Ipr - GD
Ipr - GD
Page 1 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
Page 2 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
UNIT 4
UNIT 5
Page 3 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
SYNOPSIS :
✓ Introduction
✓ Concept of IPR
✓ Historical background of the IPR
✓ Development of IPR in India
✓ Different forms of IPR
✓ Conclusion
Page 4 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Introduction :
History of IPR :
Page 5 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 6 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 7 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 8 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion :
Page 9 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis :
➢ Introduction
➢ Concept of Patent
➢ Principles of Patent law in India
➢ Procedure of obtaining Patents
➢ Conclusion
Introduction :
Concept of Patent :
Page 10 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
All primary legislation was abolished by the Indian Patent Laws and
Design Act of 1911. The Patents Act of 1970, coupled with the
Patent Rules of 1972, was put to work on April 20, 1972, and it
changed the 1911 Indian Patent and Design Act. The Patent Act is
based mainly on the suggestions of Justice Ann’s Ayyangar
Committee, which Rajagopala Iyengar chairs. One of the
suggestions was to grant patents under process for inventions
relating to pharmaceuticals, medications, food, and chemicals.
Page 11 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 12 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 13 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
If you’re still developing your product’s early stages, you can file a
provisional application. It has the following advantages:
The deadline for filing
Full specifications must be submitted within 12 months
More affordable
Page 14 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
The review report will result in some form of objections for most
patent applicants. The most acceptable course of action is to
discuss the review report with a patent specialist and respond to
the objections raised in the report.
Page 15 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis :
➢ Introduction
➢ Patent Specification and it’s Importance
➢ Kinds of Specification
➢ Legal requisites for its submission
➢ Conclusion
Introduction :
Page 16 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Section 7(4) of the Patents Act, 1970 (the Act) directs that every
patent application shall be accompanied by a provisional or a
complete specification. The Patent Rules, 2003 (the Rules) also
particularly deal with the specification of an invention.
Kinds of Specification :
1. Provisional Specification:
Page 17 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
2. Complete Specification:
Page 18 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 19 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Claim(s): To say the least, claims section is the most critical part
of a patent application. This is because the patentability of an
invention is determined by them. Claims clearly lay out the scope of
the invention for which protection is sought. Claims should cover
important aspects of the invention, such as novelty. This section
should be written in a manner to provide the broadest possible
coverage and protection for the invention, while remaining novel and
non-obvious in light of the existing technologies or art.
Conclusion :
Page 20 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
6m
1. Patentee’s Rights
2. Infringement of patent .
Concept of Patent :
Page 21 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Infringement of patent :
Page 22 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Unit-2
1. Define mark? Essential features of trademark & different
types of trademark? Ap21,22
Synopsis
• Introduction
• Define mark?
• Essential of trademark
• Different types of trademark
• Conclusion
Introduction :
Page 23 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Definition:
Under The Trade Marks Act, 1999, the word “mark” is defined
under Section 2(1)(i)(V)(m) as “a device, brand, heading, label,
ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral”. The term “Mark”
under the Act also includes the shape of goods, packaging, or
combination of colours or any other type of combination.
Page 24 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Types of Trademarks :
Page 25 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
1. Device marks:
2. Service marks:
They are used in a service business where actual goods under the
mark are not traded.
3. Collective Marks:
4. Certification Marks:
Page 26 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
5.Well-known marks:
Page 27 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Logomark only contains a symbol without any words but at the same
time it encodes a brand message. However, it requires
advertisement reports to make this mark recognisable. Examples of
logomark include the famous bitten apple of the Apple company.
Page 28 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis
• Introduction
• Trademark?
• Essentials?
• Registration of trademark:
• Grounds of refusal to trademark
Introduction:
Page 29 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Registration of trademarks
The person who is the proprietor of the trademark should apply for
the registration of the trademark with proper fees in the office of
the trademark registry under whose territorial limit or jurisdiction
the main place of business will be.
Page 30 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 31 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Section 9(2) of the Act further provides that the absolute grounds
for refusal of a trademark will be :
Page 32 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
of the Defendant. The Court also noted that the use of the word,
Sony by the Defendant did not cause any confusion among the
consumers. It also took note of the inordinate delay of the
Plaintiff in approaching the Court, and granted Defendants Rs. 25,
000/- as costs.
Section 2(1)(h) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 defines the word
“deceptively similar” as “A mark shall be deemed to be deceptively
similar to another mark if it so nearly resembles that other mark
as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion.
Page 33 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Unit 4
Synopsis :
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
Introduction
Page 34 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 35 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 36 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
The Registrar may from time to time with subject to certain terms
and conditions permit either before or after the acceptance of the
application, the correction of any error or an amendment of the
application.
Page 37 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion:
Synopsis:
➢ Introduction
➢ Definition
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
Introduction:
Page 38 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ Meaning& definition of geographical indications
➢ Offenses under GI act 1999
➢ Conclusion
Page 39 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion :
Page 40 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis :
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
Introduction:
Page 41 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cheddar, in the UK), and when a term has already been registered
as a trademark.
Legal Definition
Page 42 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 43 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion:
Page 44 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
The main grounds for opposition were that both Pakistan and India
produce Basmati, and, thereby it was a joint product of both the
Page 45 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Unit 3
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction
Page 46 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 47 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
spread around the world without paying any cost to its creator for
his labor on the invention.
Kinds of E-Commerce
Page 48 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 49 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
There are several parts of websites which are vested with the
protection of different kinds of Intellectual Property.
Page 50 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 51 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction:
Page 52 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 53 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Schedule 1 gives the documents and data where the Act is not
applicable.
Further, this act amended the Indian Penal Code 1860, the Indian
Evidence Act 1872, the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act 1891, and the
Reserve Bank of India Act 1934. The objectives of the Act are as
follows:
Page 54 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 55 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
➢ Senior police officers and other officers can enter any public
place and search and arrest without warrant
➢ Provisions for the constitution of a Cyber Regulations Advisory
Committee to advise the Central Government and Controller.
Applicability
Section 1 (2) along with Section 75, specifies that the Act is
applicable to any offence or contravention committed outside India
as well. If the conduct of person constituting the offence involves
a computer or a computerized system or network located in India,
then irrespective of his/her nationality, the person is punishable
under the Act.
Non-Applicability
Page 56 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion:
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction
Page 57 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 58 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyberbullying
Page 59 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 60 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyberstalking
Cyber defamation
Page 61 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyber fraud
Page 62 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyber theft
Yahoo!, Inc. v. Akash Arora (1999), which was one of the initial
cases related to cyber theft in India. In this case, the defendant
was accused of using the trademark or domain name
‘yahooindia.com,’. The Court ordered a permanent injunction under
Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC in this case.
Page 63 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Spyware
Page 64 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Attacks by virus
Salami attack
Page 65 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Web Jacking
There are no specific provisions dealing with web jacking under any
Indian law. However, it can be punished under Section 383 of IPC,
which primarily deals with extortion. The punishment for web
jacking under Section 383 of IPC is imprisonment of up to three
years or with a fine, or both.
Page 66 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Data diddling
Page 67 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyber pornography
Cyber terrorism
Page 68 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Cyber Espionage
Page 69 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
➢ Military data
➢ Academic research-related data
➢ Intellectual property
➢ Politically strategic data, etc.
➢ an illegal act, or
➢ an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement
is designated a criminal conspiracy.
Further, any Indian who abets cyber espionage against India can
be also punished under Section 121 of IPC, which deals with
waging, attempting, or abetting waging war against the Government
of India. The punishment prescribed for the same is the death
sentence, imprisonment for life, and a fine.
Conclusion
Page 70 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction
Meaning of E governance
Page 71 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Objectives of E governance:
Page 72 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 73 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
where any law for time being in force contains provision for audit
of documents, record or information, then such provision shall also
be applicable for audit of documents, records or information
processed and maintain in electronic records.
Page 74 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, bye law,
notification or any other matter shall be published in official
gazette, then such requirements shall be deemed to have been
satisfied if such rule, regulation, order, bye law , notification or
any other matter is published in official gazette or electronic
gazette.
Page 75 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Bhoomi:
This project was started by the state of karnatka which involves
computerization of more than 200 treasuries all over the state and
it was mainly for computerization of land record system.
Conclusion:
Synopsis
Page 76 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction:
Page 77 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Indian Penal Code, 1860: Indian Criminal Law does not explicitly
discuss data privacy infringements. Responsibility for these
infringements must be derived from similar offenses under the
Indian Penal Code. For example, Section 403 of the Indian Penal
Code imposes a criminal penalty for dishonest misuse or conversion
of “movable property” for one’s usage.
Page 78 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
third parties to use the data. In general, the customer would like
to keep their data confidential.
Attribution license
Page 79 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Section 2(o) of the Copyright Act, 1957 specifies that, unless the
purpose otherwise requires, literary work contains computer
programs, tables, and compilations, including computer databases.
The Copyright Act, 1957, therefore, also provides for the
protection of data content. The same is evident if we give an
objective and up-to-date interpretation of the provisions of the
Copyright Act.
Page 80 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 81 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion
Synopsis
➢ Introduction
➢ .
➢ .
➢ .
➢ Conclusion
Introduction
Section 2(h), of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, tells us that the
term ‘contract’ is an agreement that is enforceable under the law.
Interestingly, in the case of an E-Contract, the essence of Section
2(h) is still sustained by only tweaking the mode in which the
Contract comes into existence.
Page 82 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
➢ Offer
➢ Acceptance to Offer
➢ Consensus ad Idem
➢ Lawful Consideration
Page 83 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Kinds of e-contracts
Page 84 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Clickwrap Agreements
The Scroll Wrap Agreements require the user to scroll down the
License Agreements, implying that it has been read by the user by
scrolling down through the terms and conditions before they can
give their assent or rejection.
Page 85 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Electronic Signatures
Stamping of e- contract
Page 86 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion
UNIT 5
Synopsis :
➢ Introduction
➢ History of Paris Convention
➢ Paris Convention guarantees the protection of IP
➢ Importance of Paris Convention
➢ Conclusion
Introduction :
Page 87 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 88 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 89 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Case law :
Page 90 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion :
Synopsis :
➢ Introduction
➢ World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO)
➢ Organs of WIPO
➢ Functions of WIPO
➢ Conclusion
Introduction :
Page 91 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
WIPO : [6m]
Page 92 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 93 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Functions of WIPO :
Synopsis :
➢ Introduction
Page 94 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Introduction : [6m]
There are two treaties that govern the system: the Madrid
agreement of 1891 and the Madrid protocol of 1989. Its provisions
made the Madrid system more modern and flexible, and have led to
its global expansion. Through the Madrid system, WIPO offers
centralized registration and management of international trademarks.
Rather than having to file numerous applications for each separate
export market, with the Madrid system, an enterprise needs to file
only one application in one language at one national or regional
trademark office by paying through one currency.
Page 95 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 96 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Conclusion :
It's essential to note that specific details and procedures may vary
based on whether a country is a party to the Madrid Agreement,
the Madrid Protocol, or both. Additionally, the Madrid System
operates alongside national trademark systems, complementing rather
than replacing them.
6m
3. Convention countries
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) conventions involve international
agreements that establish standards for the protection of
intellectual property across borders. Some key conventions include:
Page 97 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 98 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
Page 99 of 101
Intellectual property Rights-1(IPR-1)
It's important to note that while the PCT assists in the initial
stages, obtaining actual patent rights still requires filing national or
regional applications within specific timeframes and complying with
the requirements of each designated country or region.
5. Co – ordination committee of WIPO
1. WIPO General Assembly: This is the highest decision-making
body of WIPO, composed of member states. It meets annually and
decides on major policy and budgetary issues.