Apportion and Re Apportion
Apportion and Re Apportion
• The main reasons for using absorption costing are for inventory valuations, pricing
decisions, and establishing the profitability of different products.
� Allocation
� Absorption
� Apportionments
1. OVERHEAD ALLOCATION
• Some costs can be easily identified with a unit or units of production such as
labour and material costs. These are said to be ‘allocated to the product’.
Often they are allocated to the cost centre or department before being
shared among the units of production. Overheads can also be allocated to a
cost centre if they are specifically identifiable with that cost centre, such as
the salary of the cost centre supervisor.
• Allocation is the process by which whole cost items are charged direct to a
cost unit or cost centre.
• The cost accounting system might include three overhead cost centers.
• 102 Department B
• 201 Rent
• Overhead costs would be allocated directly to each cost centre, ie $200 + $50
to cost centre 101, $150 to cost centre 102 and $300 to cost centre 201. The
rent of the factory will be subsequently shared between the two production
departments, but for the purpose of day to day cost recording, the rent will
first of all be charged in full to a separate cost centre.
2. OVERHEAD APPORTIONMENT
Apportionment is a procedure whereby indirect costs are spread fairly
between cost centres. Service cost centre costs may be re-apportioned to
production cost centres by using the reciprocal method
Some costs relate to the business as a whole. These costs then have to be
shared between the various departments or cost centers. This is done by
‘apportioning the costs’.
The division of costs amongst two or more cost centers is in proportion to the
estimated benefit received, by using a proxy. E.g., area, headcount, capital
value etc.
These overheads then have to be included into the cost of the products which
are produced in that department. It would be easy to just divide the cost by
the number of units made. This would be fine if only one product was made or
if all products took exactly the same time to be made. As this is not the case
we have to find a way of sharing the overhead costs between the products.
SECONDARY or RE-APPORTIONMENT
Not all departments are production based. Some act as a service to the
production departments. E.g., canteen, stores, maintenance. The costs of
these have to be included into the total overheads of the production
departments. Secondary apportionment is a means of apportioning
overheads from service cost centres to production cost centres by means of
relevant usage factors.
• A canteen – on basis of number of employees.
• A stores – on the number of stores issues.
Sometimes both service cost centres provide services to each other
(reciprocal servicing). This has to be taken into account before the final
apportionments are made.
3. OVERHEAD ABSORPTION
Overhead absorption is the process whereby overhead costs
allocated and apportioned to production cost centres are added to
unit, job or batch costs. Overhead absorption is sometimes called
overhead recovery.
An absorption rate can be thought of as a charge out rate for
overheads. Absorption rates can be calculated in a number of ways
but the most common ways for exam questions are:
• A rate per unit.
• A rate per labour hour.
• A rate per machine hour.
It is worth remembering that absorption rates are always
calculated using BUDGETED figures. Rates have to be available at
the start of a period so it is possible to cost output as the period
progresses. Actual figures are only available at the end of a period.
Absorption rates are calculated as:
• OAR = Budgeted overheads / budgeted activity
A single absorption rate can be calculated for a company as a
whole, known as a blanket rate. Equally, separate absorption rates
can be calculated for individual departments, known as
departmental rates.