0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views8 pages

Negotiation - Students Handout

The document discusses decision-making and negotiation as essential skills for effective leadership and organizational success. It outlines various techniques for decision-making, such as brainstorming and decision matrix analysis, and emphasizes the importance of negotiation skills in resolving disputes and reaching agreements. Key concepts like BATNA, WATNA, and ZOPA are introduced to aid negotiators in understanding their positions and alternatives during negotiations.

Uploaded by

chicuddly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views8 pages

Negotiation - Students Handout

The document discusses decision-making and negotiation as essential skills for effective leadership and organizational success. It outlines various techniques for decision-making, such as brainstorming and decision matrix analysis, and emphasizes the importance of negotiation skills in resolving disputes and reaching agreements. Key concepts like BATNA, WATNA, and ZOPA are introduced to aid negotiators in understanding their positions and alternatives during negotiations.

Uploaded by

chicuddly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

this analysis is that it will explain whether the cost exceeds

beyond the projections or benefits fall short of expectations.


6. Multi-voting: Brainstorming generates many ideas to handle a
problem, whereas multi-voting is effective when many people
are part of decision making. Through multi-voting a large list of
choices is reduced or narrowed down to a small list of top
choices for further consideration or research. This technique is
greatly helpful when an option or decision is favoured by most
people but is not the top priority of any one of them.
7. Decision matrix analysis: It is a powerful technique for
making a decision. It enables leaders to assess all available
options and prioritise them when searching a solution for a
complex problem. This technique is highly useful when you
have a number of good alternatives and many other factors to
look into for taking a crucial decision. You use this technique by
listing all values (options) in rows and all factors in columns in
a tabular form. You can give each combination (rows and
columns) a weighted ranking to ascertain which factor is
crucial in decision making. All the factors under each option is
added up to know the highest score about what decision is to
be made or what issue is to be addressed first.
While taking any decision, leaders must weigh the pros and cons of
these techniques and choose the one or may be a combination of them
to serve their organisational purpose in the best possible way.
“During a negotiation, it would be wise not to take anything personally. If
you leave personalities out of it, you will be able to see opportunities more
objectively.”
— Brian Koslow

14.5 NEGOTIATION FUNDAMENTALS

Negotiation is an art which you learn at every stage of life. You negotiate
with people every day on various personal and professional issues.
Professionally, the focus of your negotiations could be: resolving
employees’ issues, team work, improving business relationships, etc.
Young children also negotiate with their parents to get things of their
choice. They may put conditions like ‘If I study, would you buy me the
Firefox?’ And most of the parents end up responding positively to this
condition. Some people term negotiations as bargaining or haggling.
However, negotiations are a means through which you can resolve your
differences with people at the workplace or with your family without
getting into a dispute or by resorting to heated arguments. At the
workplace you negotiate because there is disagreement between you
and your colleagues regarding the solution of a problem or goals of a
project. If two parties conduct negotiations by keeping their ego aside, it
can be beneficial to both. They also need to follow the principle of
fairness to safeguard their mutual benefits and relationships. Good
communication and interpersonal skills are essential to conduct
effective negotiations. For successful negotiations, two parties sit across
the table and discuss all possible ways to resolve some issues or finalise
a business agreement. They accept the way that is most suitable to both
the parties. For conducting fruitful negotiations, the following points
must be taken care of.
With all planning and preparation, a decision may go wrong but a true
leader is one who emerges from such occasions and still manages the
situation.
Negotiation is a more precise and calculative work. It is highly desirable
to be armed with right information supported by strong research and
credible facts and figures.
‘I win, you win’ is the negotiation.

Preparation: Before sitting across the negotiation table, skilled


negotiators do proper preparations, like determining the goal of
negotiations and possible alternatives to be discussed for reaching the
goal. Negotiators must look at the earlier deals where they or their
colleagues had concluded agreements to reach organisational goals. Past
deals can give clues about how to initiate and move forward in
negotiations.
Problem analysis: Analyse the problems which are the focus of
negotiations and see the benefits accruing to the negotiating parties
from the resolution of the problems. All the issues – main and periphery
– associated with the problems should be identified and the possible
outcomes listed. A thorough preparation about all the essential elements
makes you a perfect negotiator. A better agreement to a well-defined
problem leads to an amicable promising solution than a great solution to
an ill-conceived problem.
Emotional balance: It is very important to maintain composure during
negotiations to arrive at correct decisions. Emotions have no room in
negotiations they can lead to wrong decisions out of frustrations caused
by emotional imbalance. If an employee has become adamant to go on
leave and in the prevailing office situation, the leave cannot be allowed.
But the boss because of emotional considerations allows the employee
to take leave, and the office work suffers. In another example, if to keep
employees in good humour, the boss takes the irrational decision of
granting them pay hikes, though the company does not have enough
resources to bear this hike, it will again not be a right approach to
handle the situation. It is better not to negotiate and walk away from the
deal with your papers than losing one’ trust and temperament.
Effective listening: During negotiations it is very important that both
the parties should not talk excessively. They should also be patient
enough to listen to each other. They must pay full attention to non-
verbal cues and interpret them properly. Non-verbal cues speak volumes
about the real intention of negotiators. If you are a good listener then
this will enable you to identify those points of compromise where you
are not going to lose much. So do not waste your energy by indulging in
unnecessary talk.
Teamwork: Negotiation is not always one-to-one. It can be many-to-
many or one-to-many. If the group works according to team plan with
good relations and understanding, the outcome can be favourable. Both
the sides should think to work together to reach to win-win situation.
Communication with words: Articulate negotiators have an advantage
over others as they can communicate with clarity and effectiveness.
Good communicators leave less scope of creating misunderstandings,
and therefore can come out with several permutations and
combinations of the problem. You can choose passive, aggressive or
assertive style while negotiating but assertive style will be the best
choice to get mutually beneficial outcomes from negotiations.
Interpersonal skills: Interpersonal skills are a key factor in
maintaining good relationship with the people involved in negotiations.
The negotiator must maintain composure and patience and should be
able to persuade his/her counterpart without manipulations. This helps
in maintaining a cordial relationship between negotiators.
A negotiation is basically an act of giving and taking. You should know
what you can give in return of what you get from other.
Decision making ability: Leaders must be quick in taking right
decisions during negotiations. Indecisiveness on their part can let a
bargaining or beneficial opportunity slip from their hands. If decisions
are not made then the deadlock will remain as it was before the start of
negotiations.
Ethics: Trust between the parties involved in negotiations can be built
only if both the parties conduct themselves in an ethical way. They must
fulfil the promises made to each other after reaching certain decisions
during negotiations. Whatever be the decisions, both the parties should
respect what has been agreed upon.
“You can’t negotiate with people who say what’s mine is mine and what’s
yours is negotiable.”
— John F. Kennedy

14.6 NEGOTIATION STYLES

There are three basic negotiation styles a negotiator can adopt. These
styles are explained below.

14.6.1 Red Style

The Red Style negotiators’ are highly competitive and therefore


considered intensely competitive/ distributive bargainers. They follow
the ideology that one side’s gain is other side’s loss (also called zero sum
or value claiming). They are self-centred, hard negotiators who do not
trust the other party and therefore focus on gaining the maximum share
of the pie.

14.6.2 Blue Style

The Blue Style negotiators adopt a cooperative style and believe in


looking for a wide range of interests to be addressed and served. They
focus on building long-term relationships for mutual benefit of the
parties involved in negotiations and create value for them (also called
non-zero sum or value creation).

14.6.3 Purple Style

The Purple Style negotiators represent a fusion of Red and Blue Style
negotiators. They believe in Give/Get principle, that is having a trading
behaviour where they gain something of their choice and give something
of others’ choice. They are called principled negotiators as they use a
strict tit-for-tat strategy. They are open, learnable, cautious and decent.

14.7 MAJOR NEGOTIATION CONCEPTS

The following concepts help both the sides make informed decisions
about possible options for a deal. With these concepts, they explore
what are their ‘best’ and ‘worst’ points and how are they going to
negotiate them along any alternative deal.

14.7.1 BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)

While preparing for negotiations, you investigate which resources you


control or influence that can serve your interests. This establishes the
baseline of your walking-in BATNA. This helps you create a benchmark
against which you can measure whether the negotiation process is
strengthening, weakening, or changing your BATNA. The term BATNA
was coined by Roger Fisher and William Ury in 1981. It means the best
you can do if your counterpart refuses to negotiate on terms acceptable
to you. BATNA provides you a clear picture of what is in your piggy bag if
you decide to walk away from the negotiation table without an
agreement. For instance, you go to buy a watch. One shopkeeper offers
you a watch for Rs. 2500. You move to the next shopkeeper who offers
the same watch at Rs. 2550. You start negotiating for a price reduction.
You already have a BATNA of Rs. 2500 and want the shopkeeper to settle
for a price below Rs. 2500.
BATNA is crucial for negotiations as no decision can be made without
knowing what alternatives are available. Before starting negotiations
put all the possible choices on your side. Having a good BATNA enhances
your negotiating power because if you are aware of good alternatives
then you need not concede much. You can also force the other side
harder. You will not even care much whether you achieved the target or
not. If you do not have a good BATNA, then you will give in to the other
person’s demand. So improve your BATNA as much as possible to be a
good negotiator.
Be clear about your negotiation style. Know and chalk out your list of
goals and decide which issues you can compete, compromise, or avoid to
cut a deal.

14.7.2 WATNA (Worst Alternative to a Negotiated


Agreement)

The term WATNA defines the leverage the other party has over you in
the negotiation process. It works positively for your counterpart in
negotiations than you.

14.7.3 ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement)

It refers to the overlapping of the aspiration ranges of the two


negotiating parties. In other words, it represents a range of prices within
which the negotiating parties may reach an agreement.
Before every negotiation, one should be prepared to handle the
following questions:
1. What are the negotiation objectives?
2. Are you going to address critical factors like time, prices,
performances and technology?
3. What is the scope of your negotiation plan? What you may
surrender or what you may not compromise with?
4. Are you planning to take a greater risk for greater margins of
return?
5. Are you prepared to face the consequences if negotiation
breaks down?

Summary

Decision making and problem solving abilities are the key skills for
doing good in business and life. How we explore a problem and come to
a solution exhibit our managerial acumen and leadership vision.
Decision making is the process of weighing our choices, comparing them
and taking the right call. For making a good decision, a leader must have
clear thinking, strong conviction and effective implementation of
decision. His/her ability to take right decisions has an important bearing
on the future and growth of his/her organisation. Every organisation
emphasises on right and timely decision making and effective
negotiations as they are vital for its progress and productivity. Effective
and successful decision making requires following a systematic process:
identifying and analysing a problem, gathering all the facts, pondering
over available choices, choosing the best option and taking action for
implementation of the chosen. There are many techniques that leaders
can use, like brainstorming, multi-voting, decision matrix and nominal
group, to assess their alternatives before coming to the final choice.
Negotiation is the organised process through which two parties try to
settle a dispute or reach an agreement. The negotiation process
demands that we listen to our counterparts in negotiations, respect
them and treat every issue seriously. Negotiation ability is a skills that
we use all our life time. It is not about winning every time but
succeeding while collaborating with others. It is exploring a common
link between two or more groups to resolve a dispute and reach an
agreement.

You might also like