ReadinessReview. 2
ReadinessReview. 2
CB identification no.
CB certificate no.
1/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Table of contents
Audit data 3
Organization information 3
Customer information 5
Processes 6
Process Management 6
Process Sales 6
Process Purchasing 7
Process Logistic 7
Process Production 9
Process R&D 9
Area of concern 17
Results 19
2/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Audit data
Audit basic data
Audit days 2
Audit team
Witnessed No
Organization information
Organization information
Division
State
Street 2
Country Algeria
Certificate information
Proposed certificate scope Design & Manufacturing of electronic Board & Harnesses
French
Conception et fabrication des cartes électroniques et faisceaux
électriques
Certification structure
3/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Corporate certification
Previous certification
Number of employees
Dedicated to Automotive
4/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Customer information
Customer: Stellantis (ex PSA)
KPIs
CSRs
Customer details
Groupe PSA “Customer-Specific Requirements for use with IATF June 2021
16949
Comments Poject ongoing. Production not yet started (Planified Week 16/2025)
Organization's process for gathering, communicating, and implementing customer specific requirements.
If the organization claims to not have an CSRs, then describe how you verified this claim.
Not applicable
5/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Processes
Process Management
Process data
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Taux d'atteinte des objectifs stratégiques > 80 % Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Résultat des audits internes et externes > 90 % Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Taux des actions clôturés > 75 % 71 % (Jan 2025) New KPI 01.Jan.2025
Process Sales
Process data
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
6/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Process Purchasing
Process data
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
OTIF (on-time in-full) Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Process Logistic
Process data
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Taux de sevice fourniseurs Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Nombre de rupture chez le client Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Nombre de ruptue Matiere premiere Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Is it a remote process? No
7/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Process performance
Taux de formations effectués Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Evolution interne des collaborateurs Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Taux de stabilité de l'emploi Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Couts de changements techniques Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Delai d'application du changement Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
technique required
8/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Nombre CIP d'innovation Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Process Production
Process data
Shifts
On site
Process performance
Process R&D
Process data
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Taux de cout unitaire de development Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
9/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Taux d'efficience de production Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Taux de respect du planning Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Taux de respeect CDC Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
Nombre de jours sans accident de tavail Missing required Missing required New KPI Missing
required
Is it a remote process? No
Process performance
10/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Legend X
Requirement
covered
11/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
1.1 The organization has 12 months of automotive-related internal and external performance data. Area of concern
1.2 The audited location has engaged individual consultants or consulting companies for quality management Not applicable
system-related development, implementation, maintenance and/or improvement of the quality management
system within twenty-four (24) months before contracting.
1.3 The audited location has engaged individual consultants or consulting companies for quality management Not applicable
system related training within the last twenty-four (24) months.
1.4 The scope of the quality management system is included in the quality manual and includes details and Yes
justification for any exclusion
1.5 The quality manual includes the documented processes that are established for the quality management Yes
system or refers to them.
1.6 The quality manual includes the organization’s processes and their sequence and interactions, including the Area of concern
type of controls and the extent of controls for outsourced quality management system processes.
1.7 The quality manual indicates where Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) are addressed within the Area of concern
audited location’s quality management system.
1.8 All mandatory documented processes required by the IATF 16949 standard are included in the audited location’s quality management
system.
7.5.3.2.2 X
8.3.1.1 Procedure for Design & Development PR-IDE-SMQ-009, rev 01, 03/03/2025
8.3.3.3 X
8.4.1.2 Procedure for Purchasing and supplier evaluation PR-IDE-SMQ-011, rev 00,
18/12/2024
12/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
8.4.2.4 Procedure for Purchasing and supplier evaluation PR-IDE-SMQ-011, rev 00,
18/12/2024
1.9 The documented quality management system structure includes the relationships and relevant functions Not applicable
and any outsourced quality management system processes.
No outsourced process
1.10 The third-party IATF 16949 audits for remote support locations providing support to the audited location Not applicable
are complete or will be completed before (or prior to) the stage 2 audit.
1.11 All IATF 16949 Standard requirements are covered in the audited location’s processes. Area of concern
1.12 Performance data for the audited location’s quality management system processes are documented and Yes
maintained.
KPI Dashbord IDENET (FR-IDE-SMQ-35) 2025 covering period between October 2024 to February 2025
1.13 Summarize the way in which information regarding customer satisfaction for the audited location was
demonstrated
Customer Complaints
Not applicable
Not applicable
Customer Scorecards
13/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
1.14 An internal audit program that covers system, process and product audits is set up and maintained. Yes
1.15 An internal system audit has been conducted to evaluate compliance of all processes defined in the Area of concern
audited location’s quality management system with the requirements in the IATF 16949 standard and applicable
customer specific requirements.
Operational Production audit wasn't peformed because production was not yet started.
1.16 Manufacturing process audits are conducted for all manufacturing processes, on all shifts, using Area of concern
customer-specified methods where required.
1.17 Product audits are conducted using customer-specified methods, where required. Area of concern
1.18 All internal system audit results are included in the latest management review record. Yes
Management review performed on 26/12/2024 . System audits are integrated wthout Process and Product audits.
1.19 All internal system, process and product auditors meet the requirements in IATF 16949, section 7.2.3. Yes
1.20 A problem-solving process for internal and external system and process audit findings, and internally and Yes
externally identified quality and/or delivery problems is established as a part of the documented quality
management system.
1.21 The management review records include the mandatory inputs and outputs required in IATF 16949 Area of concern
sections 9.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.1.
1.22 This audited location designs and/or manufactures products with safety characteristics for automotive Not applicable
customers.
1.23 Process Control Plans are developed to include the minimum informational requirements found in IATF Area of concern
16949, Annex A.
1.24 The process control plan process steps, order of the process steps and the process names are linked to Yes
the process flow diagram.
Process flow diagram: Synoptique de fabrication cable batterie IN-IDE-ENG-031, 00, 30/01/2025
1.25 The process control plan evaluation techniques, sample size, frequency and the method of control are Yes
linked to a Process Failure Mode Effects Analysis.
PFMEA established accoding the new version of FMEA AIAG VDA and according STELLANTIS Requirements.
Control plan
14/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
2.1 The sample of process owners interviewed are aware and are knowledgeable of their relevant quality Yes
management system process(es), the associated performance objectives and indicators, the current performance
of the process(es) and any relevant customer specific requirements.
Management
Production
R&D
Information Technology
2.2 Process owners interviewed are aware of existing process interfaces and interactions linked to support Yes
received from remote support locations, the support provided to other manufacturing sites, and where applicable,
the outsourced quality management system processes.
Management
Production
R&D
Information Technology
2.4 Manufacturing shifts and the associated start and end times are the same as what was submitted with the Yes
application for certification.
2.5 Measurement devices sampled on the shop floor are calibrated. Area of concern
2.6 Control plan implementation (e.g., periodic inspection, process parameter verification, reaction plans), was Area of concern
observed on the shop floor in the samples taken.
2.7 Work instructions are available at workstations and/or on the shop floor in the language required for Yes
understanding.
Work instructions are available at workstations and/or on the shop floor in 02 languages (Arabic & French)
15/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
2.8 Lot and/or part traceability is used in the manufacturing processes. Area of concern
No produced parts
2.9 Lot and/or part traceability information is used for containment of nonconforming and/or suspect parts. Area of concern
No produced parts
2.10 The identification and segregation of nonconforming and/or suspect material is evident in the areas Area of concern
observed on the shop floor.
No produced parts;
Area (Prison) was defined and limited on the shop floor. (Layout)
2.11 Repair and/or rework of nonconforming material is controlled in the areas in which it performed. Not applicable
No produced parts
2.12 Customer problems and the results of the problem-solving process used to solve them are communicated Area of concern
to the shop floor.
16/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Area of concern
no. Area of concern Question no. Rules
1 Presented peformance covered last 3 months 1.1 Rules, clause 5.14 - Letter of
Production and delivery to STELLANTIS scheduled to start from week 16 Conformance purpose
External performance : not yet
2 Sequence & interraction not integrated on the quality manual 1.6 IATF 16949, clause 7.5.1.1 -
Quality management system
documentation
3 The CSR wasn't adressed on the Quality Manual 1.7 IATF 16949, clause 7.5.1.1 -
Quality management system
documentation
4 10.2.4 - Error proofing not formalized 1.8 IATF 16949, clause 1.1 - Scope
8.5.6 - Change control not formalized
8.5.6.1.1 -Temporary change of process controls not formalized
7.5.3.2.2 - Engineering specifications not documentated
8.3.3.3 - Special characteristics not documentated
5 Operational production was not covered: Production not yet started 1.11 ISO 9001, clause 4.3 - Quality
management system and its
processes; Rules, clause 5.8.5-
Automotive Process Approach
6 Product audits not yet conducted. Production not yet started 1.17 IATF 16949, clause 9.2.2.4 -
Product audit
7 Process audits not yet conducted. Production not yet started 1.16 IATF 16949, clause 9.1.2.3 -
Manufacturing process audit
8 Operational Production audit wasn't peformed because production was not yet 1.15 IATF 16949, clause 9.1.2.2 -
started. Quality management system
audit
17/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
11 New Measurement devices not yet calibrated. 2.5 IATF 16949, clause 7.1.5.2.1 -
Calibration/verification records
12 Not yet implemenred on the manufacturing shop floor. 2.6 IATF 16949, clause 8.5.1.1 -
Control plan
16 No produced parts, no customer problems communicated. 2.12 IATF 16949, clause 10.2.6 -
complaints and field failure
test analysis
18/19
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment
Results
Stage 1 review summary
Audit conducted according to the rules 6, part of the stage one was performed on the shop as part of "Gemba".
Audit result and identified concerns were clearly communicated to the costumer.
By entering my name, I attest that a copy of the audit report was left with the organization at the closing meeting.
Organization name : IDENET OR ALGERIE SARL CB certificate no.: 40551280 IATF25 Cara V. 1.5.1
Generated at: 23.Mar.2025 13:40 (UTC) Report name/no: 40551280-idenet-or-algerie-sarl 19/19