FINAL WORK

IS219 SYSTEMS SIMULATION

PRESENTATION
The purpose of the final project is for the student to develop a simulation project (real case),
for which a case of analysis (Process) will be selected, which will allow applying everything
learned in the course.
PARTICIPANTS
Groups of 5 students will be formed per team.
Each team will be advised by the course professor, who will guide them in the execution.
project.
CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING THE PROCESS.
The process has some kind of problem, for example, it is not being complied with.
time in which it must be carried out, has high operational cost or has little result
satisfactory.
2. Having access to data that corresponds to the times required to execute each
activity of the process.
3. It is necessary to define the process regarding the number of activities, the ideal for the
work is between 8 and 10 activities.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The model will be developed using Arena or Promodel software.
2. The selected topic will be one related to the profile of the field of study.
3. One must work with real statistical data collected from the system under analysis,
even if it is a minimal percentage and where no statistical data is available
They will take some assumptions.
4. The collected statistical data must be analyzed and the function must be determined.
of probability that can represent them, this will be done with the input Analyzer module
of Arena
DELIVERABLES OF THE WORK
A detailed report of the work
2. The simulation model (model 1) of the process under analysis, which represents the state
current of the system.
3. The simulation model with the proposed changes (model 2), this is the new one.
scenario that will be evaluated.
4. Databases used in the fitting of probability distribution functions for
the random variables identified in the process.
5. An annex with the results of the statistical data analysis (analysis with the Input)
Analyzer
6. PowerPoint presentation for the final exhibition.
7. The information is uploaded to a final work link in a single ZIP file
8. Each group will present the topic and the grade will be given individually.

FINAL REPORT CONTENT

1. Company Description
2. Description of the process, includes its BPMN diagram.
3. Description of the problem identifying indicators that allow us to verify the
problem in the AS-IS
4. List of Random Variables
5. Data table with a sample of cases executed through the process.
6. List of random variables identified in the process
7. Probability distribution assigned to each random variable
8. AS-IS simulation model
9. Simulation and Analysis of indicators where the problem of the process is reflected
10. Improvement Proposal for the process
11. TO-BE Simulation Models
12. Analysis of indicators where the improvement of the process is appreciated by solving the
problem identified at the beginning in the As-IS. (Confidence intervals for each
indicator
13. Cost of the improvement with a cash flow analysis of how the investment is recovered.
14. Recommendations and decision-making based on the information provided by the model
TO-BE
FIRST DELIVERABLE
For the second Sunday after classes have started, it should be uploaded to the forum.
Second week a Word file per group with the following information.
1. Brief description of the company.
2. Description of the process to be studied.
3. Describe the problem of the process.
4. Detailed process flow (BPMN)
The file must not exceed 2 pages.
SECOND DELIVERABLE
At the end of week 5, the second deliverable must be submitted to the link Second Deliverable
Online session, must contain the following points.
1. Company Description
2. Description of the process, including its BPMN diagram.
3. Description of the problem identifying indicators that will allow us to verify the
problem in the AS-IS
4. List of Random Variables
5. Data table with a sample of cases executed through the process
6. List of random variables identified in the process
7. Probability distribution assigned to each random variable
THIRD DELIVERABLE
At the end of week 7, the third deliverable must be uploaded to the link Third Deliverable session.
Online, it must contain the following points.
1. Company Description
2. Description of the process, includes its BPMN diagram.
3. Description of the problem identifying indicators that allow us to verify the
problem in the AS-IS
4. List of random variables
5. Data table with a sample of cases executed through the process
6. List of random variables identified in the process
7. Probability distribution assigned to each random variable
8. AS-IS simulation model
9. Simulation and Analysis of indicators that reflect the process problem
10. Proposal for Improvements to the process
11. TO-BE Simulation Models
12. Analysis of simulation results
13. Economic analysis of the improvement proposal
14. Support for decision-making to solve the problem
15. Conclusions and recommendations
EVALUATION
It will be carried out with the following rubric.

FINAL EVALUATION RUBRIC

IS219 Systems Simulation
Specific Competencies

Student:

IS EPE Program Outcomes

Criteria N3 N2 N1 Score
basaABET

OVERALL SCORE 20-16 15.99-13.00 12.99-00

Specific score 6.66-5.33 05.33-04.33 04.33-00.00

1. Partially design a test plan to verify the

1. Does not recognize the importance of designing a testing plan
functional and non-functional requirements of the product in development.
1. Design a test plan that verifies the requirements tests that verify the functional requirements
Modeling: Development of the Current State Process Flow.
functional and non-functional aspects of the product in development. product functionalities in development. Modeling: Development of
Construction of the F(x) of the identified V.A. in the process.
Modeling: Development of the current state process flow. Construction Flow of the current state process. Construction of the F(x) of the
Partially meets the methodological requirements.
from the F(x) of the identified V.A.s in the process. V.A. identified in the process. The methodology is not applied correctly.
2. Partially design unit test cases on the
2. Design unit test cases for the product components in 2. Does not recognize the importance of designing unit test cases
6.c1. Experimental design. components of the product in development. Process
development. Current Process: about the components of the product in development.
Partial simulation of the current state and identification of
Complete simulation of the current state and identification of issues. Current Process: There is no simulation of the current state e
problematic.
3. Design quality assurance models according to at least one identification of the problem.
3. Partially design quality assurance models
quality assurance model Development of indicators that 3. Partially knows quality assurance models.
agreement with at least one quality assurance model.
allow to verify the identified issues. Design of No Develop indicators that allow to verify the
Partial development of indicators that allow verifying the
improvement alternatives for the process. Define efficiency goal. identified issue. Partial design of alternatives for
identified problem. Design of improvement alternatives for
improvements for the process. Does not clearly define the efficiency goal.
the process. Define Efficiency Goal.

Specific score 6.67-5.33 05.33-04.33 04:33-00:00

1. Implement functional and non-functional tests of the product according to 1. Implement functional and non-functional tests with difficulty of Understands but does not implement functional tests
with the developed design. What if? product according to the developed design. Question What if?. functionalities of the product according to the developed design.
Simulation of the new process scenarios with the alternatives of Simulation of the new process scenarios with difficulty Question What if?. Simulation of the process without testing the
improve proposals in the current process. to test the proposed improvement alternatives in the process proposed improvement alternatives in the current process.
2. Implement unit tests on the product components, of actual. understands but does not develop unit tests on the
agreement with the design developed. Desired Process. Development of 2. Implement unit tests on the components with difficulty. product components, according to the developed design.
desired processes through scenario comparison. of the product, according to the developed design. Desired Process. Partial development of the desired processes without
3. Carry out cleanups on the components of the built product. Desired Process. Partial development of the desired processes to comparison of scenarios.
Model Adjustment. Develop F(x) for activities that are through scenario comparison. 3. Do not carry out purifications on the product components
affected by the improvement proposal. 3. Makes difficult purifications on the components of built. Adjustment of
6.c2. Development of experiments. 4. Measure the main quality attributes of a development project constructed products. Model Adjustment. Model. Does not develop new F(x) for the activities that
The ability to develop y to carry
a cable
the proper experimentation, analyze e engineering product. Efficiency Goal. Partial development of the new F(x) for the activities that they are affected by the improvement proposal.
ABET 6
interpret data, use judgment
y of Validate efficiency goal. be affected by the improvement proposal. 4. does not consider the measurement of quality attributes of a
engineering to draw conclusions
4. Partially measures the main quality attributes of an engineering product development project.
of engineering product development. Efficiency Goal. Valid Efficiency Goal. Invalid Efficiency Goal.
partially the efficiency goal

Specific score 6.67-5.34 05.33-04.34 04.33-00.00

Analyze and interpret the results generated during the functional tests.
of the solution. Confidence Intervals. functional tests of the solution. Confidence Intervals. functional tests of the solution. Confidence Intervals. No
Construction of confidence intervals for each defined indicator. Partial construction of confidence intervals for each There is Construction of Confidence Intervals for each
2. Analyze and interpret the results of the non-functional tests defined indicator. defined indicator.
(performance) carried out on the solution. Interpretation of 2. Analyze and partially interpret the results of the tests not 2. Analyze and interpret the results of the tests no
Indicators. Efficiency measures assigning the level of reliability. functional (performance) tests carried out on the solution. functional (performance) tasks carried out on the solution. Interpretation
3. Analyze and conclude on the results of the measurements of the Interpretation of Indicators attributes. Efficiency measures with the level of Indicators. Efficiency measures with the level of
quality of a solution development project. Make decisions. partially interpreted reliability. uninterpreted reliability.
Determine the desired process based on the choice of the best performance. Partially analyze the results of the measurements of the attributes. Do not analyze and conclude on the results of the measurements.
that meets the efficiency measure. of quality a development project of the solution. the quality attributes of a solution development project.
6.c3. Analysis and interpretation of 4. Apply appropriate modern tools in an informed manner to the Make decisions. Determine desired process based on the Make decisions. Determine desired process without analysis of
data/results established processes in a typical project for developing a solution in partial election of the performance of the efficiency measure. performance of the efficiency measure.
engineering. Economic analysis of the 4. Knows but does not apply appropriate modern tools to the 4. partially knows modern tools appropriate for the
proposal. Cash flow. Explain how and in what time the recovery is achieved. established processes in a typical development project of a established processes in a typical software development project
investment. engineering solution. Economic analysis of the engineering solution. Economic analysis of the proposal.
proposal. Partial cash flow. It partially explains how and in Partial cash flow. Does not explain how and in what time it occurs.
how long does it take to recover the investment. recovers the investment.

TOTAL 0