SIMOPs
SIMOPs
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPs)
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOP INCIDENT
In October 2024, a Refinery experienced an H2S release that claimed the lives of
two workers and affected many others. The job involved a line-breaking (opening
a line) that occurred amongst two simultaneous maintenance operations.
The line break job occurred in one process unit that was undergoing extensive
routine maintenance activities (some aspects of the process were operational).
This area was next to another neighboring process unit undergoing a major
Turnaround (the process was fully shutdown).
Work crews moved between each maintenance activity. Safety protocols differed
slightly between each maintenance activity. While Permitting protocols were
similar, certain aspects could be different depending if the job was for the process
unit undergoing regular maintenance (some aspects of the process being
operational), versus a process undergoing a turnaround (the process was fully
shutdown). The same held for Blinding, gas monitoring and area access.
Due to contractor confusion of the requirements between the two activities and
poor communications, the wrong process line was opened, releasing sour gas. The
H2S not only killed a worker engaged in the line-breaking activity but also a worker
on the Turnaround in the adjoining process area.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOPs
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOPs
SIMOP should be identified as early as possible in the project planning stage and then
bought into the Project Execution / Commissioning Plan.
• The use of a standard Permit To Work (PTW) system facilitated by SIMOPS area
plot plans. Allows for transition when switching from the construction PTW system
and allows the operators and the Contractor to become familiar with an Operations
PTW as they were both involved with work inside the operating plant. The SIMOPS
area plot plans are updated with input from all organizations involved. This input
makes it clear who controls specific permits in each area minimizing delays and
incidents caused by mismanaged PTW interfaces.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOPs PLAN
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
TASK / WORK ACTIVITY INVENTORY
• From the Project Plan, develop a list of all activities (tasks,
work activity, jobs, etc.) that are to occur. Along with the
listing, identify the location and timing for each activity.
• Sample List Of Project Activities
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample SIMOPs Layout
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
RISK ASSESSMENT & HAZARD ANALYSIS
Each job task or activity ideally should already have a JSA (Job Safety
Analysis) or a JHA (Job Hazard Analysis). However, usually the analysis
is internal to the job/task – that is, the hazards of doing the job/task
itself are assessed. If not also done, then the JSA/JHA should be
expanded to consider external factors – that is, how the job/task
presents a hazard externally as well as what external hazards could
affect the job/task.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample List of
Hazards
(not all inclusive)
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOP PLAN
Planning of a SIMOP may consider:
• Asset integrity factors
• Environmental factors
• Equipment pressures & temperatures
• National rules and regulations
• International rules and regulations
• Operator rules and regulations
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
SIMOP PLAN
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample List Of
SIMOPs Risk Reduction Methods
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
While a SIMOPS Matrix and the MOPO can define the plan
for managing SIMOPS, a means to clarify the roles involved
in SIMOPS as well as the Responsibilities and Authorities
personnel involved may have. Because each work activity
may have it’s own Authorized/Responsible persons(s), and
therefore a number of work activities will result in a number
or Authorities/Responsible parties, there can be conflict
amongst the decision makers on what gets done, when and
how the activity is executed.
To avoid these potential conflicts, the Roles &
Responsibilities in a SIMOP must be defined and agree in
advance. A RACI Chart is a typical tool used to define who is
Responsible, Accountable, Consulted or Informed only.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 1 RACI Chart
Responsible: These are the Accountable: This is the Consulted: These are the Informed: These are the
individuals who actually complete individual/body who carries the sign-off individuals who must be individuals who must be
the task or activity and are (“yes” or “no”) authority and has full consulted prior to a final informed after a decision or
responsible for action and/or veto power for process scope and decision or action. “Consult” action is taken because they, in
implementation. Responsibility is deliverables. It is important to clarify the implies two-way turn, may take action or make a
often shared, with each levels of accountability and to communication. decision based on the output.
individual’s degree of responsibility distinguish between management “Inform” is FYI and implies only
determined by the individual with accountability and operational one-way communication.
the “A”. accountability. Only one “A” can be
assigned to a task or activity and
authority must accompany
accountability.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 2 RACI Chart
Responsible: These are the Accountable: This is the Consulted: These are the Informed: These are the
individuals who actually complete individual/body who carries the sign-off individuals who must be individuals who must be
the task or activity and are (“yes” or “no”) authority and has full consulted prior to a final informed after a decision or
responsible for action and/or veto power for process scope and decision or action. “Consult” action is taken because they, in
implementation. Responsibility is deliverables. It is important to clarify the implies two-way turn, may take action or make a
often shared, with each levels of accountability and to communication. decision based on the output.
individual’s degree of responsibility distinguish between management “Inform” is FYI and implies only
determined by the individual with accountability and operational one-way communication.
the “A”. accountability. Only one “A” can be
assigned to a task or activity and
authority must accompany
[email protected] accountability.
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
MOPO – Manual Of Permitted Operations
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 1- MOPO
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 2- MOPO
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 3- MOPO
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Example 4- MOPO
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
PTW – Permit To Work
• All permits in the same area are cross referenced. This provides an
alert to the holder of a permit that other tasks are scheduled to
happen in the same area at the same time.
• Either the SIMOPS Layout or a visual plot plan of the area with the
concurrent activities mapped onto it allows for visualization of all work
taking place under the control of a permit. This “visual plan” allows
all participants to see where other activities many be taking place in
close proximity to their place of work. This can be setup on large, post
boards in high traffic areas improving overall situational awareness of
work in progress.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample SIMOPs Checklist
of Permit To Work
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample SIMOPs Checklist
of Permit To Work (cont’d)
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample SIMOPs Checklist
of Permit To Work (cont’d)
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
Sample SIMOPs Checklist
of Permit To Work (cont’d)
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025
I post with humility. The information that I have posted is based on:
❑ SIMOPS Planning - Shell Oil
❑ SIMOPS Execution Overview – Exxon/Mobil
❑ SIMOPS General Plan – SASOL Lake Charles Ethane Cracker/LLDPE EPC Project
❑ Safe Work Practice - Simultaneous Operations, CCPS SWP
❑ Having the opportunity to benchmark the top performers in industry/business. How they achieved
top quartile performance. Not their apparent performance but proven results.
❑ 40 years of experience implementing successful safety programs in many different companies and
facilities.
[email protected]
Intellectual Property of Gregory Milewski Feb 2025