Session 1
Session 1
on
Design of 2-DOF Control and Disturbance Estimator for
Magnetic Levitation System
Power Amplifier
Sensor Signal
Processing
Ferromagnetic
Body
3
Fig. 2: Magnetic ball suspension system
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF ACTIVE MAGNETIC BEARING SYSTEM
4
ADVANTAGES OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM
NASA also uses the Maglev technology for “running start” of satellite to
9
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM
10
Fig. 9: Schematic Block diagram of Maglev system
MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND PROBLEM FORMULATION [32, 84]
The nonlinear model of magnetic levitation system is expressed as:
i2
mh = mg − C 2 (1)
h
Ci 2
f (i, h) = 2 (2)
h
For easy analysis and design of controller, the system is linearized about the
equilibrium point ( h 0 = 0.009 m and i0 = 0.8 A).
f (i, h) f (i, h) (3)
h = i + h
i i h i i0,h0
0, 0
h − Ci
= (4)
i s 2 − Ch
11
32. Ghosh, A., Krishnan, T.R., Tejaswy, P., Mandal, A., Pradhan, J.K. and Ranasingh, S. (2014) Design and Implementation of a
2-DOF PID Compensation for Magnetic Levitation Systems. ISA Transactions, 53, 1216-1222.
84. Manual (2011) Magnetic Levitation Control Experiments. Feedback Instruments Limited, UK
CONTI…
where Ci and Ch are the constant values for the maglev system and
expressed as:
Ci = 2g ,Ch = 2g (5)
i0 h0
15
Introduction:
This work proposes a systematic two-degree freedom control scheme for
unstable maglev system.
k1
G P (s) = (10)
(1s − 1)(2s + 1)
The maglev system has poles at 46.69. It is seen that one pole lies in
right half of complex s-plane so system is unstable.
17
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF PROPOSED CONTROL STRATEGY
Input Output
Disturbance Disturbance
Di Do
us f
Disturbance
Estimator
F
Stabilizing
Controller
Gc
Minimum Phase
Model of
Maglev System
_ Gm
18
3. Disturbance estimator
19
STABILIZING CONTROLLER (GC)
The stabilizing controller is designed in such a way that the unstable maglev
system can be stabilized.
G C (s) = k c + k ds (13)
12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1 = 0 (14)
With the help of Routh’s Stability criterion, we get the following condition
for parameter tuning of stabilizing controller GC(s)
k d (1 − 2 ) / k1
(15)
k c 1/ k1 21
CONTI…
The set-point tracking controller is designed with the help of ISE performance
minimization
2
1 k1C(s)
12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1 (22)
C(s) =
k1 ( cs + 1) 2
From the values k d = −0.2 & k C = −4 and the time constant (0.01- 0.1)k d
24
DISTURBANCE ESTIMATOR F(S)
In the proposed control structure as shown in Fig. 10, the load disturbance
transfer function can be written as
a s
i=1
i
i
+1 (27)
Td (s) =
(lf s +1)l +m
Td (s) 1
F(s) = . (28a)
1 − Td (s) G P (s)
26
CONTI…
As for the unstable magnetic levitation system (10), the closed loop
complementary sensitivity function is obtained as
where, 3
(30)
a1 = 1 + 1 − 1
f
1
27
CONTI…
28
CONTI…
The disturbance estimator can be easily in PID structure (32) and their
parameter is obtained as
M(0) = −38.23
And for the practical realization of PID, a filter whose time constant
is chosen between ( 0.01 − 0.1) TD sec.
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (second) 0
-2
Fig. 11(a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.6 Time (sec)
-0.8
Desired& Ball Position (volt)
-1
-1.2
Fig. 11(b)
-1.4
-2
Proposed Strategy Fig. 11 (b): Control efforts
Desired
-2.2 Conventional PID
Fig. 11 (c): Comparison
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
Fig. 11(c)
CONCLUSION