0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Homework2_Graph

The document contains homework solutions on graph theory, specifically addressing Eulerian graphs, Hamiltonian cycles, chromatic numbers, and planarity. It provides proofs and counterexamples for various statements regarding the properties of graphs, including the relationship between a graph and its line graph. Additionally, it discusses the implications of Kuratowski's Theorem and Euler's formula in determining graph planarity.

Uploaded by

elavartha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Homework2_Graph

The document contains homework solutions on graph theory, specifically addressing Eulerian graphs, Hamiltonian cycles, chromatic numbers, and planarity. It provides proofs and counterexamples for various statements regarding the properties of graphs, including the relationship between a graph and its line graph. Additionally, it discusses the implications of Kuratowski's Theorem and Euler's formula in determining graph planarity.

Uploaded by

elavartha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Graph Theory and Applications 2024-25-W

Homework - I

Name: S. Sathwik Roll No: 12141430

(1)

(a)
Statement: If G is Eulerian, then L(G) is Eulerian.
Answer: TRUE

• A graph G is Eulerian if it is connected and all its vertices have even


degrees.
• The line graph L(G) of G is a graph where:
– Each vertex of L(G) corresponds to an edge of G.
– Two vertices in L(G) are adjacent if and only if their corresponding
edges in G share a common vertex.
• Suppose G is Eulerian:
– Then every vertex in G has even degree.
– Hence, each edge in G (which becomes a vertex in L(G)) is incident
to vertices in G that have even degree.
– This implies that each vertex in L(G) has even degree (since edges
in G are incident to many other edges via shared vertices).
• Additionally, if G is connected, then L(G) is also connected (except for
trivial cases like cycles of length 3).
• Therefore, L(G) is connected and every vertex in L(G) has even degree.
• Hence, L(G) is Eulerian.

(b)
Statement: If L(G) is Eulerian, then G is Eulerian.
Answer: FALSE

• Recall that a graph is Eulerian if it is connected and every vertex has an


even degree.
• The line graph L(G) is constructed such that:

1
– Each vertex in L(G) corresponds to an edge in G.
– Two vertices in L(G) are adjacent if the corresponding edges in G
share a common vertex.
• Even if L(G) is Eulerian (i.e., every vertex in L(G) has even degree and
L(G) is connected), this does not imply that all vertices in G have even
degree.
• Counterexample:

– Consider a star graph G with center vertex of degree n ≥ 3 and all


other vertices of degree 1.
– Then, L(G) is a complete graph Kn , which is Eulerian when n is
odd.
– However, the original star graph G is not Eulerian because the center
vertex has odd degree and the leaves have degree 1.

• Thus, L(G) can be Eulerian even though G is not Eulerian.

(2)

(a)
Claim: If G is Eulerian, then G contains no cut-edges.

• Let G be an Eulerian graph.


• By definition, a graph is Eulerian if it contains a closed trail (Eulerian
circuit) that:
– starts and ends at the same vertex,
– and uses every edge exactly once.
• Suppose, for contradiction, that G contains a cut-edge e.
• A cut-edge (or bridge) is an edge whose removal increases the number of
connected components of the graph.
• Removing e splits G into two disconnected components, say G1 and G2 .
• In an Eulerian circuit, every time we enter a vertex via an edge, we must
leave via another edge. Hence, every vertex must have even degree.
• The edge e must be used exactly once in the Eulerian circuit. So, if the
circuit moves from G1 to G2 using e, it cannot return to G1 , since e is the
only edge connecting the components.

2
• This contradicts the requirement that the circuit is closed.
• Hence, our assumption is false. Therefore, an Eulerian graph cannot have
a cut-edge.

(b)

• G does not have any cycles of length 3 or 4.


• Assume that there is a Hamiltonian cycle C in G.
• A Hamiltonian cycle on 10 vertices contains 10 edges.

• But G has 15 edges. So there are 5 more edges in addition to the Hamil-
tonian cycle.
• However, adding any of these 5 extra edges to the cycle will necessarily
create a cycle of length 3 or 4.

• This contradicts the assumption that G has no cycles of length 3 or 4.


• Hence, G cannot contain a Hamiltonian cycle.

(3)

3
(4)

(a)
– A graph G with 10 vertices can have at most:
 
10
= 45 edges
2

– It is given that the chromatic number χ(G) = 4.


– Therefore, the graph can be colored using 4 colors, with each color
class being an independent set (i.e., no edges between vertices of the
same color).
– To maximize the number of edges, we need to distribute the 10 ver-
tices into 4 color classes such that the number of edges between color
classes is maximized.

4
– The optimal distribution is: 2, 2, 3, 3. That is:

Color class sizes: (2, 2, 3, 3)

– Every vertex of one color class is connected to every vertex in other


color classes. So, the total number of edges is:

E = (2·2)+(2·3)+(2·3)+(2·3)+(2·3)+(3·3) = 4+6+6+6+6+9 = 37

– Thus, the maximum number of edges in a graph with 10 vertices and


chromatic number 4 is 37
picture
– Let the vertices be assigned to color classes as follows:
∗ Color Class 1: a, b
∗ Color Class 2: c, d
∗ Color Class 3: e, f, g
∗ Color Class 4: h, i, j

5
(b)

• In the graph shown, vertices a, b, c, d, e form a K5 (i.e., a complete graph


of 5 vertices, where every vertex is connected to every other vertex).
• Now, introduce five new vertices: a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ , e′ .
• Connect each original vertex to all new vertices except its ”primed” coun-
terpart:
– Connect a to b′ , c′ , d′ , e′
– Connect b to a′ , c′ , d′ , e′
– Connect c to a′ , b′ , d′ , e′
– Connect d to a′ , b′ , c′ , e′
– Connect e to a′ , b′ , c′ , d′
• Finally, add a new vertex f and connect it to all five primed vertices:
a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ , e′ .
• In this graph:
– The largest clique is of size 5: ω(G) = 5 (formed by a, b, c, d, e).
– The chromatic number is 6: χ(G) = 6 (since f forces an additional
color beyond what is needed for the K5 ).

(5)

6
(a)
– Suppose both G and its complement G are planar.
– We know that for a connected planar graph on at least 3 vertices:

|E(G)| ≤ 3n − 6

– Also, since G is planar, we have:

|E(G)| ≤ 3n − 6

– But the total number of edges in a complete graph is:


 
n n(n − 1)
=
2 2

– So:
n(n − 1)
|E(G)| + |E(G)| =
2
– Combining the two inequalities:

|E(G)| + |E(G)| ≤ (3n − 6) + (3n − 6) = 6n − 12

– Hence:
n(n − 1)
≤ 6n − 12
2
– Multiply both sides by 2:

n(n − 1) ≤ 12n − 24

– Bring all terms to one side:

n2 − 13n + 24 ≤ 0

– Solving the quadratic inequality:


√ √
13 − 73 13 + 73
≤n≤
2 2
– Approximate roots:

2.22 ≤ n ≤ 10.77 ⇒ n < 11

– But for n ≥ 11, this gives a contradiction. Therefore, at least one of


G or G must be non-planar.

7
(b)
– Let n be the number of vertices and m the number of edges in G
with n < 12.
– Suppose δ(G) ≥ 5.
– Then, by the handshaking lemma:
2m ≥ 5n

– Also, for a planar graph:


m ≤ 3n − 6 ⇒ 2m ≤ 6n − 12

– Combining:
5n ≤ 2m ≤ 6n − 12
– Solving:
5n ≤ 6n − 12 ⇒ n ≥ 12
– This contradicts the assumption n < 12. Therefore, our assumption
is false, and we conclude:
δ(G) ≤ 4

(c)
– Base Case: For n ≤ 4, all vertices can be assigned different colors.
So the claim holds.
– Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that all connected triangle-free
planar graphs with n vertices, where 5 ≤ n ≤ k, are 4-colorable.
– Inductive Step: Consider a connected triangle-free planar graph
with k + 1 vertices.
– Since the graph is triangle-free and planar, it contains a vertex u of
degree at most 3.
– Remove vertex u and its incident edges. The resulting graph is either
connected or disconnected, and has at most k vertices.
– By the inductive hypothesis, each component (or the single connected
graph) is 4-colorable.
– Add u back to the graph. Since u has at most 3 neighbors, there
exists a fourth color not used by its neighbors. Assign this color to
u.
– Therefore, the entire graph with k + 1 vertices is also 4-colorable.
– Conclusion: By induction, any triangle-free planar graph is 4-colorable.

(6)

8
(a)
– Kuratowski’s Theorem states: A graph G is non-planar if and only if
it contains a subgraph that is a subdivision of K5 or K3,3 .
– We can obtain the Petersen graph from a subdivision of K3,3 as follows:

– As shown in the figure, starting from K3,3 , subdivision of the edges


ei , bh , bi , eh results in a subgraph of the Petersen graph (i.e., the Pe-
tersen graph without edges j → g and d → c).
– Since we have obtained a subgraph of the Petersen graph from K3,3 ,
by Kuratowski’s Theorem, the Petersen graph is non-planar.

(b)
– Euler’s formula states: If G is a connected planar graph with n vertices,
m edges, and f faces, then:
n−m+f =2

– For the Petersen graph:


n = 10, m = 15

– Using Euler’s formula:


f = m − n + 2 = 15 − 10 + 2 = 7

9
– The Petersen graph contains cycles of length at least 5. Hence, each
face is bounded by at least 5 edges.
– Therefore, the total sum of face degrees satisfies:

2·m≥5·f

– Substituting the known values:

2 · 15 = 30 < 5 · 7 = 35

– This contradiction implies our assumption of planarity is false.


– Hence, the Petersen graph is non-planar.

10

You might also like