0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views45 pages

Session 1

The document presents a lecture on the design of a 2-DOF control and disturbance estimator for a magnetic levitation (maglev) system, highlighting the principles of magnetic levitation and its applications. It details the proposed control strategy, which includes a stabilizing controller, set-point tracking controller, and disturbance estimator, aimed at addressing the instability of the maglev system. The lecture also discusses the mathematical modeling and problem formulation necessary for implementing the control design.

Uploaded by

likhithpvs96
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views45 pages

Session 1

The document presents a lecture on the design of a 2-DOF control and disturbance estimator for a magnetic levitation (maglev) system, highlighting the principles of magnetic levitation and its applications. It details the proposed control strategy, which includes a stabilizing controller, set-point tracking controller, and disturbance estimator, aimed at addressing the instability of the maglev system. The lecture also discusses the mathematical modeling and problem formulation necessary for implementing the control design.

Uploaded by

likhithpvs96
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 45

A Lecture

on
Design of 2-DOF Control and Disturbance Estimator for
Magnetic Levitation System

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Prof. Richa Negi
Professor
EED, MNNIT Allahabad, Prayagraj (UP)
1
INTRODUCTION

 Magnetic levitation (Maglev) or magnetic suspension is a method by which


an object is suspended with no support other than magnetic field.

 The electromagnetic force is used to counteract the effects of the

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


gravitational force.

 The magnetic force is controlled via control of flux/current/voltage in the


system.

 Position of levitated object can be controlled

with the help of the magnetic force control.

 The levitated objects may be ball system /maglev

train body /magnetic bearing system etc. 2


Fig. 1: Magnetic suspension
GENERALIZED DIAGRAM OF MAGNETIC BALL SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Power Amplifier

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Electromagnet
Control

Sensor Signal
Processing

Ferromagnetic
Body

3
Fig. 2: Magnetic ball suspension system
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF ACTIVE MAGNETIC BEARING SYSTEM

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Fig. 3: 1-DOF of active magnetic bearing system

4
ADVANTAGES OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM

The advantages and applications in various fields are

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 High Speed Maglev Trains

 Bio-magnetism- for MRI.


Fig. 4: Maglev Train

 Particle accelerators-to accelerate sub-atomic particles nearly to light


speed.

 Peta-flop Computers- A peta-flop is a thousand-trillion floating point


operations per second. 5
CONTI…
 Satellite Launching:

NASA also uses the Maglev technology for “running start” of satellite to

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


break the Earth’s gravity.

Fig. 5: Maglev Technology for running start 6


CONTI…
 Maglev Space Propulsion :

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 Launching systems may use magnetic

fields to levitate and accelerate a vehicle

along a specified track .

 Reaching the end of the track, the vehicle

could switch to more conventional

rocket engines. Fig. 6: Maglev Space


Propulsion
7
CONTI…
Magnetic Levitation Wind Turbine:

 Another possible application in wind turbine.

 Maximum overall efficiency of windmill

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


is 30%. The remaining energy is mainly
lost due to friction.

 If the same windmill is operating at 50% of its


maximum speed, the efficiency becomes very low.

 Normal windmill can start its generation from


wind speed of 3 m/s.

 But magnetic levitation based windmill Fig. 7: Maglev wind turbine


can start generation from wind speed of 1.5m/s.
8
MOTIVATION
 Over the last few decades, the maglev technology based systems have received
practical importance in many engineering and technological applications such as:
high-speed maglev trains, contactless bearings, used for vibration isolation in
sensitive machinery, and many more.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 The parameter uncertainty and external disturbance are serious problems in maglev
system. To ensure the robustness, various robust schemes were designed in past for
maglev system. However, all have some limitations, as continuous monitoring of
disturbance is not possible during operations.

9
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Fig. 8: Electrical Circuit Model of Magnetic Levitation System

10
Fig. 9: Schematic Block diagram of Maglev system
MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND PROBLEM FORMULATION [32, 84]
 The nonlinear model of magnetic levitation system is expressed as:
i2
mh = mg − C 2 (1)
h
Ci 2
f (i, h) = 2 (2)
h

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 where C is a constant value which depends on the parameters of coil, m is
mass of the steel ball, g is acceleration due to gravity.

 For easy analysis and design of controller, the system is linearized about the
equilibrium point ( h 0 = 0.009 m and i0 = 0.8 A).
 f (i, h) f (i, h)  (3)
h =  i + h 
 i i h i i0,h0 
 0, 0 
h − Ci
= (4)
i s 2 − Ch
11
32. Ghosh, A., Krishnan, T.R., Tejaswy, P., Mandal, A., Pradhan, J.K. and Ranasingh, S. (2014) Design and Implementation of a
2-DOF PID Compensation for Magnetic Levitation Systems. ISA Transactions, 53, 1216-1222.
84. Manual (2011) Magnetic Levitation Control Experiments. Feedback Instruments Limited, UK
CONTI…
 where Ci and Ch are the constant values for the maglev system and
expressed as:
Ci = 2g ,Ch = 2g (5)
i0 h0

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 The current i flowing in the coil is proportional to the control voltage v and
expressed as: i = C1v (6)
where C1 is the proportionality constant.

 Now, the transfer function can be written as:


h −C1Ci (7)
= 2
v s − Ch
 where v is small incremental control voltage. C2 is the gain of (IR)
12
sensor for conversion of position of ball in meter to voltage.
CONTI…

Tab. 1: Physical Parameter of maglev System [32, 84]

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


13
CONTI…
 The transfer function of magnetic levitation system with sensor system is
obtained as: h v −C1C2 Ci (8)
= 2

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


v s − Ch
 where h v is the (IR) sensor output voltage.
 Using the values of Tab. 1, the transfer function of the magnetic levitation
system is obtained as:
−3518.85 (9)
P(s) = 2
s − 2180
 The maglev system (2.9) has two poles at  46.69. It is seen that one pole
lies in right half of complex s-plane so system is unstable.
14
EED, MNNIT Allahabad
Design of 2-DOF Control and Disturbance
Estimator for Magnetic Levitation System

15
Introduction:
 This work proposes a systematic two-degree freedom control scheme for
unstable maglev system.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 The proposed control strategy is a two-step design process.

 Firstly, a proportional derivative controller is introduced purposely to get desired


set-point response of maglev system then, for designing set-point tracking
controller, an integral square error (ISE) performance specification is used.

 Secondly, a disturbance estimator is designed using the desired closed loop


16
complimentary sensitivity function for rejection of load disturbances.
PROBLEM FORMULATION
 The maglev model (9), further expressed as

k1
G P (s) = (10)
(1s − 1)(2s + 1)

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 where
k1 = −1.6142 1 = 2 = 0.0214

 The maglev system has poles at  46.69. It is seen that one pole lies in
right half of complex s-plane so system is unstable.
17
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF PROPOSED CONTROL STRATEGY

Input Output
Disturbance Disturbance
Di Do

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Unstable
Set-Point u UT Maglev
R(s) Tracking Y(s)
System(Gp)
Controller (C)

us f

Disturbance
Estimator
F

Stabilizing
Controller
Gc

Minimum Phase
Model of
Maglev System
_ Gm
18

Fig. 10: Block diagram of 2-DOF control strategy


PROPOSED CONTROL STRATEGY

 The proposed control strategy has three major controllers as

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


1. Stabilizing controller

2. Set-point tracking controller

3. Disturbance estimator

19
STABILIZING CONTROLLER (GC)

 The stabilizing controller is designed in such a way that the unstable maglev
system can be stabilized.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 With the use of stabilizing controller (GC) the maglev model is augmented
as
G m (s)
G 'm (s) = (11)
1 + G C (s)G m (s)

 The set-point transfer function is obtained as

C(s)G P (s) 1 + F(s)G m (s)


H(s) = . (12)
1 + G C (s)G m (s) 1 + F(s)G P (s)
20
CONTI…

 The stabilizing controller is selected as a proportional derivative form

G C (s) = k c + k ds (13)

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 The characteristic equation of set-point transfer function is obtained as

12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1 = 0 (14)

 With the help of Routh’s Stability criterion, we get the following condition
for parameter tuning of stabilizing controller GC(s)

k d  (1 − 2 ) / k1
(15)
k c  1/ k1 21
CONTI…

 For maglev system (10), the stabilizing controller is chosen as

G C (s) = −0.2s − 4 (16)

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 But, to remove the realization problem, a low pass filter is used with time
constant

. ( 0.01 − 0.1) k d (17)

 The realizable stabilizing controller is obtained as


−0.2s − 4 (18)
G C (s) =
(0.01s + 1)
22
Set-point Tracking Controller C(s)

 The set-point tracking controller is designed with the help of ISE performance
minimization
2
1 k1C(s)

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


W(s)(1 − H r (s) 2 = (1 −
2
(19)
s 12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1 2

 Using the orthogonality property of norm is obtained as


2
(12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1) − k1C(s)
2
1
W(s)(1 − H r (s) 2 = +
2
(20)
s 2 s(12s + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1)
2
2

 For the minimizing the right side,


12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1
C(s) = 23
k1 (21)
CONTI…

 (21) is not proper and cannot be physically realizable in practice.


1
Hence a second order low pass filter CJ (s) =

( cs + 1) 2 is required.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 The practically realizable set-point tracking controller is derived as

12s 2 + (k d k1 + 1 − 2 )s + k c k1 − 1 (22)
C(s) =
k1 ( cs + 1) 2

 From the values k d = −0.2 & k C = −4 and the time constant (0.01- 0.1)k d

 The set-point tracking controller for maglev system is obtained as

 4.579  10-4 s 2 + 0.322s + 5.456 


C(s) = −  
(23)
1.6142  10 s + 0.0323s + 1.6142 
-4 2

24
DISTURBANCE ESTIMATOR F(S)

 In the proposed control structure as shown in Fig. 10, the load disturbance
transfer function can be written as

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


ydi G P (s) (24)
H di = =
di 1 + F(s)G P (s)
ydo 1 (25)
H do = =
do 1 + F(s)G P (s)
 The complementary sensitivity function of the closed loop between the
system input and output for the load disturbance rejection is derived as
f F(s)G P (s)
Td = = (26)
di 1 + F(s)G P (s)
25
CONTI…

 The practically realizable desired closed loop complementary sensitivity


function may expressed as

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


m

a s
i=1
i
i
+1 (27)
Td (s) =
(lf s +1)l +m

 Then, the desired disturbance estimator can be inversely calculated by

Td (s) 1
F(s) = . (28a)
1 − Td (s) G P (s)

26
CONTI…

 As for the unstable magnetic levitation system (10), the closed loop
complementary sensitivity function is obtained as

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


a1s + 1
Td (s) =
( f s + 1)3 (28b)
 And desired disturbance estimator is computed as

(1s − 1)(2s + 1)(a1s + 1) (29)


F(s) =
k1[( f s + 1)3 − (a1s + 1)]

 where,   3

 (30)
a1 = 1   + 1 − 1
f
  1  
 
27
CONTI…

1 M '' (s) 2 M (i) i 


F(s) =  M(0) + M (0)s +
'
s + ... + s + ... (31)
s 2! i! 

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


 1 
FPID (s) =  K P + + TDs  (32)
 TIs 

K P = M ' (0),TI = 1/ M(0), D = M '' (0) / 2 (33)

28
CONTI…

 The disturbance estimator can be easily in PID structure (32) and their
parameter is obtained as
M(0) = −38.23

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


M(0) = −2.47 (34)
M(0) = −0.0307

 And for the practical realization of PID, a filter whose time constant
is chosen between ( 0.01 − 0.1) TD sec.

 The disturbance estimator with low pass filter ( TF = 0.005 sec )

 0.0307s 2 + 2.47s + 38.23 


F(s) = −   (35)
 s(0.005s + 1)  29
SIMULATION RESULTS
Desired & Ball Position (volt)

14 Final Control effort (U(s))


-1 12 Control effort of Disturbance Estimator (F(s))
Control effort of Stablizing Controller (Gc(s))
10 Control effort of Set-point tracking Contoller (C(s))

Control effort (volt)


-1.5 8

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


Ball Position 6
Desired
-2 4

2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (second) 0

-2
Fig. 11(a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.6 Time (sec)
-0.8
Desired& Ball Position (volt)

-1

-1.2
Fig. 11(b)
-1.4

-1.6 Fig. 11 (a): ball position


-1.8

-2
Proposed Strategy Fig. 11 (b): Control efforts
Desired
-2.2 Conventional PID
Fig. 11 (c): Comparison
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)

Fig. 11(c)
CONCLUSION

 In this work, a systematic two degree freedom control scheme is presented


to improve the reference input tracking and load disturbance rejection for

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


unstable maglev system.
 The stabilizing and tracking controller is investigated in such a way so that
the unstable maglev system gets stabilized and forces the system to track the
desired trajectory.
 The disturbance estimator comes into existence when system under goes to
internal/external disturbances.
 This technique leads to remarkable improvement of regulatory capacity for
reference input tracking as well as load disturbance rejection. 31
REFERENCES
[1] M. Ahsan, N. Masood, and F. Wali, “Control of a magnetic levitation system using non-linear robust design tool,” 3rd IEEE International
Conference on Computer, Control & Communication (IC4), Karachi, Pakistan, September 25- 26, pp.1−6, 2013.
[2] K. J. Astrom and L. Rundqwist, “Integrator windup and how to avoid it,” Proceeding in American Control Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, pp.
1693−1698, 1989.
[3] H. M. N. K. Balini, C. W. Scherer, and J. Witte, “Performance enhancement for AMB systems using unstable H∞ controllers,” IEEE
Transactions Control System Technology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1479 –1492, 2011.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[4] B. Bandyopadhyay, F. Deepak, and Y. J. Park, “A robust algorithm against actuator saturation using integral sliding mode and composite
nonlinear feedback,” Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, Korea, July 6-11,
2008.
[5] S. Banerjee and R. Bhaduri, “Performance of classical controllers for an electromagnetic levitation system: a comparative study,” J. Inst.
Eng. India Ser. B., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2012.
[6] C. Barbu, S. Galeani, A. R. Teel, and L. Zaccarian, “Non-linear anti-windup for manual flight control,” International Journal of Control, vol.
78, no. 14, pp. 1111−1129, 2005.
[7] W. Barie and J. Chiasson, “Linear and nonlinear state-space controller for magnetic levitation,” International Journal of Systems Science,
vol. 27, pp. 1153−1163, 1996.
[8] S. Bezzaouchay, B. Marxy, D. Maquiny, and J. Ragoty, “Stabilization of nonlinear systems subject to actuator saturation,” IEEE International
Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), July, pp. 1−6, 2013.
[9] A. Bittar and R. M. Sales, “H2 and H∞ control for maglev vehicles,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 18−25, 1998.
[10] S. Boyd, E. L. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, “Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory,” SIAM Studies in Applied
Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, vol. 15, pp. 1−205, 1994.
[11] Y. Y. Cao and Z. Lin, “Robust stability analysis and fuzzy-scheduling control for nonlinear systems subject to actuator saturation,” IEEE
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 11, no.1, pp. 57−67, 2003. 32
[12] Y. Y. Cao and Z. Lin, “Stability analysis of discrete-time systems with actuator saturation by a saturation-dependent Lyapunov function,”
Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vega, NV, pp. 4140−4145, 2002.
.
[13] Y. Y. Cao, Z. Lin, Z. and D. G. Ward, “An anti-windup approach to enlarging domain of attraction for linear systems subject to actuator
saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 140−145, 2002.
[14] Y. Y. Cao, Z. Lin, and D. G. Ward, “Anti-windup design of output tracking systems subject to actuator saturation and constant
disturbance,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1221−1228, 2004.
[15] B. M. Chen, T. H. Lee, K. Peng, and V. Venkataramanan, “Composite nonlinear feedback control for linear systems with input saturation:
theory and an application,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 427−439, 2003.
[16] C. A. Chen, H. K. Chiang, and J. C. Shen, “Fuzzy sliding mode control of magnetic ball suspension system,” International Journal of
Fuzzy Systems,

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


vol. 11, pp. 97−106, 2009.
[17] H. C. Chen, “Optimal fuzzy PID controller design of an active magnetic bearing system based on adaptive genetic algorithms,”
Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Kunming, China, pp. 2054–5060, 2008.
[18] X. Chen, C. Y. Su, and T. Fukuda, “A nonlinear disturbance observer for multivariable systems and its application to magnetic bearing
systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 569–577, 2004.
[19] G. Cheng and K. Peng, “Robust composite nonlinear feedback control with application to a servo positioning system,” IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1132−1140, 2007.
[20] H. K. Chiang, C. A. Chen, and M. Y. Li, “Integral variable-structure grey control for magnetic levitation system,” Proceedings of IEEE
Electric Power Applications, vol. 153, pp. 809−814, 2006.
[21] H. K. Chiang, W. T. Tseng, C. C. Fang, and C. A. Chen, “Integral backstepping sliding mode control of a magnetic ball suspension
system,” 10th IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS), April 22-25, Kitakyushu, pp. 44–49, 2013.
[22] D. Cho, Y. Kato, and D. Spilman, “Sliding mode and classical controllers in magnetic levitation systems,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 13,
no.1, pp. 42−48, 1993.
[23] V. K. Deolia, “Intelligent controller design for discrete-time nonlinear systems using backstepping technique,” Ph. D. Thesis, Motilal
Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, 2013.
[24] A. Detchrat, V. Tipsuwanporn, A. Numsomran, and S. Suvikath, “IMC based PID controllers designs for two-mass systems,” Proceeding
of MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS), Hong Kong, March 14-16, pp.1−4, 2012.
33
[
25] L. Dong and S. You, “Adaptive back-stepping control of active magnetic bearings,” 10th IEEE International Conference on
Control and Automation (ICCA), Hangzhou, China, pp. 452−457, 2013.
[26] H. Du, N. Zhang, J. C. Ji, and W. Gao, “Robust fuzzy control of an active magnetic bearing subjected to voltage saturation,”
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 164−169, 2010.
[27] A. R. Eastham and W. F. Hayes, “Maglev systems development status,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine,
vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21−30, 1988.
[28] H. A. Fertik and C. W. Ross, “Direct digital control algorithm with antiwindup feature,” ISA Transactions, vol. 6, no. 4, pp.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


317-328, 1967.
[29] W. Gao and R. R. Selmic, “Neural network control of a class of nonlinear systems with actuator saturation,” IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 147−156, 2006.
[30] S. Galeani, S. Tarbouriech, M. Turner, and L. Zaccarian, “A tutorial on modern anti-windup design,” European Journal of
Control, vol. 15, no. 3−4, pp. 418−440, 2009.
[31] C. E. Garcia and M. Morari, “Internal model control: A unifying review and some new results,” Industrial & Engineering
Chemistry Process Design and Development, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 308−323, 1982.
[32] A. Ghosh, T. R. Krishnan, P. Tejaswy, A. Mandal, J. K. Pradhan, and S. Ranasingh, “Design and implementation of a 2-DOF
PID compensation for magnetic levitation systems,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1216−1222, 2014.
[33] M. Golob and B. Tovornik, “Modeling and control of the magnetic suspension system,” ISA Transactions, vol. 42, no. 1 pp.
89−100, 2003.
[34] M. Gopal, “Digital control and state variable methods,” McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 2003.
[35] V. Goyal, V. K. Deolia, and T. N. Sharma, “Backstepping control of continuous nonlinear systems using Chebyshev neural
network,” Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, IEEE
Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, pp. 838 – 841, 2012.
[36] H. M. Gutierrez and P. I. Ro, “Magnetic servo levitation by sliding-mode control of nonaffine systems with algebraic input
invertibility,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1449−1455, 2005.
34
[37] H. E. Hajjaji and M. Ouladsine, “Modeling and nonlinear control of magnetic levitation systems,” IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 831−838, 2001.
[38] C. Hu, R. Wang, and F. Yan, “Integral sliding mode-based composite nonlinear feedback control for path following of four-
wheel independently actuated autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.
221−230, 2016.
[39] T. Hu and Z. Lin, “Control systems with actuator saturation: Analysis and Design,” Boston, MA, Birkhauser, 2001.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[40] H. P. Huang and C. C. Chen, “Control system synthesis for open-loop unstable process with time delay,” IEE Proc. Part D,
vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 334−346, 1997.
[41] L. J. hui, L. Jie, and Z. Geng, “A practical robust nonlinear controller for maglev levitation system,” J. Cent. South Univ., vol.
20, no. 11, pp. 2991−3001, 2013.
[42] A. R. Husain, M. N. Ahmad, A. Halim, and M. Yatimand, “Deterministic models of an active magnetic bearing system,”
Journal of Computers, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 9−17, 2007.
[43] H. Inooka, G. Obinata, and M. Takeshima, “Design of a controller based on series expansion of pulse transfer functions,”
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 204−207, 1983.
[44] H. Inooka, T. Watanbe, and Y. Imai, “Design of digital controller for doubleloop systems based on series expansions,”
International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1539−1546, 1988.
[45] S. Jain, J. P. Mishra, and D. B. Talange, “A robust control approach for maglev system based on super-twisting algorithm,”
Proceedings of 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), 31 May-3 June, 2015.
[46] B. V. Jayawant, “Review lecture. electromagnetic suspension and levitation techniques,” Proceeding of the Royal Society A
Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 416, pp 245−320, 1988
[47] J. Ji, C. H. Hansen, and A. C. Zander, “Nonlinear dynamics of magnetic bearing systems,” Int. J. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 19,
no. 12, pp. 1471–1491, 2008.
[48] E. N. Johnson and A. J. Calise, “Neural network adaptive control of system with input saturation,” Proceeding of the
American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, pp. 3527−3532, 2001. 35
.
[49] J. M. G. D. S. Jr, S. Tarbouriech, and R. Reginatto, “Analysis of regions of stability for linear systems with saturating inputs
through an anti-windup scheme,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System
Design, September 18-20, pp. 1106−1111, 2002.
[50] J. M. G. D. S Jr and S. Tarbouriech, “Anti-windup design with guaranteed regions of stability: an LMI-based approach,”
Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Llaui, Ilaumil, December 9-12, 2003.
[51] J. M. G. D. S. Jr and S. Tarbouriech, “Anti-windup design with guaranteed regions of stability: an LMI–based approach,”

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 106−111, 2005.
[52] J. M. G. D. S. Jr and S. Tarbouriech, “Anti-windup design with guaranteed regions of stability for discrete-time linear
systems,” System and Control Letters, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 184−192, 2006.
[53] J. M. G. D. S. Jr, M. Z. Oliveira, D. Coutinho, and S. Tarbouriech, “Static anti-windup design for a class of nonlinear
systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 793−810, 2014.
[54] E. I. Jury, “Sampled-data control system,” Wiley, New York, 1958.
[55] G. T. Kang and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy modeling,” Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, vol. 23, no.
6, pp .650−652, 1987.
[56] M. S. Kang, J. Lyou, and J. K. Lee, “Sliding mode control for an active magnetic bearing system subject to base motion,”
Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 171–178, 2009.
[57] N. Kapoor, A. R. Teel, and P. Daoutidis, “An anti-windup design for linear system with input saturation,” Automatica, vol. 34,
no. 5, pp. 559−574, 1998.
[58] H. R. Karampoorian and R. Mohseni, “Control of a nonlinear magnetic levitation system by using constraint generalized
model predictive control,” International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Kintex, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, pp.
48−51, 2010.
[59] J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, pp. 1942−1948,
1995. 36
[60] H. K. Khalil, “Non-linear systems,” 3rd Edition, Prentince Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
.
[61] S. S. Kia and F. Jabbari, “Modified anti-windup compensators for stable linear systems,” Proceeding of American Control
Conference, Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, June11-13, pp. 407−412, 2008.
[62] J. H. Kim and F. Jabbari, “Actuator saturation and control design for buildings under seismic excitation,” Journal of
Engineering Mechanics, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 403–412, 2002.
[63] C. Knospe, “The nonlinear control benchmark experiment,” Proceeding in American Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois,
pp. 2134−2138, 2000.
[64] M. Komori, M. Kumamoto, and H. Kobayashi, “A hybrid-type superconducting magnetic bearing system with nonlinear

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


control,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79−83, 1998.
[65] V. Kumar, B. C. Nakara, and A. P. Mittal, “A Review on classical and fuzzy PID controllers,” International Journal of
Intelligent Control and Systems, vol. 16, pp. 170−181, 2011.
[66] H. J. Kwak, S. W. Sung, I. B. Lee, and J. Y. Park, “Modified Smith predictor with a new structure for unstable processes,” Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 405−411, 1999.
[67] J. H. Lee, P. E. Allaire, G. Tao, J. Decker, and X. Zhang, “Experimental study of sliding mode control for a benchmark
magnetic bearing system and artificial heart pump suspension,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 11,
no. 1, pp. 128−138, 2003.
[68] T. T. Lee and J. T. Jeng, “The Chebyshev-polynomials based unified model neural networks for function approximation,”
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-PART B: Cybernetics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 925−935, 1998.
[69] W. H. Lee, K. C. Kim, and J. Lee, “Review of maglev train technologies,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42, no. 7, pp.
1917−1925, 2006.
[70] Y. Y. Lee, J. Lee, and S. Park, “PID controller tuning for integrating and unstable processes with time delay,” Chemical
Engineering Science, vol. 55, no. 17, pp. 3481−3493, 2000.
[71] X. Li and Y. Wang, “Backstepping based position control of active magnetic bearing under bounded disturbance,”
International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Wollongong, Australia, pp. 674–679, 2013.
37
[72] C. M. Lin, M. H. Lin, and C. W. Chen, “SoPC based adaptive PID control system design for magnetic levitation system,”
IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 278−287, 2011.
[73] F. J. Lin, S. Y. Chen, and K. K. Shyu, “Robust dynamic sliding-mode control using adaptive RENN for magnetic levitation
system,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 938−951, 2009.
[74] F. J. Lin, H. J. Shieh, L.T. Teng, and P. H. Shieh, “Hybrid controller with recurrent neural network for magnetic levitation
system,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2260−2269, 2005.
[75] F. J. Lin, L. T. Teng, and P. H. Shieh, “Intelligent adaptive backstepping control system for magnetic levitation apparatus,”
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2009−2018, 2007.
[76] Z. Lin, M. Pachter, and S. Banda, “Toward improvement of tracking performance nonlinear feedback for linear systems,” Int.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


J. Control, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1998.
[77] J. D. Lindlau and C. R. Knospe, “Feedback linearization of an active magnetic bearing with voltage control,” IEEE
Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21−31, 2002.
[78] D. S. Liu, J. Li, and W. S. Chang, “Internal model control for magnetic suspension system,” Proceedings of the International
Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Guangzhou, China, August 18-21, pp. 482−487, 2005.
[79] T. Liu, W. Zhang, and D. Gu, “Analytical design of two-degree-of-freedom control scheme for open-loop unstable processes
with time delay,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 559−572, 2005.
[80] F. Losch, C. Gahler, and R. Herzog, “Low order μ-synthesis controller design for a large boiler feed pump equipped with
active magnetic bearing,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications, pp. 564−569, 1999.
[81] V. J. Majd and S. Mobayen, “An ISM-based CNF tracking controller design for uncertain MIMO linear systems with multiple
time-delays and external disturbances,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 80, no. 1-2, pp. 591−613, 2015.
[82] S. Majhi and D. P. Atherton, “Obtaining controller Parameters for a new Smith predictor using auto-tuning,” Automatica, vol.
36, no. 1, pp. 1651−1658, 2000.
[83] L. Maji, P. Roy, and B. K. Roy, “Design of PID and FOPID controllers based on bacterial foraging and particle swarm
optimization for magnetic levitation system,” Indian Control Conference, Chennai, January 5-7, 463−468, 2015.
[84] Experimental Manual, “Magnetic levitation control experiments,” Feedback Instruments Limited, UK, 2011.
38
[85] E. H. Maslen, G. B. Bearnson, P. E. Allaire, R. D. Flack, M. Baloh, E. Hilton, M. D. Noh, D. B. Olsen, P. S. Khanwilkar, and J.
D. Long, “Feedback control applications in artificial hearts,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 26−34, 1998.
[86] F. Mazenc, M. S. D. Queiroz, M. Malisoff, and F. Gao, “Further results on active magnetic bearing control with input
saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 914−919, 2006.
[87] K. A. Mirica, S. T. Phillips, E. C. R. Mac, and G. M. Whitesides, “Magnetic levitation in the analysis of foods and water,”
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 6565−6569, 2010.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[88] R. Morales, V. Feliu, and H. S. Ramirez, “Nonlinear control for magnetic levitation systems based on fast online algebraic
identification of the input gain,” IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 757–771, 2010.
[89] M. Morari and E. Zafiriou, “Robust process control,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. 1989.
[90] N. Motee and M. S. D. Queiroz, “Control of active magnetic bearings with a smart bias decision and control,” Proceedings of
the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, December 10-13, 2002.
[91] S. C. Mukhopadhyay, T. Ohji, M. Iwahara, and S. Yamada, “Modeling and control of a new horizontal-shaft hybrid-type
magnetic bearing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 100−108, 2000.
[92] C. I. Muresan, C. Ionescu, S. Folea, and R. D. Keyser, “Fractional order control of unstable processes: the magnetic levitation
study case,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1761−1772, 2014.
[93] N. F. A. Muthairi and M. Zribi, “Sliding mode control of a magnetic levitation system,” Mathematical Problems in
Engineering, vol. 2004, no. 2, pp. 93−107, 2004.
[94] I. Nagesh and C. Edwards, “A multivariable super-twisting sliding mode approach,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 984−988,
2014.
[95] T. Namerikawa and W. Shinozuka, “H∞ control of the magnetic bearing considering initial state uncertainties,” 8th IEEE
International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Kamasaki, Japan, pp. 275–280, 2004.
[96] A. Nayak, “Controller design for magnetic levitation system,” Master Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering National
Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2015. 39
[97] R. Negi, S. Purwar, and H. Kar, “Delay-dependent stability analysis of discrete time delay systems with actuator saturation,”
Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34−43, 2012.
[98] K. Ogata, “Discrete-time control systems,” Pearson, New York, 1995.
[99] M. Z. Oliveira, J. D. Silva, J. M. Jr, D. Coutinho, and S. Tarbouriech, “Antiwindup design for a class of multivariable
nonlinear control systems: an LMIbased approach,” 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control
Conference (CDC-ECC), Orlando, FL, December 12-15, 2011.
[100] B. Polajzer, J. Ritonja, G. Stumberger, D. Dolinar, and J. P. Lecointe, “Decentralized PI/PD position control for active

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


magnetic bearings,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2006.
[101] B. Polajzer, “Modeling and control of horizontal-shaft magnetic bearing system,” Proceeding of the IEEE International
Symposium on Industrial Electronics, vol. 3, pp. 1051−1055, 1999.
[102] E. Prempain, M. C. Turner, and I. Postlethwaite, “Coprime factor based antiwindup synthesis for parameter-dependent
systems,” Systems & Control Letter, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 810−817, 2009.
[103] T. K. Psonis, P. G. Nikolakopoulos, and E. Mitronikas, “Design of a PID controller for a linearized magnetic bearing,”
International Journal of Rotating Machinery, vol. 2015, Article ID 656749, pp. 1−12, 2015.
[104] K. X. Qian, P. Zeng, W. M. Ru, and H. Y. Yuan, “New concepts and new design of permanent maglev rotary artificial heart
blood pumps,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 383−388, 2006.
[105] K. X. Qian and T. Jing, “Use of PM bearings in permanent maglev centrifugal pumps for stability investigation,”
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI 08), Sanya, May 27-30,
pp. 535−538, 2008.
[106] M. S. D. Queiroz and D. M. Dawson, “Nonlinear control of active magnetic bearings: a backstepping approach,” IEEE
Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 545−552, 1996.
[107] R. L. K. Reddy and G. V. Marutheeswar, “Different controlling methods and PID controller design for magnetic levitation
system,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 2, no. 12,
pp. 6210−6217, 2013.
40
[108] D. Rogg, “General survey of the possible applications and development tendencies of magnetic levitation technology,” IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1696−1701, 1984.
[109] M. N. Sahinkaya and A. E. Hartavi, “Variable bias current in magnetic bearings for energy optimization,” IEEE Transactions
on Magnetics, vol. 43 no. 3, pp. 1052−1060, 2007.
[110] A. Sakalli, T. Kumbasar, E. Yesil, and H. Hagras, “Analysis of the performance of Type-1, self-tuning Type-1 and interval
Type-2 fuzzy PID controller on the magnetic levitation system,” International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Beijing, July 6-
11, pp. 1859−1866, 2014.
[111] T. Saravanan, G. Saritha, and R. Udayakumar, “A robust H-infinity two degree of freedom control for electromagnetic

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


suspension system,” Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1827−1831, 2013.
[112] G. Schweitzer, H. Bleuler, and A. Traxler, “Active magnetic bearings: basics, properties, and applications of active magnetic
bearings,” VDF Hochschulverlag, Zurich, Switzerland, 1994.
[113] R. S. Selmic and F. L. Lewis, “Dead-zone compensation in motion control systems using neural network,” IEEE Transactions
on Automatic Control, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 602−613, 2000.
[114] V. Sharma and S. Purwar, “Nonlinear controllers for a light-weighted allelectric vehicle using Chebyshev neural network,”
International Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 2014, pp. 1−14, 2014.
[115] N. Shawki and S. Alam, “Design and implementation of a magnetic levitation system using phase lead compensation
technique,” 9th IEEE International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, pp. 294−299, 2014.
[116] J. C. Shen, “H∞ control and sliding mode control of magnetic levitation system,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp.
333−340, 2002.
[117] J. X. Shen, K. J. Tseng, M. J. D. Vilathgamuwa, and W. K. Chan, “A novel compact PMSM with magnetic bearing for
artificial heart application,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1061−1068, 2000.
[118] G. Shrestha, H. Polinder, D. Bang, A. K. Jassal, and J. A. Ferreira, “Investigation on the possible use of magnetic bearing in
large direct wind turbine,” Electrical Energy Conversion Group, Duwind, Delft University of Technology, 2013.
[119] G. Shu and R. Meisinger, “State estimation and simulation of the magnetic levitation of high speed maglev train,” IEEE
International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, August 12-14, China, 2011.
41
[120] P. Sinha, “Design of a magnetically levitated vehicle,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1672−1674, 1984.
[121] S. Sivrioglu and K. Nonami, “Sliding mode control with time-varying hyperplane for AMB systems,” IEEE/ASME
Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 51−59, 1998.
[122] S. Sivrioglu and K. Nonami, “Adaptive output backstepping control of a flywheel zero-bias amb system with parameter
uncertainty,” Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Mad, Hawaii USA, pp. 3942−3947, 2003.
[123] S. Sivroglu, “Adaptive Backstepping for switching control active magnetic bearing system with vibrating base,” IET Control
Theory Appl., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1054–1059, 2007.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[124] R. Song and Z. Chen, “Design of PID controller for maglev system based on an improved pso with mixed inertia weight,”
Journal of Networks, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1509−1517, 2014.
[125] J. T. Su and C. W. Liu, “Proposed digital control scheme for improved current share of multiphase DC/DC converters,” 8th
IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia, Jeju, 30 May-3 June, pp. 1612-1617, 2011.
[126] M. Sugeno and G. T. Kang, “Structure identification of fuzzy model,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 329−346,
1986.
[127] T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control,” IEEE Transactions
on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 116−132, 1985.
[128] W. Tan, H. J. Marquez, and T. Chen, “IMC design for unstable processes with time delay,” J. Process Control,” vol. 13, no. 1,
pp. 203−213, 2003.
[129] K. Tanaka and H. O. Wang, “Fuzzy control systems design and analysis: a linear matrix inequality approach,” John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., New York, 2001.
[130] S. Tarbouriech and M. Turner, “Anti-windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems,” IET Control
Theory and Applications, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1−19, 2009.
[131] A. Teel, “Using saturation to stabilize a class of single – input partially linear composite systems,” Proceedings of IFAC
Nonlinear Control System Design Symposium, pp. 224−229, 1992.
42
[132] A. Teel, “A nonlinear small gain theorem for the analysis of control system with saturation,” IEEE Transactions on
Automatic Control, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1256−1270, 1996.
[133] A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, J. Belikov, and E. A. Gonzalez, “Design of retuning fractional PID controllers for a closed-loop magnetic
levitation control system,” 13rd International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics & Vision (ICARCV 2014), Marina Bay
Sands, Singapore, December 10-12, pp. 1345−1350, 2014.
[134] P. Tsiotras and E. Velenis, “Low-bias control of AMB’s subjected to saturation constraints,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Control
Application, pp. 138−143, 2000.
[135] P. Tsiotras, and B. C. Wilson, “Zero and low-bias control designs for active magnetic bearings,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems
Technology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 889−904, 2003.
[136] P. Tsiotras and M. Arcak, “Low-bias control of AMB subject to voltage
saturation: state feedback and observer designs,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 262−273, 2005.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[137] R. Uswarman, A.I. Cahyadi, and O. Wahyunggoro, “Control of a magnetic levitation system using feedback linearization,” IEEE
International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA), Jakarta, November 19-21, pp. 95−98, 2013.
[138] R. J. Wai, J. D. Lee, and K. L. Chuang, “Real-time PID control strategy for maglev transportation system via particle swarm
optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 629−646, 2011.
[139] C. Wang, X. Yu, and W. Lan, “Semi-global output regulation for linear systems with input saturation by composite nonlinear feedback
control,” Int. J. Control, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 1985−1997, 2014.
[140] X. Wang, G. Zhang, and G. Wu, “Study of the LQR controller for magnetic flywheel rotor system,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 150, no. 3,
pp. 221–226, 2012.
[141] T. Wen and J. Fang, “A feedback linearization control for the nonlinear 5- DOF flywheel suspended by the permanent magnet biased
hybrid magnetic bearings,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 79, pp. 131–139, 2012.
[142] B. C. Wilson, “Control designs for low-loss active magnetic bearings: theory and implementation,” Ph.D. Dissertation, School of
Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2004.
[143] H. H. Woodson and J. R. Melcher, “Electromechanical dynamics part II: fields, forces, and motion,” MIT Open Course, Masachusetts
Institute of Technology, 1968.
[144] F. Wu, K. M. Grigoriadis, and A. Packard, “Anti-windup controller design using linear parameter-varying control methods,” International
Journal of Control, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 1104−1114, 2000.
[145] H. Wu, Z. Wang, and X. Lv, “Design and simulation of axial flow maglev blood pump,” International Journal of Information Engineering
and Electronic Business, vol. 2, pp. 42−48, 2011.
[146] F. Xianwei and Z. Jinggang, “A survey of control strategy for magnetic suspension ball system,” Proceeding of 31st Chinese Control 43
Conference, Taiyuan, July 25-27, pp. 665−670, 2012.
[147] J. Xu and Y. Zhou, “A nonlinear control method for the electromagnetic suspension system of the maglev train,” Journal of
Modern Transportation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 176−180, 2011.
[148] S. Yadav, J. P. Tiwari, and S. K. Nagar, “Digital control of magnetic levitation system using fuzzy logic controller,”
international Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 41, no. 21, pp. 27−31, 2012.
[149] H. Yaghoubi, “The most important maglev applications,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 2013, pp. 1−19, 2013.
[150] S. Yamamura, “Magnetic levitation technology of tracked vehicles present status and prospects,” IEEE Transactions on
Magnetics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 874−878, 1976.
[151] Q. Yang and M. Chen, “Robust control for uncertain linear system subject to input saturation,” J. Appl. Math., vol. 2014,
article ID 803842, 2014.

EED, MNNIT Allahabad


[152] X. P. Yang, Q. G. Wang, C. C. Hang, and C. Lin, “IMC-based control system design for unstable processes,” Ind. Chem.
Res., vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 4288−4294, 2002.
[153] Z. J. Yang, K. Kunitoshi, S. Kanae, and K. Wada, “Adaptive robust outputfeedback control of a magnetic levitation system
by K-filter approach,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 390−399, 2008.
[154] Z. X. Yang, G. S. Zhao, H. J. Rong, and J. Yang, “Adaptive backstepping control for magnetic bearing system via feed-
forward networks with random hidden nodes,” Neurocomputing, vol. 174, Part A, pp. 109−120, 2016.
[155] L. Zaccarian and A. Teel, “A common framework for anti-windup bump-less transfer and reliable design,” Automatica, vol.
38, no. 1, pp. 1735−1744, 2002.
[156] K. Zakrzewski and J. K. Sykulski, “The effect of eddy currents on physical modelling of magnetic field strength at increased
frequencies,” Journal of the Polish Academy of Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53−63, 1981.
[157] W. D. Zhang, D. G. W. Wang, and X. Xu, “Quantitative performance design of a modified Smith Predictor for unstable
processes with time delay,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 43, no.1, pp. 56−62, 2004.
[158] Z. Zheng, W. Sun, H. Chen, J. T. W. Yeow, “Integral sliding mode based optimal composite nonlinear feedback control for a
class of systems,” Control Theory and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2014.
[159] Z. Zhongqiao, W. Xiaojing, Z. Yanhong, X. Liang, and C. Yanglin, “The Research on IMC-PID Control in Maglev
Supporting System,” The Open Automation and Control Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 797−802, 2014.
[160] W. Zhou and B. Liu, “Backstepping Based Adaptive Control of Magnetic Levitation System,” Proceedings of the 2nd
International Conference On Systems Engineering and Modeling (ICSEM-13), Paris, France, pp. 435−438. 2013. 44
EED, MNNIT Allahabad
45
You…
Thank

You might also like