differ in personality, abilities, values, and needs. They therefore react to different
incentives in different ways.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Motivation and Incentives
Theories that have relevance to designing incentive plans
• Motivators and Fredrick Herzberg
• Hygiene-motivator theory divides needs into two
factors.
1. Hygiene factors include such things as working
conditions, salary, and incentives.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Pay for Performance Plan
The term “pay-for-performance compensation”
refers to performance-based pay programs where
an employee is incentivized and rewarded for
achieving goals or objectives.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Pay for Performance Plan
Objectives /Goals of Pay for performance plans:
➢ To motivate employees as they will see that their rewards are directly related to their
efforts.
➢ To increase employees’ focus on and commitment to corporate objectives.
➢ To help develop a performance culture or to reinforce the existing culture.
➢ To reward the contribution made by individuals to the organization’s success.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Pay for Performance Plan
Advantages/ Benefits of Pay for performance plans:
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Individual Employee Incentive and
Recognition Programs
A) Piecework
– piecework involves paying the worker a sum (piece rate)
for each unit he/she produces. Straight piecework entails a
strict proportionality between results and rewards regardless
of output.. -
– Earnings tied directly to what the worker produces
– Straight piecework
– Standard hour plan
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Merit Pay as an Incentive
B. Merit pay as an incentive
– Based on performance
– Evidence is mixed
• Merit pay options
– Lump-sum merit increases
– Tied to individual and organizational performance
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
3. Incentive for Professional
Employees
• Making incentive pay decisions for professional
employees is challenging
• Dual-career ladders
– One path for managers and another for technical
experts
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Non-Financial and Recognition-Base
Awards
• Recognition program
• Social recognition program
• Performance feedback
– Qualitative information
– Quantitative information
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
List of Recognition
Figure 12-1 Social Recognition and Related Positive Reinforcement Managers
Can Use
• Challenging work assignments • Being provided with ample
• Freedom to choose own work activity encouragement
• Having fun built into work • Being allowed to set own goals
• More of preferred task • Compliments
• Role as boss’s stand-in when he or • Expression of appreciation in front of
she is away others
• Role in presentations to top • Note of thanks
management • Employee-of-the-month award
• Job rotation • Special commendation
• Encouragement of learning and • Bigger desk
continuous improvement • Bigger office or cubicle
Source: Based on Bob Nelson, 1001 Ways to Reward Employees (New York: Workman Pub, 1994), p age
19; Sunny C. L. Fong and Margaret A. Shaffer, "The Dimensionality and Determinants of Pay
Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of a Group Incentive Plan," International Journal of Human
Resource Management 14, no. 4 (June 2003), p 559 (22).
age
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Job Design
Job design is the division of work tasks assigned to an
individual in an organization that specifies what the worker
does, how, and why.
• Can significantly impact employee motivation and retention
• Primary driver of employee engagement
• Useful part of an employer’s total rewards program
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentives for Salespeople
• Align:
– how they measure and reward their salespeople
– with their firms’ strategic goals.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Types of Sales Incentive Plans
• Salary plan
– When the main task involves prospecting or account
serving
• Commission plan
– Pays only for results
• Combination plan
– 60-70% base salary with 30-40% incentive
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Maximizing Sales Force Results
• In setting sales quotas and commission rates, the goal is to
motivate sales activity but avoid excessive commissions
– Set Effective Quotas
– Distinguish Among Performers
• Enterprise Incentive Management (EIM)
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentives for Managers and Executives
• Managers play a crucial role in divisional and company-
wide profitability, and employers therefore put
considerable thought into how to reward them. Most
managers get short-term and long-term incentives in
addition to salary.
– Short-term Incentives
– Long-term Incentives
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Strategy and the Executive’s Long-Term
and Total Rewards Package (2 of 4)
• Short-term incentives and the annual bonus
– Eligibility
– Fund size
– Individual awards
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Strategy and the Executive’s Long-Term
and Total Rewards Package (3 of 4)
• Long-term incentives
– Stock options
▪ right to purchase a specific number of shares of
company stock at a specific price during a specific
period
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Strategy and the Executive’s Long-Term
and Total Rewards Package (4 of 4)
• Potential Problems
– Short termism
– Lack of range
• Ethics
– “People put their efforts where they know they’ll be
rewarded.”
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Team and Organization-Wide Incentive
Plans
• How to Design Team Incentives
– Pay incentives to the team based on the team’s
performance
• Evidence-Based HR: Inequities That Undercut Team
Incentives
– Often counterproductive
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Organization-Wide Incentive Plans
• Profit-sharing plans
• Scanlon plans - The basic features of the plan
include: philosophy of cooperation, identity,
competence, involvement system, and sharing of
benefits formula.
• Other gainsharing plans
• At-Risk pay plans
• Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
• Broad-based stock options
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved