Chapters
Chapters
CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-evolving landscape of software development, the demand for delivering high-quality
software at an accelerated pace has never been more critical. Organizations today operate in highly
competitive and dynamic environments, where end-user expectations for reliability, performance, and
rapid feature updates are continually rising. Traditional software development methodologies,
although once standard, are increasingly becoming obsolete in the face of modern demands for
agility, scalability, and speed.
One of the major pitfalls of traditional development was the integration problem. Integrating
independently developed code at the later stages often led to unexpected bugs and conflicts, creating
what is infamously known as the “integration hell.” Since developers weren’t regularly syncing their
changes, merging codebases became a tedious and error-prone task. This lack of early integration and
testing often meant that critical issues were only discovered close to release, significantly
complicating debugging and increasing the cost of fixing bugs.
Moreover, slow feedback loops were a characteristic weakness of older models. Without immediate
testing and validation, developers had no timely insight into whether their changes were compatible
or functional within the overall system. This led to bottlenecks in development, where progress was
often stalled by the need to resolve accumulated bugs, sometimes requiring major code rewrites.
Manual testing and deployment processes also contributed to delays and inconsistencies. Human
error was a frequent cause of failed deployments and missed defects, and the reliance on manual
scripts or documentation-based procedures made reproducing environments or deployment states
cumbersome and unreliable.
As organizations began to feel the strain of these inefficiencies, there was a paradigm shift in
software development practices with the adoption of Agile methodologies and DevOps principles.
Agile introduced iterative, incremental development with a focus on customer collaboration, adaptive
planning, and rapid delivery. DevOps, in parallel, emphasized breaking down silos between
development and operations teams, fostering a culture of collaboration and shared responsibility for
the entire lifecycle of software delivery. Out of this cultural and procedural evolution emerged the
concepts of Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) together known as
CI/CD.
The need for CI/CD became apparent as software systems grew more complex and the demand for faster
releases increased. CI/CD addresses the inefficiencies of traditional methods by embracing automation,
immediate feedback, and continuous improvement. In older development models, the delay between writing
code and discovering its issues often spanned weeks or months. CI/CD eliminates this by integrating code
changes into the main branch frequently—sometimes multiple times a day—and automatically building and
testing these changes.
CI/CD mitigates the integration problems of the past by making integration a continuous process rather than a
phase. By integrating code regularly, developers are less likely to encounter large, complex conflicts, and
when conflicts do arise, they are easier to resolve because they are detected early.
Furthermore, CI/CD enhances feedback speed. Automated testing frameworks ensure that developers receive
immediate feedback on the quality and functionality of their code. This allows issues to be addressed when
they are cheapest and easiest to fix right at the time of development.
The automation of deployment also minimizes human errors. Instead of relying on manual steps to push code
into production, CI/CD pipelines define standardized, repeatable processes that ensure consistency and
reliability across different environments such as development, staging, and production.
Understanding CI/CD
At the core of this modern approach are two main components: Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous
Deployment (CD).
Continuous Integration (CI) refers to the practice of frequently merging all developers’ working copies to a
shared mainline branch. Each merge or commit triggers an automated build process followed by a suite of
automated tests. The goal of CI is to detect integration issues early and reduce the overhead of big-bang
merges. By integrating often, developers receive instant validation that their changes do not break the existing
codebase. This helps maintain a stable baseline and allows the team to move faster without fear of regressions.
CI also encourages the use of automated unit tests, integration tests, code linting, and static code analysis tools.
These checks run every time new code is pushed, ensuring that quality standards are upheld across the
codebase. By shifting testing to the early stages of development, CI helps create a feedback-rich environment
where bugs are caught and resolved quickly.
Continuous Deployment (CD) builds upon CI by automating the process of deploying every validated code
change to production. Once a change passes all automated tests, it is automatically released into the live
environment. This automation eliminates the traditional release process that involved multiple handoffs,
approvals, and manual verifications. CD allows teams to deliver features and fixes to users in a matter of
minutes or hours, rather than days or weeks.
It’s important to note that CD is often used interchangeably with Continuous Delivery, although there is a
subtle difference. Continuous Delivery ensures that every change that passes automated tests is ready for
production deployment but may require manual approval before the final release. This approach strikes a
balance between full automation and human oversight, allowing teams to retain control over when and how
changes are released.
Together, CI and CD form a robust pipeline that supports modern software delivery goals. This pipeline can be
enhanced with additional practices such as Infrastructure as Code (IaC), containerization, and observability,
ensuring that applications are not only delivered quickly but also operate reliably in production environments.
CHAPTER -2
LITERATURE SURVEY
[2022] Prevalence of GitOps, DevOps in Fast CI/CD Cycles
In this paper, Saumya Gupta et al. explore the evolution of DevOps practices into GitOps to meet the demands
of faster and more reliable CI/CD cycles. GitOps leverages Git as the single source of truth for both
application code and infrastructure, promoting a declarative approach that simplifies deployment and rollback
operations. The study highlights how containerized applications, particularly in Kubernetes environments,
benefit from this model by improving visibility, security, and automation. Tools such as Flux, Argo CD,
Jenkins X, and Helm are presented as key components in automating deployment pipelines. The
implementation on AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) further demonstrates how GitOps workflows
enhance the developer experience by aligning operations with version control practices familiar to software
engineers.
[2023] Implementation of an Agile SDLC CI/CD Pipeline for Managing a SDN VXLAN-EVPN Fabric
Spas Georgiev and Kamelia Nikolova introduce a DevOps-based approach to managing large-scale software-
defined networking (SDN) infrastructures using Agile SDLC principles. The paper presents a CI/CD pipeline
built with GitLab and Ansible to automate the configuration and deployment of a VXLAN-EVPN fabric. The
system integrates Cisco’s Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) as an SDN controller, showcasing how IaC
(Infrastructure as Code) and DevOps tools can be adapted to network engineering. This approach enhances
flexibility, reduces manual errors, and supports modular, automated deployments. By bringing Agile practices
to network provisioning, the authors demonstrate how the DevOps mindset can be successfully extended
beyond traditional software development into infrastructure management.
[2022] Creating Microservices and Using Infrastructure as Code within the CI/CD for Dynamic
Container Creation
Tomáš Golis, Pavle Đakić, and Valentino Vranić focus on the practical and educational aspects of developing
and deploying microservices within a local Kubernetes environment. Their work demonstrates how CI/CD
pipelines, integrated with tools such as Docker, Helm, and Minikube, can be used to manage dynamic
containerized applications. The study discusses the architecture of microservices, comparing stateless versus
stateful services and synchronous versus asynchronous communication models. It also explores the use of
service mesh architectures for managing inter-service communication. The implementation includes several
specialized microservices that handle login authentication, image building, deployment, and pipeline
generation. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of modern microservice deployment strategies and
their orchestration within CI/CD workflows.
Improved
Prevalence of Use GitOps with
Inefficient CI/CD deployment
GitOps, DevOps tools like Flux and
1 in cloud-native speed, rollback
in Fast CI/CD Argo CD in
environments. capability, and
Cycles Kubernetes.
automation.
Implementation
of an Agile Automated,
Ansible and
SDLC CI/CD Manual SDN faster, and
GitLab-based
2 Pipeline for configuration is repeatable
CI/CD integrated
Managing a SDN error-prone and network
with Cisco DCNM.
VXLAN-EVPN slow. deployment.
Fabric
Creating
Microservices
and Using Lack of practical Local Kubernetes Enabled user-
Infrastructure as microservice cluster using driven
3 Code within the CI/CD Minikube, Docker, deployment and
CI/CD for environments for Helm, and CI/CD orchestration of
Dynamic learners. pipelines. microservices.
Container
Creation
Automated
CI/CD Pipeline Deployment of Integrated
security checks
with unscanned SonarQube, Trivy,
4 and reduced
Vulnerability vulnerable code and Docker Bench
vulnerabilities
Mitigation and containers. into CI/CD.
in deployments.
Enhanced
DevSecOps
Secure pipeline
Security gaps in integration with
Development integrity and
5 traditional CI/CD access control,
Workflows in early
pipelines. static analysis, and
CI/CD Pipelines vulnerability
code signing.
detection.
CHAPTER - 3
3.2 Objectives
Automating the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)
• Automatically integrates, tests, and deploys code changes.
• Reduces manual intervention across development, staging, and production environments.
• Enables early bug detection through automated testing.
• Ensures consistency across environments.
CHAPTER - 4
METHODOLOGY
The diagram follows a modern CI/CD methodology combining automation, quality control, and GitOps-based
deployment. Jenkins orchestrates the continuous integration pipeline, using Maven to build the code and
SonarQube to perform static code analysis. Once quality checks and tests pass, a Docker image is created and
pushed to DockerHub. An image updater tool detects the new image and modifies the Kubernetes manifest files
in the Git repository. Argo CD, a GitOps tool, then automatically syncs the updated manifests to deploy the
application to the Kubernetes cluster.
This architecture diagram illustrates a CI/CD pipeline with integrated code quality checks,
containerization, and GitOps-based deployment using tools like Jenkins, SonarQube, DockerHub, and
Argo CD. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Build Verification
• Jenkins checks if the Maven build is successful.
• If the build fails, it exits the pipeline and generates a report sent to communication tools like Slack
or email.
Automated Testing
• If SonarQube validation passes, automated tests are executed.
• On failure, the pipeline again exits and sends a report.
Image Updater
• An Image Updater service (like Flux Image Update or a custom script) detects the new image in
DockerHub.
• It updates the Kubernetes manifest files in the Git repository (referred to as the Manifests Repo).
• Artifact Storage – Successfully built code is stored in repositories like Docker Hub, Nexus.
• Deployment – Code is deployed to staging using Jenkins, GitHub Actions, ArgoCD.
• Monitoring & Feedback – Tools like Prometheus, Grafana, and ELK Stack track performance.
Serverless CI/CD
• Serverless applications use AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions to deploy functions instead
of VMs.
• GitHub Actions and AWS CodePipeline automate deployment workflows.
Rolling Deployment
• Gradually replaces old instances with new ones without downtime.
• Ensures a smooth transition but may take longer to complete.
• Used in cloud-native applications and Kubernetes environments.
Blue-Green Deployment
• Two identical environments (blue and green) are maintained.
• Traffic is switched from the current to the new environment once testing is complete.
• Enables instant rollback if issues arise.
Canary Deployment
• Releases updates to a small subset of users first.
• Monitors performance before rolling out changes to the entire system.
• Ideal for risk-sensitive applications (e.g., banking, healthcare).
Recreate Deployment
• Shuts down the old version before deploying the new one.
• Results in downtime but ensures a clean deployment.
Dept. of Information Science and Engineering, AIT 14
Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) 2024-25
CONCLUSION
The CI/CD (Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment/Delivery) pipeline has transformed
modern software development, enabling faster and more reliable releases. By automating code
integration, testing, and deployment, CI/CD minimizes human intervention, reduces errors, and
accelerates software delivery cycles.
One of the most significant advancements in CI/CD is its integration with cloud-native technologies,
containerization (Docker, Kubernetes), and Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, Ansible). These
technologies provide a scalable and flexible environment for deploying applications efficiently across
different platforms.
Another key evolution is the adoption of AI and machine learning in CI/CD pipelines, which helps in
automated testing, anomaly detection, and predictive analytics. This reduces failures, optimizes
resource utilization, and enhances software quality.
Additionally, DevSecOps is becoming an essential part of modern CI/CD pipelines, ensuring security
is integrated throughout the development lifecycle. Tools like SonarQube, Snyk, and Trivy help in
early vulnerability detection, making applications more secure.
Another key benefit of CI/CD is its role in fostering a DevOps culture, promoting collaboration
between development, operations, and security teams. The adoption of Infrastructure as Code (IaC),
containerization (Docker, Kubernetes), and cloud-native technologies has further enhanced CI/CD
capabilities, making it a fundamental practice in modern IT organizations.
As businesses continue to evolve, CI/CD will play an increasingly critical role in maintaining
software agility, scalability, and security. Organizations that implement effective CI/CD pipelines
can accelerate innovation, reduce operational costs, and enhance customer satisfaction. With ongoing
advancements in AI-driven automation, GitOps, and security-focused DevOps (DevSecOps), the
future of CI/CD looks even more promising, ensuring faster, smarter, and more resilient software
delivery.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Gupta, M. Bhatia, M. Memoria and P. Manani, "Prevalence of GitOps, DevOps in Fast CI/CD
Cycles," 2022 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel
Computing (COM-IT-CON), Faridabad, India, 2022, pp. 589-596, doi: 10.1109/COM-IT-
CON54601.2022.9850786.
[2] S. Georgiev and K. Nikolova, "Implementation of an Agile SDLC CI/CD pipeline for managing a
SDN VXLAN-EVPN fabric," 2023 31st National Conference with International Participation
(TELECOM), Sofia, Bulgaria, 2023, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/TELECOM59629.2023.10409668.
[3] T. Golis, P. Dakić and V. Vranić, "Creating Microservices and using infrastructure as code within
the CI/CD for dynamic container creation," 2022 IEEE 16th International Scientific Conference
on Informatics (Informatics), Poprad, Slovakia, 2022, pp. 114-119, doi:
10.1109/Informatics57926.2022.10083442.
[5] P. Bajpai and A. Lewis, "Secure Development Workflows in CI/CD Pipelines," 2022 IEEE
Secure Development Conference (SecDev), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022, pp. 65-66, doi:
10.1109/SecDev53368.2022.00024.