Qsn - Implement logging framework meeting specific requirements such as supporting

different log levels (debug, info, error) and allowing the addition of various
appenders for each log level. It should also have the capability to dynamically
modify the log level and add appenders during runtime.

deepseek Thinking -
Okay, I need to create a logging framework in .NET that meets specific
requirements. Let me go through the requirements again to make sure I cover
everything. The framework should support different log levels: debug, info, error.
It needs to allow adding various appenders for each log level. Also, it should
dynamically modify the log level and add appenders during runtime. Alright, let's
break this down.

First, the log levels. I'll probably create an enum for the log levels: Debug,
Info, Error. That makes sense. Then, each log message will have a level associated
with it. The framework should allow setting a minimum log level so that messages
below that level aren't logged. For example, if the current level is Info, Debug
messages are ignored.

Next, appenders. Appenders are responsible for writing the log messages to
different outputs, like console, file, database, etc. The user should be able to
add multiple appenders for each log level. So each log level can have its own set
of appenders. Wait, or is it that appenders are added per log level? Or maybe
appenders can be assigned to handle specific log levels? Hmm, the requirement says
"allowing the addition of various appenders for each log level." So for example,
for the Error level, I might have a console appender and an email appender. For
Info, maybe just a file appender. So each log level has a collection of appenders.
That's how I should structure it.

Wait, but sometimes appenders might handle multiple levels. Like, a file appender
could handle all levels from Debug up. But the requirement says to add appenders
for each log level. So maybe each appender is associated with a specific log level.
Or perhaps appenders can be added to specific levels. That might complicate things.
Alternatively, appenders could have their own minimum level, but the requirement
seems to specify adding appenders per log level. Let me re-read the requirement:
"allowing the addition of various appenders for each log level." So, for each log
level (debug, info, error), you can add appenders. So when a log message of level X
is logged, all appenders attached to X will process it. That seems to be the case.
So each log level has its own list of appenders.

Wait, but that might not be flexible. For example, if I want an appender to handle
both Info and Error levels, I would have to add it to both. Alternatively, maybe
the appenders are registered for certain levels. But according to the requirement,
the user should be able to add appenders for each log level. So perhaps the
approach is that each log level has a list of appenders, and when you log a message
at that level, all appenders for that level are used. So when adding an appender,
you specify which log level(s) it should be attached to. Hmm, but the requirement
says "for each log level," so maybe each log level can have multiple appenders. So
when you call AddAppender, you specify the log level and the appender. That way,
when a message is logged at that level, all appenders for that level are triggered.

But then, what about hierarchical log levels? For example, if the current log level
is set to Info, then Error messages are also logged because they are higher. Wait,
but the requirement says "dynamically modify the log level." So maybe the framework
has a minimum log level, and any message with a level equal or higher is logged. So
if the minimum is Info, then Info, Warn, Error, etc., are logged. But the user
might want to set the log level to, say, Error only. So I need a LogLevel enum that
is ordered, and the framework has a CurrentLogLevel property that determines which
messages are processed.
But the requirement also says that appenders can be added per log level. So maybe
the appenders are associated with specific log levels, and when a message is logged
at a certain level, only the appenders for that level are used. But if the
CurrentLogLevel is set to Info, then messages with level Info, Warn, Error are
logged, but each message's level determines which appenders are used. Wait, that
might complicate things. Let me think.

Alternatively, the framework has a minimum log level. When a message is logged, if
its level is equal to or higher than the minimum, it's processed. Then, each
appender can be configured to handle certain log levels. But the requirement states
that the appenders are added per log level. So perhaps the Logger class has a way
to add an appender to a specific log level, meaning that when a message of that
level is logged (and the current log level allows it), the appender is invoked.

Wait, maybe the user can add appenders to specific log levels. For example, adding
a console appender to the Error level, so that only Error messages go to the
console, and a file appender to Info and Debug levels. But the framework's current
log level would still determine whether a message is processed at all. So the flow
would be: check if the message's level is >= CurrentLogLevel. If yes, then for each
appender registered for that specific level, log the message. Hmm, but that may not
capture all appenders for higher levels. Wait, maybe the appenders are added to
specific levels, but when a message is logged, all appenders attached to levels <=
message level are invoked. No, that's getting complicated. Let me clarify the
requirements.

The user wants to add appenders for each log level. So, for example, they can add a
ConsoleAppender to Debug, Info, and Error levels. Or maybe they can add different
appenders to different levels. So each log level (Debug, Info, Error) can have
multiple appenders. When a message is logged at a certain level, all appenders
registered for that level are used, provided the current log level allows the
message to be logged.

Wait, but the current log level is the minimum level required for a message to be
logged. So if the current level is Info, then Debug messages are not logged, but
Info, Warn, Error are. But the appenders are per log level. So for example, when
you log an Info message, all appenders added to the Info level would be called. If
the current log level is Info, then the message is processed. If the current log
level is Error, then Info messages are not processed, so even if there are
appenders for Info, they aren't called.

So the steps would be:

1. When a message is logged, check if its level is >= CurrentLogLevel. If not,

ignore.

2. For the message's level, get all appenders registered for that specific level.

3. Call each of those appenders to log the message.

But wait, maybe the appenders are added to handle messages of a certain level or
higher. For example, adding an appender to the Info level would handle Info, Warn,
Error. But the requirement says "allowing the addition of various appenders for
each log level." So perhaps each appender is added to a specific log level, and
only processes messages of that level. But that might not be flexible.
Alternatively, appenders can be added to multiple levels. For example, an appender
can be added to both Info and Error levels, so it processes messages of those
levels.
Hmm. The user's requirement is a bit ambiguous here. Let me read again: "allowing
the addition of various appenders for each log level." So, for each log level (like
Debug, Info, Error), you can add appenders. So each appender is associated with a
log level. So when a message of that level is logged, the appender is used. But how
does the current log level setting affect this?

Wait, perhaps the current log level is separate from the appenders. The current log
level determines which messages are processed, and then the appenders for that
specific log level are called. So:

- The Logger has a CurrentLogLevel (e.g., Info). Any message with level >=
CurrentLogLevel is processed.

- For each message that is processed (because its level is >= CurrentLogLevel), the
appenders added to that specific message level are called.

Wait, but that would mean that if CurrentLogLevel is Info, a message with level
Info would trigger the appenders added to Info. But a message with level Error
would trigger appenders added to Error. So even though the message is logged
because it's >= Info, the appenders are selected based on the message's level. That
could work, but maybe the user wants appenders to be added to certain levels and
handle messages of that level or higher. But according to the requirement, it's per
log level. So perhaps the user can add an appender to a specific level, and it will
handle messages of that level only. Alternatively, maybe the appenders can handle
messages of that level or higher. But the requirement isn't clear. Let me think
about possible use cases.

If a user wants to have all Error messages go to an email appender, and all Info
and above go to a file, then the email appender is added to the Error level, and
the file appender is added to the Info level. But when the current log level is
Info, the Info messages would go to the file appender, and Error messages would go
to both the file (if added to Info?) and the email. Hmm, maybe not. Alternatively,
the file appender is added to Info level, so only Info messages go there. But
that's not typical. Usually, appenders handle all messages at or above a certain
level. But the requirement here is to add appenders per log level.

Alternatively, perhaps the framework allows adding appenders to specific levels,

and each appender can be added to one or more levels. So when a message is logged
at level X, all appenders added to X are invoked. So, for example:

- Add a ConsoleAppender to Debug level. So Debug messages go to console.

- Add a FileAppender to Info level. So Info messages go to file.

- Add an EmailAppender to Error level. So Error messages go to email.

In this setup, if the current log level is Info, then Debug messages are ignored,
Info and Error are processed. So Info messages trigger the FileAppender, and Error
messages trigger the EmailAppender. But if the user wants the FileAppender to also
handle Error messages, they would have to add it to both Info and Error levels.
That's possible, but maybe not ideal.

Alternatively, maybe appenders can be configured with their own log levels. For
example, a FileAppender could be set to log Info and above, so any message >= Info
would go to the file. But that's a different approach. The requirement states that
appenders can be added for each log level. So perhaps the first approach is
correct: appenders are added per level, and they handle messages of that level
only. Then, the current log level of the framework determines which messages are
processed, and for those messages, the appenders added to their specific level are
invoked.

So to model this, the Logger class would have a dictionary that maps each LogLevel
to a list of appenders. When adding an appender, you specify which LogLevel it's
associated with. Then, when a message is logged at a certain level, if the
message's level is >= CurrentLogLevel, the appenders for that specific level are
called.

But wait, the message's level could be higher than the CurrentLogLevel. For
example, CurrentLogLevel is Info, message level is Error. Since Error >= Info, the
message is processed. Then, the appenders for Error level are called.

So the steps are:

1. Check if message.Level >= Logger.CurrentLogLevel. If not, return.

2. For the message.Level, get all appenders registered for that level.

3. Invoke each appender's Log method with the message.

This way, appenders are tied to specific log levels. But this might not be the
standard way logging frameworks work. Usually, appenders have their own log level
thresholds. However, the user's requirement is explicit about adding appenders for
each log level, so perhaps this is the way to go.

Now, moving on to dynamic modification. The framework should allow changing the log
level at runtime. So the CurrentLogLevel property should be settable. Also, adding
appenders during runtime. So the Logger class should have methods like
AddAppender(LogLevel level, IAppender appender) that can be called anytime.

Now, let's think about the components:

- LogLevel enum: Debug, Info, Error. Ordered so that Debug < Info < Error.

- IAppender interface: has a method to log a message (e.g., void Log(string

message, LogLevel level).

Wait, but in the previous model, appenders are called only for their registered
level. So maybe the appender's Log method doesn't need the level parameter, since
it's already determined by the level it's registered to. But perhaps including the
level in the Log method is still useful for the appender to include in the output.

Alternatively, the Logger could pass the message along with its level to the
appender, even though the appender is registered to a specific level. But in that
case, maybe the appender can format the message with the level. So the IAppender
interface would have a Log method that takes the message and the level.

Wait, but if the appender is registered to a specific level, the Logger could call
it only when that level is being logged. So for example, if an appender is added to
the Info level, it would only receive messages of level Info. But maybe the user
wants an appender to handle multiple levels, so they add it to multiple levels. For
example, adding a FileAppender to Info and Error levels, so it logs those messages.
In that case, the appender would receive messages of those levels, and can include
the level in the log entry.

So the IAppender's Log method should include the message and the LogLevel. That
makes sense.

So the IAppender interface could be:

public interface IAppender

void Log(string message, LogLevel level);

Then, when the Logger processes a message of level X, it calls all appenders
registered to X, passing the message and X as parameters.

Now, for the Logger class:

- It has a CurrentLogLevel property (LogLevel type), which can be set at runtime.

- A dictionary that maps each LogLevel to a list of IAppender instances.

- Methods to add appenders to a specific LogLevel.

- Methods to log messages at different levels (Debug(), Info(), Error()).

The Logger should be thread-safe, since logging might occur from multiple threads.
So the dictionary of appenders and the CurrentLogLevel should be accessed in a
thread-safe manner. Using locks or concurrent collections.

In .NET, using a ConcurrentDictionary might be appropriate, but since the keys are
enums (finite and known), perhaps using a regular dictionary with locks around
modifications and reads. Alternatively, for the appenders, since each LogLevel has
its own list, perhaps using a lock for each LogLevel's list.

But for simplicity, maybe use a lock around the entire appender dictionary when
adding appenders or logging. However, that could lead to contention. Alternatively,
use a ReaderWriterLockSlim to allow multiple readers but exclusive writers.

But let's start simple, then optimize if needed. For the sake of this example, use
lock statements around the critical sections.

So, the Logger class outline:

public class Logger

private LogLevel _currentLogLevel = LogLevel.Info;

private readonly Dictionary<LogLevel, List<IAppender>> _appenders = new

Dictionary<LogLevel, List<IAppender>>();

private readonly object _lock = new object();

public LogLevel CurrentLogLevel

get { lock (_lock) return _currentLogLevel; }

set { lock (_lock) _currentLogLevel = value; }

}

public void AddAppender(LogLevel level, IAppender appender)

lock (_lock)

if (!_appenders.TryGetValue(level, out var appenderList))

appenderList = new List<IAppender>();

_appenders[level] = appenderList;

appenderList.Add(appender);

public void Log(LogLevel level, string message)

// Check if the message level is below the current log level

if (level < CurrentLogLevel)

return;

List<IAppender> appendersToUse;

lock (_lock)

if (!_appenders.TryGetValue(level, out appendersToUse))

return; // No appenders for this level

appendersToUse = new List<IAppender>(appendersToUse); // Create a copy to avoid

concurrency issues during iteration

foreach (var appender in appendersToUse)

appender.Log(message, level);

}
}

// Convenience methods for each log level

public void Debug(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Debug, message);

public void Info(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Info, message);

public void Error(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Error, message);

Wait, but in the Log method, when we check if level < CurrentLogLevel, we need to
get the current log level. But since CurrentLogLevel can be modified at runtime, we
should retrieve it once and check. However, there's a possibility that after
checking, the CurrentLogLevel is changed, but that's acceptable because it's a
dynamic setting. The check is a snapshot in time.

But the code as written has:

if (level < CurrentLogLevel)

return;

But CurrentLogLevel's getter is under a lock. Wait, in the CurrentLogLevel

property, the getter is:

get { lock (_lock) return _currentLogLevel; }

So when getting CurrentLogLevel, it's under the lock. However, in the Log method,
the code is:

if (level < CurrentLogLevel)

return;

But CurrentLogLevel's getter uses a lock. So each time we access CurrentLogLevel,

we're taking a lock. That could be a performance issue, but for the sake of
simplicity, maybe it's acceptable. Alternatively, we can retrieve the current log
level once:

public void Log(LogLevel level, string message)

LogLevel currentLevel;

lock (_lock)

currentLevel = _currentLogLevel;

if (level < currentLevel)

return;
// ... rest of the code

But this way, we take the lock once to get the current level, then proceed. That's
more efficient.

So adjusting the Log method:

public void Log(LogLevel level, string message)

LogLevel currentLevel;

List<IAppender> appendersToUse;

lock (_lock)

currentLevel = _currentLogLevel;

if (level < currentLevel)

return;

if (!_appenders.TryGetValue(level, out appendersToUse))

return; // No appenders for this level

appendersToUse = appendersToUse.ToList(); // Create a copy to iterate without lock

foreach (var appender in appendersToUse)

appender.Log(message, level);

Wait, but inside the lock, we check if level < currentLevel, which is
_currentLogLevel. Then, if not, we get the appenders for that level. Then, create a
copy of the list to avoid holding the lock while iterating. That way, if the
appenders are modified during iteration, the copy remains intact. This is important
because iterating over a list that's being modified can cause exceptions.

So the steps inside the lock:

1. Capture the current log level.

2. If the message's level is below, return.

3. Get the appenders for the message's level, if any.

4. Create a copy of the appenders list to iterate outside the lock.

This approach ensures that adding/removing appenders doesn't affect the ongoing
logging operation, and vice versa.

Wait, but in this code, after checking the current log level and the message's
level, we proceed to get the appenders for the message's level. However, what if
the current log level is changed after the check? For example, after the check,
another thread sets the current log level to a higher level. But the message is
already being processed. That's acceptable because the log level is dynamic, and
the check is a snapshot.

So the Log method captures the current log level once, checks if the message should
be processed, and if so, proceeds to get the appenders for the message's level.
Then, even if the log level is changed, this message is already being logged
because it passed the check at that point in time.

Now, the next part: adding appenders during runtime. The AddAppender method is
straightforward, adding to the dictionary under the lock.

But what about removing appenders? The requirement doesn't mention removing, but
perhaps it's implied that adding is possible, but the user might want to remove as
well. However, the requirement states "allowing the addition of various appenders",
so maybe removal is not required. But for completeness, maybe include a
RemoveAppender method. But the user didn't ask for it, so perhaps we can omit it
unless necessary.

Now, implementing sample appenders. For example, a ConsoleAppender, FileAppender,

etc.

Sample IAppender implementation:

public class ConsoleAppender : IAppender

public void Log(string message, LogLevel level)

Console.WriteLine($"{level}: {message}");

public class FileAppender : IAppender

private readonly string _filePath;

public FileAppender(string filePath)

_filePath = filePath;

}
public void Log(string message, LogLevel level)

File.AppendAllText(_filePath, $"{DateTime.Now} {level}: {message}

{Environment.NewLine}");

These appenders implement the IAppender interface and write to console or file.

Now, testing the code.

Sample usage:

var logger = new Logger();

logger.CurrentLogLevel = LogLevel.Debug;

// Add a console appender to Debug and Info levels

logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Debug, new ConsoleAppender());

logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Info, new ConsoleAppender());

logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Error, new FileAppender("errors.txt"));

logger.Debug("This is a debug message"); // Logged to console

logger.Info("This is an info message"); // Logged to console

logger.Error("This is an error message"); // Logged to file

// Dynamically change log level to Info

logger.CurrentLogLevel = LogLevel.Info;

logger.Debug("This debug message won't be logged"); // Ignored

logger.Info("Another info message"); // Logged to console

logger.Error("Another error"); // Logged to file

// Add a new appender at runtime

logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Error, new ConsoleAppender());

logger.Error("This error goes to both console and file"); // Both appenders are
called

This seems to work as expected.

But wait, in the AddAppender method, when adding a ConsoleAppender to both Debug
and Info levels, each call to AddAppender adds the same instance to different
levels. So the same appender instance is in multiple lists. That's acceptable.
Now, thread safety. The lock in the Logger ensures that modifications to the
appenders dictionary and current log level are thread-safe. The Log method captures
the current log level and the appenders list in a thread-safe manner.

Potential issues:

- If an appender's Log method is slow or blocking, it could affect performance. But

that's up to the appender implementation to handle, perhaps by using async or other
mechanisms. The Logger's Log method calls each appender synchronously.

- The appenders are called in the order they were added. If order matters, the
Logger preserves that order.

Another consideration: the LogLevel enum should be ordered correctly. So the enum
should have values that reflect their severity. For example:

public enum LogLevel

Debug,

Info,

Error

But in this case, Debug is 0, Info is 1, Error is 2. So when comparing, Debug <
Info < Error, which is correct.

Now, the requirement also mentions dynamically modifying the log level and adding
appenders during runtime. The provided code allows that via the CurrentLogLevel
property and AddAppender method, both of which are thread-safe.

Potential improvements:

- Allow appenders to be added for multiple levels at once. For example, a method
that takes a collection of LogLevels. But the requirement says "for each log
level," so the current AddAppender method is per level.

- Implement a way to remove appenders. But as per requirements, it's not necessary.

- Allow formatting of log messages (e.g., including timestamp, log level, etc.).
The current appenders handle formatting, but perhaps the Logger could pass a
structured log message (e.g., a LogEntry object with timestamp, level, message) to
the appenders. But the requirement doesn't specify, so the current approach is to
pass the message and level.

Testing for concurrency: multiple threads logging messages while another thread is
changing the log level or adding appenders. The locks should handle this correctly.

In summary, the proposed solution includes:

- LogLevel enum.

- IAppender interface.

- Logger class with CurrentLogLevel, AddAppender, and Log methods.

- Thread safety using locks.

- Sample appenders.

This meets the requirements: different log levels, appenders per level, dynamic
changes at runtime.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Ans -
To implement a logging framework in .NET that meets the specified requirements,
follow this structured approach:

### 1. Define Log Levels

Create an enum to represent different log levels, ordered by severity.

```csharp
public enum LogLevel
{
Debug,
Info,
Error
}
```

### 2. Define the Appender Interface

Create an interface for appenders, which handle the output of log messages.

```csharp
public interface IAppender
{
void Log(string message, LogLevel level);
}
```

### 3. Implement the Logger Class

Develop a thread-safe `Logger` class that manages log levels and appenders
dynamically.

```csharp
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;

public class Logger

{
private LogLevel _currentLogLevel;
private readonly Dictionary<LogLevel, List<IAppender>> _appenders;
private readonly object _lock = new object();

public Logger()
{
_currentLogLevel = LogLevel.Info;
 _appenders = new Dictionary<LogLevel, List<IAppender>>();
foreach (LogLevel level in Enum.GetValues(typeof(LogLevel)))
{
_appenders[level] = new List<IAppender>();
}
}

public LogLevel CurrentLogLevel

{
get
{
lock (_lock)
{
return _currentLogLevel;
}
}
set
{
lock (_lock)
{
_currentLogLevel = value;
}
}
}

public void AddAppender(LogLevel level, IAppender appender)

{
lock (_lock)
{
_appenders[level].Add(appender);
}
}

public void Log(LogLevel level, string message)

{
LogLevel currentLevel;
List<IAppender> appenders;

lock (_lock)
{
currentLevel = _currentLogLevel;
appenders = new List<IAppender>(_appenders[level]);
}

if (level < currentLevel)

{
return;
}

foreach (var appender in appenders)

{
appender.Log(message, level);
}
}

public void Debug(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Debug, message);

public void Info(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Info, message);
public void Error(string message) => Log(LogLevel.Error, message);
}
```

### 4. Implement Sample Appenders

Create appenders for different outputs, such as console and file.

```csharp
public class ConsoleAppender : IAppender
{
public void Log(string message, LogLevel level)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{DateTime.Now:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss} [{level}]
{message}");
}
}

public class FileAppender : IAppender

{
private readonly string _filePath;

public FileAppender(string filePath)

{
_filePath = filePath;
}

public void Log(string message, LogLevel level)

{
string logEntry = $"{DateTime.Now:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss} [{level}] {message}
{Environment.NewLine}";
File.AppendAllText(_filePath, logEntry);
}
}
```

### 5. Usage Example

Demonstrate how to use the logger with dynamic log level changes and appender
additions.

```csharp
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var logger = new Logger();

// Add appenders
logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Debug, new ConsoleAppender());
logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Info, new ConsoleAppender());
logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Error, new FileAppender("errors.log"));

// Log messages
logger.Debug("Debugging process started.");
logger.Info("Application initialized.");
logger.Error("An unexpected error occurred.");

// Dynamically change log level to Error

logger.CurrentLogLevel = LogLevel.Error;
logger.Info("This info message will not be logged."); // Ignored

// Add a new appender at runtime

 logger.AddAppender(LogLevel.Error, new ConsoleAppender());
logger.Error("Critical error!"); // Logged to both console and file
}
}
```

### Key Features:

- **Dynamic Log Level Adjustment**: Change the log level at runtime using
`CurrentLogLevel`.
- **Appender Flexibility**: Add multiple appenders per log level (e.g., console,
file).
- **Thread Safety**: Ensures safe concurrent access to logger configuration and
logging operations.

This implementation provides a flexible and thread-safe logging framework that

meets the specified requirements, allowing for dynamic adjustments and extensible
appender integration.