Material Mechanical Database Low Temperature Pipelines
Material Mechanical Database Low Temperature Pipelines
org
San Francisco, CA, USA, June 25-30, 2017
Copyright © 2017 by the International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE)
ISBN 978-1-880653-97-5; ISSN 1098-6189
A Data Management System for Material Properties and Fracture Assessment at Low Temperature
welding qualification.
With cost savings in mind, the objective of the proposed database is to The web implementation enable users to export desired tables of data
establish a data management system for material assessment at (e.g. to Microsoft Excel) and data plotting for further analysis while
temperatures relevant for the Arctic region. This may reduce cost in applying filters for different data types.
design and redesign, and not at least, during in materials selection and
310
The system is based on a relational database (RDBMS) and has been The search result is by default presented as tables consisting of columns
tested on both commercial database systems and free and open source that the user can choose, see Figure 3. The available columns is of
database systems. For the web interface available for the Arctic course not restricted to data for one class, but can be chosen from any
Materials project partners, a Microsoft SQL-Server database is related class in the network of relations between classes.
currently being used. The web front-end is realized using C# and
ASP.NET at the server side. The communication with the clients is
partly based on Ajax and Javascript for flexibility and quick response
on user actions.
311
POST-PROCESSING PROCEDURE FOR SCATTER AND
FRACTURE TOUGHNESS ASSESSMENT
One of the goals for the database framework proposed here is to be able
to efficiently post-process a large amount of available test results
performed in a large range of testing conditions. The filtering facilities
aforementioned, have thus been combined with statistical post-
processing functionalities (under continuous development) that can
provide a huge time-saver and confidence levels for data analysis and
particularly in presence of scatter inherent to the material properties or
induced by any potential changes of testing conditions.
Figure 8 and Figure 9 show examples of the median rank and Weibull
distribution of fracture toughness for weld thermal simulated 420 MPa
Figure 5: Example of material card related to CTOD data of a 420 MPa grade steels.
grade steel, including SEM pictures of post-mortem specimen.
Weibull distributions (with distribution parameters estimated using the
maximum likelihood method) are, for these microstructure and
specimen geometry, in reasonable agreement with the fracture
toughness scatters observed for various temperatures and 10 parallel
tests performed at each temperature.
312
The master curve is however known to be very sensitive to the
reference temperature value, an accurate estimation of T0 is thus
crucial. Since T0 is assumed to be constant, for a given specimen
geometry (and constraint condition), another estimation of T0 has been
done based on fracture toughness data at all temperatures. The updated
Master curve shown in Figure 11 exhibits a reasonable predictive
ability against tests temperature for the ICCGHAZ simulated material.
Figure 10: Test results and Master curve obtained for 420 MPa grade,
weld simulated ICCCGHAZ with T0=-56oC. T0 obtained from -30oC
test results.
313
Weibull distribution. This procedure will be made available in the next
step in the database interface.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the Research Council of Norway for funding
through the Petromaks 2 Programme, Contract No.228513/E30
managed by SINTEF. The financial support from ENI, Statoil, Lundin,
Total, Scana Steel Stavanger, JFE Steel Corporation, Posco, Kobe
Steel, SSAB, Bredero Shaw, Borealis, Trelleborg, Nexans, Aker
Solutions, Kværner Verdal, Marine Aluminium, FMC Kongsberg
Subsea, Hydro and Sapa are also acknowledged.
REFERENCES
314