SCM Forecasting On Iphone 14
SCM Forecasting On Iphone 14
1 The current forecast for Period 12 is 27500 and will be the same for all future
2 The Tracking Signal (TS) is well within the range of (±) 6, which indicates that t
does not contain any significant bias. It does, however, a fairly large MAD of 4
3 Given that the MAD is 4616, the estimate of standard deviation of forecast er
1.25 x 4616 = 5770. In this case, the standard deviation of forecast error is fair
to the size of the forecast. Hence 4 period Moving Average does not give us a
COL 7 COL 8 COL 9 COL 10 COL 11 COL 12 COL 13
Forecast Absolute Percent
Error Et Error At MSE MAD Error MAPE TS
be the same for all future periods say from period 13 to period 16.
±) 6, which indicates that the forecast using the 4- period Moving Average
er, a fairly large MAD of 4616 and MAPE 18 percent in period 12.
35000
10000
5000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
B SIMPLE EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING
2 The current forecast for all future periods is equal to the current estimate of level and is
Ft+1 = Lt and Ft+n = Lt
3 After observing the demand (Dt+1) for period t+1, we revise the estimate of the level as
Lt+1 = αDt+1 + (1- α)Lt
where α is a smoothing constant for the level 0 < α < 1. The revised value of the level is
observed value of the level (Dt+1) for period t+1 and the old estimate of te level (Lt) in
4 The current estimate of the level is a weighted average of all the past observations of d
weighted higher than older observations. A gigher value of α, corresponds to a forecast
recent observations, whereas a lower value of α, represents a more stable forecast that
observations.
5 Restating the above table and starting with the initial forecst of period '0' (avearge of 12
compute Simple Exponential Smoothing.
COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 COL 7
Period t Demand D Level Lt Forecast Ft Error Et Absolute Mean Squared
ErrorAt Error MSEt
0 24,975
1 15600 24,038 24,975 9,375 9375 87,890,625
2 18700 23,504 24,038 5,338 5338 58,189,766
3 26700 23,823 23,504 -3,196 3196 42,198,515
4 28900 24,331 23,823 -5,077 5077 38,091,917
5 17700 23,668 24,331 6,631 6631 39,267,665
6 21200 23,421 23,668 2,468 2468 33,738,170
7 28600 23,939 23,421 -5,179 5179 32,749,944
8 32300 24,775 23,939 -8,361 8361 37,394,436
9 20000 24,298 24,775 4,775 4775 35,773,033
10 25000 24,368 24,298 -702 702 32,245,065
11 30000 24,931 24,368 -5,632 5632 32,197,432
12 35000 25,938 24,931 -10,069 10069 37,962,934
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
9375 60 60 1
7356 29 44 2
5970 12 34 2
5746 18 30 1
5923 37 31 2
5347 12 28 3
5323 18 26 2
5703 26 26 0
5600 24 26 1
5110 3 24 1
5158 19 23 0
5567 29 24 -2
Column D
Column E
Linear (Column E)
7 8 9 10 11 12
TREND-CORRECTED EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING (Holt's Model)
2 We obtain an initial estimate of level of trend by running a linear regression between dem
Dt = b + at.
In this case running a linear regression between demand and time periods is appropriate b
has a trend but no seasonlality. The underlying relationship between demand and time is t
b ' measuares the estimate of demadn at period 't' = 0 and is an estimate of initial level L0
The slope measures the rate of change in demand per period and is the initial estimate of
In period 't', given estimates of Level Lt and trend Tn the forecast for future period is expre
Fn+1 = Lt + Tn and Ft+n = Lt + nTt
Herein we have found the Intercept as 17931 and Coefficient as 1083.
These two elements are L0 = 17931and T0 = 1083respectively.
3 After observing demand for period 't' we revise the estimates for level and trend as follow
Where 'α' is a smoothing coefficient for the level , 0 < α < 1 and 'β' is a smoothing constant
We observe that in each of the two updates, the revised estimate (of level or trend) is a w
observed value and the old estimate.
4 Restating the Table we calculate the Trend -Corrected smoothing Coefficient as follows:
5 Thus using Holt's Method the forecast for the next four periods is as follows:
F13 = L12 +T12 = 30887+1X1079=31966
F14 = L13 +T13 =30887+2X1079=33045
F15 = L14 +T14 = 30887+3X1079=34124
F16 = L15 +T15 = 30887+4X1079=35203
6 In this case, MAD =4447. Thus the estimate of standard deviation of forecast error using H
with α =0.10 and β = 0.20 is 1.25 x 4447= 5558. In this case. The standard deviation of fore
to other two cases is though less yet still fairly large.
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation Predicted Y
1 19015.385
2 20098.951
3 21182.517
4 22266.084
5 23349.65
6 24433.217
7 25516.783
8 26600.35
9 27683.916
F Significance F 10 28767.483
6.4028729254068 0.0298509429 11 29851.049
12 30934.615
11,655,396 3414 22 22 1
6,315,098 2201 5 14 2
16,680,338 3506 23 17 0
23,359,017 4276 23 18 -2
27,190,100 4725 37 22 0
24,684,857 4519 16 21 0
22,633,088 4332 11 20 0
23,555,574 4475 17 19 -2
29,141,097 4933 43 22 0
27,658,730 4818 15 21 1
25,179,170 4436 2 20 1
24,821,163 4447 13 19 0
3
COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6
Seasonal
Period t Demand D Level Lt Trend T Factor St Forecast F
11855 1690
1 15600 14527 1788 0.47 6366
2 18700 16895 1846 0.67 10931
3 26700 18955 1868 1.16 21740
4 28900 20652 1851 1.66 34566
5 17700 23261 1926 0.47 10576
6 21200 25510 1959 0.67 16875
7 28600 27328 1945 1.16 31863
8 32300 28781 1895 1.66 48592
9 20000 31271 1955 0.47 14418
10 25000 33430 1975 0.67 22261
11 30000 34928 1928 1.16 41070
12 35000 36067 1849 1.66 61180
0.47 17820
0.67 26642
1.16 48271
1.66 72146
mand is as follows:
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.6643075844
R Square 0.4413045667
Adjusted R Square 0.3481886611
Standard Error 5032.4147695
Observations 8
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 120023809.52381 120023809.52 4.7393038178 0.0723605989
Residual 6 151951190.47619 25325198.413
Total 7 271975000
ObservationPredicted Y Residuals
1 20308.33 -2608.333
2 21998.81 -798.8095
3 23689.29 4910.714
4 25379.76 6920.238
5 27070.24 -7070.238
6 28760.71 -3760.714
7 30451.19 -451.1905
8 32141.67 2858.333
COL 13
TSt
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-2.36
-3.37
-4.26
-4.05
-1.12
-1.93
-2.47
-0.77
2.39