Scribd
Upload
5 views6 pages

Apache Messging

The document compares four messaging options for a Spring Boot application requiring high-throughput, fault-tolerant asynchronous messaging with message ordering: ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, and Redis Pub/Sub. Apache Kafka is highlighted as the best choice due to its high scalability, fault tolerance, and ability to maintain message order per partition. In contrast, ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ offer some fault tolerance and message queuing but are not optimized for extremely high throughput, while Redis Pub/Sub lacks durability and strict ordering guarantees.

Uploaded by

sanjay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views6 pages

Apache Messging

The document compares four messaging options for a Spring Boot application requiring high-throughput, fault-tolerant asynchronous messaging with message ordering: ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, and Redis Pub/Sub. Apache Kafka is highlighted as the best choice due to its high scalability, fault tolerance, and ability to maintain message order per partition. In contrast, ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ offer some fault tolerance and message queuing but are not optimized for extremely high throughput, while Redis Pub/Sub lacks durability and strict ordering guarantees.

Uploaded by

sanjay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Apache Kafka

Your Spring Boot Application Requires High-


Throughput, Fault-Tolerant Asynchronous
Messaging with Message Ordering. Find the Best
Choice?

1. ActiveMQ
2. RabbitMQ
3. Apache Kafka
4. Redis Pub/Sub

Let’s Break Down


each Option based on
the key requirements
Req Breakdown:
High-throughput → Can handle Large
Message Volumes Efficiently.

Fault-tolerant → Can Recover from


Failures without message loss.

Asynchronous Messaging → Supports


decoupled, event-driven processing.

Message Ordering → Guarantees


messages are processed in the correct
sequence.
ActiveMQ
Supports message queuing (JMS) and
durable subscriptions.

Provides fault tolerance via message


persistence.

Not optimized for very high throughput


compared to Kafka.

Message ordering is Limited to individual


queues.
RabbitMQ
Supports durable queues,
acknowledgments, and retries.

Can handle a decent amount of


throughput with optimizations.

Not designed for extremely high message


volumes like Kafka.

Message ordering is not strictly


guaranteed across distributed nodes.
Apache Kafka
Highly scalable & fault-tolerant due to
partitioning and replication.

Designed for very high throughput


(millions of messages per second).

Maintains message order per partition,


making it the best choice for ordered
processing.

Supports distributed & event-driven


architectures.
Redis Pub/Sub

Very fast for real-time notifications &


ephemeral messaging.

No message durability (messages are lost


if the consumer is offline).

No built-in fault tolerance for long-term


message storage.

No strict ordering guarantees.

You might also like