Finall - Report - Neuromorphic Computing
Finall - Report - Neuromorphic Computing
PRESENTATION REPORT
ON
SUBMITTED
TO
BY
Meghana Mohan Barad
Through
DIRECTOR
BHARATI VIDYAPEETH (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), PUNE
ABHIJIT KADAM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND
SOCIAL SCIENCES, SOLAPUR
1
BHARATI VIDYAPEETH
(DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), PUNE
ABHIJIT KADAM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL
SCIENCES, SOLAPUR
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Meghana Mohan Barad having Exam Seat No.
Place: Solapur
Date:
Dr. A. B. NADAF
Project Guide (Internal) External Examiner
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3
INDEX
4
1. Introduction to the Topic – Neuromorphic Computing
In the modern era of technology, the demand for intelligent systems capable
of performing complex tasks with high efficiency and minimal energy
consumption is growing rapidly. Conventional computing architectures,
primarily based on the Von Neumann model, are increasingly facing
challenges in meeting the computational requirements of emerging fields such
as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, autonomous systems, and real-time
data analytics. These limitations are particularly evident in applications that
require adaptive learning, parallel processing, and ultra-low power
consumption.
5
2. What is Neuromorphic Computing?
Key Features :-
6
3. Key Principles of Neuromorphic Computing
a. Parallel Processing
One of the defining features of the human brain is its ability to carry out millions of
operations simultaneously. Neuromorphic systems embrace this principle by
utilizing massively parallel architectures, where thousands or even millions of
artificial neurons can process information concurrently. This parallelism
significantly increases computational speed and is especially beneficial in
applications requiring real-time processing, such as computer vision, robotics, and
autonomous vehicles.
c. Asynchronous Signals
d. Localized Memory
7
4. Neuromorphic Architecture
Neuromorphic systems are designed to imitate the brain’s neural networks using
artificial components that enable efficient data processing and learning.
a. Neurons
Artificial neurons serve as processing units that receive input signals and
generate output spikes when a threshold is exceeded. Operating in an event-
driven way, they conserve power by firing only when necessary. These
neurons can mimic different firing patterns seen in biological brains,
supporting complex behaviors.
b. Synapses
Synapses act as connections between neurons, controlling the flow and
strength of signals through adjustable weights. These weights can be
dynamically changed based on neural activity, allowing the system to learn
and adapt over time. Synapses thus encode memory and facilitate
communication within the network.
c. Memristors
Memristors are novel, non-volatile components that emulate synaptic
functions by retaining resistance states without power. They enable efficient
storage and analog modulation of synaptic weights. Their small size and low
power consumption make memristors ideal for building large-scale
neuromorphic architectures.
8
5. How It Works: Spike-Based Communication
• Neuron Spikes:
Neurons generate short, sharp electrical pulses known as spikes when the
accumulated input signals exceed a certain threshold. These spikes act as all-
or-nothing messages that propagate through the network, similar to action
potentials in biological neurons.
• Spike Activation:
When a neuron fires a spike, it sends this signal to connected neurons via
synapses. The receiving neurons integrate these incoming spikes over time,
and if their combined input surpasses their firing threshold, they too produce
spikes, creating a cascading effect of activation.
• Synaptic Weights:
The strength or weight of each synapse determines how much influence one
neuron’s spike has on another. These weights can be positive or negative and
are dynamically adjusted during learning to enhance or suppress certain
pathways, allowing the system to prioritize important signals.
• Learning:
Through exposure to data and interaction with the environment, the synaptic
weights are updated based on spike timing and frequency, enabling the
network to recognize patterns, adapt to new inputs, and store information.
This adaptive learning process is fundamental to neuromorphic systems’
ability to perform complex cognitive tasks efficiently.
9
6. Advantages of Neuromorphic Computing
a. Energy Efficiency
b. Real-Time Speed
d. Adaptive Learning
A key advantage is the ability to learn and adapt over time through changes
in synaptic weights. Neuromorphic systems can adjust their internal
connections based on new experiences and data patterns, allowing them to
improve performance without explicit reprogramming. This adaptability
makes them suitable for dynamic environments where conditions evolve and
prior training data might be insufficient.
10
7. Application of Neuromorphic Computing
• Computer Vision
• Robotics
• Speech Recognition
11
8. Challenges and Limitations
Designing and fabricating neuromorphic chips is highly complex due to the need
to closely replicate the brain’s neural architecture at a hardware level. This
involves integrating millions of artificial neurons and synapses with precise
timing and communication mechanisms, which demands advanced fabrication
technologies. The process is often costly and time-consuming, limiting the
availability of large-scale neuromorphic hardware platforms.
b. Algorithm Development
c. Tool Limitations
d. Scalability Issues
12
9. Future Trends in Neuromorphic Computing
• Advanced Memristors
• AI Integration
• Edge Computing
• Brain-Inspired Algorithms
13
probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics alongside the brain-inspired
processing of neuromorphic hardware, potentially delivering unprecedented
computational power and solving problems currently beyond the reach of
classical computers.
10. Conclusion
Despite its vast potential, neuromorphic computing is still in the early stages of
development, facing challenges related to complex hardware design, immature
learning algorithms, and difficulties scaling systems to larger sizes. However,
continuous research efforts are addressing these obstacles. Advances in novel
materials like memristors and the emergence of hybrid architectures that combine
neuromorphic principles with other computational paradigms are fueling
progress.
14
11. References
[3] IEEE Papers and ACM articles on Neuromorphic Hardware and Memristors
15