Scribd
Upload
8 views3 pages

Evaluating-TECHNICAL TEAM

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating individual participation in a group task for a community outreach program, with criteria including contribution to task, teamwork, responsibility, initiative, and communication. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 4, with a total score determining performance levels ranging from 'Outstanding' to 'Poor'. Group leaders are instructed to evaluate members, compile scores, and submit them to the class leader and secretary.

Uploaded by

Eena Gee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views3 pages

Evaluating-TECHNICAL TEAM

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating individual participation in a group task for a community outreach program, with criteria including contribution to task, teamwork, responsibility, initiative, and communication. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 4, with a total score determining performance levels ranging from 'Outstanding' to 'Poor'. Group leaders are instructed to evaluate members, compile scores, and submit them to the class leader and secretary.

Uploaded by

Eena Gee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

NSTP

Rubric for Evaluating Individual Participation in a Group Task


Please take the time to read first the Criteria before evaluating your members. Scoring will be 4 being the Highest and 1 being the lowest.
Adding all scores together, base the total on the points provided below in red font and supply it to the TOTAL SCORE in the Table below.

COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM PREPARATION


Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs Improvement (1)
Consistently contributes high-
Regularly contributes Occasionally contributes
Rarely contributes to the
Contribution to quality work and ideas; goesgood-quality work and work but may need
task or needs frequent
Task above and beyond assigned ideas; completes assigned reminders; effort is
prompting to participate.
tasks. tasks well. inconsistent.
Actively supports and Works well with team Participates in teamwork Shows little cooperation or
Teamwork & collaborates with team members; participates in but may need reminders to engagement; may cause
Collaboration members; encourages others; discussions; helps when cooperate; occasionally conflicts or require
resolves conflicts effectively.
needed. passive. intervention.
Completes assigned work
Always meets deadlines, Sometimes needs reminders Often misses deadlines or
Responsibility & on time and takes
fulfills assigned roles, and is to complete tasks and meet fails to complete tasks,
Dependability responsibility with minimal
reliable in completing tasks. deadlines. requiring intervention.
supervision.
Takes initiative in planning, Shows initiative and takes Sometimes takes initiative
Rarely shows initiative
Initiative & problem-solving, and decision- on responsibilities beyond but mostly follows
and waits for instructions
Leadership making; leads effectively when assigned tasks directions without
before taking action.
needed. occasionally. additional effort.
Communicates clearly and
Communicates well and Occasionally engages in Rarely communicates with
Communication & effectively with the team;
engages in discussions but communication but may be the group, making
Engagement listens actively and engages in
may need prompting. unclear or hesitant. teamwork difficult.
discussions.

Scoring Guide and Interpretation

• 18-20 points (Outstanding Performance) – Exceeds expectations in participation and teamwork.


• 14-17 points (Good Performance) – Meets expectations with consistent effort and contribution.
• 10-13 points (Satisfactory Performance) – Shows some participation but needs improvement.
• 5-9 points (Needs Improvement) – Minimal effort and contribution; needs significant improvement.

//cabforms25
nstp2ndsem
• Scoring Guide (Points to Percentage Conversion)
• Please refer to the red pointing system for the TOTAL SCORE.

Total Points (Out of 20) Percentage Equivalent Performance Rating


18 – 20 points (60 pts) 90 – 100% Outstanding Performance
14 – 17 points (50 pts) 75 – 89% Good Performance
10 – 13 points (40 pts) 60 – 74% Satisfactory Performance
5 – 9 points (30 pts.) 50 – 59% Needs Improvement
Below 5 points (25 pts) Below 50% Poor Performance

Group Leaders: Kindly list your members (LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MI), supply the points base on your evaluation, get
the TOTAL SCORE and when done, submit it to your Class Leader.
Class Leader: Kindly list your group leaders (LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MI) supply the points base on your evaluation, get
the TOTAL SCORE and when done, and submit it to your Class Secretary.
Class Secretary: Compile and submit a soft copy of the scores of the whole class to your teacher.

Class Leader will be graded by the Teacher for the performance and output presented by the class.

//cabforms25
nstp2ndsem
GROUP LEADER: GABRIEL, APRIL ROSE A.
CLASS SECTION: BSA 1-D
GROUP NO. TECHNICAL TEAM

No. Name Contribution Teamwork & Responsibility & Initiative & Communication Total Total
to Task Collaboration Dependability Leadership & Engagement Points Score
1 Yulo, Althea Denise 4 4 4 4 4 20 60pts
2 Cullo, Lyca May 4 4 4 4 4 20 60pts
3
4
5

Submitted by: Gabriel, April Rose A. Date: May 20,2025


Group/Class Leader’s Printed Name and Signature

Received by: ___________________________ Date: _____________


Class Leader/Secretary’s Printed Name and Signature
Please underline your position above

//cabforms25
nstp2ndsem

You might also like