The document explores the philosophy of artificial intelligence, questioning whether machines can think, have free will, be conscious, or feel. It distinguishes between strong AI, which may possess minds, and weak AI, which only simulates intelligence. Key arguments from figures like Alan Turing and John Searle are presented to support the notion that current computers lack true thought and emotional capacity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views16 pages
04 Philosophy of AI
The document explores the philosophy of artificial intelligence, questioning whether machines can think, have free will, be conscious, or feel. It distinguishes between strong AI, which may possess minds, and weak AI, which only simulates intelligence. Key arguments from figures like Alan Turing and John Searle are presented to support the notion that current computers lack true thought and emotional capacity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16
Philosophy of
Artificial Intelligence Introduction to Artificial Intelligence What is the Philosophy of AI?
What is “strong” versus “weak” AI?
Can a computer “think”?
Outline Can a computer have a “free will”?
Can a computer be conscious?
Can a computer “feel”?
What is the Philosophy of AI • The philosophy of AI asks the question of whether computers, machines in general, or for that matter anything that is not of natural origin can be said to have a mind, and/ or to think. What is “strong” versus “weak” AI? Strong vs Weak AI • Strong AI • machines do or ultimately will have minds • has a complex algorithm that helps it act in different situations • poker AI which can teach itself to adapt to and outsmart the skills of human opponents • Weak AI • they merely simulate, rather than duplicate, real intelligence • pre-programmed by a human • iPhone’s Siri and Amazon’s Alexa (voice-activated assistance usually has a programmed response) • sense or ‘scan’ for things that are similar to what they already know, and classify them accordingly • The distinction is between whether machines can be truly intelligent or simply able to act “as if” they are intelligent. Can a computer think? Computer manipulating capabilities = thinking? • 1950 essay entitled “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” by English mathematician Alan Turing • Imitation Game • An interrogator in a separate room, communicating with a man and a woman only through written communication (preferably typed), attempting to guess which is the man and which is the woman. • The machine replaced the woman and is tasked with fooling the interrogator into thinking it is the man, while the man is telling the truth about who he is. Computers can’t think • John Searle, professor of philosophy at the University of California at Berkeley • computers can’t “think” since they don’t actually mean or do anything — at best, they manipulate symbols • Humans the ones associating their computations with the external world Can a computer have free will? • Humans, and possibly some animals, have free will, but can a machine or a computer also have free will? • Computers may not have free will because they are different from us in two key respect: • they work according to well- understood engineering principles and so can always be predicted; • they can’t consider choices in the same sense that people do Can a computer be conscious? Can computers be conscious? • Some researchers tie consciousness to the role of emotional states and physical embodiment • Certainly seen no evidence of it to date Can a computer feel? Can a computer “feel”? • It’s relatively simple to build a robot that flinches, cries out, and/ or simply says, “Ouch, that hurts” when you pinch it. But does that say anything about whether it feels pain? • Since computers are so different from us (at least today) and are designed by us for specific purposes (as opposed to naturally occurring), it seems logical to say they don’t, and most likely never will, have real feelings. Questions?