(GUID NUMBER) DPP Assignment 2 Cover Document
(GUID NUMBER) DPP Assignment 2 Cover Document
Assignment 2
AI Statement
Note: A copy of this statement with the cover page and feedback form is available on Moodle.
The aim of the programme is to develop your skills, knowledge, dispositions and ability to
critically evaluate, and apply these, for your future as English language teachers. An AI-generated
output ‘replicates biased results, and does not provide contextualised, evaluated or critiqued
evaluation of information’ (UofG position). If submitted as your own work, you are not working
with academic integrity and the work does not meet the University Regulations for Assessment.
As unethical AI use does not adequately allow you to bring your own learning experiences to the
learning and assessment process. Specific programme guidelines on AI use and
acknowledgement can be found here: programme guidelines.
It is important therefore that any use of AI tools are employed ‘effectively, ethically, critically,
and transparently’ (UofG position), and that you seek guidance from your tutors on what is
allowed and what is not.
‘If you make use of AI at any point in your research or writing process, no matter at what stage,
you must acknowledge the use of that source/platform as you would any other piece of
evidence/material in your submission’ UofG position.
If you have used AI, describe in detail how you have used and referenced it here:
2024-2025 1
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2024-2025 2
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
All assignments are marked according to the University moderation and second marking policy. For
further details, see http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_216411_en.pdf
Assignments are assessed and graded according to the University of Glasgow’s Code of Assessment
(http://senate.gla.ac.uk/academic/assessments/scheda.html).* Marks are subject to moderation by
External Examiners and confirmation at the meeting of the Board of Examiners. Until then, all marks are
to be regarded as provisional.
Agreed Grade
Please note that this grade is provisional on ratification by the Examination Board
o Analyse a specific aspect of language learning and select relevant learning tasks and materials
for the development of this area in a specific context.
o Demonstrate an ability to plan a series of connected lessons & show that you can sequence
lessons and activities/tasks.
2024-2025 3
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
*You must ensure you follow appropriate conventions for referring to sources/background reading. Failure to do so
can be construed as plagiarism. This can have serious consequences, including failing the assignment. See the
University Senate web pages for more information.
http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/senateoffice/studentcodes/staff/plagiarism/
2024-2025 4
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 5
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
suitable language strategies in intercultural contexts (Mu & Yu, 2023). Since this course is
designed for students from non-English majors, they may have fewer opportunities to be exposed
to foreign cultures. Therefore, the course should employ authentic English materials and adopt
social contexts from international communication during practice, which can help students
develop intercultural communicative competence. In addition, besides acquiring fundamental
theoretical knowledge and vocabulary, this course should help students practice oral
communication in authentic business contexts.
However, some students may present low engagement in speaking activities because of teacher-
led classroom management, limited tolerance for pauses or silence, and insufficient opportunities
for authentic language production (Tsui, 1996; Swain, 1985, as cited in Zhang & Head, 2010).
This shows the importance of adapting teaching strategies to suit the learning preferences of
Chinese college students. This will be further discussed in Section 2.4.
1.3 Materials
Based on the mentioned learners’ profile and requirements, the main teaching
material selected for this course is English for Socializing, which was designed
for those who wish to build rapport with international clients and colleagues
and maintain successful business relationships with them (Gore & Smith,
2007). In this textbook, Unit 1 and Unit 3 are selected for this course because
they provide clear guidance on how to make greetings and contact, keep
small talk and shift to business, which is acceptable and practical for Business
English beginners.
The difficulty of this textbook is appropriately suited for B1-B2 learners. Most
vocabulary and phrases are basic and practical. However, they can reflect
natural usage in authentic business contexts. For example, in Appendix 2
Figure 3, the textbooks presents several easy but natural phrases to make
contact with clients like “Greet to see you again”, “Can I help with your
bags?”. However, it still contains some expressions that students may be
unfamiliar with (e.g., “There was some turbulence”, “Uneventful, thank you”
(Appendix 2 Figure 2)). This aligns with Krashen’s “i+1” theory (1982),
offering accessible but little challenging expressions through meaningful
context.
Furthermore, this material provides a wide range of authentic business
contexts for students to learn useful expressions and practice speaking
output. For example, when practicing small talk, a highly authentic
2024-2025 6
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 7
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
in discourse accurately (Liu, 2006). This may be due to the lack of emphasis on the development
of pragmatic competence in Chinese college ELT. Wen (2018) pointed out that primary college
ELT teaching methods in China are text-centered and input-based, which means the commanding
the text is regarded as the final goal rather than practical language use. This separates language
learning from language use, which may lead to the phenomenon of “dumb English” (Dai, 2001, as
cited in Wen, 2018). Moreover, because Chinese ELT materials and assessment primarily focus on
written input and grammatical structures, it is difficult for students to transfer their learning to
authentic communicative contexts (Wen, 2018). Similarly, Rao (2002) pointed out that most
Chinese college students preferred to non-communicative activities such as grammar drills,
translation exercises, and reading comprehension. However, they are less frequently engaged in
oral activities like role plays, group discussions and interviews. This can reflect that their
oral training is not enough and it will probably make them hard to deal with
the conversation demands in natural contexts. Therefore, college ELT in China
should employ a pragmatics-oriented approach by strengthening oral training
and creating authentic communicative environments. Furthermore, it is
necessary to improve students’ cross cultural knowledge, helping them to
identify pragmatic cues, speaker’s intent, and speech acts in English.
2.3 Task-Based Language Teaching for Developing Students’
Pragmatic Competence
Based on the challenges discussed in Section 2.2, it is important to adopt
effective teaching methods to help Chinese college EFL learners to improve
their pragmatic competence in authentic communication contexts. There are
several pedagogical strategies which have been proved to be effective for
developing students’ pragmatic competence and Task-Based Language
Teaching (TBLT) is widely accepted as one of the most widely-adopted
teaching methods in this field. However, because of the specific features of
Chinese college students such as limited speaking practice, high reliance on
textbooks, and low engagement in interactive activities (Zhang & Head, 2010;
Wen, 2018; Liu, 2006), TBLT probably need to be adjusted to better suit their
learning habits and classroom situations.
TBLT is an ELT strategy based on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and theories of
Second Language Acquisition (SLA). It organizes language learning through real world
communicative tasks and emphasizes the use of language for meaning rather than grammar drills
(Long, 1985; Candlin, 1987; Breen, 1989; Prabhu, 1987, as cited in Ellis et al., 2020). In TBLT,
2024-2025 8
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
tasks share four core characteristics: they are meaning-focused, involve some kind of information
gap, encourage learner autonomy in language use, and target at a clearly defined communicative
outcome (Ellis & Shintani, 2014). Many researches has demonstrated that TBLT can effectively
enhance learners’ communicative competence, making it particularly suitable for pedagogical
contexts that prioritize authentic language use (Ellis et al., 2020).
However, Ellis et al. (2020) pointed out that TBLT may encounter several challenges during
implementation. One significant issue is the difficulty of some tasks is hard to be assessed and
many students may have difficulty understanding the task requirements. Additionally, because
TBLT emphasizes learner autonomy and self-directed learning, the teacher guidance may be
neglected. Wen (2016) noted that TBLT in China may overemphasize students’ autonomous
practice while marginalizing the teacher’s instruction role. This absence of instructional support
can often lead to low learning efficiency.
To address this challenge, explicit instruction can be adopted as a complementary strategy. This
strategy is triggered by the teacher, instructional content, or classroom design, which aims to
actively guide learners to notice and understand pragmatic features in language use by explicitly
explaining the rules of language use and mechanisms of meaning (Ifantidou, 2013). Many studies
found that explicit instruction can significantly improve learners’ ability to identify implied
meaning in authentic texts and enhance learners’ attention to pragmatic features and help them
facilitate the internalization of language input (Ifantidou, 2013; Ishihara & Cohen, 2014).
Therefore, before TBLT activities like role plays, explicit instruction can provide essential
scaffolding through helping students understand the task objectives and the communicative
intentions involved. It should also include the review of relevant language expressions that help
learners internalize language input and apply it in real communication. This approach can enhance
the effectiveness of the task and avoid the issue noted by Wen (2016), where increased learner
output is mostly incidental rather than the result of systematic instructional design.
2.4 Addressing Students’ Silence in the Speaking Classroom
As what discussed in Section 3, TBLT activities like role plays are useful for
teaching pragmatic competence. However, it might be difficult for Chinese
students to adapt. This can result in classroom silence and reduced
participation (Zhang & Head, 2010). This reticence is probably influenced by
multiple factors. Initially, many students especially those with lower language
proficiency tend to be afraid of making mistakes and losing face. This may
lead to communication anxiety and decrease their willing ro make oral
production (Allwright & Bailey, 1991; Tudor, 1996; Ho & Crookall, 1995, as
cited in Zhang & Head, 2010). Additionally, some teachers’ tolerance of
2024-2025 9
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
silence is low and students’ thinking time will be reduced, which may
discourage their participation motivation (Tsui, 1996, as cited in Zhang &
Head, 2010). Moreover, the traditional Asian education which emphasizes
teacher authority may hinder students from expressing personal opinions (Ho
& Crookall, 1995; Liu, 1998, as cited in Zhang & Head, 2010).
In order to address this issue, Zhang and Head (2010) advocated the use of a negotiated syllabus,
which emphasizes shared decision-making between teachers and students and encourages learners
to participate in course plan and activities (Breen and Littlejohn, 2000). Zhang and Head (2010)
pointed out that negotiated syllabus significantly enhanced students’ participation and sense of
responsibility, improved their motivation and confidence, and reduced classroom reticence.
However, this might not be suitable for Business English elective course for beginners. In Zhang
and Head’s study, some students reported that they lacked confidence in their English ability and
expressed a preference for listening to teacher-centred lectures. This reflects that beginners
probably are not able to take on an active role in the classroom, especially in selecting learning
content or planning activities. Therefore, for beginners of Business English, effective negotiation
with the teacher is probably not feasible, which indicates that instruction should remain teacher-
led in design. However, students’ freedom to express themselves cannot be ignored. Therefore, an
approach that strikes a balance between structure and learner autonomy should be adopted.
To meet this balance, Hunter (2012) proposed delayed corrective feedback (CF) strategy, which
provides a practical and low-anxiety way to improve students’ pragmatic competence by allowing
students to speak freely without being corrected immediately. During student-led speaking tasks,
the teacher should listen silently, note errors, and give written or recorded feedback after class.
This can help avoid embarrassment and allows students to notice their mistakes more comfortably
(Schmidt & Frota, 1986, as cited in Hunter, 2012).
Although Hunter (2012) believed that the learning content should be decided by students instead
of teachers, the feedback method he suggested still keeps a clear teacher-led structure and gives
students chances to speak. This method is especially suitable for Business English beginners who
are not ready to help plan the course and it may improve speaking participation, raise language
awareness, and reduce silence in Chinese EFL classrooms.
3. Theoretical Applications in the Three-Lesson Sequence
3.1 The Sequencing of the Three Lessons
This three-lesson course follows Graves’ (1996) sequencing principles in two core ways. First,
this lesson moves from simple to complex, from concrete to open-ended activities. In Lesson 1,
students are asked to practice simple expressions like “Nice to meet you” and “How was your
2024-2025 10
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
flight?” (Appendix 1a Task 1). Lesson 2 extends this by teaching students how to ask about
hobbies and mutual acquaintances to keep the conversation going. In Lesson 3, students should
decide how and when to shift from small talk to formal business talk. They also need to choose
appropriate phrases like “Shall we begin?” or “Let’s move on to the agenda?” according to
different listeners to conduct small talk and make transition (Appendix 1c Task 1). Second, key
phrases such as greetings, weather talk, and travel questions are recycled across lessons to support
retention and fluency. For example, at the beginning of both Lesson 2 and Lesson 3, a review
activity is included to ask students to recall what they learned in the previous lesson (Appendix 1b
Appendix 1c Stage Plan). Additionally, Lesson 2 Task 4 requires students to do greetings while
Lesson 3 Task 1 asks them to start small talk.
3.2 How Theories Are Integrated in Each Lesson Activity
3.21 Lesson 1: Making Contact: Greetings and Small Talk (Appendix
1a)
This lesson aims to help students learn how to greet and start small talk in a business context. The
warm-up reduces anxiety and activates personal knowledge. It can give students a safe start,
which is important for Chinese learners who often hesitate in speaking (Zhang & Head, 2010).
The matching task (Appendix 1a Task 1) is directly taken from the textbook (Appendix 2 Figure
2), but it is used differently. Instead of simple drill, it uses a task aiming to help students
understand why some responses are more polite or suitable than others. This supports their
illocutionary competence (Bachman, 1990) and prepares them for later use. The listening task’s
(Appendix 1a Task 2) material is adapted from Appendix 3 Figure 1. It combines three separate
dialogues from the textbook into one integrated airport pick-up conversation, which provides
contextualized input and helps students notice how language can be used in real situations. The
next teacher-led explanation (Appendix 1a Task 3) also supports explicit instruction (Ifantidou,
2013), which can let students learn about tone, purpose, and cultural meaning of these phrases. In
the role-play (Appendix 1a Task 4), students practice what they learned using real roles like host
and visitor. To support students’ confidence and accuracy, useful phrases was provided during the
role-play task. This aligns with the principles of explicit instruction and helps learners focus on
appropriate expressions in context. For Chinese students who often struggle with spontaneous
speech (Zhang & Head, 2010), this may reduce their anxiety of making mistakes (Ellis et al.,
2020) and supports more fluent and polite interaction and enhance their awareness of how
pragmatic forms fit different roles and situations (Bachman, 1990). The final reflection gives
delayed feedback, which lets students improve with less pressure (Schmidt & Frota, 1986, as cited
in Hunter, 2012).
3.22 Lesson 2: Getting Acquainted: Extending Small Talk and Building
2024-2025 11
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 12
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Handford, 2010). This presentation helps them choose suitable language for different situations,
which is often difficult for Chinese students due to limited input (Wen, 2018).
4. Limitations
A key limitation of this lesson is the contradiction between English as a Lingua Franca (ELF)
principles and classroom practice. ELF encourages respect for English varieties, including China
English. However, this course asked students to avoid certain local expressions to ensure cultural
appropriateness in international business settings. For instance, Mu and Yu (2023) noted that some
Chinese students were unaware that “666” is taboo in Western culture but it is often used in China
as praise. Ideally, a separate lesson on intercultural taboos would help students avoid such
misunderstandings. Apart from avoiding taboos, students need not to deliberately imitate Western
English but to ensure their communication is appropriate, polite, and intelligible. Yet, due to time
constraints, the course could not fully address these issues.
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford
University Press.
Breen, M. P., & Littlejohn, A. (2000). Classroom decision-making: Negotiation and
process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (n.d.). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning,
teaching, assessment – Global scale (Table 1). https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-
framework-reference-languages/table-1-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-global-scale
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language
teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language
acquisition research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796580
Gore, S., & Smith, A. (2007). English for socializing. Oxford University Press.
Hunter, J. (2012). ‘Small talk’: Developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT
Journal, 66(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq093
2024-2025 13
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language
and culture meet. Routledge.
Liu, J. D. (2006). Assessing EFL learners’ interlanguage pragmatic knowledge: Implications for testers
and teachers. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–22.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2025). Teaching standards for business
English programmes (Higher Vocational Education – College level).
http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A07/zcs_ztzl/2017_zt06/17zt06_bznr/bznr_zyjyzyjxbz/gdzyjy_zk/
zk_jyytydl/jyytydl_yyl/202502/P020250207554543068266.pdf
Mu, Y., & Yu, B. (2023). Developing intercultural competence in college business English students: A
study of innovative teaching in China. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
92, 101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101747
Ren, W. (2023). Small talk is not small: A commentary on pragmatics studies on small talk
(postscript). Acta Linguistica Academica, 70(4), 524–528.
https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00737
Wen, Q. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China.
Language Teaching, 51(4), 526–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481600001X
Zhang, X., & Head, K. (2010). Dealing with learner reticence in the speaking class. ELT Journal,
64(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp018
Zheng, L., & Huang, J. (2010). A study of Chinese EFL learners’ pragmatic failure and the
implications for college English teaching. Polyglossia, 18, 41–54.
2024-2025 14
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
how to greet or begin small talk when first meeting an unfamiliar foreigner due to limited
exposure to real-life English use.
Lesson Aim: To develop students’ competence of starting greetings and first-contact small
talk in semi-formal situations. By the end of the class, students should have the ability to use
polite and natural phrases to greet a visitor and ask appropriate introductory questions.
Stage Plan:
Stage Interacti Aims (Why) Procedure (What)
and on
Timing
Warm- T-S Activate students’ T asks students: “What
up background do you usually say
(5 mins) knowledge on when you meet
greetings and someone for the first
small talk. time in English?”;
“Have you ever made
small talk with your
friends?” Then, T
introduces the
importance of good
greetings and small
talk.
Match S-S Help students Students match
phrases identify common phrases like “Nice to
with greeting meet you” or “How was
answers expressions and your flight?” to their
(10mins) their purposes. probable answers
Listenin T-S Help students T plays the record and
g task understand target Students listen to a
(10 language in short dialogue of a host
mins) context and greeting a visitor and
improve they complete a gap-fill
comprehension. task.
Languag T-S Review the form T reviews the answers,
e focus and meaning of leads students to drill
& the core phrases. pronunciation, and
clarificat explains usage and
ion (15 cultural meaning.
mins)
Role- S-S T-S Practice learned Students take roles
play phrases in (visitor and host) in
task (15 simulated pairs and act a short
mins) dialogue. first meeting, using
language learned from
the class. T give
feedback.
Feedbac T-S Review the T provides feedback on
k& context and frequent errors and
reflectio reflect on use of leads students to share
n (5 expressions. which strategies were
mins) most useful and where
they felt uncomfortable.
2024-2025 15
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
Materials: English for Socializing, Unit 1 (Gore & Smith, 2007, Oxford University
Press). The class activities are all adapted from this textbook.
2024-2025 16
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 18
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 19
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 20
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
Emma: Hey Jack, are there any nice places to go running around here?
Jack: Yeah, there’s a park just behind the office. I go there sometimes before
work.
Emma: Sounds nice. My daughter and I enjoy playing chess in the evenings. It
helps her focus.
Jack: Oh, that’s cool. Have you ever done tai chi? I really enjoy it on
weekends.
Emma: I’ve seen it in the park, but never tried. How often do you go to the
gym?
Jack: Twice a week, if I’m lucky. But I’ve played the piano since I was a child—
keeps me sane.
Emma: That’s impressive! Last summer we went windsurfing almost every
day. It was amazing.
Jack: Nice! I used to do aerobics when I was younger, but not anymore.
Emma: Same here. I wish I had time to do more sport these days.
2024-2025 21
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 22
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 23
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 24
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
2024-2025 25
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 1)
2024-2025 26
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 2)
(Figure 3)
2024-2025 27
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 4)
(Figure 5)
2024-2025 28
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 6)
(Figure 7)
2024-2025 29
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 8)
(Figure 9)
2024-2025 30
MSc TESOL School of Education & EAS, School of Modern Languages & Cultures
(Figure 10)
References of Appendix
Gore, S., & Smith, A. (2007). English for socializing. Oxford University Press.
2024-2025 31