BLD 312 Construction Technology I Lecture Note 1 - 090844
BLD 312 Construction Technology I Lecture Note 1 - 090844
Before any initial planning of the site layout can take place certain preliminary work must be carried out, preferably at
the pre-tender stage. The decision to tender will usually be taken by the managing director or, for small works, by the
senior estimator up to a contract value laid down by the managing director. With given designs and specifications, the
best opportunity for the contractor to prepare a competitive and economic tender is in the programming and planning
of the construction activities. A thorough study of the bill of quantities will give an indication of the amount and
quality of the materials required and also of the various labour resources needed to carry out the contract. A similar
study of the drawings, together with the bill of quantities and the specification, will enable the builder to make a
preliminary assessment of the size and complexity of the contract, the plant required, and the amount of money that
can reasonably be expended on labour-saving items such as concrete mixing and placing alternatives, handling and
transporting equipment and off-site fabrication of such items as formwork and reinforcement.
Before the estimator can make a start on calculating unit rates a site investigation should be carried out, preferably by
the site manager, who will supervise the contract should the tender be successful.
An efficiently organized construction site layout has a significant impact on the productivity, material handling,
logistics, costs, and overall duration of a project. A good site layout is vital to ensuring a safe work environment and
effective and efficient construction operations. It is the contractor’s task to plan his choice of temporary works,
buildings, and services. The site layout is usually planned in detail during the pre-contract period and updated during
the construction phase.
Traditionally, when the contractor’s site layout is drawn, a transparent overlay and/or cut-outs are used to achieve
the most efficient and effective layout. The following elements should be considered:
Space for the use of a crane and other plant needs
Site accommodations and material storage
Communications
Access
View of the work
Security
Noise
Setting out grid
Other considerations
site activities;
efficiency;
movement;
control;
facilities for health, safety and welfare provision;
accommodation for staff and storage of materials.
SITE ACTIVITIES
The time needed for carrying out the principal activities can be estimated from the data obtained previously for
preparing the material and labour requirements. With repetitive activities estimates will be required to determine the
most economical balance of units that will allow simultaneous construction processes; this in turn will help to
establish staff numbers, work areas and material storage requirements.
A similar argument can be presented for overlapping activities. If a particular process presents a choice in the way the
result can be achieved the alternatives must be considered: for example, the rate of placing concrete will be
determined by the output of the mixer and the speed of transporting the mix to the appropriate position.
Alternatives that can be considered are:
MOVEMENT
Apart from the circulation problems mentioned above, the biggest problem is one of access. Vehicles delivering
materials to the site should be able to do so without difficulty or delay. Many of the contractors’ vehicles will be
lightweight and will therefore present few or no problems, but the weight and length of suppliers’ vehicles should be
taken into account. For example, a fully laden ready-mix concrete lorry can weigh 20 tonnes, and lorries used for
delivering structural steel can be 18.000 metres long, weigh up to 40 tonnes and require a large turning circle.
If it is anticipated that heavy vehicles will be operating on site, it will be necessary to consider the road surface
required. If the roads and paved areas are part of the contract and will have adequate strength for the weight of the
anticipated vehicles it may be advantageous to lay the roads at a very early stage in the contract, but if the
specification for the roads is for light traffic it would be advisable to lay only the base hoggin or hardcore layer at the
initial stages because of the risk of damage to the completed roads by the heavy vehicles. As an alternative it may be
CONTROL
This is concerned mainly with the overall supervision of the contract, including staff, materials, and the movement of
both around the site. This control should form the hub of the activities, which logically develops into areas or zones
of control radiating from this hub or centre. Which zone is selected for storage, accommodation or specific activities
is a matter of conjecture and the conditions prevailing on a particular site, but as a rule the final layout will be one of
compromise, with storage and accommodation areas generally receiving priority.
ACCOMMODATION
Apart from legislative necessities, the main areas of concern will be sizing, equipping and siting the various units of
accommodation.
Mess huts
These are for the purposes of preparing, heating and consuming food, which may require the following services:
drainage, light, power, hot and cold water supply.
To provide a reasonable degree of comfort a floor area of 2.0 to 2.5 m2 per person should be allowed. This will
provide sufficient circulation space, room for tables and seating, and space for the storage of any utensils.
Consideration can also be given to introducing a system of staggered meal breaks, thus reducing space requirements.
On large sites where full canteen facilities are being provided this will be subcontracted to a catering firm. Mess huts
should be sited so that they do not interfere with the development of the site but are positioned so that travel time is
kept to a minimum. On sites that by their very nature are large, it is worthwhile considering a system whereby tea
breaks can be taken in the vicinity of the work areas. Siting mess huts next to the main site circulation and access
roads is not of major importance. It is the principal contractor’s responsibility to ensure that reasonable welfare
facilities are available on site, although they do not necessarily have to provide these. It may be part of
subcontractors’ conditions of engagement that they provide their own.
Drying rooms
Used for the purposes of depositing and drying wet clothes. Drying rooms generally require a lighting and power
supply, and lockers or racks for deposited clothes. A floor area of 0.6 m2 per person should provide sufficient space
for equipment and circulation. Drying rooms should be sited near or adjacent to the mess room.
Toilets
Contractors are required to provide at least adequate washing and sanitary facilities as set out in Regulation 22 of the
Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations. All these facilities will require light, water and drainage
services. If it is not possible or practicable to make a permanent or temporary connection to a drainage system, the
use of chemical methods of disposal should be considered.
Sizing of toilet units is governed by the facilities being provided, and if female staff are employed on site separate
toilet facilities must be provided. Toilets should be located in a position that is convenient to both offices and mess
rooms, which may mean providing more than one location on large sites.
First-aid rooms
Only required on large sites as a specific facility, otherwise a reasonably equipped mess room will suffice. The first-
aid room should be sited in a position that is conveniently accessible from the working areas, and must be of such a
size as to allow for the necessary equipment and adequate circulation, which would indicate a minimum floor area of
6m2. First-aid equipment must be under the charge of a suitably trained, appointed person, with responsibility for
accounting for the contents and their use.
Calculation of Storage Space Requirements: each site will present its own problems since a certain amount of site
space must be allocated to the units of accommodation, car parking, circulation and working areas, therefore the
amount of space available for materials storage may be limited. The size of the materials or component being ordered
must be known together with the proposed method of storage and this may vary between different sites of similar
building activities. There are therefore no standard solutions for allocating site storage space and each site must be
considered separately to suit its own requirements.
Site Allocation for Materials Storage: the allocation of an actual position on site will depend on: -
1. Space available after areas for units of accommodation have been allocated.
2. Access facilities on site for delivery, vehicles.
3. Relationship of storage area(s) to activity area(s) - the distance between them needs to be kept as short as possible
to reduce transportation needs in terms of time and costs to the minimum. Alternatively, storage areas and work
areas need to be sited within the reach of any static transport plant such as a tower crane.
4. Security - needs to be considered in the context of site operations, vandalism and theft.
5. Stock holding policy - too little storage could result in delays awaiting materials to be delivered, too much storage
can be expensive in terms of weather and security protection requirements apart from the capital used to purchase the
materials stored on site. For example, Bricks may be supplied loose or strapped in unit loads and stored on timber
pallets.
The Client-Engineer-Contractor (CEC) relationship is a fundamental concept in civil engineering contracts. This
relationship defines the roles, responsibilities, and interactions between the three primary parties involved in a
construction project:
CLIENT
1. Project Owner: The client is the entity that owns the project and is responsible for financing it.
2. Project Requirements: The client defines the project's requirements, including its scope, budget, and timeline.
3. Decision-Making: The client makes key decisions regarding the project, including selecting the engineer and
contractor.
ENGINEER
1. Design and Supervision: The engineer is responsible for designing the project and supervising its construction.
2. Technical Expertise: The engineer provides technical expertise and ensures that the project is constructed according
to the approved design and specifications.
3. Contract Administration: The engineer administers the contract between the client and contractor, ensuring that the
contractor complies with the contract terms.
CONTRACTOR
1. Construction: The contractor is responsible for constructing the project according to the approved design and
specifications.
2. Project Execution: The contractor executes the project, including procuring materials, labour, and equipment.
3. Quality Control: The contractor ensures that the project is constructed to the required quality standards.
RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS
1. Client-Engineer Relationship: The client hires the engineer to design and supervise the project. The engineer reports
to the client and provides technical expertise.
2. Engineer-Contractor Relationship: The engineer selects and hires the contractor to construct the project. The
contractor reports to the engineer and is responsible for executing the project.
3. Client-Contractor Relationship: The client has a direct relationship with the contractor, primarily for contractual
and payment purposes.
2. Effective Communication: The CEC relationship promotes effective communication among the parties, ensuring
that project requirements are met, and issues are addressed promptly.
3. Quality Project Delivery: The CEC relationship enables the delivery of high-quality projects, as each party is
accountable for their specific responsibilities.
COMMON CHALLENGES
1. Communication Breakdowns: Poor communication among the parties can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and
cost overruns.
2. Role Confusion: Unclear roles and responsibilities can cause confusion and conflicts among the parties.
3. Contractual Disputes: Disputes over contractual terms, payment, or scope can arise, potentially leading to project
delays or termination.
By understanding the Client-Engineer-Contractor relationship, parties involved in civil engineering contracts can
navigate the complexities of project delivery, ensuring successful project outcomes.
The work is usually carried out under different form of contract and method of measurement as published by the
Institution of Civil Engineers, and because of the different conditions contained within the contract, the consultant
civil engineer appoints other professionals direct. In doing so, the powers of such parties are somewhat diminished.
For example, the role of private quantity surveyor is usually restricted to measuring and establishing value of work.
As a result of the size of the work, the consultant civil engineer usually appoints a resident engineer who, as his title
would suggest, is based on site. The resident engineer carries out very important function protecting the client’s interests
on site. He is usually responsible for all post contract activities including day-to-day design work, variations, valuation
and measurement of work and dealing with the civil engineering contractor.
The role of the civil engineering contractor is very similar to that of the main contractor in building having due regard
to the larger scope of projects, the repetitive nature of the work and the smaller range of construction materials. It
would be reasonable to assume therefore that his head office and site organisation structure would also be similar.
These duties may vary depending on the specific project requirements and the employer's expectations.
lifting a load which is too heavy or too cumbersome, resulting in back injury;
poor posture during lifting or poor lifting technique, resulting in back injury;
dropping a load, resulting in foot injury;
lifting sharp-edged or hot loads resulting in hand injuries.
muscular sprains and strains – caused when a muscular tissue (or ligament or tendon) is stretched beyond its
normal capability leading to a weakening, bruising and painful inflammation of the area affected. Such injuries
normally occur in the back or in the arms and wrists;
back injuries – include injuries to the discs situated between the spinal vertebrae (i.e. bones) and can lead to
a very painful prolapsed disc lesion (commonly known as a slipped disc). This type of injury can lead to other
conditions known as lumbago and sciatica (where pain travels down the leg);
trapped nerve – usually occurring in the back as a result of another injury but aggravated by manual handling;
Avoid manual handling operations so far as is reasonably practicable by either redesigning the task to avoid
moving the load or by automating or mechanising the operations.
If manual handling cannot be avoided, then a suitable and sufficient risk assessment should be made.
Reduce the risk of injury from those operations so far as is reasonably practicable, either by the use of
mechanical handling or making improvements to the task, the load and the working environment.
The guidance given to the Manual Handling Operations Regulations (available in the HSE Legal series – L23) is a
very useful document. It gives very helpful advice on manual handling assessments and manual handling training. The
advice is applicable to all occupational sectors. In the construction industry, the typical manual handling tasks that
occur on most sites are lifting building blocks, cement bags, doors, windows and lintels. Another common example
occurs in road and street works – the lifting and manoeuvring of kerb stones and paving slabs. These examples can
lead not only to a strained back and pulled muscles but also to trapped fingers and toes.
This indicates the need for strong gloves and safety footwear.
MANUAL HANDLING ASSESSMENTS
The Regulations specify four main factors which must be taken into account during the assessment. These are the task,
the load, the working environment and the capability of the individual who is expected to do the lifting. The task
should be analysed in detail so that all aspects of manual handling are covered including the use of mechanical
assistance. The number of people involved and the cost of the task should also be considered. Some or all of the
following questions are relevant to most manual handling tasks:
Is the load held or manipulated at a distance from the trunk? The further from the trunk, the more difficult
it is to control the load and the stress imposed on the back is greater.
Is a satisfactory body posture being adopted? Feet should be firmly on the ground and slightly apart and there
should be no stooping or twisting of the trunk. It should not be necessary to reach upwards, as this will place
additional stresses on the arms, back and shoulders. The effect of these risk factors is significantly increased
if several are present while the task is being performed.
Are there excessive distances to carry or lift the load? Over distances greater than 10 m, the physical demands
of carrying the load will dominate the operation. The frequency of lifting and the vertical and horizontal
distances the load needs to be carried (particularly if it has to be lifted from the ground and/or placed on a
high shelf) are very important considerations
Is there excessive pulling and pushing of the load? The state of floor surfaces and the footwear of the individual
should be noted so that slips and trips may be avoided.
Is there a risk of a sudden movement of the load? The load may be restricted or jammed in some way.
Is frequent or prolonged physical effort required? Frequent and prolonged tasks can lead to fatigue and a
greater risk of injury.
Are there sufficient rest or recovery periods? Breaks and/or the changing of tasks enables the body to recover
more easily from strenuous activity.
Is there an imposed rate of work on the task? This is a particular problem with some automated production
lines and can be addressed by spells on other operations away from the line.
Is the load too heavy? The maximum load that an individual can lift will depend on the capability of the
individual and the position of the load relative to the body. There is therefore no safe load. Figure 1c.3 is
reproduced from the HSE guidance, which does give some advice on loading levels. It recommends that loads
in excess of 25 kg should not be lifted or carried by a man (and this is only permissible when the load is at
the level of and adjacent to the thighs). For women, the guideline figures should be reduced by about one-
third.
Is the load too bulky or unwieldy? In general, if any dimension of the load exceeds 0.75 m (c. 2 ft.), its
handling is likely to pose a risk of injury. Visibility around the load is important. It may hit obstructions or
become unstable in windy conditions. The position of the centre of gravity is very important for stable lifting
– it should be as close to the body as possible.
Is the load difficult to grasp? Grip difficulties will be caused by slippery surfaces, rounded corners or a lack
of foot room.
Are the contents of the load likely to shift? This is a particular problem when the load is a container full of
smaller items, such as a sack full of nuts and bolts. The movements of people (in a nursing home) or animals
(in a veterinary surgery) are loads which fall into this category.
Is the load sharp, hot or cold? Personal protective equipment may be required.
Does the task require unusual characteristics of the individual (e.g. strength or height)? It is important to
remember that strength and general manual handling ability depends on age, gender, state of health and
fitness.
Are employees who might reasonably be considered to be pregnant or to have a health problem put at
risk by the task? Particular care should be taken to protect pregnant women or those who have recently
given birth from handling loads. Allowance should also be given to any employee who has a health
problem, which could be exacerbated by manual handling.
The assessment must be reviewed if there is reason to suspect that it is no longer valid or there has been a significant
change to the manual handling operations to which it relates.
REDUCING THE RISK OF INJURY
This involves the introduction of control measures resulting from the manual handling risk assessment. The guidance
to the Regulations (L23) and the HSE publication Manual Handling – Solutions You Can Handle (HSG115) contain
many ideas to reduce the risk of injury from manual handling operations. An ergonomic approach is generally required
to design and develop the manual handling operation as a whole. The control measures can be grouped under five
headings. However, the first consideration, when it is reasonably practicable, is mechanical assistance.
The task can be improved by changing the layout of the workstation by, for example, storing frequently used loads at
waist level. The removal of obstacles and the use of a better lifting technique that relies on the leg rather than back
muscles should be encouraged. When pushing, the hands should be positioned correctly. The work routine should also
be examined to see whether job rotation is being used as effectively as it could be. Special attention should be paid to
seated manual handlers to ensure that loads are not lifted from the floor while they are seated. Employees should be
encouraged to seek help if a difficult load is to be moved so that a team of people can move the load. Adequate and
suitable personal protective equipment should be provided where there is a risk of loss of grip or injury. Care must be
taken to ensure that the clothing does not become a hazard in itself (e.g. the snagging of fasteners and pockets).
The load should be examined to see whether it could be made lighter, smaller or easier to grasp or manage. This could
be achieved by splitting the load, the positioning of handholds or a sling, or ensuring that the centre of gravity is
brought closer to the handler’s body. Attempts should be made to make the load more stable and any surface hazards,
such as slippery deposits or sharp edges, should be removed. It is very important to ensure that any improvements do
not, inadvertently, lead to the creation of additional hazards.
The working environment can be improved in many ways. Space constraints should be removed or reduced. Floors
should be regularly cleaned and repaired when damaged. Adequate lighting is essential and working at more than one
level should be minimised so that hazardous ladder work is avoided. Attention should be given to the need for suitable
temperatures and ventilation in the working area.
The capability of the individual is the fifth area where control measures can be applied to reduce the risk of injury.
The state of health of the employee and his/her medical record will provide the first indication as to whether the
BLD 312 Construction Technology I Lecture Note 1 Page 21
individual is capable of undertaking the task. A period of sick leave or a change of job can make an individual vulnerable
to manual handling injury. The Regulations require that the employee be given information and training. The
information includes the provision, where it is reasonably practicable to do so, of precise information on the weight of
each load and the heaviest side of any load whose centre of gravity is not centrally positioned. In a more detailed risk
assessment, other factors will need to be considered such as the effect of personal protective equipment and
psychosocial factors in the work organisation. The following points may need to be assessed: