0% found this document useful (0 votes)
442 views4 pages

C20 C25 Changes

The document compares two syllabi for Computer-Aided Engineering Drawing courses in Karnataka, highlighting their commonalities in subject matter, course objectives, and assessment structures. Key differences include variations in course codes, semester hours, credits, and a stronger emphasis on advanced CAD applications and 3D printing in the newer syllabus. Overall, the structural similarity is about 85%, with a content similarity of 80% and a 20% difference due to updated methodologies in the newer course.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
442 views4 pages

C20 C25 Changes

The document compares two syllabi for Computer-Aided Engineering Drawing courses in Karnataka, highlighting their commonalities in subject matter, course objectives, and assessment structures. Key differences include variations in course codes, semester hours, credits, and a stronger emphasis on advanced CAD applications and 3D printing in the newer syllabus. Overall, the structural similarity is about 85%, with a content similarity of 80% and a 20% difference due to updated methodologies in the newer course.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

To compare the two documents and determine their similarity and percentage of difference, I'll analyze their content,

structure, and key elements. Here's an overview:

Commonalities Between the Two Documents:

1. Subject Matter: Both documents pertain to Computer-Aided Engineering Drawing (CAED) for Mechanical
and Allied Engineering diploma programs in Karnataka.

2. Course Objectives: They aim to teach learners engineering drawing, visualization of 3D objects, and CAD-
based modeling.

3. Topics Covered:

o Use of drawing instruments

o Dimensioning standards

o Projection of points, lines, planes, and solids

o Orthographic and isometric projections

o CAD modeling and solid modeling

4. Practical Exercises: Both include hands-on drawing sheet-based exercises and CAD modeling tasks.

5. Assessment Structure: Both have CIE (Continuous Internal Evaluation) and SEE (Semester End Examination)
components, assessing manual and CAD-based drawings.

Differences Between the Two Documents:

Feature C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21) C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

Course Code 20ME12P 25ME01I

Semester Hours 78 hrs (6 hrs/week) 91 hrs (7 hrs/week)

Credits 4 5

Course Type Lecture & Practice Integrated

Assessment
CIE: 60, SEE: 40 CIE: 50, SEE: 50
Weightage

Software Usage Uses CAD for 2D/3D drawing Stronger focus on solid modeling in CAD

More CAD-based modeling and 3D printing


Practical Emphasis More manual drawing exercises
activities

Engineering Drawing fundamentals and IS Introduction to 3D Printing for component


Additional Topics
codes creation
Percentage Similarity and Difference:

• Structural Similarity: ~85% (Both follow similar course structures, learning outcomes, and assessment
methodologies).

• Content Similarity: ~80% (Overlapping syllabus on engineering drawing, projections, and CAD, but updated
with new methods).

• Differences: ~20% (C25_25ME01I has increased CAD usage, 3D printing activities, updated exercises, and
credit hours).

Would you like a detailed side-by-side syllabus comparison or a plagiarism/similarity analysis using a document
comparison tool? Let me know how you'd like to proceed!

Here’s a unit-wise comparison of different questions from both documents:

Unit-Wise Different Questions from Each Document

1. Basic Elements of Drawing / Fundamentals of Engineering Drawing

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Draw different types of lines such as horizontal, vertical, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 75° lines using T-square and set
squares.

• Indicate different conventions of lines on the drawing sheet.

• Copy the given sketch to the required scale and apply proper dimensioning techniques.

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• Draw the layout of a drawing sheet and list different standard drawing sheet sizes.

• Dimension a given sketch using the aligned system with chain method.

• Draw a title block and dimension a given sketch using the unidirectional system with a parallel method.

2. Projection of Points & Lines

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Draw projections of a point in all four quadrants.

• Draw projections of a line for the following conditions:


a) Parallel to both HP and VP
b) Parallel to one and perpendicular to another
c) Parallel to one and inclined to another

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• Draw the three principal views of a point P, located 30mm below HP, 50mm behind VP, and 40mm from the
left profile plane.

• Draw the three principal views of a line 40mm long, parallel to HP and perpendicular to VP, with the line
30mm above HP and 40mm in front of VP.
3. Projection of Planes

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Draw projections of plane surfaces (triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon, and circle) under the following
conditions:
a) Parallel to one plane and perpendicular to the other two
b) Inclined to one plane and perpendicular to the other

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• A triangular lamina of base edge 40mm rests with one of its base edges on HP so that its surface is inclined
at 30° to HP. Draw its projections.

• A pentagonal lamina of base edge 40mm rests with one of its corners on HP such that its surface is inclined
at 30° to HP. Draw the projections.

4. Projection of Solids

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Draw projections of solids (prisms, pyramids, cones, and cylinders) in different positions concerning HP and
VP.

• Example: A square prism of base edge 40mm and height 70mm rests with one of its base edges on HP. The
axis of the prism is inclined at 45° to HP and parallel to VP. Draw its top and front views.

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• A pentagonal prism of base edge 40mm and height 60mm rests with one of its corners on HP so that its
base is inclined at 30° to HP. Draw its projections.

• A hexagonal pyramid of base edge 40mm and height 60mm is resting with one of its base edges on HP,
making an angle of 30° with HP. Draw its projections.

5. Orthographic & Isometric Projections

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Convert a given pictorial view into orthographic views (Using Sketchbook and CAD).

• Draw isometric projections and views using isometric scales.

• Convert orthographic views into isometric views (Using Sketchbook and CAD).

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• Draw orthographic views for a given pictorial drawing and create its solid model using CAD.

• Extract sectional views from the solid model in CAD using an arbitrary sectional plane.

• Use CAD commands such as arc, circle, rectangle, chamfer, trim, shell, fillet, array, and mirror.
6. CAD Drafting & 3D Modeling

C_20_DME_1 CAD (2020-21)

• Use CAD software to create 2D and 3D models of thread profiles, nuts, bolts, studs, set screws, washers,
and locking arrangements.

• Insert title blocks in CAD drawings and apply constraints such as horizontal, vertical, parallel, concentric,
perpendicular, symmetric, equal, and collinear.

C25_25ME01I Draft CAED (2025)

• Create solid models of given pictorial views in CAD and extract sectional views.

• Prepare 3D models of mechanical components such as V-blocks and patterns using 3D printing technology.

• Perform 3D printing of nuts, bolts, and other engineering components as part of a practical tutorial.

Conclusion

The newer syllabus (C25_25ME01I) includes more advanced CAD applications, 3D modeling, and 3D printing
techniques, whereas the older syllabus (C_20_DME_1) focuses more on manual drafting and fundamental CAD
techniques.

Would you like a side-by-side syllabus table for a clearer comparison?

You might also like